Transgenic Research

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1167–1178 | Cite as

Genomic stability and long-term transgene expression in poplar

  • Matthias Fladung
  • Hans Hoenicka
  • M. Raj Ahuja
Original Paper


Stable expression of foreign genes over the entire life span of a plant is important for long-lived organisms such as trees. For transgenic forest trees, very little information is available on long-term transgene expression and genomic stability. Independent transgenic lines obtained directly after transformation are initially screened in respect to T-DNA integration and transgene expression. However, very little consideration has been given to long-term transgene stability in long-lived forest trees. We have investigated possible genome wide changes following T-DNA integration as well as long-term stability of transgene expression in different transgenic lines of hybrid aspen (Populus tremula × Populus tremuloides) that are up to 19 years old. For studies on possible genome wide changes following T-DNA integration, four different independent rolC-transgenic lines were subjected to an extensive AFLP study and compared to the non-transgenic control line. Only minor genomic changes following T-DNA integration could be detected. To study long-term transgene expression, six different independent rolC-transgenic lines produced in 1993 and since that time have been kept continuously under in vitro conditions. In addition, 18 transgenic plants belonging to eight independent rolC-transgenic lines transferred to glasshouse between 1994 and 2004 were chosen to determine the presence and expression of the rolC gene. In all transgenic lines examined, the rolC gene could successfully be amplified by PCR tests. Both, the 19 years old tissue cultures and the up to 18 years old glasshouse-grown trees revealed expression of the rolC transgene, as demonstrated by the rolC-phenotype and/or northern blot experiments confirming long-term transgene expression.


Genomic changes Genetic transformation Transgene insertion Transgene stability Transgenic trees 



