Transgenic Research

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 671–676 | Cite as

Pig gene knockout by rAAV-mediated homologous recombination: comparison of BRCA1 gene knockout efficiency in Yucatan and Göttingen fibroblasts with slightly different target sequences

  • Yonglun Luo
  • Lars Bolund
  • Charlotte Brandt Sørensen
Brief Communication

Abstract

In this study, we compared the gene targeting efficiencies of two rAAV-BRCA1 KO targeting constructs in Yucatan and Göttingen minipig fibroblasts. The homology arms of the constructs consisted exclusively of exonic sequences amplified by PCR from Yucatan genomic DNA. The sequences were identical to those of the reference porcine genome of a Duroc sow (Ensembl Susscrofa 9) and the BRCA1 gene of the Landrace breed (NCBI acc. no. AB271921). Surprisingly, we found that the very efficient gene targeting observed for Yucatan fibroblasts (35% targeting efficiency) was completely absent using either of the two constructs in Göttingen fibroblasts. Sequencing of the relevant BRCA1 exon 11 region (~2 kb) in the Göttingen minipig revealed three single nucleotide differences in the sequence targeted by the left homology arm of the construct (0.3% of the bases) and three or seven in the two right homology regions (0.3 or 0.7% of the bases, respectively). Construction of a novel rAAV-BRCA1 targeting vector based on the Göttingen genomic DNA sequence re-established gene targeting although the efficiency was somewhat lower than that observed for Yucatan fibroblasts. These BRCA1 KO Göttingen fibroblast clones have been used as nuclear donor cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer to generate a Göttingen BRCA1 KO pig model as previously done with the Yucatan breed. The present study illustrates that even a few mismatches present in the homology arms of an efficient rAAV-targeting construct can completely abolish gene targeting by homologous recombination emphasizing the importance of using isogenic DNA even for creating targeting constructs consisting of exon sequences only.

Keywords

rAAV-mediated gene targeting BRCA1 Homologous recombination Isogenic DNA Yucatan minipig Göttingen minipig 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Bert Vogelstein & Kenneth W. Kinzler, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, US, for kindly providing the pNeDaKO plasmid vector and Dr. R. Jude Samulski and the UNC Vector Core Facility, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, US for the rAAV packaging. We thank Ellegaard Göttingen Minipigs A/S for authorizing us to use the Göttingen fibroblasts for cloning. We also would like to thank Trine Skov Petersen for skilled technical assistance. The project was supported by a grant from the ‘‘Pigs and Health Platform’’ of the Danish National Advanced Technology Foundation (Højteknologifonden), the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation (grant no. 274-05-0535), the DAnish Genetically Modified Animal Resource (DAGMAR), and the ‘‘Sino-Danish Breast Cancer Research Centre’’ under the auspices of the Danish National Research Foundation (Grundforskningsfonden) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

References

  1. Aigner B, Renner S, Kessler B, Klymiuk N, Kurome M, Wunsch A, Wolf E (2010) Transgenic pigs as models for translational biomedical research. J Mol Med 88(7):653–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd M, Harris F, McFarlane R, Davidson HR, Black DM (1995) A human BRCA1 gene knockout. Nature 375(6532):541–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Evers B, Jonkers J (2006) Mouse models of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency: past lessons, current understanding and future prospects. Oncogene 25(43):5885–5897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gowen LC, Johnson BL, Latour AM, Sulik KK, Koller BH (1996) Brca1 deficiency results in early embryonic lethality characterized by neuroepithelial abnormalities. Nat Genet 12(2):191–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hakem R, de la Pompa JL, Sirard C, Mo R, Woo M, Hakem A, Wakeham A, Potter J, Reitmair A, Billia F et al (1996) The tumor suppressor gene Brca1 is required for embryonic cellular proliferation in the mouse. Cell 85(7):1009–1023PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1996) Breast cancer. What’s mice got to do with it? Nature 382(6593):672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klymiuk N, Aigner B, Brem G, Wolf E (2010) Genetic modification of pigs as organ donors for xenotransplantation. Mol Reprod Dev 77(3):209–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kragh PM, Nielsen AL, Li J, Du Y, Lin L, Schmidt M, Bogh IB, Holm IE, Jakobsen JE, Johansen MG et al (2009) Hemizygous minipigs produced by random gene insertion and handmade cloning express the Alzheimer’s disease-causing dominant mutation APPsw. Transgenic Res 18(4):545–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Luo Y, Li J, Liu Y, Lin L, Du Y, Li S, Yang H, Vajta G, Callesen H, Bolund L et al (2010) High efficiency of BRCA1 knockout using rAAV-mediated gene targeting: developing a pig model for breast cancer. Transgenic Res 20(5):975–988Google Scholar
  10. Luo Y, Bolund L, Sorensen CB (2011) An improved PCR strategy for fast screening of specific and random integrations in rAAV-mediated gene targeted cell clones. BMC Res Notes 4(1):246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCreath KJ, Howcroft J, Campbell KH, Colman A, Schnieke AE, Kind AJ (2000) Production of gene-targeted sheep by nuclear transfer from cultured somatic cells. Nature 405(6790):1066–1069PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rogers CS, Hao Y, Rokhlina T, Samuel M, Stoltz DA, Li Y, Petroff E, Vermeer DW, Kabel AC, Yan Z (2008) Production of CFTR-null and CFTR-DeltaF508 heterozygous pigs by adeno-associated virus-mediated gene targeting and somatic cell nuclear transfer. J Clin Invest 118(4):1571–1577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Simianer H, Kohn F (2010) Genetic management of the Gottingen Minipig population. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 62(3):221–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith LD, Tesoriero AA, Wong EM, Ramus SJ, O’Malley FP, Mulligan AM, Terry MB, Senie RT, Santella RM, John EM et al (2011) Contribution of large genomic BRCA1 alterations to early-onset breast cancer selected for family history and tumour morphology: a report from the breast cancer family registry. Breast Cancer Res 13(1):R14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Whyte JJ, Samuel M, Mahan E, Padilla J, Simmons GH, Arce-Esquivel AA, Bender SB, Whitworth KM, Hao YH, Murphy CNet al (2010) Vascular endothelium-specific overexpression of human catalase in cloned pigs. Transgenic Res 20(5):989–1001Google Scholar
  16. Yang D, Wang CE, Zhao B, Li W, Ouyang Z, Liu Z, Yang H, Fan P, O’Neill A, Gu W et al (2010) Expression of Huntington’s disease protein results in apoptotic neurons in the brains of cloned transgenic pigs. Hum Mol Genet 19(20):3983–3994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yonglun Luo
    • 1
  • Lars Bolund
    • 1
  • Charlotte Brandt Sørensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiomedicineAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations