The M4 insulator, the TM2 matrix attachment region, and the double copy of the heavy chain gene contribute to the enhanced accumulation of the PHB-01 antibody in tobacco plants
The expression of recombinant proteins in plants is a valuable alternative to bioreactors using mammalian cell systems. Ease of scaling, and their inability to host human pathogens, enhance the use of plants to generate complex therapeutic products such as monoclonal antibodies. However, stably transformed plants expressing antibodies normally have a poor accumulation of these proteins that probably arise from the negative positional effects of their flanking chromatin. The induction of boundaries between the transgenes and the surrounding DNA using matrix attachment regions (MAR) and insulator elements may minimize these effects. With the PHB-01 antibody as a model, we demonstrated that the insertion of DNA elements, the TM2 (MAR) and M4 insulator, flanking the transcriptional cassettes that encode the light and heavy chains of the PHB-01 antibody, increased the protein accumulation that remained stable in the first plant progeny. The M4 insulator had a stronger effect than the TM2, with over a twofold increase compared to the standard construction. This effect was probably associated with an enhancer-promoter interference. Moreover, transgenic plants harboring two transcriptional units encoding for the PHB-01 heavy chain combined with both TM2 and M4 elements enhanced the accumulation of the antibody. In summary, the M4 combined with a double transcriptional unit of the heavy chain may be a suitable strategy for potentiating PHB-01 production in tobacco plants.
KeywordsAntibody Plant expression Insulator Matrix attachment region Tobacco
Matrix attachment region
Cauliflower mosaic virus
The authors thank Dra. Miriam Ribas Hermelo for critical review of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Chng J et al (2015) Cleavage efficient 2A peptides for high level monoclonal antibody expression in CHO cells. In: MAbs, vol 2. Taylor & Francis, pp 403–412Google Scholar
- Doyle J (1991) DNA protocols for plants. In: Molecular techniques in taxonomy. Springer, pp 283–293Google Scholar
- Felsenfeld G, Burgess-Beusse B, Farrell CM, Gaszner M (2004) Chromatin boundaries and chromatin domains. Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp 245–250Google Scholar
- Gan S, Xie M (2009) Genetic insulator for preventing influence by another gene promoter. Google PatentsGoogle Scholar
- García H, Castro M, Oliva O, Enriquez G (2010) ‘BHmN’ variedad de tabaco (Nicotiana tabacum l.) Resistente al moho azul (peronospora hyoscyami de bary f. Sp. Tabacina) desde estadios tempranos obtenida por nueva estrategia de selección con su androestéril. Cuba Tabaco 11:17–23Google Scholar
- Hall G, Allen GC (1991) Nuclear scaffold and scaffold-attachment region in higher plants. Biochemistry 88:9320–9324Google Scholar
- Horsch R, Rogers S, Fraley R (1985) Transgenic plants. In: Cold spring harbor symposia on quantitative biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp 433–437Google Scholar
- Triguero A, Cabrera G, Cremata JA, Yuen CT, Wheeler J, Ramirez NI (2005) Plant-derived mouse IgG monoclonal antibody fused to KDEL endoplasmic reticulum-retention signal is N-glycosylated homogeneously throughout the plant with mostly high-mannose-type N-glycans. Plant Biotechnol J 3:449–457PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar