, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 249–255 | Cite as

Perceiving Multiple Locations in Time: A Phenomenological Defence of Tenseless Theory

  • Sean Enda PowerEmail author


It is a common claim that one concept of time, tenseless theory, is in greater conflict with how the world seems to us (with the phenomenology) than the competing theories of tense theory and presentism. This paper offers at least one counter-example to that claim. Here, it is argued that tenseless theory fares better than its competitors in capturing the phenomenology in particular cases of perception. These cases are where the visual phenomenology is of events occurring together which must be occurring at different times. The commitments of matching such phenomenology in one’s ontology undermine tense theory and presentism and support tenseless theory.


Metaphysics of time Experience of time Eternalism Presentism Tenseless theory Tense theory 



Many thanks to anonymous reviewers who provided extensive suggestions and advice. Many of the thoughts here come from discussions with colleagues in Philosophy at University College Cork; in particular, my thanks to Julia Jansen, Lilian O’Brien and Joel Walmsley. And also from discussions with members of the TIMELY interdisciplinary research group; in particular, Valtteri Arstila, Bruno Mulder and Marc Wittmann. I am also grateful for general discussions with Robin Le Poidevin and Grace Weir. Lastly, a version of this paper was presented at a 2014 Trinity College Dublin Philosophy Colloquium, and I appreciate the very thought-provoking questions from attendees.


  1. Callender C (2008) The common now. Philosophical 18:339–361Google Scholar
  2. Craig WL (1998) McTaggart’s paradox and the problem of temporary intrinsics. Analysis 58(2):122–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dainton B (2000) Stream of consciousness: unity and continuity in conscious experience. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Le Poidevin R (2004) The experience and perception of time. In: Zalta EN (Ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2004 Edition), Cited 15th Oct 2013
  5. Le Poidevin R (2007) Images of time. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Loizou A (1986) The reality of time. Gower, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  7. McTaggart JME (1908) The unreality of time. Mind New Ser 17(68):457–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mellor DH (1998) Real time II. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Power SE (2012) The metaphysics of ‘the specious present’. Erkenntnis 77(1):121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Power SE (2013) Perceiving external things and the time-lag argument. Euro J Philos 21(1):94–117Google Scholar
  11. Prior AN (1959) Thank goodness that’s over. Philosophy 34(128):12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schlesinger GN (1991) E Pur Si Muove. Philos Q 41(165):427–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sider T (2003) Four-dimensionalism: an ontology of persistence and time. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Tallant J (2008) What is it to “B” a relation? Synthese 162(1):117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wittmann M (2011) Moments in time. Front Integr Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00066 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations