Transgenic Research

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 77–88 | Cite as

Determination of insecticidal Cry1Ab protein in soil collected in the final growing seasons of a nine-year field trial of Bt-maize MON810

  • Helga GruberEmail author
  • Vijay Paul
  • Heinrich H. D. Meyer
  • Martin Müller
Original Paper


Cultivation of genetically modified maize (Bt-maize; event MON810) producing recombinant δ-endotoxin Cry1Ab, leads to introduction of the insecticidal toxin into soil by way of root exudates and plant residues. This study investigated the fate of Cry1Ab in soil under long-term Bt-maize cultivation in an experimental field trial performed over nine growing seasons on four South German field sites cultivated with MON810 and its near isogenic non Bt-maize variety. Cry1Ab protein was quantified in soil (<2 mm size) using an in-house validated ELISA method. The assay was validated according to the criteria specified in European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. The assay enabled quantification of Cry1Ab protein at a decision limit (CCα) of 2.0 ng Cry1Ab protein g−1 soil with analytical recovery in the range 49.1–88.9%, which was strongly correlated with clay content. Cry1Ab protein was only detected on one field site at concentrations higher than the CCα, with 2.91 and 2.57 ng Cry1Ab protein g−1 soil in top and lower soil samples collected 6 weeks after the eighth growing season. Cry1Ab protein was never detected in soil sampled in the spring before the next farming season at any of the four experimental sites. No experimental evidence for accumulation or persistence of Cry1Ab protein in different soils under long-term Bt-maize cultivation can be drawn from this field study.


Soil Genetically modified maize Bt-maize MON810 Long-term field trial Cry1Ab protein Biosafety ELISA 



The research project was supported by the State of Bavaria. We thank the staff at the Bavarian experimental stations Baumannshof, Puch, Neuhof, and Grub for their engaged contribution to this work. We gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of S. Gellan and helpful support by U. Ziegltrum and J. Karpf. We are very thankful for the contributions of R. Brandhuber from the Institute for Agricultural Ecology, Organic Farming and Soil Protection (Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture) and from J. Kler, who performed the soil-texture analysis.


  1. Badea EM, Chelu F, Lacatusu A (2010) Results regarding the levels of Cry1Ab protein in transgenic corn tissue (MON810) and the fate of Bt protein in three soil types. Rom Biotech Let 15(1):55–62Google Scholar
  2. Baumgarte S, Tebbe CC (2005) Field studies on the environmental fate of the Cry1Ab Bt toxin produced by transgenic maize (MON810) and its effect on the bacterial communities in the maize rhizosphere. Mol Ecol1 4:2539–2551Google Scholar
  3. Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (2005) Monitoring der Umweltwirkungen des Bt-Gens Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag des Bayerischen Staatsministeriums für Umwelt, Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz. LfL-Schriftenreihe ISSN 1611–4159 (7)Google Scholar
  4. Byrne D (2002) Commission decision of 12 August (2002) Implementing the council directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results (2002/657/EC). Off J Eur Commun L221:8–33Google Scholar
  5. CERA (2010) GM crop database. Center for environmental risk assessment (CERA), ILSI research foundation, Washington, DC.
  6. Chevallier T, Muchaonyerwa P, Chenu C (2003) Microbial utilisation of two proteins adsorbed to a vertisol clay fraction: toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp tenebrionis and bovine serum albumin. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1211–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark BW, Phillips TA, Coats JR (2005) Environmental fate and effects of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) proteins from transgenic crops: a review. J Agric Food Chem 53(12):4643–4653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crecchio C, Stotzky G (1998) Insecticidal activity and biodegradation of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki bound to humic acids from soil. Soil Biol Biochem 30(4):463–470Google Scholar
  9. Crecchio C, Stotzky G (2001) Biodegradation and insecticidal activity of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp kurstaki bound on complexes of montmorillonite—humic acids—Al hydroxypolymers. Soil Biol Biochem 33(4–5):573–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crickmore N, Zeigler DR, Feitelson J, Schnepf E, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Dean DH (1998) Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62(3):807–813PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferré J, Van Rie J (2002) Biochemistry and genetics of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Ann Rev Entomol 47:501–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gruber H, Paul V, Meyer HHD, Müller M (2008) Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for monitoring Cry1Ab toxin in soils planted with Bt-maize (MON810) in a long-term field trial on four South German sites. J Cons Prot Food Saf 3:22–25Google Scholar
  13. Guertler P, Paul V, Albrecht C, Meyer HHD (2009) Sensitive and highly specific quantitative real-time PCR and ELISA for recording a potential transfer of novel DNA and Cry1Ab protein from feed into bovine milk. Anal Bioanal Chem 393:1629–1638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guertler P, Paul V, Steinke K, Wiedeman S, Preißinger W, Albrecht C, Spiekers H, Schwarz FJ, Meyer HHD (2010) Long-term feeding of genetically modified corn (MON810)—fate of cry1Ab DNA and recombinant protein during the metabolism of the dairy cow. Livest Sci 131:250–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harwood JD, Samson RA, Obrycki JJ (2006) No evidence for the uptake of Cry1Ab Bt-endotoxins by the generalist predator Scarites subterraneus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in laboratory and field experiments. Biocontrol Sci Technol 16(4):377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Head G, Surber JB, Watson JA, Martin JW, Duan JJ (2002) No detection of Cry1Ac protein in soil after multiple years of transgenic Bt cotton (bollgard) use. Environ Entomol 31:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilbeck A, Moar WJ, Pusztai-Carey M, Filippini A, Bigler F (1999) Prey-mediated effects of Cry1Ab toxin and protoxin and Cry2A protoxin on the predator Chrysoperla carnea. Entomol Exp Appl 91:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoefte H, Whiteley HR (1989) Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev 53:242–255Google Scholar
  19. Hoess S, Arndt M, Baumgarte S, Tebbe C, Nguyen-Thu H, Jehle J (2008) Effects of transgenic corn and Cry1Ab protein on the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotox Environ Saf 70:334–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hopkins D, Gregorich EG (2003) Detection and decay of the Bt endotoxin in soil from a field trial with genetically modified maize. Eur J Soil Sci 54:793–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Icoz I, Stotzky G (2008) Fate and effects of insect-resistant Bt crops in soil ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 40:559–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaiser-Alexnat R, Meise T, Langenbruch G, Hommel B, Huber J (2005) Studies on the early detection of resistance development of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) to the Bt-corn-toxin Cry1Ab. Nachrichtenblatt Deut Pflanzenschutzd 57:144–151Google Scholar
  23. Koskella J, Stotzky G (1997) Microbial utilization of free and clay-bound insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis and their retention of insecticidal activity after incubation with microbes. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(9):3561–3568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Koziel MG, Beland GL, Bowman C, Carozzi NB, Crenshaw R, Crossland L, Dawson J, Desai N, Hill M, Kadwell S, Launis K, Lewis K, Maddox D, McPherson K, Meghji MR, Merlin E, Rhodes R, Warren GW, Wright M, Evola SV (1993) Field performance of elite transgenic maize plants expressing an insecticidal protein derived from Bacillus thuringiensis. Nat Biotech 11:194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME (1999) Transgenic pollen harms monarch butterflies. Nature 399:214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marvier M, McCreedy C, Regetz J, Kareiva P (2007) A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates. Science 316(5830):1475–1477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meissle M, Romeis J (2009) Insecticidal activity of Cry3Bb1 expressed in Bt-maize on larvae of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Entomol Exp Appl 131:308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mendelsohn M, Kough J, Vaituzis Z, Matthews K (2003) Are Bt crops safe? Nat Biotechnol 21:1003–1009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nguyen HT, Jehle JA (2007) Quantitative analysis of the seasonal and tissue-specific expression of Cry1Ab in transgenic maize Mon810. J Plant Dis Prot 114:82–87Google Scholar
  30. Pagel-Wieder S, Gessler F, Niemeyer J, Schröder D (2004) Adsorption of the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (cry1Ab) on Na-montmorillonite and on the clay fractions of different soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 167:184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pagel-Wieder S, Niemeyer J, Fischer WR, Gessler F (2007) Effects of physical and chemical properties of soils and adsorption of the insecticidal protein (Cry1Ab) from Bacillus thuringiensis at Cry1Ab protein concentrations relevant for experimental field sites. Soil Biol Biochem 39(12):3034–3042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palm C, Donegan H, Harris D, Seidler R (1994) Quantification in soil of Bacillus thuringiensis var kurstaki delta-endotoxin from transgenic plants. Mol Ecol 3:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paul V, Steinke K, Meyer HHD (2008) Development and validation of a sensitive enzyme immunoassay for surveillance of Cry1Ab toxin in bovine blood plasma of cows fed Bt-maize (MON810). Anal Chim Acta 607:106–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paul V, Guertler P, Wiedemann S, Meyer HHD (2010) Degradation of Cry1Ab protein from genetically modified maize (MON810) in relation to dietary feed proteins in dairy cow digestion. Transgenic Res 19(4):683–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Priestley AL, Brownbridge M (2009) Field trials to evaluate effects of Bt-transgenic silage corn expressing the Cry1Ab insecticidal toxin on non-target soil arthropods in northern New England, USA. Transgenic Res 18(3):425–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rauschen S, Schuphan I (2006) Fate of the Cry1Ab protein from Bt-maize MON810 silage in biogas production facilities. J Agric Food Chem 54(3):879–883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roush RT (1997) Bt-transgenic crops: just another pretty insecticide or a chance for a new start in resistance management? Pestic Sci 51(3):328–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saeglitz C, Bartsch D, Eber S, Gathmann A, Priesnitz KU, Schuphan I (2006) Monitoring the Cry1Ab susceptibility of European Corn Borer in Germany. J Econ Entomol 99(5):1768–1773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saxena D, Stotzky G (2000) Insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is released from roots of transgenic Bt corn in vitro and in situ. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33(1):35–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001) Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin released from root exudates and biomass of Bt corn has no apparent effect on earthworms, nematodes, protozoa, bacteria, and fungi in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 33(9):1225–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saxena D, Stotzky G (2003) Fate and effects in soil of the insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis in transgenic plants. Coll Biosaf Rev 1:9–85Google Scholar
  42. Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G (2002) Vertical movement in soil of insecticidal Cry1Ab protein from Bacillus thuringiensis. Soil Biol Biochem 34:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J (1998) Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:775–806PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Stotzky G (2000) Persistence and biological activity in soil of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis and of bacterial DNA bound on clays and humic acids. J Environ Qual 29:691–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stotzky G (2002) Clays and humic acids affect the persistence and biological activity of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis in soil. Dev Soil Sci 28(2):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stotzky G (2005) Persistence and biological activity in soil of the insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis, especially from transgenic plants. Plant Soil 266(1–2):77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tabashnik BE, Liu Y-B, Finson N, Masson L, Heckel DG (1997) One gene in diamondback moth confers resistance to four Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94(5):1640–1644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tapp H, Stotzky G (1995) Insecticidal activity of the toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki and tenebrionis adsorbed and bound on pure and soil clays. Appl Environ Microbiol 61(5):1786–1790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tapp H, Stotzky G (1998) Persistence of the insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp kurstaki in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 30:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tapp H, Calamai L, Stotzky G (1994) Adsorption and binding of the insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp kurstaki and subsp tenebrionis on clay minerals. Soil Biol Biochem 26:663–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs (2001) Biopesticides Registration Action Documents Bacillus thuringiensis Plant-Incorporated Protectants.
  52. Van Rie J, Jansens S, Höfte H, Degheele D, Van Mellaert H (1990) Receptors on the brush border membrane of the insect midgut as determinants of the specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(5):1378–1385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang H, Ye Q, Wang W, Wu L, Wu W (2006) Cry1Ab protein from Bt transgenic rice does not residue in rhizosphere soil. Environ Pollut 143:449–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helga Gruber
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    Email author
  • Vijay Paul
    • 2
    • 3
  • Heinrich H. D. Meyer
    • 2
  • Martin Müller
    • 1
  1. 1.Bavarian State Research Center for AgricultureInstitute for Crop Science and Plant BreedingFreisingGermany
  2. 2.Physiology WeihenstephanTechnische Universität MünchenFreisingGermany
  3. 3.National Research Centre on Yak, (ICAR)West Kameng District, Arunachal PradeshIndia
  4. 4.Bavarian Health and Food Safety AuthorityOberschleissheimGermany

Personalised recommendations