Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 61, Issue 12–13, pp 1263–1273 | Cite as

Morphology Conserving High Efficiency Nitrogen Doping of Titanate Nanotubes by NH3 Plasma

  • Balázs Buchholcz
  • Kamilla Plank
  • Miklós Mohai
  • Ákos Kukovecz
  • János Kiss
  • Imre Bertóti
  • Zoltán Kónya
Original Paper


Titanate nanotubes offer certain benefits like high specific surface area, anisotropic mesoporous structure and ease of synthesis over other nanostructured titania forms. However, their application in visible light driven photocatalysis is hindered by their wide band-gap, which can be remedied by, e.g., anionic doping. Here we report on a systematic study to insert nitrogen into lattice positions in titanate nanotubes. The efficiency of N2+ bombardment, N2 plasma and NH3 plasma treatment is compared to that of NH3 gas synthesized in situ by the thermal decomposition of urea or NH4F. N2+ bombarded single crystalline rutile TiO2 was used as a doping benchmark (16 at.% N incorporated). Surface species were identified by diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy, structural features were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction measurements. The local chemical environment of nitrogen built into the nanotube samples was probed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Positively charged NH3 plasma treatment offered the best doping performance. This process succeeded in inserting 20 at.% N into nanotube lattice positions by replacing oxygen and forming Ti–N bonds. Remarkably, the nanotubular morphology and titanate crystal structure were both fully conserved during the process. Since plasma treatment is a readily scalable technology, the suggested method could be utilized in developing efficient visible light driven photocatalysts based on N-doped titanate nanotubes.


Titanate nanotube N-doping NH3 plasma Morphology Anatase 

1 Introduction

Layered titanate nanotubes (TiONT) have attracted considerable attention in the past two decades because of their relatively high specific surface area and pore volume, interesting open-ended tubular morphology [1, 2] and ability to stabilize metal nanoparticles [3, 4], metal oxides [5] or multicomponent semiconductors on their surface [6]. These properties render TiONTs a potential catalyst or catalyst support in thermal [7, 8] and photo-activated chemical reactions [9, 10, 11]. Moreover, titanate nanotubes can be used as ion-exchangers [12], adsorbents [13] or in different biomedical applications [14, 15]. The chemical formula of TiONTs can be described as Na2Ti3O7 or H2Ti3O7, the latter being the protonated form of the as-synthesized former structure. Peng et al. offered a mixed cationic formula: NaxH2−xTi3O7 [16] that is probably the most appropriate for referring to a general TiONT sample.

TiONTs can be synthesized from a broad variety of titanium-oxides made up of TiO6 octahedra, e.g. anatase, rutile, brookite and certain salts of titanic acid [17, 18]. At the first glance, TiONTs seem to be very different from titanium-dioxides, but actually, there are many similarities in the properties of this titanium-oxide based material and TiO2 [16]. Finding these similarities and differences between TiO2 and TiONT is a key direction in contemporary titania nanostructure research [5].

TiO2 is among the most popular metal-oxide semiconductors in the field of UV-light driven photocatalysis [19, 20, 21, 22]. Its ability to generate electron–hole pairs by incident light with appropriate wavelength and use them in redox reactions makes TiO2 a favorable “green-chemical” catalyst [23]. The anatase and rutile forms of TiO2 have relative large indirect band-gap (Eg) with 3.2 and 3.0 eV, respectively. Electron mobility is higher in anatase than in rutile. Unfortunately, TiO2 absorbs only 6% of solar light in the UV-range, whereas 50% of the energy arriving to the Earth at sea level is between 400 and 700 nm. Many research groups work on developing TiO2-based photocatalysts that are excitable by the lower energy part of electromagnetic spectrum, namely the UV–Vis [24], visible [25] and NIR [26, 27] (near infrared) ranges. Today, several methods are available to prepare TiO2 based visible light photocatalysts, but the ultimate high performance material is yet to be discovered.

Doping is a well-known method to decrease the band gap energy or create mid-gap states in the band structure by incorporating foreign atoms into the lattice [28]. Such dopants can be metallic [29, 30] or non-metallic [31, 32], as well as anionic or cationic [33]. For example, the Cr doping of a rutile lattice facilitates its visible light excitation. According to DFT calculations, this is due to TiO2 electrons being excited either from the valence band (VB) into unoccupied Cr mid-gap states or from partially filled Cr mid-gap states into the conduction band by incident visible light. Gracia et al. [34] revealed that even though the Cr, Fe, V and Co doping of anatase results in a red shift of its light absorption spectrum, this process is not necessarily accompanied by the enhancement of the photocatalytic activity. New levels due to dopants can either promote or hinder the recombination of electron–hole pairs. Some dopants can act as recombination centers, whereas doping with e.g. Fe3+ or V4+ cations brings about longer excited charge carrier lifetimes than those observed in either undoped or Cr, Mn and Co ion modified counterparts [24].

Anionic doping of TiO2 is also an effective way to change its electronic band structure. In 2001, Asahi et al. reported on the nitrogen doping of TiO2 and its enhanced visible light induced photocatalytic activity [35]. The number of publications in this field has increased dramatically since Asahi’s pioneering work. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that Sato et al. have published an interesting study about NOx-doped TiO2 and its photocatalytic activity in visible light back in 1986 [36]. Today this paper is generally agreed to be the very first N-doped TiO2 article for visible light driven (VLD) photocatalysis. Anionic doping by other elements, e.g. B, P, C and S can also tune the optical properties of TiO2 [28]. The general explanation for the effectivity of anionic dopants is that such anions are less electronegative than O, therefore, they push p-states from the VB up into the band-gap when substituted into the lattice. Although these dopants do not affect the thermal stability of TiO2, they can be thermally removed from the system during an annealing process [24]. Unfortunately, the most widespread sol–gel synthesis methods typically involve a final heat-treatment step to achieve well crystallized TiO2 [37].

The thermal stability of titanias depends on their structure. Anatase TiO2 turns into rutile around 600–700 °C [38]. Titanate nanotubes with trititanate structure transform easily into anatase nanorods at ~ 400 °C, then into rutile at 600 °C. The tubular morphology collapses into a non-layered one between 150 and 200 °C but the one dimensional (1D) structure is preserved. Moreover, TiONT is a metastable material with structural water content [16]. The trititanate to anatase phase transition is thermodynamically favored under ambient conditions, but the transition itself takes at least 1.5–2 years. The thermal stability of titanate nanowires (another 1D titanate nanostructure) is superior to that of TiONTs [39, 40], but their low specific surface area and lack of mesoporous channels make them inappropriate candidates for ionic doping. Titanate nanowires can also stabilize metal nanoparticles on their surface [4].

Nitrogen doping of TiO2 is a well-known approach to create mid-gap states [41]. There are so called wet and dry N doping methods. In the case of wet methods, either the dopant source is mixed with the titania precursor solution or the titania particles are mixed with the solution of the dopant compound. Dry methods generally utilize a gas phase dopant source and solid state titania, e.g. solid TiO2 kept in NH3 gas flow at elevated temperature (400–600 °C) [42]. An example for the wet method is stirring tetra-butyl titanate in the presence of ammonia solution and calcining the dried precursor at 350 °C or higher [43]. Different methods result in different nitrogen sites within the titania structure. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) investigations reveal that there are two (or three) main nitrogen types. The peak at 396 eV binding energy in the N1s region corresponds to the substitutional state mentioned above, where N substitutes O in the lattice. Some articles suggest that this is the type of nitrogen responsible for the improved visible light photocatalytic properties of doped TiO2 [24, 30]. The other main N site has its XPS signal around ~ 400 eV. This is the so-called interstitial or embedded N that can also decrease the excitation wavelength. In this case reduced Ti3+ sites stabilized by the N2− or N3− dopants are formed [44]. It should be noted here that adsorbed N-containing specimens also give rise to an XPS peak around 400 eV.

In our previous study we prepared various nitrogen doped titanium-oxide nanoparticles from protonated titanate nanotubes. The dopant source was NH3 gas generated in situ by the thermal decomposition of urea in a closed autoclave in the presence of TiONTs at 200 °C [45]. The structure and morphology of doped TiONTs changed with the reaction time. After 12 h the tubular trititanates were transformed into nitrogen-doped anatase nanoparticles. A similar collapse was observed by Chang et al. in the case of NH4+ ion exchanged TiONT at elevated temperature [46]. Surface NH4+ groups also form during the phase transition. The XPS peak at 396 eV corresponding to Ti–N sites is missing from these spectra, but the ~ 400 eV signal due to adsorbed NHx (including NH3) was observed [41, 47].

Earlier Bertóti investigated N implantation into rutile (110) TiO2 single crystal and other metal-oxide surfaces via 1–5 keV N2+ bombardment [48, 49], which is a highly refined method to investigate nitrogen incorporation into the structure. An oxygen deficient surface formed due to the ion-implantation and metal oxinitride surface developed. The amount of substituted N was equal to that of the reduced oxygen in the lattice [50, 51].

The paramount importance of N-doped TiO2 in visible light photocatalysis necessitates a paradigm shift in research. Ad hoc doping studies need to be replaced by more systematic efforts. The present study is a step in this direction. We present a comparative investigation on the effects of N2+ ion implantation, N2 and NH3 plasma treatments on the structure and morphology of titanate nanotubes and on the chemical states of the built-in nitrogen. Results are compared with those obtained by thermal nitridation where the dopants were urea or NH4F.

2 Experimental

2.1 Synthesis of Titanate Nanotubes

Elongated titanate nanotubes were synthesized by the hydrothermal conversion of TiO2 (99.8% anatase, Sigma–Aldrich) in highly alkaline media. In a typical process, 50 g TiO2 precursor was stirred in 1 L 10 M NaOH (99.3% NaOH, Molar) solution for 1 h. The obtained white solid was kept in a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-lined stainless steel autoclave for 24 h at 130 °C. The reactor was rotated during the synthesis at 3 rpm around its short axis. The product was neutralized by washing with distilled water (2×) and then protonated by washing with 0.01 M HCl solution several times to yield protonated titanate nanotubes (H2Ti3O7). Finally, the remaining acid content was washed out from the system with distilled water and the protonated nanotubes were dried at 60 °C for 48 h in air.

2.1.1 Nitrogen Doping Nitrogen Incorporation by N2 + Ion Bombardment N2 and NH3 Plasma Treatment

Nitrogen was incorporated into titanate nanotubes by N2+ bombardment and from N2 and NH3 plasma. Ion bombardment was performed within the analysis chamber of the XPS instrument, using a Kratos MacroBeam ion gun fed with high (5N) purity N2. The ion beam (spot size of about 2 mm, non mass-selected, incident at mean angle 55° to the surface normal) was rastered over the sample area of about 8 × 8 mm2. The N2+ ions were accelerated by 3 kV, producing N projectiles of 1.5 keV energy. The plasma treatment was performed in the stainless steel sample preparation chamber of the XPS instrument (base pressure < 1 × 10−4 Pa). The high purity N2 (5N) or NH3 flow of a few ml/min (STP) was regulated by a bleeding valve that set the pressure to 5–7 Pa. Constant RF power of 100 W at 13.56 MHz was applied through a matching circuit to a copper coil fixed on the outside of a glass dome attached to the preparation chamber. The sample bias was set to negative values between 100 and 300 V. Treatment time was varied from 5 to 30 min. The sample was transferred to the analysis chamber after treatment without exposing it to the ambient air. Thermally Activated Nitrogen Incorporation Method

Two kinds of thermally activated doping processes were applied. Firstly, urea was used as dopant source as reported earlier [45]. In this setup, 12 g urea (99.46%, Molar) and 1 g titanate nanotubes were kept in a PTFE-lined stainless steel autoclave, where the two compounds were separated from each other by a cylindrical PTFE spacer. The system was kept at 200 °C for 24 h. The thermal decomposition of urea yielded the NH3 gas that acted as the effective nitrogen dopant source.

The second thermal doping method was similar to the previous one. The same system was used to modify the nanotubes, however, 15 g NH4F was used instead of urea to dope 0.5 g of titanate nanotubes. In this case, thermal decomposition simultaneously yields HF and NH3 gas that create a potentially more aggressive doping environment.

2.2 Characterization

2.2.1 TEM and SEM Investigation

The morphology of pristine TiONTs and thermally doped nanostructures was analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using an FEI Tecnai G2 20 X-Twin instrument operated at 200 kV accelerating voltage. Samples were drop-casted from their ethanol suspensions onto copper mounted holey carbon grids. The morphological changes of NH3 plasma modified TiONTs on Al foil were studied by scanning electron microscopy using a HITACHI S-4700 Type II instrument operated at 30 kV accelerating voltage.

2.2.2 XPS Analysis

X-ray photoelectron spectra of N2+ ion bombarded and N2 and NH3 plasma treated titanates were recorded on a Kratos XSAM 800 spectrometer operating in fixed analyzer transmission mode, using Mg Kα1,2 (1253.6 eV) excitation. The pressure in the analysis chamber was lower than 1 × 10−7 Pa. Survey spectra were recorded in the kinetic energy range of 150–1300 eV in 0.5 eV steps. Photoelectron lines of the main constituent elements, i.e. O1s, Ti2p, N1s and C1s, were recorded in 0.1 eV steps and 1 s dwell time. Spectra were referenced to the energy of the C1s line of the carbon contamination, set at 284.6 ± 0.1 eV binding energy (B.E.). A Gaussian–Lorentzian peak shape (70/30 ratio) was used for peak decomposition. Quantitative analysis, based on peak area intensities after removal of the Shirley-type background, was performed by the Kratos Vision 2 and by the XPS MultiQuant programs [52, 53] using the experimentally determined photo-ionization cross-section data of Evans et al. and the asymmetry parameters of Reilman et al. [54]. In all cases, unless otherwise stated, the conventional infinitely thick layer model was employed, where all components are supposed to be homogeneously distributed within the sampling depth detected by XPS. Chemical shifts, representing different bonding states of the nitrogen and oxygen to titanium, were evaluated by applying an accurate peak decomposition procedure. In order to prepare samples for the above treatments, ethanol suspension of TiONT was drop casted onto Al foil to obtain a consistent film-like structure with homogenous nanotube distribution. Films were dried at 100 °C to remove the bulk water from the surface.

2.2.3 XRD Analysis

The crystal structure of TiONTs before and after different nitridation processes was investigated using a Rigaku Miniflex powder X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα irradiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) operating at 30 kV and 15 mA. The scanning rate was 4°/min in the 5–60° 2θ range.

2.2.4 DRIFTS Measurements

Infrared spectroscopic measurements were carried out in an Agilent Cary-670 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a Harrick Praying Mantis diffuse reflectance attachment. The sample holder had BaF2 windows in the IR light path. The spectrometer was purged with dry nitrogen. Typically, 32 scans were recorded at a spectral resolution of 2 cm−1. Either the spectrum of the pristine nanotubes or a commercial anatase reference (Hombikat UV-100) was used as background.

3 Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows pristine protonated TiONTs at different magnifications. The as-synthesized elongated nanotubes are open-ended with a layered, rolled-up structure. In Fig. 1b the inner pore channel of these nanotubular materials is visible. The average TiONT length is 100–130 nm, the inner diameter is 5–6 nm and the outer diameter is 11–12 nm.

Fig. 1

TEM images of pristine protonated TiONTs in different magnifications (a, b). The inner pore channels of nanotubes are clearly seen in panel b

Previously we investigated the urea based ammonia doping of titanate nanotubes, similarly to those reported in [28, 35, 46]. During this process we observed that nanotubes completely morph into 25 nm long isotropic (cuboid and octahedral) nanoparticles. In Fig. 2. TEM images of pristine TiONT (a), and urea based NH3 doped nanotubes (b) are compared. We successfully reproduced our previous results as demonstrated in Fig. 2b. NH4F treatment also resulted in the collapse of the nanotubes. It seems plausible that the acidic media enhanced TiONT degradation in this case [55].

Fig. 2

TEM images of pristine titanate nanotubes (a) and after urea (b) and NH4F (c) treatment at 200 °C

As mentioned earlier, single crystal TiO2 (scTiO2) favors N embedding into its lattice upon N2+ ion bombardment [49]. XPS results corresponding to this ion implantation method are depicted in Fig. 3. The signal at 396.7 eV is characteristic for substitutional nitrogen bonded to metal. Peaks at 397.3 and 398.3 eV are due to N-containing ions in O–Ti–N bond on the surface (Fig. 3b). Reduced titania states are also formed during nitridation. Both Ti2+ and Ti3+ exist under these conditions [48]. This nitridation process took 20 min and the overall built-in nitrogen content was 16.1 at.%.

Fig. 3

XP lines of Ti2p (a) and N1s (b) of scTiO2 before and after N2+ implantation process

This experiment was repeated using TiONTs instead of scTiO2. Interestingly, only 2.7 at.% nitrogen content was achieved by the similar 20 min long N2+ bombardment process. Figure 4a shows a doping-induced change in the Ti2p XP line shape. The small shoulder at around 456.0 eV is characteristic for the Ti3+ state. Figure 4b reveals N at B.E. of 396.3 eV that is, in position substituting lattice oxygen [28, 35, 56, 57, 58], while other lines between 398 and 402 eV are characteristic for nitrogen trapped in different lattice defects surrounded by varying number of oxygens. Features at 398–400 eV are due to interstitial N [47], while photoemission peaks above 400 eV are typically attributed to either embedded N2 or to nitrate/nitrite species [28].

Fig. 4

XP lines of Ti2p (a) and N1s (b) of TiONT before and after N2+ implantation

Since the extent of nitrogen incorporation into TiONTs by N2+ bombardment is limited to low levels (approximately 3 at.%), the application of plasma treatment was considered. The first dopant source was N2 plasma at 600 V bias voltage for 20 min. The positively charged N2+ plasma ions dissociate to two N atoms with an average energy of 300 eV each upon hitting the surface, thus the process is capable of building various types of nitrogen into the lattice. Figure 5a shows that essentially no reduced Ti states appear in this case, which also indicates that N incorporation in substitutional position is minimal. Indeed, only a weak N signal at B.E. 396 eV is observable (Fig. 5b) and N–O–Ti bonds are formed besides other entrapped N species appearing in the 398–402 eV B.E. range. The explanation to the low degree of formation of Ti–N via ion bombardment and N2 plasma treatment on TiONTs lies in the structure of the nanotubes. Unlike single crystal titania, titanates—even in their protonated forms—contain significant amounts of OH groups and structural water [5]. We suggest that this oxygen rich local surface environment hinders substitutional N incorporation in titanate nanotubes compared to single crystal TiO2 [41].

Fig. 5

XP lines of Ti2p (a) and N1s (b) of TiONT before and after N2 plasma treatment process

To verify this hypothesis, TiONTs were treated in positively charged NH3 plasma for 10 and 30 min at 300 V bias voltage. This bias condition ensured that the energy of N atoms actually interacting with the surface closely matched that relevant for N2 plasma at 600 V bias. Figure 6a, b shows that indeed, more nitrogen is incorporated into the nanotubes from NH3 plasma then from N2 plasma. The achieved nitrogen content increased by one order of magnitude to 20.4 at.%. Three types of nitrogen are observable in the N1s region: the 396 eV photoemission belongs to the substitutional (Ti–N) form, while the peaks at 398–399.5 and 400.5 eV can be attributed to different NH species [56, 59] and/or interstitial N [47]. The Ti2p XP lines also changed during the process: the Ti3+ peak developed at 456.0 eV indicating a successful, Ti–N bond forming N incorporation.

Fig. 6

XP lines of Ti2p and N1s of TiONT before and after NH3 plasma nitridation (a, b) and urea based thermic doping (c, d) process

Figure 6c, d depict XP spectra of TiONTs N-doped by NH3 generated in situ by urea decomposition. There are no significant differences in the Ti2p region between pristine and doped samples and one dominating type of N is observable in the N 1 s region at about 400 eV BE. This one is characteristic for N species built, most probably, into different defect sites surrounded by oxygen (400 eV B.E.). Such nitrogen bonding states were tentatively assigned to an N⋯H complex interstitially bound in the TiO2 lattice [56, 57] and linked to the enhanced photocatalytic activity, even though the observed photo-threshold energy decrease was associated earlier exclusively with substitutional N at 396.5 eV B.E [35]. N doping was suggested to introduce localized N2p states within the band gap close to the top of the valence band, facilitating the production of oxygen vacancies and Ti3d states within the bandgap at elevated temperatures [60]. In the case of NH4F treatment no photoemission at ~ 396 eV due to subtitutional N was detected. The Ti2p line remained unaltered.

Summarizing, XPS measurements depicted in Fig. 6. suggest that NH3 plasma treatment is the most effective way to incorporate substitutional nitrogen into the lattice of TiONTs.

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (DRIFTS) was utilized to identify surface specimens formed during the doping process, i.e. to reveal the nature of the so-called “adsorbed nitrogen” species. Figure 7 depicts the DRIFTS spectra of TiONTs treated in NH3 plasma for 30 min, as well as their urea-based and NH4F thermally doped counterparts. IR bands were observed after NH3 plasma treatment at around 3000, 1700–1560, 1434, and 1257 cm−1. When urea was the precursor molecule, the same peaks with much higher intensities were detected between 3200–2800 cm−1 (3201, 3037, 2967, 2928, and 2854 cm−1) and 1700–1200 cm−1 (1703, 1627, 1563, 1443, and 1257 cm−1). A very similar IR spectrum was recorded earlier on ammonium trititanate nanotubes (NH4TNT) produced from sodium trititanate nanotubes by ion exchange using NH4NO3 [46]. The observed peaks were assigned to the N–H steching mode and the asymmetric bending mode of NH4+. Similar NH vibration features were observed after NH3 adsorption on TiO2 [61]. Bands at 1703, 1563 and 1257 cm−1 for NH4 species were detected after adsorption of NH4F on TNT (Fig. 7). Summarizing, the DRIFTS experiments confirmed the XPS results insofar as Ti–N formation is always accompanied by NH4+ group development in the studied processes [58]. It is important to emphasize that no bands indicative of nitrosyl species were detected in the 1950–1850 cm−1 range after NH3 plasma treatment [62].

Fig. 7

DRIFT spectra of a NH3 plasma treated sample and two thermally doped (urea and NH4F decomposition) TiONT samples

Figure 8 depicts the morphology of pristine and N-doped titanate nanotubes on Al foil. It is remarkable that even though NH3 plasma treatment was the best way to impose structural changes on TiONTs by incorporating nitrogen into the lattice, it left the tubular morphology intact. Indeed, SEM images in Fig. 8b, c. do not show any signs of nanotube morphing or collapse—the tubular structure was maintained during and after nitrogen incorporation.

Fig. 8

FE-SEM images of pristine (a) and NH3 plasma modified titanate nanotubes (bc) on Al foil. The scale bar corresponds to 500 nm in all three images

The structure conserving nature of NH3 plasma doping was confirmed by analyzing the crystallinity of the doped samples using XRD. Figure 9 depicts the XRD patterns of TiONT before and after the different nitridation processes. The characteristic reflections are indicated in the figure. Characteristic reflections of TiONT (2θ = 9.66°, 24.49°, 28.08° and 48.5°) match the literature data well [16]. The first broad reflection corresponds to the 0.74 nm interlayer distance between the rolled-up titanate sheet layers. It is clear that none of the plasma treatments affects the trititanate structure and there are no new phases in the system. In contrast, titanate reflections disappeared when either of the thermal doping processes was attempted, and new reflections with Miller indices of (101), (004), (200), (105), (211) and (204) appeared at 2θ = 25.45°, 37.06°, 37.89°, 38.74°, 48.22°, 53.97°, and 55.17°, respectively. This confirms that the trititanate structure recrystallized into anatase TiO2 during the synthesis. However, the crystallinity degree of commercial anatase is higher than that of its thermal doping derived counterparts.

Fig. 9

XRD patterns of titanate nanotubes before and after different nitridation processes

4 Conclusions

We presented a systematic study on N-doping in protonated titanate nanotubes utilizing N2+ bombardment, thermal and plasma based methods. NH4+ was detected on the surface in all cases. Single crystalline rutile TiO2 bombarded with N2+ served as a doping benchmark. Methods based on the thermal decomposition of urea or NH4F generate NH3 in situ, but neither of them is capable of inserting substitutional nitrogen into the lattice. On the other hand, N2+ bombardment as well as N2 and NH3 plasma based methods can all yield N-doped nanotubes with the desired Ti–N bonds. This was clearly confirmed by monitoring the N XPS peak at around 396 eV, which is characteristic for nitrogen in this position and also by a low B.E. shoulder on the Ti2p line. The extent of nitridation depends on the type of the plasma and the duration of the treatment. Positively charged NH3 plasma was found to be the most powerful way to incorporate nitrogen into the nanotube lattice in over 20 at.% loading. Surprisingly, this incorporation technique left both the tubular morphology and the titanate crystal structure of the nanotubes intact. Considering the high specific surface area of titanate nanotubes as well as the technological feasibility and scalability of the NH3 plasma treatment, we believe that the reported results represent a step forward in the systematic design of highly efficient titanate based VLD photocatalysts.



The financial support of the Hungarian Research Development and Innovation Office through Grants NKFIH OTKA K 126065 (Á.K.), K 120115 (Z.K.) and GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-0013 (Á.K., Z.K.) is acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Bavykin DV, Parmon VN, Lapkin AA, Walsh FC (2004) The effect of hydrothermal conditions on the mesoporous structure of TiO2 nanotubes. J Mater Chem 14(22):3370–3377. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kasuga T, Hiramatsu M, Hoson A, Sekino T, Niihara K (1998) Formation of titanium oxide nanotube. Langmuir 14(12):3160–3163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pótári G, Madarász D, Nagy L, László B, Sápi A, Oszkó A, Kukovecz A, Erdohelyi A, Kónya Z, Kiss J (2013) Rh-induced support transformation phenomena in titanate nanowire and nanotube catalysts. Langmuir 29(9):3061–3072. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kukovecz Á, Kordás K, Kiss J, Kónya Z (2016) Atomic scale characterization and surface chemistry of metal modified titanate nanotubes and nanowires. Surf Sci Rep 71(3):473–546. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchholcz B, Haspel H, Boldizsár T, Kukovecz Á, Kónya Z (2017) pH-regulated antimony oxychloride nanoparticle formation on titanium oxide nanostructures: a photocatalytically active heterojunction. CrystEngComm 19(10):1408–1416. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchholcz B, Haspel H, Oszkó A, Kukovecz A, Kónya Z (2017) Titania nanotube stabilized BiOCl nanoparticles in visible-light photocatalysis. RSC Adv 7(27):16410–16422. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sluban M, Cojocaru B, Parvulescu VI, Iskra J, Korošec RC, Umek P (2017) Protonated titanate nanotubes as solid acid catalyst for aldol condensation. J Catal 346:161–169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuwahara Y, Fujie Y, Yamashita H (2017) Poly-(ethyleneimine)-tethered Ir complex catalyst immobilized in titanate nanotubes for hydrogenation of CO2 to formic acid. ChemCatChem 9(11):1906–1914. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aouadi I, Touati H, Tatibouët J-M, Bergaoui L (2017) Titanate nanotubes as ethanol decomposition catalysts: effect of coupling photocatalysis with non-thermal plasma. J Photochem Photobiol A 346:485–492. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandoval A, Hernández-Ventura C, Klimova TE (2017) Titanate nanotubes for removal of methylene blue dye by combined adsorption and photocatalysis. Fuel 198:22–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    László B, Baán K, Varga E, Oszkó A, Erdőhelyi A, Kónya Z, Kiss J (2016) Photo-induced reactions in the CO2-methane system on titanate nanotubes modified with Au and Rh nanoparticles. Appl Catal B 199:473–484. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bavykin DV, Walsh FC (2007) Kinetics of alkali metal ion exchange into nanotubular and nanofibrous titanates. J Phys Chem C 111(40):14644–14651. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bavykin DV, Lapkin AA, Plucinski PK, Friedrich JM, Walsh FC (2005) Reversible storage of molecular hydrogen by sorption into multilayered TiO2 nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 109(41):19422–19427. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paris J, Bernhard Y, Boudon J, Heintz O, Millot N, Decréau R (2015) Phthalocyanine–titanate nanotubes: a promising nanocarrier detectable by optical imaging in the so-called imaging window. RSC Adv 5(9):6315–6322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang D, Wang X, Ai Q, Shi J, Jiang Z (2015) Performance comparison of immobilized enzyme on the titanate nanotube surfaces modified by poly-(dopamine) and poly-(norepinephrine). RSC Adv 5(53):42461–42467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen Q, Du G, Zhang S, Peng L-M (2002) The structure of trititanate nanotubes. Acta Crystallogr Sect B 58(4):587–593. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dmitry V, Walsh C (2010) Titanate and titania nanotubes: synthesis, properties and applications. Royal Society of Chemisty, Cambridge, CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kukovecz Á, Hodos M, Horváth E, Radnóczi G, Kónya Z, Kiricsi I (2005) Oriented crystal growth model explains the formation of titania nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 109(38):17781–17783. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Diebold U (2003) The surface science of titanium-dioxide. Surf Sci Rep 48(5):53–229. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang L, Sasaki T (2014) Titanium-oxide nanosheets: graphene analogues with versatile functionalities. Chem Rev 114(19):9455–9486. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Houas A, Lachheb H, Ksibi M, Elaloui E, Guillard C, Herrmann J-M (2001) Photocatalytic degradation pathway of methylene blue in water. Appl Catal B 31(2):145–157. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thiruvenkatachari R, Vigneswaran S, Moon IS (2008) A review on UV/TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation process (Journal Review). Korean J Chem Eng 25(1):64–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Halasi G, Schubert GB, Solymosi F (2012) Photodecomposition of formic acid on N-doped and metal-promoted TiO2 production of CO-free H2. J Phys Chem C 116(29):15396–15405. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumar SG, Devi LG (2011) Review on modified TiO2 photocatalysis under UV/visible light: selected results and related mechanisms on interfacial charge carrier transfer dynamics. J Phys Chem A 115(46):13211–13241. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rehman S, Ullah R, Butt A, Gohar N (2009) Strategies of making TiO2 and ZnO visible light active. J Hazard Mater 170(2):560–569. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Qin W, Zhang D, Zhao D, Wang L, Zheng K (2010) Near-infrared photocatalysis based on YF3: Yb3+, Tm3+/TiO2 core/shell nanoparticles. Chem Commun 46(13):2304–2306. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tang Y, Di W, Zhai X, Yang R, Qin W (2013) NIR-responsive photocatalytic activity and mechanism of NaYF4: Yb, Tm@ TiO2 core–shell nanoparticles. ACS Catal 3(3):405–412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Henderson MA (2011) A surface science perspective on photocatalysis. Surf Sci Rep 66(6):185–297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Park MS, Kwon S, Min B (2002) Electronic structures of doped anatase TiO2: Ti1–xMxO2 (M = Co, Mn, Fe, Ni). Phys Rev B 65(16):161201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kočí K, Matějů K, Obalová L, Krejčíková S, Lacný Z, Plachá D, Čapek L, Hospodková A, Šolcová O (2010) Effect of silver doping on the TiO2 for photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Appl Catal B 96(3):239–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dozzi MV, Selli E (2013) Doping TiO2 with p-block elements: effects on photocatalytic activity. J Photochem Photobiol C 14:13–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Devi LG, Kavitha R (2013) A review on non metal ion doped titania for the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants under UV/solar light: role of photogenerated charge carrier dynamics in enhancing the activity. Appl Catal B 140:559–587. