Heterologous expression of cellobiohydrolase II (Cel6A) in maize endosperm
- 493 Downloads
The technology of converting lignocellulose to biofuels has advanced swiftly over the past few years, and enzymes are a significant constituent of this technology. In this regard, cost effective production of cellulases has been the focus of research for many years. One approach to reach cost targets of these enzymes involves the use of plants as bio-factories. The application of this technology to plant biomass conversion for biofuels and biobased products has the potential for significantly lowering the cost of these products due to lower enzyme production costs. Cel6A, one of the two cellobiohydrolases (CBH II) produced by Hypocrea jecorina, is an exoglucanase that cleaves primarily cellobiose units from the non-reducing end of cellulose microfibrils. In this work we describe the expression of Cel6A in maize endosperm as part of the process to lower the cost of this dominant enzyme for the bioconversion process. The enzyme is active on microcrystalline cellulose as exponential microbial growth was observed in the mixture of cellulose, cellulases, yeast and Cel6A, Cel7A (endoglucanase), and Cel5A (cellobiohydrolase I) expressed in maize seeds. We quantify the amount accumulated and the activity of the enzyme. Cel6A expressed in maize endosperm was purified to homogeneity and verified using peptide mass finger printing.
KeywordsZea mays Endosperm Hypocrea jecorina Cellobiohydrolase II Cel6A Biomass
This work was supported by a grant from the US Department of Energy (DE FG36 GO88025) with cost share from the Wal-Mart Foundation, the Walton Family Foundation, and Arkansas State University. The authors would like to thank Dr. Brett Savary and Dr. Prasanna Vasu, Arkansas Biosciences Institute, Arkansas State University, for the use of the HPLC and MALDI–TOF.
- An G, Mitra A, Choi HK, Costa MA, An K, Thornburg RW, Ryan CA (1989) Functional analysis of the 3[prime] control region of the potato wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene. Plant Cell Online 1:115–122Google Scholar
- Boisset C, Fraschini C, Schülein M, Henrissat B, Chanzy H (2000) Imaging the enzymatic digestion of bacterial cellulose ribbons reveals the endo character of the cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Humicola insolens and its mode of synergy with cellobiohydrolase Cel7A. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1444–1452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clarke ND (2010) Protein engineering for bioenergy and biomass-based chemicals. Membr Eng Des 20:527–532Google Scholar
- Koivula A, Ruohonen L, Wohlfahrt G, Reinikainen T, Teeri TT, Piens K, Claeyssens M, Weber M, Vasella A, Becker D, Sinnott ML, Zou J-y, Kleywegt GJ, Szardenings M, Ståhlberg J, Jones TA (2002) The active site of cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Trichoderma reesei: the roles of aspartic acids D221 and D175. J Am Chem Soc 124:10015–10024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Streatfield S, Mayor J, Barker D, Brooks C, Lamphear B, Woodard S, Beifuss K, Vicuna D, Massey L, Horn M, Delaney D, Nikolov Z, Hood E, Jilka J, Howard J (2002) Development of an edible subunit vaccine in corn against enterotoxigenic strains of escherichia coli. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 38:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Woodard S, Mayor J, Bailey M, Barker D, Love R, Lane J, Delaney D, McComas-Wagner J, Mallubhotla H, Hood E (2003) Maize (Zea mays)-derived bovine trypsin: characterization of the first large-scale, commercial protein product from transgenic plants. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 38:123–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yuan J, Tiller K, Al-Ahmad H, Stewart N, Stewart C Jr (2004) Plants to power: bioenergy to fuel the future. Trends Plant Sci 13:412–429Google Scholar