Atomic Friction Modulation on the Reconstructed Au(111) Surface
- 439 Downloads
Friction between a nanoscale tip and a reconstructed Au(111) surface is investigated both by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and molecular statics calculations. Lateral force AFM images exhibit atomic lattice stick–slip behavior with a superstructure corresponding to the herringbone reconstruction pattern. However, the superstructure contrast is not primarily due to variations in the local frictional dissipation (which corresponds to the local width of the friction loop). Rather, the contrast occurs primarily because the local centerline position of the friction loop is periodically shifted from its usual value of zero. Qualitatively, similar behavior is reproduced in atomistic simulations of an AFM tip sliding on the reconstructed Au(111) substrate. In both simulations and experiments, this centerline modulation effect is not observed on unreconstructed surfaces. Similarly, using a topographically flat surface as a hypothetical control system, the simulations show that the centerline modulation is not caused by variations in the reconstructed surface’s topography. Rather, we attribute it to the long-range variation of the local average value of the tip-sample interaction potential that arises from the surface reconstruction. In other words, surface atoms located at unfavorable sites, i.e., in the transition between face-centered-cubic (FCC) and hexagonal-close-packed (HCP) regions, have a higher surface free energy. This leads to a varying conservative force which locally shifts the centerline position of the friction force. This demonstrates that stick–slip behavior in AFM can serve as a rather sensitive probe of the local energetics of surface atoms, with an attainable lateral spatial resolution of a few nanometers.
KeywordsNanotribology Stick–slip AFM Friction mechanisms Gold
This study was funded by the National Science Foundation under grants CMMI-0758604 & 0800154.
- 1.Mate, C.M.: Tribology on the Small Scale: A Bottom up Approach to Friction Lubrication and Wear. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
- 3.Tomlinson, G.A.: A molecular theory of friction. Philos. Mag. Series 7 7(46), 905–939 (1929)Google Scholar
- 19.Filleter, T., Bennewitz, R.: Structural and frictional properties of graphene films on SiC(0001) studied by atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 81(15), 155412 (2010)Google Scholar
- 21.Maier, S., Gnecco, E., Baratoff, A., Bennewitz, R., Meyer, E.: Atomic-scale friction modulated by a buried interface: combined atomic and friction force microscopy experiments. Phys. Rev. B78(4), 5 (2008)Google Scholar
- 26.Maier, S., Sang, Y., Filleter, T., et al.: Fluctuations and jump dynamics in atomic friction experiments. Phys. Rev. 72(B24), 9 (2005)Google Scholar
- 27.Negri, C., Manini, N., Vanossi, A., Santoro, G.E., Tosatti, E.: AFM dissipation topography of soliton superstructures in adsorbed overlayers. Phys. Rev. B81(4), 5 (2010)Google Scholar
- 29.Li, Q.Y., Dong, Y.L., Perez, D., Martini, A., Carpick, R.W.: Speed dependence of atomic stick-slip friction in optimally matched experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(12), 4 (2011)Google Scholar
- 32.Woll, C., Chiang, S., Wilson, R.J., Lippel, P.H.: Determination of atom positions at stacking-fault dislocations on Au(111) by scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. B39(11), 7988–7991 (1989)Google Scholar
- 35.Voter, A.F.: Los alamos unclassified technical report la-ur-93-3901 (1993)Google Scholar