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Serpone N (2006) Is the band gap of pristine TiO2 narrowed by anion- and cation-doping of titanium dioxide in second-generation photocatalysts? J Phys Chem B 110(48):24287–24293. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gracia F, Holgado JP, Caballero A, Gonzalez-Elipe AR (2004) Structural, optical, and photoelectrochemical properties of Mn+–TiO2 model thin film photocatalysts. J Phys Chem B 108(45):17466–17476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Asahi R, Morikawa T, Ohwaki T, Aoki K, Taga Y (2001) Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science 293(5528):269–271. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sato S (1986) Photocatalytic activity of NOx-doped TiO2 in the visible light region. Chem Phys Lett 123(1–2):126–128. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jagadale TC, Takale SP, Sonawane RS, Joshi HM, Patil SI, Kale BB, Ogale SB (2008) N-doped TiO2 nanoparticle based visible light photocatalyst by modified peroxide sol–gel method. J Phys Chem C 112(37):14595–14602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hanaor DA, Sorrell CC (2011) Review of the anatase to rutile phase transformation. J Mater Sci 46(4):855–874. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Buchholcz B, Varga E, Varga T, Plank K, Kiss J, Kónya Z (2017) Structure and stability of boron doped titanate nanotubes and nanowires. Vacuum 138:120–124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pusztai P, Puskás R, Varga E, Erdőhelyi A, Kukovecz Á, Kónya Z, Kiss J (2014) Influence of gold additives on the stability and phase transformation of titanate nanostructures. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16(48):26786–26797. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Halasi G, Schubert G, Solymosi F (2012) Comparative study on the photocatalytic decomposition of methanol on TiO2 modified by N and promoted by metals. J Catal 294:199–206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Joung S-K, Amemiya T, Murabayashi M, Itoh K (2006) Relation between photocatalytic activity and preparation conditions for nitrogen-doped visible light-driven TiO2 photocatalysts. Appl Catal A 312:20–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang Z, Cai W, Hong X, Zhao X, Xu F, Cai C (2005) Photocatalytic degradation of phenol in aqueous nitrogen-doped TiO2 suspensions with various light sources. Appl Catal B 57(3):223–231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Di Valentin C, Finazzi E, Pacchioni G, Selloni A, Livraghi S, Paganini MC, Giamello E (2007) N-doped TiO2: theory and experiment. Chem Phys 339(1):44–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Buchholcz B, Haspel H, Kukovecz Á, Kónya Z (2014) Low-temperature conversion of titanate nanotubes into nitrogen-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. CrystEngComm 16(32):7486–7492. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chang J-C, Tsai W-J, Chiu T-C, Liu C-W, Chao J-H, Lin C-H (2011) Chemistry in a confined space: characterization of nitrogen-doped titanium oxide nanotubes produced by calcining ammonium trititanate nanotubes. J Mater Chem 21(12):4605–4614. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Maeda M, Watanabe T (2006) Visible light photocatalysis of nitrogen-doped titanium oxide films prepared by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. J Electrochem Soc 153(3):C186-C189. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bertóti I (2012) Nitrogen modified metal oxide surfaces. Catal Today 181(1):95–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sullivan JL, Saied SO, Bertoti I (1991) Effect of ion and neutral sputtering on single crystal TiO2. Vacuum 42(18):1203–1208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bertóti I, Kelly R, Mohai M, Tóth A (1992) A possible solution to the problem of compositional change with ion-bombarded oxides. Surf Interface Anal 19(1–12):291–297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bertóti I, Kelly R, Mohai M, Tóth A (1993) Response of oxides to ion bombardment: the difference between inert and reactive ions. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 80–81 (Part 2):1219–1225.
  52. 52.
    Mohai M (2004) XPS MultiQuant: multimodel XPS quantification software. Surf Interface Anal 36(8):828–832. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mohai M, Bertoti I (2004) Calculation of overlayer thickness on curved surfaces based on XPS intensities. Surf Interface Anal 36(8):805–808. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Reilman RF, Msezane A, Manson ST (1976) Relative intensities in photoelectron spectroscopy of atoms and molecules. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 8(5):389–394. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bavykin DV, Friedrich JM, Lapkin AA, Walsh FC (2006) Stability of aqueous suspensions of titanate nanotubes. Chem Mater 18(5):1124–1129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Diwald O, Thompson TL, Zubkov T, Walck SD, Yates JT (2004) Photochemical activity of nitrogen-doped rutile TiO2(110) in visible light. J Phys Chem B 108(19):6004–6008. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Thompson TL, Yates JT (2006) Surface science studies of the photoactivation of TiO2—new photochemical processes. Chem Rev 106(10):4428–4453. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Beranek R, Kisch H (2008) Tuning the optical and photoelectrochemical properties of surface-modified TiO2. Photochem Photobiol Sci 7(1):40–48. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Souto S, Alvarez F (1997) The role of hydrogen in nitrogen-containing diamondlike films studied by photoelectron spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 70(12):1539–1541. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Batzill M, Morales EH, Diebold U (2006) Influence of nitrogen doping on the defect formation and surface properties of TiO2 rutile and anatase. Phys Rev Lett 96(2):026103. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jung SM, Grange P (2000) The investigation of mechanism of SCR reaction on a TiO2-SO4 2– catalyst by DRIFTS. Appl Catal B 27(1):L11-L16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ramis G, Busca G, Lorenzelli V, Forzatti P (1990) Fourier transform infrared study of the adsorption and coadsorption of nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide and ammonia on TiO2 anatase. Appl Catal 64:243–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Balázs Buchholcz
    • 1
  • Kamilla Plank
    • 1
  • Miklós Mohai
    • 2
  • Ákos Kukovecz
    • 1
  • János Kiss
    • 3
    • 4
  • Imre Bertóti
    • 2
  • Zoltán Kónya
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Applied and Environmental ChemistryUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
  2. 2.Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS), Research Centre of Natural SciencesInstitute of Materials and Environmental ChemistryBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Department of Physical Chemistry and Materials ScienceUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
  4. 4.MTA-SZTE Reaction Kinetics and Surface Chemistry Research GroupUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary

Personalised recommendations