Topoi

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 243–253 | Cite as

Varieties of Empathy and Moral Agency

Article
First Online:

Abstract

Contemporary literature includes a wide variety of definitions of empathy. At the same time, the revival of sentimentalism has proposed that empathy serves as a necessary criterion of moral agency. The paper explores four common definitions in order to map out which of them best serves such agency. Historical figures are used as the backdrop against which contemporary literature is analysed. David Hume’s philosophy is linked to contemporary notions of affective and cognitive empathy, Adam Smith’s philosophy to projective empathy, and Max Scheler’s account to embodied empathy. Whereas cognitive and projective empathy suffer from detachment and atomism, thereby providing poor support for the type of other-directedness and openness entailed by moral agency, embodied and affective empathy intrinsically facilitate these factors, and hence are viewed as fruitful candidates. However, the theory of affective empathy struggles to explain why the experience of empathy includes more than pure affective mimicry, whilst embodied empathy fails to take into account forms of empathy that do not include contextual, narrative information. In order to navigate through these difficulties, Edith Stein’s take on non-primordial experience is used as a base upon which a definition of affective empathy, inclusive of an embodied dimension, and founded on a movement between resonation and response, is sketched. It is argued that, of the four candidates, this new definition best facilitates moral agency.

Keywords

Empathy Affective empathy Embodiment Resonation Moral psychology 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S (2004) The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism and normal sex differences. J Autism Dev Disord 34:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blair R (2005) Responding to the emotions of others: dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Conscious Cogn 14:698–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blair R (2008) Fine cute of empathy and amygdale: dissociable deficits in psychopathy and autism. Q J Exp Psychol 61(1):157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blum L (1988) Gilligan and Kohlberg: implications for moral theory. Ethics 98(3):472–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Book AS, Quinsey VL, Langford D (2006) Psychopathy and the perception of affect and vulnerability. Crim Justice Behav XX(X):1–21Google Scholar
  6. Batson D, Chang, J, Orr R, Rowland J (2002) Empathy, attitudes, and action: can feeling for a member of a stigmatised group motivate one to help the group? Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28(12):1656–1666Google Scholar
  7. Churchland P (2011) Brainstorm. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole J (2001) Empathy needs a face. In: Thompson E (ed) Between ourselves: second-person issues in the study of consciousness. Imprint Academic, ThorvertonGoogle Scholar
  9. Day A, Casey S, Gerace A (2010) Interventions to improve empathy in sexual and violent offenders: conceptual, empirical, and clinical issues. Aggress Violent Behav 15:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Waal F (2008) Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annu Rev Psychol 59:279–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Decety J, Ickes W (eds) (2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Decety J, Jackson P (2004) The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3(2):71–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Decety J, Jackson P (2006) A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15:54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doherty W (1997) The emotional contagion scale: a measure of individual differences. J Nonverbal Behav 21(2):131–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dziobek I, Rogers K, Hassenstab J, Wolf O, Convit A (2007) Who cares? Revisiting empathy in Asperger syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord 37:709–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallagher S (2012) Empathy, simulation and narrative. Sci Context 25(3):355–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldie P (2000) The emotions: a philosophical exploration. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldman A (2009) Mirroring, simulation and mindreading. Mind Lang 24(2):235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gordon RM (1995) Sympathy, simulation and the impartial spectator. Ethics 105:727–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hatfield E, Cacioppo J, Rapson R (1994) Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffman M (1990) Empathy and justice motivation. Motiv Emot 14:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hume D (1969) A treatise on human nature. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Husserl E (1989) Ideas second book: pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (trans: Rojcewicz R, Schuwer A). Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  24. Levinas E (1969) Totality and Infinity. Duquesne University Press, PittsburgGoogle Scholar
  25. McGreer V (2008) Varieties of moral agency: lessons from autism (and psychopathy). In: Sinnott-Armstrong W (ed) Moral psychology: the neuroscience of morality, vol 3. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Mullins-Nelson J, Randall TS, Leistico A-M (2006) Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: implications for the successful psychopathy concept. Int J Forensic Ment Health 5(2):133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nilsson P (2003) Empathy and emotions: on the notion of empathy as emotional sharing. Umea Stud Philos 7Google Scholar
  28. Nussbaum M (2001) The upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prinz J (2006) The emotional basis of moral judgments. Philos Explor 9(1):29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rick J (2007) Hume’s and Smith’s partial sympathies and impartial stances. J Scott Philos 5(2):135–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ritter K, Dziobek I et al (2011) Lack of empathy in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Psychiatry Res 187:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scheler M (1979) The nature of sympathy. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Slote M (2007) The ethics of care and empathy. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith A (2006) Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behaviour and evolution. Psychol Rec 56:3–21Google Scholar
  35. Smith A (2009) The theory of moral sentiments. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Stein E (1989) On the problem of empathy (trans: Stein W). ISC, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Vignemont F, Frith U (2008) Autism, morality and empathy. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W (ed) Moral psychology: the neuroscience of morality, vol 3. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 273–280Google Scholar
  38. Volbrecht M, Lemery-Chalfant K, Aksan N, Zahn-Waxler C, Goldsmith H (2007) Examining the familial link between positive affect and empathy development in the second year. J Genet Psychol 168(2):105–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zahavi D (2007) Expression and empathy. In: Hutto D, Ratcliffe M (eds) Folk psychology re-assessed. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zahavi D (2008) Simulation, projection and empathy. Conscious Cogn 17:514–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland

Personalised recommendations