Tribology Letters

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 377–387 | Cite as

Dry Sliding Wear Behavior of Zircon Sand Reinforced Al–Si Alloy

Original paper

Abstract

The emerging demand of light weight alloys and composites for the engineering and structural applications leads to explore the possibility to develop new techniques to achieve materials of high performance. In the present study, Al–Si/zircon sand reinforced composite has been developed via spray forming technique. Dry sliding wear behavior of as cast Al–Si base alloy and spray formed Al–Si/zircon sand reinforced composite containing 8% V f of zircon sand has been analyzed. An isotropic wear property of spray formed composite has been checked by selecting the spray formed preform in both horizontal and vertical sections of deposit. The wear tests which were carried out at loads of 14.7, 24.5, 34.3, 44.1, and 53.9 N have shown that spray formed composite is more wear resistant in comparison to the cast Al–Si alloy. Moreover, wear coefficient in case of composite is also found to be lower than base alloy. Optical and scanning electron microscopies have been carried out to furnish a suitable explanation for observed wear behavior of composite and alloy.

Keywords

Adhesive wear Wear mechanisms SEM Wear particle analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India funded scheme number 22(0403)/06/EMR-II for providing financial support for this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Hashim, J., Looney, L., Hashmi, M.S.J.: Particle distribution in cast metal matrix composites—Part I. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 123, 251–257 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grant, P.S.: Spray forming. Prog. Mater. Sci. 39, 497–545 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singer, A.R.E.: A new generation of engineering materials produced by Spray forming. Mater. Des. 4, 892–897 (1983)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hariprasad, S., Sastry, S.M.L., Jernia, K.L., Lederich, R.J.: Microstructures and mechanical properties of dispersion-strengthened high-temperature Al–8.5Fe–1.2V–1.7Si alloys produced by atomized melt deposition process. Metall. Trans. A 24, 865–873 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mi, J., Fritsching, U., Belkessam, O., Garmendia, I., Landaberea, A., Grant, P.S.: Multiphysics modelling of the spray forming process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 477, 2–8 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McHugh, K.M., Lin, Y., Zhou, Y., Johnson, S.B., Delplanque, J.P., Lavernia, E.J.: Microstructure evolution during spray rolling and heat treatment of 2124 Al. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 477, 26–34 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cai, W.D., Smugeresky, J., Lavernia, E.J.: Low-pressure spray forming of 2024 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 241, 60–71 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferrarini, C.F., Bolfarini, C., Kiminami, C.S., Botta, F.W.J.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of spray deposited hypoeutectic Al–Si alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 375–377, 577–580 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srivastava, V.C., Mandal, R.K., Ojha, S.N.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Si alloys produced by spray forming process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 304–306, 555–558 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anand, S., Srivatsan, T.S., Wu, Y., Lavernia, E.J.: Processing, microstructure and fracture behaviour of a spray atomized and deposited aluminium–silicon alloy. J. Mater. Sci. 32, 2835–2848 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Srivastava, V.C., Schneider, A., Uhlenwinkel, V., Bauckhage, K.: Spray processing of 2014-Al + SiCP composites and their property evaluation. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 412, 19–26 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xing, C., Chengxiao, Y., Leding, G., Biao, Y.: TiB2/Al2O3 ceramic particle reinforced aluminum fabricated by spray deposition. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 496, 52–58 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ding, G.J., Yu, J.K., Li, H.L., Hu, R.: SiCp/Al composites fabricated by spray codeposition. In: Miravete A. (ed.) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Composite Materials, vol 1, p. 839. Woodhead Publishing Limited (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gomes, E.G., Rossi, J.L.: Microstructural characterization by scanning electron microscopy of spray formed Al/SiCp matrix composite. Mater. Sci. Forum 498–499, 251–257 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pai, B.C., Ramani, G., Pillai, R.M., Satyanarayana, K.G.: Role of magnesium in cast aluminium alloy matrix composites. J. Mater. Sci. 30, 1903–1911 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Srivastava, V.C., Rudrakshi, G.B., Uhlenwinkel, V., Ojha, S.N.: Wear characteristics of spray formed Al-alloys and their composites. J. Mater. Sci. 44, 2288–2299 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhenhua, C., Jie, T., Gang, C., Dingfa, F., Hongge, Y.: Effect of silicon content and thermomechanical treatment on the dry sliding behavior of spray deposited Al–Si/SiCp composites. Wear 262, 362–368 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Banerji, A., Surappa, M.K., Rohatgi, P.K.: Cast aluminum alloys containing dispersions of zircon particles. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 14, 273–283 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ejiofor, J.U., Okorie, B.A., Reddy, R.G.: Studies on sintered zircon-reinforced aluminium alloy matrix composites. Advances in synthesis and processing of metal ceramic matrix composites III. In: TMS Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, 12 February 1997Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jangg, G., Danninger, H., Schroder, K., Abhari, K., Neubing, H.C., Seyrkammer, J.: PL aluminum camshaft belt pulleys for automotive engines. Mater-wissen. Werkst. Tech. 27, 179–189 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Das, S., Das, S., Das, K.: Abrasive wear of zircon sand and alumina reinforced Al–4.5% Cu alloy matrix composites—a comparative study. Compos. Sci. Technol. 67, 746–751 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lavernia, E.J., Wu, Y.: Spray Atomization and Deposition. Wiley, England (1996)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ma, T., Yamaura, H., Koss, D.A., Voigt, R.C.: Dry sliding wear behavior of cast SiC-reinforced Al MMCs. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 360, 116–125 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chaudhary, S.K., Singh, A.K., Sivaramakrishnan, C.S., Panigrahi, S.C.: Wear and friction behavior of spray formed and stir cast Al–2Mg–11TiO2 composites. Wear 258, 759–767 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Archard, J.F.: Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 24, 981–988 (1953)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bayer, R.G.: Mechanical Wear Prediction and Prevention. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1994)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pandey, O.P.: Microstructure and wear characteristics of Al–4.5Cu–5Pb alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 14, 125–131 (1998)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bauri, R., Surappa, M.K.: Sliding wear behaviour of Al–Li–SiCp composites. Wear 265, 1756–1766 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mandal, A., Murty, B.S., Chakraborty, M.: Sliding wear behavior of T6 treated A356-TiB2 in situ composites. Wear 266, 865–872 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morris, S., Wood, R.J.K., Harvey, T.J., Powrie, H.E.G.: Electrostatic charge monitoring of unlubricated sliding wear of a bearing steel. Wear 255, 430–443 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Glascott, J., Stott, F.H., Wood, G.C.: The effectiveness of oxides in reducing sliding wear of alloys. Oxid. Met. 24, 99–114 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physics and Materials ScienceThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations