Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Erratum to: Classical EHL Versus Quantitative EHL: A Perspective Part I—Real Viscosity-Pressure Dependence and the Viscosity-Pressure Coefficient for Predicting Film Thickness

  • 669 Accesses

Erratum to: Tribol Lett DOI 10.1007/s11249-014-0302-7

During typesetting conversion, an expression was incorrectly edited in the list of notations of the above article. L, the Moes dimensionless parameter, should read as follows:

$$ L = G\root{4}\of {U} $$

The publisher would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Author information

Correspondence to Philippe Vergne.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11249-014-0302-7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vergne, P., Bair, S. Erratum to: Classical EHL Versus Quantitative EHL: A Perspective Part I—Real Viscosity-Pressure Dependence and the Viscosity-Pressure Coefficient for Predicting Film Thickness. Tribol Lett 54, 13 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-014-0318-z

Download citation