Advertisement

Topoi

pp 1–7 | Cite as

Empathic Inaccuracy in Narrative Fiction

  • Suzanne KeenEmail author
Article
  • 12 Downloads

In this essay, I expand upon my previous proposals about empathic inaccuracy: “A reader persuaded that she has felt with a fictional character may defy the stated or implicit intentions of an author.. .. Empathic inaccuracy, to craft a hypothesis out of this circumstance, may then contribute to a strong sense that the author’s perspective is simply wrong” (Keen 2007, pp. 139–40, emphasis in original). I base my definition of empathic inaccuracy on the psychological concept of empathic accuracy, studied by William Ickes and others. This cognitive capacity involves the relative abilities of people correctly to infer others’ dispositions, personality traits, and psychological states, including their thoughts and feelings (Ickes 1993). Empathic accuracy can be stronger or weaker in an individual, and it is usually measured after interviewing subjects and target individuals. Ickes makes the recommendation that “the most straightforward way to measure empathic accuracy is to compare the...

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

I have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Atwood M (2003) Oryx and Crake. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Austen J (1814) Mansfield Park. Egerton, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batson CD (2009) These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In: Decety J, Ickes W (eds) Social neuroscience. The social neuroscience of empathy. MIT Press, Cambridge.  https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom H (1975) A Map of Misreading. Oxford UP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Danticat E (2004) The Dew Breaker. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis MH (1980) A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog Sel Docs in Psychology 10:85Google Scholar
  7. DeMan P (1971) Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. Oxford UP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. DeMan P (1979) Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. Yale UP, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  9. Felski R (2011) Suspicious Minds. Poetics Today 32.2:215–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forster EM (1927) Aspects of the Novel. Harcourt, Brace & World, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Freud S (1907) Creative Writers and Day-Dreaming. In: Strachey J (ed) Standard Edn Complete Psychological Works Sigmund Freud, vol 9. 1959. Hogarth P and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallagher C (1995) Nobody’s Story: The Vanishing Acts of Women Writers in the Marketplace, 1670–1920. U California P, BerkeleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ickes W (1993) Empathic Accuracy. J Personality 61:4: 587–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iser W (1972) The Reading Process: a Phenomenological Approach. New Literary Hist 3. 2: 279 – 99Google Scholar
  15. Keen S (2007) Empathy and the Novel. Oxford UP, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keen S (2014) Narrative Empathy. In: Hühn P, Meister JC, Pier J (eds) Handbook of Narratology, vol 2, 2nd edn. DeGruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Keen S (2015) Narrative Form: Revised and Expanded Second Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, HoundmillsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keen S (2018) Twenty-First Century Fictional Experiments with Emotion and Cognition. In: Baumbach S, Neumann B, Nünning A (eds) New Approaches to the 21st-century Anglophone Novel. Palgrave Macmillan, HoundmillsGoogle Scholar
  19. Lanser SS (2009) Negative Plotting: Or, The Shadow Knows. Handout accompanying paper presented at International Society for the Study of Narrative Plenary Session, Birmingham, England 4–6 June 2009Google Scholar
  20. McEwan I (2001) Atonement. Jonathan Cape, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosenblatt L (1938) Literature as Exploration. Appleton-Century, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Said E (1993) Culture and Imperialism. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Sternberg M (1982) Proteus in Quotation-Land: Mimesis and the Forms of Reported Discourse. Poetics Today 3.2:107–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor M, Hodges SD, Kohányi A (2003) The Illusion of Independent Agency: Do Adult Fiction Writers Experience Their Characters as Having Minds of Their Own? Imagination Cognition Personality 22(4):361–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wimsatt WK, Beardsley MC (1946) The Intentional Fallacy. Sewanee Rev 54.3: 468–88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hamilton CollegeClintonUSA

Personalised recommendations