, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 161–171 | Cite as

Is There a Philosophy of Information?

  • Fred Adams
  • João Antonio de Moraes


In 2002, Luciano Floridi published a paper called What is the Philosophy of Information?, where he argues for a new paradigm in philosophical research. To what extent should his proposal be accepted? Is the Philosophy of Information actually a new paradigm, in the Kuhninan sense, in Philosophy? Or is it only a new branch of Epistemology? In our discussion we will argue in defense of Floridi’s proposal. We believe that Philosophy of Information has the types of features had by other areas already acknowledge as authentic in Philosophy. By way of an analogical argument we will argue that since Philosophy of Information has its own topics, method and problems it would be counter-intuitive not to accept it as a new philosophical area. To strengthen our position we present and discuss main topics of Philosophy of Information.


Information Knowledge Meaning Qualia Ethics Floridi Dretske 


  1. Abrantes P (2004) Naturalismo em filosofia da mente. In: Ferreira A, Gonzalez MEQ, Coelho JG (Org.) Encontro com as ciências cognitivas, vol 4. UNESP, Marília, pp 5–37Google Scholar
  2. Adams F (2003) The informational turn in philosophy. Minds Mach 13:471–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams F (2004) Knowledge. In: Floridi L (ed) The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 228–236Google Scholar
  4. Adriaans P, Van Benthem J (eds) (2008) Philosophy of information: handbook of the philosophy of science. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Allo P (ed) (2011) Putting information first: Luciano Floridi and the philosophy of information. Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Beavers AF, Jones D (eds) (2014) Philosophy in the age of information: a symposium on Luciano Floridi’s the philosophy of information. In: Mind and Machines, 24(1):1–141Google Scholar
  7. Boolos G (1987) The consistency of Frege’s foundations of arithmetic. In: Boolos G (ed) Logic, logic, and logic. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 183–201Google Scholar
  8. Brey P (2011) Global information ethics and the challenge of cultural relativism.
  9. Capurro R (2005) Privacy. An intercultural perspective. Ethics Inf Technol 7:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capurro R (2006) Towards an ontological foundation of Information Ethics. Ethics Inf Technol 8(4):175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Capurro R (2010) Desafíos téoricos y practicos de la ética intercultural de la información. In: E-Book do I Simpósio Brasileiro de Ética da Informação. Idea, João Pessoa, pp 11–51Google Scholar
  12. Chalmers DJ (1996) The conscious mind. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. DeCew J (2006) Privacy. In: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
  14. Demir H (ed) (2012) Luciano Floridi’s philosophy of technology, vol 8. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Dretske F (1981) Knowledge and the flow of information. Blackwell Publisher, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Dretske F (1992) Explaining behavior: reasons in a world of causes. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Dretske F (1995) Naturalizing the mind. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Ess C (2006) Ethical pluralism and global information ethics. Ethics Inf Technol 8:215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ess C (2008) Culture and global networks. Hope for a global ethics? In: van den Hoven J, Weckert J (eds) Information technology and moral philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 195–225Google Scholar
  20. Floridi L (1999) Information ethics: on the philosophical foundation of computer ethics. Ethics Inf Technol 1:37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Floridi L (2002) What is the philosophy of information. Metaphilosophy 33(1–2):123–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Floridi L (2004) Open problems in the philosophy of information. Metaphilosophy 35(4):554–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Floridi L (2005a) Per una filosofia dell’infarmazione. Epistemologia XXVIII:283–292Google Scholar
  24. Floridi L (2005b) La Filosofia dell’informazione e i suoi problemi. Iride 45:291–312Google Scholar
  25. Floridi L (2005c) The ontological interpretation of informational privacy. Ethics Inf Technol 7:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Floridi L (2006) Four challenges for a theory of information privacy. Ethics Inf Technol 8:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Floridi L (2008a) Information ethics: its nature and scope. In: van den Hoven J, Weckert J (eds) Information technology and moral philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 40–65Google Scholar
  28. Floridi L (ed) (2008b) The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of information and computing. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Floridi L (2008c) Trends in the philosophy of information. In: Adriaans P, Benthem JFAKV (eds) Handbook of philosophy of information, vol 8. North-Holland, London, pp 113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Floridi L (2008d) Understanding epistemic relevance. Erkenntnis 69(1):69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Floridi L (2009a) Philosophical conceptions of information. In: Giovanni S (ed) Formal theories of information. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Floridi L (2009b) The information society and its philosophy: introduction to the special issue on “the philosophy of information, its nature and future developments”. Inf Soc Int J 25(3):153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Floridi L (2011) The philosophy of information. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Floridi L (2012) Turing’s three philosophical lesson and the philosophy of information. Philos Transcr A 370:3536–3542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Floridi L (2013a) The ethics of information. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Floridi L (2013b) What is a philosophical question? Metaphilosophy 44(3):195–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fodor JA (1990) A theory of content and other essays. MIT/Bradford, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Frege G (1990) The foundations of arithmetic. A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, 1984Google Scholar
  39. Gibson JJ (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  40. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  41. Gleick J (2011) The information: a history, a theory, a flood. Fourth Estate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Gonzalez MEQ, Moraes JA (forthcoming) Complexidade e privacidade informacional: um estudo na perspectiva sistêmica. In: Gonzalez MEQ, Pellegrini AM, Andrade RCS (Orgs.) Auto-Organização: estudos interdiscilinares. Campinas, UNICAMP, v. 0, pp 00–00. Coleção CLEGoogle Scholar
  43. Gonzalez MEQ, Nascimento TCA, Haselager WFG (2004) Informação e conhecimento: notas para uma taxonomia da informação. In: Ferreira A, Gonzalez MEQ, Coelho JG (Orgs) Encontro com as ciências cognitivas, 4. Cultura Acadêmica, São Paulo, pp 195–220Google Scholar
  44. Griffiths P (2008) Philosophy of biology. In: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
  45. Hale B, Wright C (2001) The reason’s proper study: essays towards a Neo-Fregean philosophy of mathematics. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hilbert D (1983) On the infinite. In: Benacerraf P, Putnam H (eds) Philosophy of mathematics: selected readings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 183–201Google Scholar
  47. Himma KE (2008) The intercultural ethics agenda from the point of view of a moral objectivist. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc 6(2):101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Horsten L (2012) Philosophy of mathematics. In: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
  49. Levine J (1983) Materialism and qualia: the explanatory gap. Pac Philos Q 64:354–361Google Scholar
  50. Moraes JA (2012) Implicações éticas da “virada informacional na Filosofia”. UNESP, 2012. (Master’s Degree Thesis)Google Scholar
  51. Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review 4(LXXXIII):435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nissenbaum H (2001) Securing trust online: Wisdom or oxymoron. Boston Univ Law Rev 81(3):635–664Google Scholar
  53. Quilici-Gonzalez JA, Kobayashi G, Broens MC, Gonzalez MEQ (2010) Ubiquitous computing: any ethical implications? Int J Technoeth 1:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Russell B (1902) Letter to Frege. In: van Heijenoort J (ed) From Frege to Gödel: a source book in mathematical logic (1879–1931). Cambridge, Harvard University Press, pp 124–125, 1967Google Scholar
  55. Schoeman F (ed) (1984) Philosophical dimensions of privacy: an anthology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Shannon C, Weaver W (1998) A mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1998 (1st edn 1949)Google Scholar
  57. Sober E (2008) Core questions in philosophy. Pearson, Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  58. Stonier T (1990) Information and the internal structure of the universe. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59:433–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tye M (1995) Ten problems of consciousness: a representational theory of the phenomenal mind. MIT Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  61. van Atten M (2004) On Brouwer. Wadsworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Warren S, Brandeis L (1890) The right to privacy. Harvard Law Rev 4:193–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiener N (1965) Cybernetics, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1948Google Scholar
  64. Wiener N (1968) The human use of human beings: cybernetics and society. Sphere Books LTD, London, 1954Google Scholar
  65. Wright C (1983) Frege’s conception of numbers as objects. Aberdeen University Press, AberdeenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations