, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 29–39 | Cite as

Intuition and Visualization in Mathematical Problem Solving

  • Valeria GiardinoEmail author


In this article, I will discuss the relationship between mathematical intuition and mathematical visualization. I will argue that in order to investigate this relationship, it is necessary to consider mathematical activity as a complex phenomenon, which involves many different cognitive resources. I will focus on two kinds of danger in recurring to visualization and I will show that they are not a good reason to conclude that visualization is not reliable, if we consider its use in mathematical practice. Then, I will give an example of mathematical reasoning with a figure, and show that both visualization and intuition are involved. I claim that mathematical intuition depends on background knowledge and expertise, and that it allows to see the generality of the conclusions obtained by means of visualization.


Mathematical intuition Mathematical visualization Diagrammatic reasoning Problem-solving 



I thank Roberto Casati, Davide Crippa, Leon Horsten, John Mumma, and Mario Piazza for their useful suggestions on a first draft of the article. The research was supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program ([FP7/2007-2013] under a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship for Career Development, contract number no. 220686—DBR (Diagram-based Reasoning).


  1. Barwise J, Etchemendy J (1996) Visual information and valid reasoning. In: Allwein G, Barwise J (eds) Logical reasoning with diagrams. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–25Google Scholar
  2. Bråting K, Pejlare J (2008) Visualizations in mathematics. Erkenntnis 68(3):345–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cantor G (1915) Contributions to the founding of the theory of transfinite numbers (transl: Jourdain PEB). Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Feferman S (2000) Mathematical intuition vs. mathematical monsters. Synthese 125:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischbein E (1987) Intuition in science and mathematics. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Giardino V, Piazza M (2008) Senza Parole. Ragionare con le Immagini. Milan, BompianiGoogle Scholar
  7. Gödel K (1986) Collected works. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Hadamard J (1945) An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein F (2004) Elementary mathematics from an advanced standpoint (transl: Hedrick ER, Noble CAM). Courier Dover Publications. The first German edition is 1908Google Scholar
  10. Mancosu P (2001) Mathematical explanation: problems and prospects. Topoi 20:97–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mancosu P (2005) Visualization in logic and mathematics. In Mancosu P, Jørgensen KF, Pedersen SA (eds) Visualization, explanation and reasoning styles in mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nelsen R (1997) Proofs without words: exercises in visual thinking. The Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Nelsen R (2001) Proofs without words II: more exercises in visual thinking. The Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Netz R (1999) The shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics: a study in cognitive history. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Polya G (1945) How to solve it. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Rota GC (1997) The phenomenology of mathematical proof. In: Kamamori A (ed) Proof and progress in mathematics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 183–196Google Scholar
  17. Shin S-J (1994) The logical status of diagrams. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Shin S-J (2004) Heterogenous reasoning and its logic. The Bullettin of Symbolic Logic 10:86–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Jean NicodCNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations