Tribology Letters

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 265–273 | Cite as

Studies on friction and transfer layer: role of surface texture



Friction influences the nature of transfer layer formed at the interface between tool and metal during sliding. In the present investigation, experiments were conducted using “Inclined Scratch Tester” to understand the effect of surface texture of hard surfaces on coefficient of friction and transfer layer formation. EN8 steel flats were ground to attain surfaces of different textures with different roughness. Then super purity aluminium pins were scratched against the prepared steel flats. Scanning electron micrographs of the contact surfaces of pins and flats were used to reveal the morphology of transfer layer. It was observed that the coefficient of friction and the formation of transfer layer depend primarily on the texture of hard surfaces, but independent of surface roughness of hard surfaces. It was observed that on surfaces that promote plane strain conditions near the surface, the transfer of material takes place due to the plowing action of the asperities. But, on a surface that promotes plane stress conditions the transfer layer was more due to the adhesion component of friction. It was observed that the adhesion component increases for surfaces that have random texture but was constant for the other surfaces.


friction surface texture inclined scratch transfer layer 


  1. 1.
    Rymuza Z. (1996) Wear 199: 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kato K. (2000) Wear 241: 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bello D.O., Walton S. (1987) Tribol. Int. 20: 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rasp W., Wichern C.M. (2002) J. Mater. Process. Tech. 125–126: 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schedin E. (1994) Wear 179: 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim D.E., Suh N.P. (1991) Wear 149: 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hu Z.M., Dean T.A. (2000) Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. 40: 1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lanzon J.M., Cardew-Hall M.J., Hodgson P.D. (1998) J. Mater. Process. Tech. 80–81: 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saha P.K., Wilson W.R.D., Timsit R.S. (1996) Wear 197: 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lovell M.R., Deng Zhi, Khonsari M.M. (2000) Trans. of ASME 122: 856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lakshmipathy R., Sagar R. (1992) Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. 32: 685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang L.Y., Yin Z.F., Zhang J., Chen C., Hsu S. (2000) Wear 237: 155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feder J. (1988) Fractals Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hasegawa M., Liu J., Okuda K., Nunobiki M. (1996) Wear 192: 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bowden F.P., Tabor D. (1954) The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    George E. Dieter (2000) Mechanical Metallurgy. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faulkner A., Arnell R.D. (2000) Wear 242: 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Satish V. Kailas and Pradeep Lancy Menezes, Proceedings of International Seminar on Metal Forming–Process Design and Optimization, (Indian Institute of Science, India, 2003) pp. 124–143Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Challen J.M., Oxley P.L.B. (1979) Wear 53: 229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MetallurgyIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations