Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) based assays are widely used to estimate the content of genetically modified (GM) materials in food, feed and seed. It has been known that the genetic structures of the analyte can significantly influence the GM content expressed by the haploid genome (HG) % estimated using real-time PCR assays; this kind of influence is also understood as the impact of biological factors. The influence was first simulated at theoretical level using maize as a model. We then experimentally assessed the impact of biological factors on quantitative results, analysing by quantitative real-time PCR six maize MON 810 hybrid kernels with different genetic structures: (1) hemizygous from transgenic male parent, (2) hemizygous from transgenic female parent and (3) homozygous at the transgenic locus. The results obtained in the present study showed clear influences of biological factors on GM DNA quantification: 1% of GM materials by weight (wt) for the three genetic structures contained 0.39, 0.55 and 1.0% of GM DNA by HG respectively, from quantitative real-time PCR analyses. The relationships between GM wt% and GM HG% can be empirically established as: (1) in the case of the presence of a single GM trait: GM HG% = GM wt% × (0.5 ± 0.167Y), where Y is the endosperm DNA content (%) in the total DNA of a maize kernel, (2) in the case of the presence of multiple GM traits: GM HG% = N × GM wt% × (0.5 ± 0.167Y), where N is the number of GM traits (stacked or not) present in an unknown sample. This finding can be used by stakeholders related to GMO for empirical prediction from one unit of expression to another in the monitoring of seed and grain production chains. Practical equations have also been suggested for haploid copy number calculations, using hemizygous GM materials for calibration curves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991) Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9:208–218
Corbisier P, Trapmann S, Gancberg D, Hannes L, Van Iwaarden P, Berben G, Schimmel H, Emons H (2005) Quantitative determination of roundup ready soybean (Glycine max) extracted from highly processed flour. Anal Bioanal Chem 383:282–290
Demeke T, Perry DJ, Scowcroft WR (2006) Adventitious presence of GMOs: scientific overview for Canadian grains. Can J Plant Sci 86:1–23
ENGL (2006) Explanatory document on the use of Percentage of GM-DNA copy numbers in relation to the target taxon specific DNA copy numbers calculated in terms of haploid genomes European Commission, JRC, Italy 1–16
European Commission (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Off J Eur Communities L106:1–38
European Commission (2003a) Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Off J Eur Union L266:1–23
European Commission (2003b) Regulation (EC) No. 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Off J Eur Union L266:24–28
European Commission (2004) Commission recommendation 2004/787/EC of 4 October 2004 on technical guidance for sampling and detection of genetically modified organisms and material produced from genetically modified organisms or in products in the context of Regulation (EC) No. 1830/2003. Off J Eur Union L348:18–26
Hernandez M, Duplan MN, Berthier G, Vaïtilingom M, Hauser W, Freyer R, Pla M, Bertheau Y (2004) Development and comparison of four real-time polymerase chain reaction systems for specific detection and quantification of Zea mays L. J Agric Food Chem 52:4632–4637
Holck A, Vaïtilingom M, Didierjean L, Rudi K (2002) 5′-Nuclease PCR for quantitative event-specific detection of the genetically modified MON 810 MaisGard maize. Eur Food Res Technol 214:449–453
Holst-Jensen A, Rønning SB, Løvseth A, Berdal KG (2003) PCR technology for screening and quantification of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Anal Bioanal Chem 375:985–993
Holst-Jensen A, De Loose M, Van den Eede G (2006) Coherence between legal requirements and approaches for detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their derived products. J Agric Food Chem 54:2799–2809
Laffont JL, Remund KM, Wright D, Simpson RD, Grégoire S (2005) Testing for adventitious presence of transgenic material in conventional seed or grain lots using quantitative laboratory methods: statistical procedures and their implementation. Seed Sci Res 15:197–204
Lipp M, Shillito R, Giroux R, Spiegelhalter F, Charlton S, Pinero D, Song P (2005) Polymerase chain reaction technology as analytical tool in agricultural biotechnology. J AOAC Int 88:136–155
Moreano F, Busch U, Engel KH (2005) Distortion of genetically modified organism quantification in processed foods: influence of particle size compositions and heat-induced DNA degradation. J Agric Food Chem 53:9971–9979
Norme Expérimentale XP V03-020-2 (2005). Produits alimentaires—Détection et quantification des organismes végétaux génétiquement modifies et produits dérivés, Partie 2: méthodes basées sur la reaction de polymérisation en chaîne. 1–23
Papazova N, Malef A, Degrieck I, Van Bockstaele E, De Loose M (2005) DNA extractability from the maize embryo and endosperm-relevance to GMO assessment in seed samples. Seed Sci Technol 33:533–542
Papazova N, Taverniers I, Degrieck I, Van Bockstaele E, Joost H, De Loose M (2006) Real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) quantification of T25 maize seeds-influence of the genetic structures in the maize kernel on the quantitative analysis. Seed Sci Technol 34:307–317
Pla M, La Paz JL, Penas G, Garcia N, Palaudemas M, Esteve T, Messeguer J, Melé E (2006) Assessment of real-time PCR based methods for quantification of pollen-mediated gene flow from GM to conventional maize in a field study. Transgenic Res 15:219–228
Remund KM, Doris AD, Wright DL, Holden LR (2001) Statistical considerations in seed purity testing for transgenic traits. Seed Sci Res 11:101–119
Trapmann S, Le Guern L, Prokisch J, Robouch P, Kramer GN, Schimmel H, Pauwels J, Querci M, Van den Eede G, Anklam E (2001) The certification of reference materials of dry mixed maize power with different mass fractions of MON 810 maize. EUR 20111 EN 1–12
Trifa Y, Zhang D (2004) DNA content in embryo and endosperm of maize kernel (Zea mays L.): impact on GMO quantification. J Agric Food Chem 52:1044–1048
Weighardt F (2006) European GMO labelling thresholds impractical and unscientific. Nat Biotechnol 24:23–25
Yoshimura T, Kuribara H, Matsuoka T, Kodama T, Iida M, Watanabe T, Akiyama H, Maitani T, Furui S, Hino A (2005) Applicability of the quantification of genetically modified organisms to foods processed from maize and soy. J Agric Food Chem 53:2052–2059
We thank Monsanto SAS FRANCE for the supply of all MON 810 hybrid seeds used in the present study and the anonymous reviewers for very useful and constructive criticism. This research was supported by the European Union (FP6 Integrated Project Co-Extra, contract 007158, co-ordinated by INRA, FRANCE).
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, D., Corlet, A. & Fouilloux, S. Impact of genetic structures on haploid genome-based quantification of genetically modified DNA: theoretical considerations, experimental data in MON 810 maize kernels (Zea mays L.) and some practical applications. Transgenic Res 17, 393–402 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-007-9114-y
- MON 810
- GM DNA quantification
- Haploid genome