Tribology Letters

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 223–229

On the Validity of the Method of Reduction of Dimensionality: Area of Contact, Average Interfacial Separation and Contact Stiffness

  • I. A. Lyashenko
  • Lars Pastewka
  • Bo N. J. Persson
Original Paper

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that many contact mechanics problems between solids can be accurately studied by mapping the problem on an effective one-dimensional (1D) elastic foundation model. Using this 1D mapping, we calculate the contact area and the average interfacial separation between elastic solids with nominally flat but randomly rough surfaces. We show, by comparison to exact numerical results, that the 1D mapping method fails even qualitatively. We also calculate the normal interfacial stiffness K and compare it with the result of an analytic study. We attribute the failure of the elastic foundation model to the incorrect treatment of the long-range elastic coupling between the asperity contact regions.

Keyword

Contact mechanics Contact area Contact stiffness Randomly rough surfaces Method of reduction of dimensionality 

References

  1. 1.
    Greenwood, J.A., Williamson, J.B.P.: Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. A 295, 300 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bush, A.W., Gibson, R.D., Thomas, T.R.: The elastic contact of a rough surface. Wear 35, 87 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Almqvist, A., Campañá, C., Prodanov, N., Persson, B.N.J.: Interfacial separation between elastic solids with randomly rough surfaces: comparison between theory and numerical techniques. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 59, 2355 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carbone, G., Bottiglione, F.: Asperity contact theories: do they predict linearity between contact area and load. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56, 2555 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramisetti, S.B., Campañá, C., Anciaux, G., Molinari, J.-F., Müser, M.H., Robbins, M.O.: The autocorrelation function for island areas on self-affine surfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 215004 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campañá, C., Müser, M.H., Robbins, M.O.: Elastic contact between self-affine surfaces: comparison of numerical stress and contact correlation functions with analytic predictions. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 354013 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Persson, B.N.J.: Capillary adhesion between elastic solids with randomly rough surfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 315007 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meakin, P.: Fractals, Scaling and Growth Far From Equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geike, T., Popov, V.L.: Mapping of three-dimensional contact problems into one dimension. Phys. Rev. E 76, 036710 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heß, M.: Über die Abbildung ausgewhlter dreidimensionaler Kontakte auf Systeme mit niedrigerer räumlicher Dimension. Cuvillier-Verlag, Göttingen (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pohrt, R., Popov, V.L.: Normal contact stiffness of elastic solids with fractal rough surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 104301 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pohrt, R., Popov, V.L., Filippov, A.É.: Normal contact stiffness of elastic solids with fractal rough surfaces for one- and three-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. E 86, 026710 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Popov, V.L.: Method of reduction of dimensionality in contact and friction mechanics: a link between micro and macro scales. Friction 1, 41 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sneddon, I.N.: The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barber, J.R., private communicationGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Persson, B.N.J.: Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics. J. Chem. Phys. 115, 3840 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hyun, S., Pei, L., Molinari, J.-F., Robbins, M.O.: Finite-element analysis of contact between elastic self-affine surfaces. Phys. Rev. E 70, 026117 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berthoud, P., Baumberger, T.: Shear stiffness of a solid–solid multicontact interface. Proc. R. Soc. A 454, 1615 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barber, J.R.: Bounds on the electrical resistance between contacting elastic rough bodies. Proc. R. Soc. A 459, 53 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Persson, B.N.J.: Relation between interfacial separation and load: A general theory of contact mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 125502 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Campañá, C., Müser, M.H.: Contact mechanics of real vs. randomly rough surfaces: a Green’s function molecular dynamics study. EPL 77, 38005 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Campañá, C., Persson, B.N.J, Müser, M.H.: Transverse and normal interfacial stiffness of solids with randomly rough surfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 085001 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Akarapu, S., Sharp, T., Robbins, M.O.: Stiffness of contacts between rough surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 204301 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carbone, G., Scaraggi, M., Tartaglino, U.: Adhesive contact of rough surfaces: Comparison between numerical calculations and analytical theories. Eur. Phys. J. E 30, 65 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carbone, G., Bottiglione, F.: Contact mechanics of rough surfaces: a comparison between theories. Meccanica 46, 557 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lorenz, B., Persson, B.N.J.: Interfacial separation between elastic solids with randomly rough surfaces: comparison of experiment with theory. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 015003 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pastewka, L., Prodanov, N., Lorenz, B., Müser, M.H., Robbins, M.O., Persson, B.N.J.: Finite-size scaling in the interfacial stiffness of rough elastic contacts. Phys. Rev. E 87, 062809 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Popov, V.L., Filippov, A.É.: Force of friction between fractal rough surface and elastomer. Tech. Phys. Lett. 36, 525 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Popov, V.L.: Contact Mechanics and Friction, Physical Principles and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    See articles in: Phys. Mesomech. 15(4) (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Popov, V.L., Filippov, A.É.: Applicability of a reduced model to description of real contacts between rough surfaces with different Hirsch indices. Tech. Phys. Lett. 34, 722 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Campañá, C., Müser, M.H.: Practical Green’s function approach to the simulation of elastic semi-infinite solids. Phys. Rev. B 74, 075420 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pastewka, L., Sharp, T.A., Robbins, M.O.: Seamless elastic boundaries for atomistic calculations. Phys. Rev. B 86, 075459 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Polonsky, I.A., Keer, L.M.: A numerical method for solving rough contact problems based on the multi-level multi-summation and conjugate gradient techniques. Wear 231, 206 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Scaraggi, M., Putignano, C., Carbone, G.: Elastic contact of rough surfaces: A simple criterion to make 2D isotropic roughness equivalent to 1D one. Wear 297, 811 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. A. Lyashenko
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lars Pastewka
    • 3
    • 4
  • Bo N. J. Persson
    • 1
  1. 1.Peter Grünberg Institut-1FZ-JülichJülichGermany
  2. 2.Sumy State UniversitySumyUkraine
  3. 3.Department of Physics and AstronomyJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.MikoTribologie Centrum μTCFraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoffmechanik IWMFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations