Concept of Evidence and the Quality of Evidence-Based Reasoning in Elementary Students
The present study has two goals: to explore elementary students’ understanding of evidence and the ways they deploy it to construct arguments, and to examine whether eliciting their concept of evidence during argumentation improves students’ evidence-based reasoning. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 4th and 6th graders (N = 66) in a public school in Mexico. We found significant differences between groups regarding the concept of evidence, with better performance in the older group. A positive correlation between the concept of evidence and the quality of evidence-based reasoning was found. Also, three performance profiles were observed after eliciting the concept of evidence when grade was excluded as a factor. Results suggest that the concept of evidence plays an essential role in developing argumentative competence in pre-adolescence.
KeywordsConcept of evidence Argumentation quality Elementary school Evidence-based reasoning Evidence generation Evidence quality
This study was supported by the Mexican Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) and the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (EDU2013-47593-C2-2-P; DGICYT 2018_RTI2018-097289-B-I00 and the PRX18/00039).
This Study was supported by the Mexican Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tectonología (Andrea Miralda-Banda, PhD Grant), and the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competeitividad (Merce Garcia-Mila, Grants Nos.: EDU2013-47593-C2-2-P; DGICYT 2018_RTI2018-097289-B-I00 and PRX18/00039).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Andrea Miralda-Banda declares that she has no conflict of interest. Merce Garcia-Mila declares that she has no conflict of interest. Mark Felton declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Berland LK, Reiser B (2004) Students constructing and defending evidence-based scientific explanations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TXGoogle Scholar
- Chandler MJ, Hallett D, Sokol BW (2002) Competing claims about competing knowledge claims. In: Hofer BK, Pintrich PR (eds) Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, pp 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fulton L, Poetler E (2013) Developing a scientific argument. Modeling and practice help students build skills in oral and written discourse. Sci Child Summer 2013:30–35Google Scholar
- Gott R, Roberts R (2008) Concepts of evidence and their role in open-ended practical investigations and scientific literacy; background to published papers. Durham University, DurhamGoogle Scholar
- Gott R, Duggan S, Roberts R, Hussain A (2018) Research into understanding scientific evidence. http://www.dur.ac.uk/rosalyn.roberts/Evidence/cofev.htm. Accessed June 1, 2019
- Koslowski B (1996) Theory and evidence. The development of Scientific Reasoning. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Kuhn D (2005) Education for thinking. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Kuhn L, Reiser B (2005) Students constructing and defending evidence-based scientific explanations. In: Annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Dallas, EUAGoogle Scholar
- Moore W (2013) The use of evidence in young adolescents’ argumentation. Doctoral Dissertation. Columbia University, USAGoogle Scholar
- Rapanta C (2019) Argumentation strategies in the classoom. Vernon, WilmingtonGoogle Scholar
- Walton D (2001) Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments. Informal Log 21(2):141–169Google Scholar
- Walton D (2004) Relevance in argumentation. John Benjamins Publishing Company, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Zembal-Saul C, McNeill K, Hershberger K (2013) What’s your evidence? Engaging K-5 students in constructing explanations in science. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey, NJGoogle Scholar