Constitutive expression of antimicrobial peptide PR-39 in transgenic mice significantly enhances resistance to bacterial infection and promotes growth
- 81 Downloads
Use of huge amounts of antibiotics in farm animal production has promoted the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which poses a serious threat to public health. Therefore, alternative approaches are needed to reduce or replace antibiotic usage in the food animal industry. PR-39 is a pig-derived proline-rich antimicrobial peptide that has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity and a low propensity for development of resistance by microorganisms. To test whether ubiquitous expression of PR-39 in transgenic (TG) mice can increase resistance against bacterial infection, we generated TG mice that ubiquitously express a pig-derived antimicrobial peptide PR-39 and analyzed their growth and resistance to infection of the highly pathogenic Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP) isolated from swine. The growth performance was significantly increased in TG mice compared with their wild-type (WT) littermates. After the APP challenge, TG mice exhibited a significantly higher survival rate and significantly lower tissue bacterial load than WT littermates. Furthermore, the tissue lesion severity that resulted from APP infection was milder in TG mice than that in their WT littermates. This study provides a good foundation for the development of PR-39-expressing TG animals, which could reduce the use of antibiotics in the farm animal industry.
KeywordsAntimicrobial peptides PR-39 Transgenic animals Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae infection Growth
This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31601911) and two grants from the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province, China (grant nos. 2014A030310500 and 2015TX01N081).
- Aarestrup FM (2005) Veterinary drug usage and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria of animal origin. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 96:271–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto960401.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Auger E, Deslandes V, Ramjeet M, Contreras I, Nash JH, Harel J, Gottschalk M, Olivier M, Jacques M (2009) Host-pathogen interactions of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae with porcine lung and tracheal epithelial cells. Infect Immun 77:1426–1441. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00297-08 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Cheng C, Sun WK, Liu R, Wang RM, Chen YH, Wang Y, Li JL, Lu XB, Gao R (2015) Comparison of gene expression of Toll-like receptors and antimicrobial peptides in immune organs and tissues between Yorkshire and Tibetan pigs. Anim Genet 46:272–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12286 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gudmundsson GH, Magnusson KP, Chowdhary BP, Johansson M, Andersson L, Boman HG (1995) Structure of the gene for porcine peptide antibiotic PR-39, a cathelin gene family member: comparative mapping of the locus for the human peptide antibiotic FALL-39. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:7085–7089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vieira AR, Collignon P, Aarestrup FM, McEwen SA, Hendriksen RS, Hald T, Wegener HC (2011) Association between antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from food animals and blood stream isolates from humans in Europe: an ecological study. Foodborne Pathog Dis 8:1295–1301. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.0950 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang X, Cheng YT, Tan MF, Zhang HW, Liu WQ, Zou G, Zhang LS, Zhang CY, Deng SM, Yu L, Hu XY, Li L, Zhou R (2015) Overexpression of Porcine Beta-Defensin 2 Enhances Resistance to Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae infection in pigs. Infect Immun 83:2836–2843. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.03101-14 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar