Advertisement

Topoi

pp 1–11 | Cite as

The Role of Emotion Modulation in Moral Bioenhancement Debate

  • Karolina Kudlek
Article

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze technical and internal aspects of one particular type of human moral enhancement, i.e. enhancement of moral motivation via direct emotion modulation. More precisely, it challenges the assumption that modifying certain emotions will have the results desired by the advocates of this theory. It is argued that neuropsychological understanding of the role and function of emotions, as well as of underlying cognitive mechanisms, might be relevant for the discussion about biomedical enhancement of moral capacities. Moreover, typical claims about direct emotion modulation seem to be contradicted, or at least seriously challenged, by available neuroscientific data. Particular attention is paid to the theory that emotions are evolved and functionally specialized programs whose task is to coordinate other adaptive mechanisms of human psychology in order to promote one’s fitness. If this view of emotions is plausible, it can be argued that several difficulties for moral bioenhancement theory ensue. Neuroscientific and evolutionary-psychological perspective seem to indicate that emotions don’t fulfill necessary requirements to serve as the vehicles of moral enhancement and it should, therefore, take into account role and function of entire cognitive modules associated with moral decision-making.

Keywords

Biomedical moral enhancement Emotions Evolutionary psychology Moral motivation Persson/Savulescu 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my gratitude to anonymous reviewers of the journal Topoi, to my supervisors Tomislav Bracanović and Javier Rodríguez Alcázar, as well as to Petar Bodlović for their valuable comments and insights on earlier versions of this article.  This paper is, also, partially a product of the following research project ​FFI2016-79000-P.

References

  1. Al-Shawaf L et al (2015) Human emotions: an evolutionary psychological perspective. Emotion Rev. doi: 10.1177/1754073914565518 Google Scholar
  2. Bartz JA, Zaki J, Bolger N, Ochsner KN (2011) Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. Trends Cogn Sci 15:301–309Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan A (2011) Beyond humanity. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buss D (2005) The handbook of evolutionary psychology. 2nd edn, Volume 1, Foundations. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss D (2007) Evolutionary psychology—the new science of the mind. 3rd edition. Pearson Education, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. Confer JC et al (2010) Evolutionary psychology: controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. Am Psychol 65(2):110–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cosmides L, Tooby J (2000) Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM (eds) Handbook of emotions, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 91–115Google Scholar
  8. Crockett MJ (2014) Moral bioenhancement: a neuroscientific perspective. J Med Ethics 40(6):370–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crockett MJ et al (2013) Serotonin modulates striatal responses to fairness and retaliation in humans. J Neurosci 33(8):3505–3513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cushman F, Young L, Greene JD (2010) Multi-system moral psychology. In: Doris JM (ed) The moral psychology handbook. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. De Dreu CKW (2011) Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:1262–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Dreu CKW et al (2010) The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science 328:1408–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeGrazia D (2014) Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behavior. J Med Ethics 40:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doris JM (2010) The moral psychology handbook. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Douglas T (2008) Moral enhancement. J Appl Philos 25(3):228–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Douglas T (2013) Moral enhancement via direct emotion modulation: a reply to John Harris. Bioethics 27(3):160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris J (2013) Moral progress and moral enhancement. Bioethics 27(5):285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jebari K (2014) What to enhance: behaviour, emotion or disposition? Neuroethics 7:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jotterand F (2011) ‘Virtue engineering’ and moral agency: will post-humans still need the virtues? AJOB Neurosci 2(4):3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435:673–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis M et al (2008) Handbook of Emotions. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Nesse RM (1990) Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Human Nat 1(3):261–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nesse RM (1991) What good is feeling bad?: the evolutionary benefits of psychic pain. Science 30–37Google Scholar
  24. Nesse RM, Williams GC (1994) Why we get sick. Times Books Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Panksepp J, Panksepp JB (2000) The seven sins of evolutionary psychology. Evol Cognit 6(2):108–131Google Scholar
  26. Persson I, Savulescu J (2008) The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. J Appl Philos 25(3):162–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Persson I, Savulescu J (2011) Getting moral enhancement right: the desirability of moral bioenhancement. Bioethics 27(3):124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Persson I, Savulescu J (2012) Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Persson I, Savulescu J (2015) Summary of Unfit for the future. J Med Ethics 41(4):338–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prinz JJ, Nichols S (2010) Moral Emotions. In: Doris JM (ed) The moral psychology handbook. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Radke S, de Bruijn ERA (2012) The other side of the coin: oxytocin decreases the adherence to fairness norms. Front Human Neurosci 6(193):1–7Google Scholar
  32. Schnall S, Haidt J, Clore G (2008) Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 34:1096–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shook JR (2012) Neuroethics and the possible types of moral enhancement. AJOB Neurosci 3(4):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Specker J, Focquaert F, Raus K, Sterckx S, Schermer M (2014) The ethical desirability of moral bioenhancement: a review of reasons. BMC Med Ethics 15:67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stich S, Doris JM, Roedder E (2010) Evolutionary vs. Psychological Altruism. In: Doris JM (ed) The moral psychology handbook. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Tooby, J (1985) The emergence of evolutionary psychology. In D. Pines (ed), Emerging syntheses in science: proceedings of the founding workshops of the Santa Fe Institute. NM: Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  37. Tooby J, Cosmides L (1990) The past explains the present: emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethol Sociobiol 11:375–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tooby J, Cosmides L (2008) The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barrett L (eds) Handbook of emotions. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 114–137Google Scholar
  39. Zak PJ, Kurzban R, Matznera WT (2004) The neurobiology of trust. Ann NY Acad Sci 1032: 224–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Croatian StudiesUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy IUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations