Advertisement

Transgenic Research

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 739–749 | Cite as

Enhanced conversion of plant biomass into glucose using transgenic rice-produced endoglucanase for cellulosic ethanol

  • Hesham Oraby
  • Balan Venkatesh
  • Bruce Dale
  • Rashid Ahmad
  • Callista Ransom
  • James Oehmke
  • Mariam Sticklen
Original Paper

Abstract

The catalytic domain of Acidothermus cellulolyticus thermostable endoglucanase gene (encoding for endo-1,4-β-glucanase enzyme or E1) was constitutively expressed in rice. Molecular analyses of T1 plants confirmed presence and expression of the transgene. The amount of E1 enzyme accounted for up to 4.9% of the plant total soluble proteins, and its accumulation had no apparent deleterious effects on plant growth and development. Approximately 22 and 30% of the cellulose of the Ammonia Fiber Explosion (AFEX)-pretreated rice and maize biomass respectively was converted into glucose using rice E1 heterologous enzyme. As rice is the major food crop of the world with minimal use for its straw, our results suggest a successful strategy for producing biologically active hydrolysis enzymes in rice to help generate alcohol fuel, by substituting the wasteful and polluting practice of rice straw burning with an environmentally friendly technology.

Keywords

Endoglucanase Acidothermus cellulolyticus Transgenic rice Ethanol fuel Rice straw burning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by DOE/Edenspace (Cooperative Agreement # DE-FG02-04ER86183), Government of Egypt, MSU Research Excellence Funds (REF) and Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research (CPBR Agreement # GO12026-168). The authors are thankful to National Renewable Energy Laboratory for providing the E1 antibodies, Dr. K. Danna for providing the pZM766-E1cat, USDA-ARS in Beaumont, Texas and the National Small Grains Collection at Aberdeen, Idaho for providing the rice seeds. The authors appreciate the critical review of the manuscript by Dr. Brian Hooker and Dr. Chris Somerville.

References

  1. Ahmad A, Maqbool SB, Riazuddin S, Sticklen MB (2002) Expression of synthetic cry1ab and cry1ac genes in basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety 370 via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation for the control of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 38:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey MR, Woodard SL, Callaway E, Beifuss K, Magallanes-Lundback M, Lane JR, Horn ME, Mallubhotla H, Delaney DD, Ward M, Van Gastel F, Howard JA, Hood EE (2004) Improved recovery of active recombinant laccase from maize seed. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:390–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayer EA, Chanzy H, Lamed R, Shoham Y (1998) Cellulose, cellulases and cellulosomes. Curr Opin In Str Biol 8:548–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bothast RJ, Schlicher MA (2005) Biotechnological processes for conversion of corn into ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67: 19–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. California Rice Commission (2005) Introduction to rice straw management. Available at http://www.calrice.orgGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandra Babu R, Nguyen BD, Varapong Chamarerk, Shanmugasundaram P, Chezhian P, Jeyaprakash P, Ganesh SK, Palchamy A, Sadasivam S, Sarkarung S, Wade LJ, Nguyen HT (2003) Genetic analysis of drought resistance in rice by molecular markers association between secondary traits and field performance. Crop Sci 43:1457–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng M, Lowe BA, Spencer TM, Ye X, Armstrong CL (2004) Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of monocotyledonous species. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 40:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiang CM, Yeh FS, Huang LF, Tseng TH, Wang CS, Lur HS, Shaw JF, Yu SM (2005) Expression of a bifunctional and thermostable amylopullulanase in transgenic rice seeds leads to starch autohydrolysis and altered composition of starch. Mol Breed 15:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai Z, Hooker BS, Anderson DB, Thomas SR (2000) Improved plant-based production of E1 endoglucanase using potato: expression optimization and tissue targeting. Mol Breed 6:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dai Z, Hooker BS, Quesenberry RD, Thomas SR (2005) Optimization of Acidothermus celluloyticus endoglucanase (E1) production in transgenic tobacco plants by transcriptional, post-transcription and post-translational modification. Transgenic Res 14:627–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O’Hare M, Kammen DM. (2006) Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311:506–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer R, Stoger E, Schillberg S, Christou P, Twyman R (2004) Plant-based production of biopharmaceuticals. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:152–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hong CY, Chen KJ, Liu LF, Tseng TH, Wang CS, Yu SM (2004) Production of two highly active bacterial phytases with broad pH optima in germinating transgenic rice seeds. Trans Res 13:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jefferson RA, Kananagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: Glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3301–3306Google Scholar
  15. Kabel MA, Van der Maarel MJEC, Klip G, Voragen AGJ, Schols HA (2005) Standard assays do not predict the efficiency of commercial cellulase preparations towards plant materials. Biotechnol Bioeng 93:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kayaba H, Meguro H, Muto H, Kamada Y, Adachi T, Yamada Y, Kanda A, Yamaguchi K, Hamada K, Ueki S, Chihara J (2004) Activation of Eosinophils by rice-husk dust exposure: a possible mechanism for the aggravation of asthma during rice harvest. Tohoku J Exp Med 204:27–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim S, Dale BE (2004) Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass Bioenergy 26:361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knauf M, Moniruzzaman M (2004) Lignocellulosic biomass processing: A perspective. Internat Sugar Jour 106:147–150Google Scholar
  19. Kusnadi AR, Nikolov ZL, Howard JA (1997) Production of Recombinant Proteins in Transgenic Plants: Practical Considerations. Biotechnol Bioeng 56:473–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu HL, Li WS, Lei T, Zheng J, Zhang Z, Yan XF, Wang ZZ, Wang YL, Si LS (2005) Expression of Human Papillomavirus type 16 L1 protein in transgenic tobacco plants. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 37:153–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lynd LR, van Zyl WH, McBride JE, Laser M (2005) Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16:577–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Medve J, Karlsson J, Lee D, Tjerneld F (1998) Hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose by cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase II from Trichoderma reesei: Adsorption, sugar production pattern and synergism. Biotechnol Bioeng 59:621–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. NRC (1996) Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 7th Revised edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Oliveira ME, Vaughan BE, Rykiel EJ (2005) Ethanol as fuel: Energy, carbon dioxide balances, and ecological footprint. BioScience 55:593–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qi B, Fraser T, Mugford S, Dobson G, Sayanova O, Butler J, Napier JA, Stobart AK, Lazarus CM (2004) Production of very long chain polyunsaturated omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in plants. Bio/technology 22:739–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ Jr, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL et al (2006) The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311:484–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rice Straw Feedstock Joint Venture (1999) Rice Straw Feedstock Supply Study for Colusa County California, Western Regional Biomass Energy Program, Lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
  28. Sahrawy M, Avila C, Chueca A, Canovas FM, Lopez-Gorge J (2004) Increased sucrose level and altered nitrogen metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana transgenic plants expressing antisense chloroplastic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. J Exp Bot 55:2495–2503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sticklen M (2006) Plant genetic engineering to improve biomass characterization for biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:315–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Teymouri F, Alizadeh H, Laureano-Perez L, Dale BE, Sticklen M (2004) Effects of ammonia fiber explosion treatment on activity of endoglucanase from Acidothermus cellulolyticus in transgenic plant. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 116:1183–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wyman CE (1999) Biomass ethanol: Technical progress, opportunities, and commercial challenges. Annu Rev Energ Env 24:189–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ziegelhoffer TJ, Raasch A, Austin-Phillips S (2001) Dramatic effects of truncation and subcellular targeting on the accumulation of recombinant microbial cellulase in tobacco. Mol Breed 8:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ziegler MT, Thomas SR, Danna KJ (2000) Accumulation of a thermostable endo-1,4-β-d-glucanase in the apoplast of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Mol Breed 6:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hesham Oraby
    • 1
  • Balan Venkatesh
    • 2
  • Bruce Dale
    • 2
  • Rashid Ahmad
    • 1
  • Callista Ransom
    • 1
  • James Oehmke
    • 3
  • Mariam Sticklen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural EconomicsMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations