Topoi

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 209–220 | Cite as

Capacity and Potentiality: Aristotle’s Metaphysics Θ.6–7 from the Perspective of the De Anima

Article

Abstract

The notion of a capacity (dunamis) in the sense of a power to bring about or undergo change plays a key role in Aristotle’s theories about the natural world. However, in Metaphysics Θ Aristotle also extends ‘capacity’, and the corresponding concept of ‘activity’ (energeia), to cases where we want to say that something is in capacity, or in activity, such and such but not, or not directly, in virtue of being capable of initiating or undergoing change. This paper seeks to clarify and confirm a certain view of how Aristotle wishes us to see the relationship between the two uses of ‘capacity’ and ‘activity’. To that end, I consider also Aristotle’s employment of the terms in the De Anima, which sheds light on the key examples which direct the discussion in Metaph. Θ.

Keywords

Capacity (dunamisActivity (energeiaFulfilment (entelekheiaChange Body-soul relationship Instrument Teleology 

References

  1. Beere J (2009) Doing and being—an interpretation of Aristotle’s metaphysics theta. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowin J (2011) Aristotle on various types of alteration in De Anima II.5. Phronesis 56:138–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnyeat MF (2002) De Anima II.5. Phronesis 47:28–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charles D (2010) Metaphysics Θ. 7 and 8: some issues concerning actuality and potentiality. In: Bolton R, Lennox J (eds) Being, nature, and life in Aristotle. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Foster K, Humphries S (eds) (1951) Thomas aquinas: commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  6. Frede M (1994) Aristotle’s notion of potentiality in metaphysics Θ. In: Scaltsas T, Charles D, Gill ML (eds) Unity, identity, and explanation in Aristotle’s metaphysics. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Heinaman R (2007) Actuality, potentiality and De Anima II.5. Phronesis 52:139–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johansen TK (2012) The powers of Aristotle’s soul. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Lorenz H (2007) The assimilation of sense to sense object in Aristotle. Oxf Stud Anc Philos 33:183Google Scholar
  10. Makin S (2006) Aristotle. Metaphysics book Θ. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Philosophy, Brasenose CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations