Advertisement

Topoi

pp 1–15 | Cite as

The Pre-reflective Situational Self

  • Robert W. Clowes
  • Klaus Gärtner
Article

Abstract

It is often held that to have a conscious experience presupposes having some form of implicit self-awareness. The most dominant phenomenological view usually claims that we essentially perceive experiences as our own. This is the so called “mineness” character, or dimension of experience. According to  this view, mineness is not only essential to conscious experience, it also grounds the idea that pre-reflective self-awareness constitutes a minimal self. In this paper, we show that there are reasons to doubt this constituting role of mineness. We argue that there are alternative possibilities and that the necessity for an adequate theory of the self within psychopathology gives us good reasons to believe that we need a thicker notion of the pre-reflective self. To this end, we develop such a notion: the Pre-Reflective Situational Self. To do so, we will first show how alternative conceptions of pre-reflective self-awareness point to philosophical problems with the standard phenomenological view. We claim that this is mainly due to fact that within the phenomenological account the mineness aspect is implicitly playing several roles. Consequently, we argue that a thin interpretation of pre-reflective self-awareness—based on a thin notion of mineness—cannot do its needed job within, at least within psychopathology. This leads us to believe that a thicker conception of pre-reflective self is needed. We, therefore, develop the notion of the pre-reflective situational self by analyzing the dynamical nature of the relation between self-awareness and the world, specifically through our interactive inhabitation of the social world.

Keywords

Minimal self Pre-reflective self awareness Situatedness Ipseity Schizophrenia Virtual self Predictive processing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Robert W. Clowes’s work is funded by the FCT postdoctoral research fellowship (SFRH/BPD/70440/2010) and the IFILNOVA research fellowship (FCSH/NOVA UID/FIL/00183/2013). Klaus Gärtner’s work is funded by the CFCUL postdoctoral research fellowship (UID/FIL/00678/2013). We would like to thank Anna Ciaunica for her helpful feedback. Also, we would like to thank Steven Gouveia for the possibility to present some of the material at the Third International Conference on Philosophy of Mind “Minds, Brains and Consciousness” at the University of Minho, Braga and the audience for their feedback. Finally, we would also like to thank the Lisbon Mind and Reasoning Group for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Robert W. Clowes and Klaus Gärtner declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants and animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Alsmith AJT (2015) Mental activity and the sense of ownership. Rev Philos Psychol 6(4):881–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell J (2009) Consciousness and reference. In: McLaughlin B, Beckermann A, Walter S (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 648–662Google Scholar
  3. Ciaunica A, Fotopoulou A (2017) The touched self: psychological and philosophical perspectives on proximal intersubjectivity and the self. In: Durt C, Fuchs T, Tewes C (eds) Embodiment, enaction, and culture: investigating the constitution of the shared world. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 173–192Google Scholar
  4. Clark A (2002) Is seeing all it seems? Action, reason and the grand illusion. J Conscious Stud 5–6:181–202Google Scholar
  5. Clark A (2015a) Embodied prediction. In: Metzinger T, Windt JM (eds) Open MIND: 7(T). MIND Group, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark A (2015b) Surfing uncertainty: prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Clowes RW (2015) The reality of the virtual self as interface to the social world. In: Fonseca J, Gonçalves J (eds) Philosophical perspectives on self. Peter Lang, Lisbon, pp 221–276Google Scholar
  8. Clowes RW (2018) Rethinking the ipseity disturbance theory of schizophrenia through predictive processing. In: Hipólito I, Gonçalves J, Pereira JG (eds) Schizophrenia and common sense. Springer, New York, pp 113–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole J, Spalding H (2008) The invisible smile: living without facial expression. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colombetti G (2017) The embodied and situated nature of moods. Philosophia 45(4):1437–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colombetti G, Krueger J (2015) Scaffoldings of the affective mind. Philosophical Psychology 28(8):1157–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Damasio AR (2000) The feeling of what happens: body, emotion and the making of consciousness. Vintage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Damnjanovic N (2012) Revelation and physicalism. Dialectica 66:69–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dennett DC (1991) Consciousness explained. Penguin Books, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  15. Flanagan OJ (1992) Consciousness Reconsidered. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuchs T (2015) Pathologies of intersubjectivity in autism and schizophrenia. J Conscious Stud 22(1–2):191–214Google Scholar
  17. Gallagher S (2000) Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cognit Sci 4(1):14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallagher S (2013) A pattern theory of self. Front Hum Neurosci 7:443.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallagher S, Zahavi D (2015) Phenomenological approaches to self-consciousness. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/self-consciousness-phenomenological/
  20. Gärtner K (2018) Conscious experience and experience externalization. In: Hipólito I, Gonçalves J, Pereira JG (eds) Schizophrenia and common sense: explaining madness and social values. Springer, New York, pp 97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, Garden CityGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldman A (1970) A theory of human action. Prentice-Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Hohwy J (2013) The predictive mind. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hume D (2000) A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (Original work published in 1739)Google Scholar
  25. Hutto D (this issue). Selfless activity and experience: radicalizing minimal self-awareness. TopoiGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnston M (1992) How to speak of the colors. Philos Stud 68:221–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiverstein J (this issue) Free energy and the self: an ecological-enactive interpretation. TopoiGoogle Scholar
  28. Kriegel U (2009) Subjective consciousness. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krueger JW (2011) The who and the how of experience. M. In: Siderits E, Thompson, Zahavi D (eds) Self, no self?: perspectives from analytical, phenomenological, and indian traditions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 27–55Google Scholar
  30. Krueger JW (this issue). Schizophrenia and the Scaffolded Self. TopoiGoogle Scholar
  31. Lane T (2012) Toward an explanatory framework for mental ownership. Phenomenol Cognit Sci 11(2):251–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis D (1995) Should a materialist believe in qualia? Austral J Philos 73:140–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lihoreau F (2014) Revelation and the essentiality of essence. Symposion 1:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linson A, Clark A, Ramamoorthy S, Friston K (2018) The active inference approach to ecological perception: general information dynamics for natural and artificial embodied cognition. Front Robot AI.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lysaker PH, Lysaker JT (2008) Schizophrenia and the fate of the self. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mendonça D (2017) Situating moods. Philosophia 45(4):1453–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Metzinger T (2004) Being no one: the self-model theory of subjectivity. Bradford Book, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Metzinger T (2011) The no-self alternative. In: Gallagher S (ed) The Oxford handbook of the self. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 279–296Google Scholar
  39. Nelson B, Parnas J, Sass LA (2014) Disturbance of minimal self (ipseity) in schizophrenia: clarification and current status. Schizophr Bull 40(3):479–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nida-Rümelin M (2014) Basic intentionality, primitive awareness and awareness of oneself. In: Reboul A (ed) Mind, values, and metaphysics. Springer, New York, pp 261–290Google Scholar
  41. Noë A (2002) Is the visual world a grand illusion? J Conscious Stud 9(5–6):1–12Google Scholar
  42. Noë A (2004) Action in perception. Bradford Books, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Nordgaard J, Parnas J (2014) Self-disorders and the schizophrenia spectrum: a study of 100 first hospital admissions. Schizophr Bull, 1300–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Regan JK (2002) The grand illusion and sensorimotor approaches to consciousness. J Conscious Stud 9(5–6):1–12Google Scholar
  45. O’Regan JK, Noë A (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav Brain Sci 24:939–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parnas J (2003) Self and schizophrenia: a phenomenological perspective. In: Kircher T, David A (eds) The self in neuroscience and psychiatry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 217–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parnas J, Handest P (2003) Phenomenology of anomalous self-experience in early schizophrenia. Compr Psychiatry 44(2):121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parnas J, Sass L (2011) The structure of self-consciousness in schizophrenia. In: Gallagher S (ed) The Oxford handbook of the self. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 521–546Google Scholar
  49. Parnas J, Zahavi D (2002) The role of phenomenology in psychiatric classification and diagnosis. In: Maj M, Gaebel W, Lopez-Ibor JJ, Sartorius N (eds) Psychiatric diagnosis and classification: World Psychiatric Association Series. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 137–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parnas J, Møller P, Kircher T, Thalbitzer J, Jansson L, Handest P, Zahavi D (2005) EASE: examination of anomalous self-experience. Psychopathology 38(5):236–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prinz W (2003) Emerging selves: representational foundations of subjectivity. Conscious Cognit 12(4):515–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ratcliffe M (2017) Real hallucinations: psychiatric illness, intentionality, and the interpersonal world. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Sass LA (2003) Self-disturbance in schizophrenia: hyperreflexivity and diminished self-affection. In: Kircher T, David A (eds) The self in neuroscience and psychiatry, vol 870539117. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Sass LA (2004) Schizophrenia: a disturbance of the thematic field Gurwitsch’s relevancy for cognitive science. Springer, New York, pp 59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sass LA, Parnas J (2003) Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophr Bull 29(3):427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sass LA, Pienkos E, Nelson B, Medford N (2013) Anomalous self-experience in depersonalization and schizophrenia: a comparative investigation. Conscious Cognit 22(2):430–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schechtman M (2011) The narrative self. In: Gallagher S (ed) The Oxford handbook of the self. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 394–416Google Scholar
  58. Seth AK (2013) Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends Cognit Sci 17(11):565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seth AK, Critchley HD (2013) Extending predictive processing to the body: emotion as interoceptive inference. Behav Brain Sci 36(3):227–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seth AK, Suzuki K, Critchley HD (2011) An interoceptive predictive coding model of conscious presence. Front Psychol 2:395Google Scholar
  61. Simons DJ, Rensink RA (2005) Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends Cognit Sci 9(1):16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stoljar D (2009) The argument from revelation. In: Braddon-Mitchell D, Nola R (eds) Conceptual analysis and philosophical naturalism. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 113–138Google Scholar
  63. Williams B (1973) Problems of the self. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zahavi D (2000) Self and consciousness. In: Zahavi D (ed) Exploring the self: philosophical and psychopathological perspectives on self-experience. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zahavi D (2004) Back to Brentano? J Conscious Stud 11(10–11):66–87Google Scholar
  66. Zahavi D (2005) Subjectivity and selfhood: investigating the first-person perspective. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Zahavi D (2014) Self and other: exploring subjectivity, empathy and shame. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zahavi D (2017) Thin, thinner, thinnest: defining the minimal self. In: Durt C, Fuchs T, Tewes C (eds) Embodiment, enaction, and culture: investigating the constitution of the shared world. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 193–199Google Scholar
  69. Zahavi D, Kriegel U (2015) For-me-ness: what it is and what it is not. In: Dahlstrom D, Elpidorou A, Hopp W (eds) Philosophy of mind and phenomenology. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 36–53Google Scholar
  70. Zahavi D, Parnas J (1998) Phenomenal consciousness and self-awareness: a phenomenological critique of representational theory. J Conscious Stud 5:687–705Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nova Institute of Philosophy (IFILNOVA)/Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities of the Universidade Nova de Lisboa (FCSH)LisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Center for Philosophy of Sciences of the University of Lisbon (CFCUL)Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations