, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 183–195 | Cite as

Strong Epistemic Possibility and Evidentiality

  • Katrina PrzyjemskiEmail author


The paper distinguishes between weak and strong epistemic possibility and argues that the notion of strong epistemic possibility is the key to solving some of the most vexing puzzles about the semantics of epistemic modality.


Modality Evidence Disagreement Epistemic modality Epistemic possibility Epistemic necessity 


  1. Brayshaw TC (1965) Native poplars of southern Alberta and their hybrids. Publication 1109. Canada Department of Forests, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  2. Coleman T (2004) The Nelson touch: the life and legend of Horatio Nelson. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Cossins A (2013) The legacy of the Makin case 120 years on. Syd Law Rev 35:731Google Scholar
  4. Court of Appeals of North Carolina (2002) STATE of North Carolina v. Harry REED, Jr. No COA01-1371. 15 Oct 2002Google Scholar
  5. DeRose K (1991) Epistemic possibilities. Philos Rev 100(4):581–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dorr C, Hawthorne J (2013) Embedding epistemic modals. Mind 122(488):867–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hacking, I (1967) Possibility. Philos Rev 76:143–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harper K, Shane J, Jones J (1985) Aspen ecology and management in the Western United States. US DOA General Technical Report RM-119Google Scholar
  9. Kiefer F (1984) Focus and modality. In: Abraham W, de Mey S (eds) Papers from the 6th Groninger grammar talks on ‘topic, focus and configurationality’, vols 1, 24, pp 55–81. 6–8 Apr 1984. GAGLGoogle Scholar
  10. Kratzer A (1981) The notional category of modality. In: Eikmeyer HJ, Rieser H (eds) Words, worlds, and contexts. New approaches in word semantics. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 38–74Google Scholar
  11. Kratzer A (1991) Modality. In: von Stechow A, Wunderlich D (eds) Semantics: an international handbook of contemporary research. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 639–650Google Scholar
  12. Lasersohn P (2005) Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguist Philos 28:643–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lasersohn P (2008) Quantification and perspective in relativist semantics. Philos Perspect 22(1):305–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lyons J (1977) Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacFarlane J (2011) Epistemic modals are assessment-sensitive. In: Egan A, Weatherson B (eds) Epistemic modality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 144–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mackey R (2014) War crimes experts call Syrian defector’s photographs ‘Direct Evidence’ of Assad’s ‘Killing Machine’. New York Times Blog, 20 Jan 2014Google Scholar
  17. Ornstein N (2014) The U.S. Needs a Constitutional Right to Vote. THEATLANTIC.COM.
  18. Richard M (2004) Contextualism and relativism. Philos Stud 119(1-2):215–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ronald WG, Lenz LM, Cumming WA (1973) Biosystematics of the genus Populus LI Distribution and morphology of native Manitoba species and variants. Canad J Bot 51(12):2431–2442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stephenson T (2007) A Parallel account of epistemic modals and predicates of personal taste. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11:583–597Google Scholar
  21. Switek B (2012) Did dinosaurs swim? SMITHSONIAN.COM.
  22. von Fintel K, Gillies S (2008) CIA leaks. Philos Rev 117(1):77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. von Fintel K, Gillies A (2011) Might made right. In: Egan A, Weatherson B (eds) Epistemic modality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 108–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. von Fintel K, Iatridou S (2008) How to say ought in foreign: the composition of weak necessity modals. In: Guéron J, Lecarme J (eds) Time and modality. Springer, Berlin, pp. 115–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. von Hacquard V (2009) Modality. In: von Heusinger K, Maienborn C, Portner P (eds) Semantics, vol 2. de Gruyte, Berlin, pp 1484–1514Google Scholar
  26. von Wright GH (1963) Norm and action. A logical inquiry. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Westmoreland RR (1998) Information and intonation in natural language modality. PhD thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  28. Yalcin S (2011) Nonfactualism about epistemic modality. In: Egan A, Weatherson B (eds) Epistemic modality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 295–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yalcin S, Knobe J (2010) Fat Tony might be dead: an experimental note on epistemic modals. Unpublished manuscript.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations