Advertisement

Transgenic Research

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 143–149 | Cite as

Production of mRNA from the cry1Ac transgene differs among Bollgard® lines which correlates to the level of subsequent protein

  • John J. AdamczykJr.Email author
  • Omaththage Perera
  • William R. Meredith
Brief Communication

Abstract

Commercial cultivars of Bollgard® cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., differ in the amount of expressed Cry1Ac protein. However, the plant-mechanism for which this occurs is still unknown. Using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), we developed a method to determine if differences in the overall level of Cry1Ac among Bollgard® lines could be correlated to the mRNA transcripts. Our data shows that the cry1Ac mRNA transcript differs among Bollgard® lines and are correlated with corresponding Cry1Ac protein levels. In addition, qPCR based methods can efficiently be employed to quantify Cry1Ac protein expression levels in transgenic cotton cultivars. We postulate that qPCR based methods could be successfully employed for quantifying expression levels of transgenes in plants carrying different Bt toxins.

Keywords

Insect-Plant-Protectants (PIP) Genetically-modified organisms (GMO) Real-time PCR 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the numerous student aids that assisted in collecting cotton tissue for analysis. Statistical assistance by Debbie Boykin, USDA, ARS, Mid-South Area, is much appreciated. Comments and suggestions were much appreciated from Drs. Kate Aronstein, Jesus DeLeon, Bill Pettigrew, and Jack McCarty. Mention of a trademark, warranty, proprietary product or vendor does not constitute a guarantee by the USDA and does not imply approval or recommendation of the product to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.

References

  1. Adamczyk JJ Jr, Sumerford DV (2001) Potential factors impacting season-long expression of Cry1 Ac in 13 commercial varieties of Bollgard® cotton. J Insect Sci 1:13. Available online: http://insectscience.org/1.13
  2. Adamczyk JJ Jr, Gore J (2004) Development of bollworms, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), on two commercial Bollgard® cultivars that differ in overall Cry1Ac level. J Insect Sci 4:32. Available online at http://insectsceince.org/4.32
  3. Adamczyk JJ Jr, Meredith WR Jr (2004) Genetic basis for variability of CrylAc expression among commercial transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton cultivars in the United States. J Cotton Sci 8:17–23Google Scholar
  4. Adamczyk JJ Jr, Meredith WR Jr (2006) Selecting for efficacy of Bollgard® cotton cultivars against various Lepidoptera using forward breeding techniques. J Econ Entomol 99:1835–1841PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Adamczyk JJ Jr, Hardee DD, Adams LC, Sumerford DV (2001) Correlating differences in larval survival and development of bollworms (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and fall armyworms (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to differential expression of Cry1A(c) δ-endotoxin in various plant parts among commercial cultivars of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis cotton. J Econ Entomol 94:284–290Google Scholar
  6. Bacheler JS, Mott DW (1997) Efficacy of grower-managed Bt cotton in North Carolina. In: Dugger P, Richter D (eds) Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, pp 858–861Google Scholar
  7. Burd T, Bradley JR Jr, Van Duyn JW (1999) Performance of selected Bt cotton genotypes against bollworm in North Carolina. In: Dugger P, Richter D (eds) Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, pp 931–934Google Scholar
  8. Dong HZ, Li WJ (2007) Variability of endotoxin expression in Bt transgenic cotton. J Agron Crop Sci 193:21–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00240.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dutton A, Klein H, Romeis J, Bigler F (2002) Uptake of Bt-toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and consequences for the predator Chrysoperia carnea. Ecol Entomol 27:441–447. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00436.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finnegan EJ, Llewellyn DJ, Fitt GP (1998) What’s happening to the expression of the insect protection in field-grown Ingard® cotton? In: Proceedings of the ninth Australian cotton conference. The Cotton Research & Development Corporation, Australia, pp 291–297Google Scholar
  11. Fitt GP (1998) Efficacy of Ingard® cotton-patterns and consequences. In: Proceedings of the ninth Australian cotton conference. The Cotton Research & Development Corporation, Australia, pp 233–245Google Scholar
  12. Kranthi KR, Naidu S, Dhawad CS, Tatwawadi A, Mate K, Patil E et al (2005) Temporal and intra-plant variability of Cry1Ac expression in Bt-cotton and its influence on the survival of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera). Curr Sci 89:291–298Google Scholar
  13. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  14. Livak K (1997) ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system, User Bulletin 2. PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CAGoogle Scholar
  15. Olsen KM, Daly JC, Holt HE, Finnegan EJ (2005) Season-long variation in expression of Cry1Ac gene and efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin in transgenic cotton against Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol 98:1007–1017PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rochester IJ (2006) Effect of genotype, edaphic, environmental conditions, and agronomic practices on Cry1Ac protein expression in transgenic cotton. J Cotton Sci 10:252–262Google Scholar
  17. Roof ME, Durant JA (1997) On-farm experiences with Bt cotton in South Carolina. In: Dugger P, Richter D (eds) Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, p 861Google Scholar
  18. SAS Institute (2001) Proprietary software release 8.2, Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith RH (1998) Year two of Bollgard behind boll weevil eradication: Alabama observations. In: Dugger P, Richter D (eds) Proceedings of 2000 Beltwide Cotton Conference. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, pp 965–966Google Scholar
  20. Wan P, Zhang Y, Wu K, Huang M (2005) Seasonal expression profiles of insecticidal protein and control efficacy against Helicoverpa armigera for Bt cotton in the Yangtze River Valley in China. J Econ Entomol 98:195–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams MR (2000) Cotton insect loss estimates. In: 1999 Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference. San Antonio, TX. 4–8 January 2000. National Cotton Council America, Memphis, TNGoogle Scholar
  22. Wong LM, Medrano JF (2005) Real-time PCR for mRNA quantification. Biotechniques 39:75–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Xia L, Xu Q, Guo S (2005) Bt insecticidal gene and its temporal expression in transgenic cotton plants. Acta Agron Sin 31:197–202Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • John J. AdamczykJr.
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Omaththage Perera
    • 1
  • William R. Meredith
    • 3
  1. 1.USDA, ARS, Southern Insect Management Research UnitStonevilleMSUSA
  2. 2.USDA, ARS, KSARCWeslacoTXUSA
  3. 3.USDA, ARS, Crop Genetics and Production Research UnitStonevilleMSUSA

Personalised recommendations