Advertisement

Topoi

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 283–294 | Cite as

A New Taxonomy of Persisting (Relativistic) Objects

  • Claudio Calosi
  • Vincenzo Fano
Article
  • 175 Downloads

Abstract

The paper presents a thorough exploration of the problem of persistence in a relativistic context. Using formal methods such as mereology, formal theories of location and the so called intrinsic formulation of special relativity we provide a new, more rigorous and more comprehensive taxonomy of persisting entities. This new taxonomy differs significantly from the ones that are present in the recent literature.

Keywords

Persistence Mereology Location Minkowski Spacetime 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are deeply grateful to Cody Gilmore, Yuri Balashov, Mark Hinchliff, Fred Muller, Dennis Dieks, Andrea Bottani, Giuliano Torrengo and Stefano Bordoni for their invaluable help in commenting and discussing the various drafts of the paper. We also want to thank an anonymous referee of this journal whose careful and insightful comments improved the paper greatly.

References

  1. Balashov Y (2008) Persistence and multilocation in spacetime. In: Dieks D (ed) The ontology of spacetime, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 59–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balashov Y (2010) Persistence and spacetime. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casati R, Varzi A (1999) Parts and places. The structure of spatial representation. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Colosi D, Doplcher L, Fairbairn W, Modesto L, Noui K, Rovelli C (2005) Background independence in a nutshell. Class Quantum Gravity 22:85–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donnelly M (2010) Parthood and multi-location. Oxf Stud Metaphys 5:203–243Google Scholar
  6. Gibson I, Pooley O (2006) Relativistic persistence. Philos Perspect 20:157–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilmore C (2006) Where in the relativistic world are we? Philos Perspect 23:199–236Google Scholar
  8. Gilmore C (2007) Time travel, coinciding objects and persistence. Oxf Stud Metaphys 3:177–198Google Scholar
  9. Gilmore C (2008) Persistence and location in relativistic spacetime. Philos Compass 3(6):1224–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilmore C (2009) Why parthood might be a four place relation and how it behaves if it is. In: Honnefelder L, Schick B (eds) Unity and time in metaphysics. De Gruiter, Berlin, pp 83–133Google Scholar
  11. Gilmore C (2013) Location and mereology. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/location-mereology/
  12. Hawthorne J (2008) Three-dimensionalism vs four-dimensionalism. In: Sider T, Hawthorne J, Zimmerman D (eds) Contemporary debates in metaphysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 263–282Google Scholar
  13. Hudson H (2001) A materialist metaphysics of the human person. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  14. Ladyman J, Ross D (2007) Every thing must go. Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lang M (2002) An introduction to the philosophy of physics: locality, fields, energy and mass. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis D (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Basic Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Malament D (2007) Classical relativity theory. In: Earman J, Butterfield J (eds) Philosophy of physics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 229–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malament D (2009) Geometry and spacetime. Available at: http://www.lps.uci.edu/malament/geometryspacetimedocs/GST.pdf
  19. Markosian N (1998) Simples. Australas J Philos 76:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maudlin T (2007) The metaphysics within physics. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McDaniel K (2007) Extended Simples. Philos Stud 133:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merricks T (2005) On the incompatibility of enduring and perduring entities. Mind 104:523–531Google Scholar
  23. Minkowski H [1908] (1952) Space and time. In: Lorentz HA, Einstein A, Minkowski H, Weyl H (eds) Principle of relativity. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Parsons J (2006) Theories of locations. Oxf Stud Metaphys 3:201–232Google Scholar
  25. Rindler W (1991) Introduction to special relativity, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Sattig T (2006) The language and reality of time. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saucedo R (2011) Parthood and location. Oxf Stud Metaphys 6:225–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scala M (2002) Homogeneous simples. Philos Phenomenol Res 64:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schaffer J (2009) Spacetime the one substance. Philos Stud 145:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schutz B (1985) A first course in general relativity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Sider T (2001) Four-dimensionalism: an ontology of persistence and time. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simons P (1987) Parts. A study in ontology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Stein H (1968) On Einstein–Minkowski spacetime. J Philos 65:5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Inwagen P (1981) The doctrine of arbitrary undetached parts. Pac Philos Quart 62:123–137 (reprinted in Rea M (ed.) Material constitution. Rowman & Littlefield, Boston, pp 191–208Google Scholar
  35. Van Inwagen P (1990) Four-dimensional objects. Noûs 24:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Varzi A (2009) Mereology. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mereology/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foundations of ScienceUniversity of UrbinoUrbinoItaly

Personalised recommendations