Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Transducer Misalignment and Contact Pressure Distributions as Error Sources in Friction Measurement on Small-Diameter Pin-on-Disk Experiments

  • 233 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

This paper explores the effects of wear track diameter, contact area and pressure distributions (Hertzian and uniform circular) on errors in measuring friction coefficients on rotating pin-on-disk experiments. Integral solutions of the measured friction coefficient are compared to the actual friction coefficient. Errors associated with angular misalignments of the force transducer are also evaluated. It is shown that the errors for small-diameter wear tracks relative to the contact width are lower for sphere-on-flat (Hertzian) contact geometries than circular flat-on-flat contact geometries. Small-diameter experiments result in surprisingly small errors for Hertzian contact pressure distribution. Angular misalignments further collude to increase the error in measured friction coefficient for small track-diameter-to-contact-width ratios, converging to the cosine error for large track-diameter-to-contact-width ratios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Krick, B.A., Sawyer, W.G.: A little analysis of errors in friction for small wear tracks. Tribol. Lett. 39(2), 221–222 (2010)

  2. 2.

    Burris, D.L., Sawyer, W.G.: Measurement uncertainties in wear rates. Tribol. Lett. 36(1), 81–87 (2009)

  3. 3.

    Burris, D.L., Sawyer, W.G.: Addressing practical challenges of low friction coefficient measurements. Tribol. Lett. 35(1), 17–23 (2009)

  4. 4.

    Colbert, R., et al.: Uncertainty in pin-on-disk wear volume measurements using surface scanning techniques. Tribol. Lett. 42(1), 129–131 (2011)

  5. 5.

    Schmitz, T.L., et al.: Wear-rate uncertainty analysis. J. Tribol. 126(4), 802–808 (2004)

  6. 6.

    Schmitz, T.L., et al.: The difficulty of measuring low friction: uncertainty analysis for friction coefficient measurements. J. Tribol. 127(3), 673–678 (2005)

  7. 7.

    Novak, R., Polcar, T.: Tribological analysis of thin films by pin-on-disc: evaluation of friction and wear measurement uncertainty. Tribol. Int. 74, 154–163 (2014)

  8. 8.

    Sehgal, R., Gandhi, O.P., Angra, S.: Wear evaluation and ranking of tribomaterials using a Hasse diagram approach. J. Tribol. 123(3), 486–493 (2000)

  9. 9.

    Tieu, A.K., Qiu, Z.L.: Experimental study of Freely Alignable Journal Bearings—Part 1: static characteristics. J. Tribol. 118(3), 498–502 (1996)

  10. 10.

    Baumberger, T., et al.: An inertial tribometer for measuring microslip dissipation at a solid–solid multicontact interface. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69(6), 2416–2420 (1998)

  11. 11.

    Hegadekatte, V., et al.: A predictive modeling scheme for wear in tribometers. Tribol. Int. 41(11), 1020–1031 (2008)

  12. 12.

    Kline, S.J.: The purposes of uncertainty analysis. J. Fluids Eng. 107(2), 153–160 (1985)

  13. 13.

    da Silva Jr, C.R.Á., Pintaude, G.: Uncertainty analysis on the wear coefficient of Archard model. Tribol. Int. 41(6), 473–481 (2008)

  14. 14.

    Wiehn, J.S., Dugger, M.T., Buchheit, T.E.: Measurement of force and displacement for the tribological analysis of MEMS. In: World Tribology Congress III. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2005)

  15. 15.

    Carmignato, S., et al.: Uncertainty evaluation of volumetric wear assessment from coordinate measurements of ceramic hip joint prostheses. Wear 270(9–10), 584–590 (2011)

  16. 16.

    Bills, P.J., et al.: Volumetric wear assessment of retrieved metal-on-metal hip prostheses and the impact of measurement uncertainty. Wear 274–275, 212–219 (2012)

  17. 17.

    Chromik, R.R., et al.: In situ tribometry of solid lubricant nanocomposite coatings. Wear 262(9–10), 1239–1252 (2007)

  18. 18.

    Dudder, G.J., et al.: Environmental effects on the tribology and microstructure of MoS2–Sb2O3–C films. Tribol. Lett. 42(2), 203–213 (2011)

  19. 19.

    Gilley, K.L., et al.: Heat treatments modify the tribological properties of nickel boron coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4(6), 3069–3076 (2012)

  20. 20.

    Krick, B., et al.: Optical in situ micro tribometer for analysis of real contact area for contact mechanics, adhesion, and sliding experiments. Tribol. Lett. 45(1), 185–194 (2012)

  21. 21.

    Krick, B.A., Hahn, D.W., Sawyer, W.G.: Plasmonic diagnostics for tribology. In situ observations using surface plasmon resonance in combination with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Tribol. Lett. 49(1), 95–102 (2013)

  22. 22.

    Sawyer, W.G., et al.: Mechanistic studies in friction and wear of bulk materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44(1), 395–427 (2014)

  23. 23.

    Sawyer, W.G., Wahl, K.J.: Accessing inaccessible interfaces. In situ approaches to materials tribology. MRS Bull. 33(12), 1145–1148 (2008)

  24. 24.

    Wahl, K.J., Sawyer, W.G.: Observing interfacial sliding processes in solid–solid contacts. MRS Bull. 33(12), 1159–1167 (2008)

  25. 25.

    Hu, J.J., et al.: Transmission electron microscopy analysis of Mo-W-S-Se film sliding contact obtained by using focused ion beam microscope and in situ microtribometer. Tribol. Lett. 32(1), 49–57 (2008)

  26. 26.

    Erdemir, A., Eryilmaz, O.L., Kim, S.H.: Effect of tribochemistry on lubricity of DLC films in hydrogen. Surf. Coat. Technol. 257, 241–246 (2014)

  27. 27.

    Kim, H., et al.: Environmental effects on the friction of hydrogenated DLC films. Tribol. Lett. 21(1), 51–56 (2006)

  28. 28.

    Krick, B., Sawyer, W.: Space tribometers: design for exposed experiments on orbit. Tribol. Lett. 41(1), 303–311 (2011)

  29. 29.

    Lancaster, J.K.: A review of the influence of environmental humidity and water on friction, lubrication and wear. Tribol. Int. 23(6), 371–389 (1990)

  30. 30.

    Zabinski, J., et al.: Multi-environmental lubrication performance and lubrication mechanism of MoS2/Sb2O3/C composite films. Tribol. Lett. 23(2), 155–163 (2006)

  31. 31.

    Singer, I.L., et al.: In situ analysis of the tribochemical films formed by SiC sliding against Mo in partial pressures of SO2, O-2, and H2S gases. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Films 14(1), 38–45 (1996)

  32. 32.

    Hertz, H.: Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 92, 156–171 (1882)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professor Justin W. Jaworski of Lehigh University for discussion and valuable insight.

Author information

Correspondence to Brandon A. Krick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sidebottom, M.A., Krick, B.A. Transducer Misalignment and Contact Pressure Distributions as Error Sources in Friction Measurement on Small-Diameter Pin-on-Disk Experiments. Tribol Lett 58, 30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-015-0500-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Uncertainty
  • Pin-on-disk
  • Tribometers
  • Friction coefficient
  • Hertzian contact