Advertisement

Tribology Letters

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 13–21 | Cite as

3-D Characterization, Optimization, and Classification of Textured Surfaces

  • Gwidon Stachowiak
  • Pawel Podsiadlo
Original Paper

Abstract

Surface texturing is a new technology aiming at reducing friction in operating machinery. Different surface features of varying shape and density are artificially introduced onto the existing surfaces. The methods currently available for the 3-D characterization and description of these surfaces are inadequate. Reliable surface description is necessary for the optimization of those surfaces and quality control during production. In this paper possible ways of solving the problems associated with 3-D description and optimization of textured surfaces are outlined and discussed. The problems associated with the development of automated classification systems for textured surfaces are also presented.

Keywords

Textured surfaces Surface characterization Surface texture classification 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank the School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Western Australia for its help during preparation of the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Willis, E.: Surface finish in relation to cylinder liners. Wear 109, 351–366 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, Q.J., Zhu, D.: Virtual texturing: Modelling the performance of lubricated contacts of engineered surfaces. Trans. ASME 127, 722–728 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mourier, L., Mazuyer, D., Lubrecht, A.A., Donnet, C.: Transient increase of film thickness in micro-textured EHL contacts. Tribol. Int. 39, 1745–1756 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu, Y.Z., Zhou, D.: A full numerical solution to the mixed lubrication in point contacts. ASME J. Tribol. 122, 1–9 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, X., Adachi, K., Otsuka, K., Kato, K.: Optimization of the surface texture for silicon carbide sliding in water. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 1282–1286 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ren, N., Nanbu, T., Yasuda, Y., Zhou, D., Wang, Q.: Micro textures in concentrated-conformal-contact lubrication: Effect of distribution patterns. Tribol. Lett. 28, 275–285 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siripuram, R.B., Stephens, L.S.: Effect of deterministic asperity geometry on hydrodynamic lubrication. ASME J. Tribol. 126, 527–534 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fowell, M., Olver, A.V., Gosman, A.D., Spikes, H.A., Pegg, I.: Entrainment and inlet suction: Two mechanisms of hydrodynamic lubrication in textured bearings. Trans. ASME 129, 336–346 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Podsiadlo, P., Stachowiak, G.W.: Scale-invariant analysis of wear particle morphology—a preliminary study. Tribol. Int. 33, 289–295 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Podsiadlo, P., Stachowiak, G.W.: Scale-invariant analysis of wear particle morphology. I: Theoretical background, computer implementation and technique testing. Wear 242, 160–179 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stachowiak, G.W., Podsiadlo, P.: Surface characterization of wear particles. Wear 225–229, 1171–1185 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Podsiadlo, P., Stachowiak, G.W.: Scale-invariant analysis of wear particle surface morphology. II: Fractal dimension. Wear 242, 180–188 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Podsiadlo, P., Stachowiak, G.W.: Hybrid fractal-wavelet method for characterization of tribological surfaces—a preliminary study. Tribol. Lett. 13, 241–250 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Costa, H.L., Hutchings, I.M.: Hydrodynamic lubrication of textured steel surfaces under reciprocating sliding conditions. Tribol. Int. 40, 1227–1238 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johansson, S., Nilsson, P.H., Ohlsson, R., Anderberg, C., Rosen, B.-G.: New cylinder liner surfaces for low oil consumption. Tribol. Int. 41, 854–859 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marian, V.G., Kilian, M., Scholz, W.: Theoretical and experimental analysis of a partially textured thrust bearing with square dimples. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part. J: J. Eng. Tribol. 221, 771–778 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buscaglia, G.C., Ciuperca, I., Jai, M.: On the optimization of surface textures for lubricated contacts. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 335, 1309–1317 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pontryagin, L.S., Boltyanskii, V.G., Gamkrelidze, R.V., Mischenko, E.F.: The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes. Wiley, New York (1962)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maday, C.J.: The maximum principle approach to the optimum one-dimensional journal bearing. Trans. ASME J. Lubr. Technol. 92, 482–489 (1970)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bourgin, P., Gay, B.: The optimum Rayleigh bearing in terms of load capacity or friction for non-Newtonian lubricants. Trans. ASME J. Tribol. 107, 157–164 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bellman, R.: Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Control Processes, vol. 1. Academic Press, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stachowiak, G.W., Podsiadlo, P.: Towards the development of an automated wear particle classification system. Tribol. Int. 39, 1615–1623 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stachowiak, G.P., Podsiadlo, P., Stachowiak, G.W.: Comparison of feature extraction methods for machine condition monitoring and failure analysis. Tribol. Lett. 20, 133–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stachowiak, G.P., Podsiadlo, P., Stachowiak, G.W.: Automated classification of wear particles based on their surface texture and shape features. Tribol. Int. 41, 34–43 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Podsiadlo, P., Stachowiak, G.W.: Classification of tribological surfaces without surface parameters. Tribol. Lett. 16, 163–171 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tribology Laboratory, School of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations