Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 60, Issue 17–18, pp 1401–1407 | Cite as

Partial Oxidation of Isobutane and Isobutene to Methacrolein Over a Novel Mo–V–Nb(–Te) Mixed Oxide Catalyst

Original Paper


Aiming at a catalyst with improved catalytic properties in the oxidation of isobutane and isobutene to methacrolein and methacrylic acid, a novel MoVNb(Te) mixed oxide catalyst was synthesized. Rietveld analysis revealed that the crystal structure is well distinguishable from the known MoVTeNb mixed oxide catalyst used in the (amm-)oxidation of C3 hydrocarbons. In the conversion of isobutane, activity as well as selectivities to methacrolein and methacrylic acid were low, and the dehydrogenation of isobutane to isobutene was found to be rate determining. However, the novel catalyst is highly suitable for the partial oxidation of isobutene. While selectivity to methacrolein is comparable to that reported for other catalysts, the activity is superior, resulting in very high space-time-yields at temperatures up to 420 °C. The novel mixed oxide is a Mars van Krevelen-type catalyst. Excess oxygen in the feed is required to ensure optimum performance.


Isobutene Isobutane Selective oxidation Methacrolein MoVNb(Te) mixed oxide catalyst 


  1. 1.
    Arpe H-J (2007) Industrielle organische chemie, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lucite International: FreeFlow, April 2007: 4–5Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cavani F, Mezzogori R, Pigamo A, Trifirò F, Etienne E (2001) Catal Today 71:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cavani F, Trifirò F (1992) Appl Catal A 88:115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tan S-H, Yee K-F, Mohammed A-R (2013) Renew Sustain Energy Rev 22:604–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kan Q, Guan J, Jing S, Wu S, Xu H, Wang Z (2007) React Kinet Catal Lett 90:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wan H-L, Weng W-Z, Sun X-D, Yi X-D, Hua W-Q, Hao J (2011) Fuel Process Technol 92:1662–1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacobs P, Paul J, Janssens R, Denayer J, Baron G (2005) J Comb Chem 7:407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kan Q, Guan J, Wang H, Song K, Xu C, Wang Z (2009) Catal Commun 10:1437–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kan Q, Guan J, Song K, Xu H, Wang Z, Ma Y, Shang F (2009) Catal Commun 10:528–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kan Q, Guan J, Wu S, Wang H, Jing S, Wang G, Zhen K (2007) J Catal 251:354–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trunschke A (2011) Propane-selective oxidation to acrylic acid. In: Hess C, Schlögl R (eds) Nanostructured catalysts: selective oxidations. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, pp 56–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheary R-W, Coelho A-A (1992) J Appl Crystallogr 25:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bruker AXS TOPAS V4.2. (2008) General profile and structure analysis software for powder diffraction data. User’s manual. Bruker AXS, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buttrey D-J, DeSanto P, Grasselli R-K, Lugmair C-G, Volpe A-F, Toby B-H, Vogt T (2004) Z Kristallogr 219:152–165Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shishido T, Inoue A, Konishi T, Matsuura I, Takehira K (2000) Catal Lett 68:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    López Nieto J-M, Solsona B, Concepción P, Ivars F, Dejoz A, Vázquez M-I (2010) Catal Today 157:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Chemical Process Engineering (CVT)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)Eggenstein-LeopoldshafenGermany

Personalised recommendations