This study was supported by the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF). We deeply thank Dr. Trevor Fenning (Northern Research Station of Forest Research, Roslin, UK) for critically reading the manuscript. The technical assistance of Olaf Polak, Doris Ebbinghaus and Anke Schellhorn is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Ahuja MR (2009) Transgene stability and dispersal in forest trees. Trees 23:1125–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja MR (2011) Fate of transgenes in the forest tree genome. Tree Gen Genomes 7:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altpeter F, Varshney A, Abderhalden O, Douchkov D, Sautter C, Kumlehn J, Dudler R, Schweizer P (2005) Stable expression of a defense-related gene in wheat epidermis under transcriptional control of a novel promoter confers pathogen resistance. Plant Mol Biol 57:271–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarez Viveros MF, Inostroza-Blancheteau C, Timmermann T, González M, Arce-Johnson P (2013) Overexpression of GlyI and GlyII genes in transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) plants confers salt tolerance by decreasing oxidative stress. Mol Biol Rep 40:3281–3290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anand A, Trick HN, Gill BS, Muthukrishnan S (2003) Stable transgene expression and random gene silencing in wheat. Plant Biotech J 1:241–251Google Scholar
  6. Arruda P (2012) Genetically modified sugarcane for bioenergy generation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:315–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonadei M, Zelasco S, Giorcelli A, Gennaro M, Calligari P, Quattrini E, Balestrazzi A (2012) Transgene stability and agronomical performance of two transgenic Basta (R)-tolerant lines of Populus alba L. Plant Biosyst 146:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borejsza-Wysocka E, Norelli JL, Aldwinckle HS, Malnoy M (2010) Stable expression and phenotypic impact of attacin E transgene in orchard grown apple trees over a 12 year period. BMC Biotech 10:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunner AM, Li JY, DiFazio SP, Shevchenko O, Montgomery BE, Mohamed R, Wei H, Ma C, Elias AA, VanWormer K, Strauss SH (2007) Genetic containment of forest plantations. Tree Gen Genomes 3:75–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalakouras A, Moser M, Boonrod K, Krczal G, Wassenegger M (2011) Diverse spontaneous silencing of a transgene among two Nicotiana species. Planta 234:699–707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fladung M (1999) Gene stability in transgenic aspen (Populus). I. Flanking DNA sequences and T-DNA structure. Mol Gen Genet 260:574–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fladung M, Ahuja MR (1995) Sandwich method for non-radioactive hybridization. Biotechniques 18:800–802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fladung M, Hoenicka H (2012) Fifteen years of forest tree biosafety research in Germany. Iforest 5:126–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fladung M, Kumar S (2002) Gene stability in transgenic aspen-Populus. III. T-DNA repeats influence transgene expression differentially among different transgenic lines. Plant Biol 4:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fladung M, Muhs HJ, Ahuja MR (1996) Morphological changes in transgenic Populus carrying the rolC gene from Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Silv Genet 45:349–354Google Scholar
  16. Fladung M, Kumar S, Ahuja MR (1997) Genetic transformation of Populus genotypes with different chimeric gene constructs: transfromation efficiency and molecular analysis. Transgen Res 6:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawkins S, Leple JC, Cornu D, Jouanin L, Pilate G (2003) Stability of transgene expression in poplar: a model forest tree species. Ann For Sci 60:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoenicka H, Fladung M (2006) Biosafety in Populus spp. and other forest trees: from non-native species to taxa derived from traditional breeding and genetic engineering. Trees 20:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar S, Fladung M (2000) Transgene repeats in aspen: molecular characterisation suggests simultaneous integration of independent T-DNAs into receptive hotspots in the host genome. Mol Gen Genet 264:20–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar S, Fladung M (2001) Gene stability in transgenic aspen (Populus). II. Molecular characterization of variable expression of transgene in wild and hybrid aspen. Planta 213:731–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar S, Fladung M (2002) Transgene integration in aspen: structures of integration sites and mechanism of T-DNA integration. Plant J 31:543–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lachance D, Hamel LP, Pelletier F, Valero J, Bernier-Cardou M, Chapman K, Seguin A (2007) Expression of a Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ab gene in transgenic white spruce and its efficacy against the spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana). Tree Gen Genomes 3:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lardet L, Leclercq J, Benistan E, Dessailly F, Oliver G, Martin F, Montoro P (2011) Variation in GUS activity in vegetatively propagated Hevea brasiliensis transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 30:1847–1856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation: a novel source of variability from cell-cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Latham JR, Wilson AK, Steinbrecher RA (2006) The mutational consequences of plant transformation. J Biomed Biotech 2006:25376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li J, Brunner AM, Meilan R, Strauss SH (2008a) Stability of transgenes in trees: expression of two reporter genes in poplar over three field seasons. Tree Physiol 29:299–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li J, Meilan R, Ma C, Barish M, Strauss SH (2008b) Stability of herbicide resistance over 8 years of coppice in field-grown, genetically engineered poplars. West J Appl For 23:89–93Google Scholar
  28. Maghuly F, AdC Machado, Leopold S, Khan MA, Katinger H, Laimer M (2007) Long-term stability of marker gene expression in Prunus subhirtella: a model fruit tree species. J Biotech 127:310–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markussen T, Tusch A, Stephan BR, Fladung M (2004) Identification of molecular markers for selected wood properties of Norway spruce Picea abies L. (Karst.) I. Wood density. Silv Genet 53:45–50Google Scholar
  30. Masclaux FG, Pont-Lezica R, Galaud JP (2005) Relationship between allelic state of T-DNA and DNA methylation of chromosomal integration region in transformed Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Plant Mol Biol 58:295–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meilan R, Auerbach DJ, Ma C, DiFazio SP, Strauss SH (2002) Stability of herbicide resistance and GUS expression in transgenic hybrid poplars (Populus sp.) during four years of field trials and vegetative propagation. HortScience 37:277–280Google Scholar
  32. Meng L, Ziv M, Lemaux PG (2006) Nature of stress and transgene locus influences transgene expression stability in barley. Plant Mol Biol 62(1–2):15–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ming R, Hou SB, Feng Y, Yu QY, Dionne-Laporte A, Saw JH, Alam M (2008) The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus). Nature 452:991–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mirza B (2005) Influence of the nature of the T-DNA insertion region on transgene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetika 411601–411607Google Scholar
  35. Pons E, Peris JE, Peña L (2012) Field performance of transgenic citrus trees: assessment of the long-term expression of uidA and nptII transgenes and its impact on relevant agronomic and phenotypic characteristics. BMC Biotechnol 12–41Google Scholar
  36. Saika H, Nonaka S, Osakabe K, Toki S (2012) Sequential monitoring of transgene expression following Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice. Plant Cell Physiol 53:1974–1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmulling T, Fladung M, Grossmann K, Schell J (1993) Hormonal content and sensitivity of transgenic tobacco and potato plants expressing single Rol genes of Agrobacterium rhizogenes T-DNA. Plant J 3:371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spena A, Schmulling T, Koncz C, Schell JS (1987) Independent and synergistic activity of Rol-A, Rol-B and Rol-C loci in stimulating abnormal growth in plants. EMBO J 6:3891–3899PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Srivastava V (2013) Site-specific gene integration in rice. Methods Mol Biol 956:83–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vanyushin BF, Ashapkin VV (2011) DNA methylation in higher plants: past, present and future. Biochim Biophys Acta 1809:360–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Vandelee T, Hornes M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA-fingerprinting. Nucl Acid Res 23:4407–4414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walter C, Fladung M, Boerjan W (2010) The 20-year environmental safety record of GM trees. Nature Biotech 28:656–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wei A, He C, Li B, Li N, Zhang J (2011) The pyramid of transgenes TsVP and BetA effectively enhances the drought tolerance of maize plants. Plant Biotechnol J 9:216–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson A, Latham J, Steinbrecher R (2005) Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops. Nature Biotech 23:785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yao Q, Cong L, Chang JL, Li KX, Yang GX, He GY (2006) Low copy number gene transfer and stable expression in a commercial wheat cultivar via particle bombardment. J Exp Bot 57:3737–3746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zeng FS, Zhan YG, Zhao HC, Xin Y, Qi FH, Yang CP (2010a) Molecular characterization of T-DNA integration sites in transgenic birch. Trees 24:753–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zeng FS, Qian J, Luo W, Zhan YG, Xin Y, Yang CP (2010b) Stability of transgenes in long-term micropropagation of plants of transgenic birch (Betula platyphylla). Biotech Lett 32:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zeng FS, Xin Y, Li B, Zhan YG, Yang CP (2011) The stability of transgene expression and effect of DNA methylation on post transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) in birch. Afr J Biotech 10:8188–8193Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Fladung
    • 1
  • Hans Hoenicka
    • 1
  • M. Raj Ahuja
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Thuenen-Institute (TI) of Forest GeneticsGrosshansdorfGermany
  2. 2.New PaltzUSA

Personalised recommendations