Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 59, Issue 13–14, pp 1165–1177 | Cite as

Catalytic Hydrogenation of d-Xylose Over Ru Decorated Carbon Foam Catalyst in a SpinChem® Rotating Bed Reactor

  • Tung Ngoc Pham
  • Ajaikumar Samikannu
  • Anne-Riikka Rautio
  • Koppany L. Juhasz
  • Zoltan Konya
  • Johan Wärnå
  • Krisztian Kordas
  • Jyri-Pekka MikkolaEmail author


In this work the activity of ruthenium decorated carbon foam (Ru/CF) catalyst was studied in three phase hydrogenation reaction of d-xylose to d-xylitol. The developed catalyst was characterized by using scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry and nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurement. Kinetic measurements were carried out in a laboratory scale pressurized reactor (Parr®) assisted by SpinChem® rotating bed reactor (SRBR), at pre-defined conditions (40–60 bar H2 and 100–120 °C). The study on the influence of reaction conditions showed that the conversion rate and selectivity of hydrogenation reaction of d-xylose was significantly affected by temperature. These results have been proved by a competitive kinetics model which was found to describe the behavior of the novel system (Ru/CF catalyst used together with the SRBR) very well. Besides, it was revealed that the catalytic activity as well as the stability of our Ru/CF-SRBR is comparable with the commercial ruthenium decorated carbon catalyst (Ru/AC) under identical reaction conditions. Moreover, all steps from catalyst preparation and catalyst recycling as well as catalytic testing can be performed in an easy, fast and elegant manner without any loss of materials. Briefly, the developed Ru/CF catalyst used together with the SRBR could be used an excellent alternative for the conventional Raney nickel catalyst in a slurry batch reactor and offers an attractive concept with obvious industrial applicability.


d-xylose d-xylitol Ruthenium Carbon foam SpinChem Rotating bed reactor 



SpinChem AB is thanked for providing the polymeric precursor materials and the SpinChem® rotating bed reactor. The Artificial Leaf, Bio4Energy programme & the Kempe Foundations are acknowledged for funding. This work is also a part of the ‘‘Artificial Leaf’’ project activities funded by the Knut & Alice Wallenberg foundation as well as the Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre at Åbo Akademi University.


  1. 1.
    Holladay J, Bozell J, White J, Johnson D (2007) Top value-added chemicals from biomass. DOE Report PNNL 16983Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Massoth D, Massoth G, Massoth IR, Laflamme L, Shi W, Hu C, Gu F (2006) The effect of xylitol on Streptococcus mutans in children. J Calif Dent Assoc 34(3):231–234Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takahashi Y, Takeda C, Seto I, Kawano G, Machida Y (2007) Formulation and evaluation of lactoferrin bioadhesive tablets. Int J Pharm 343(1):220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sokmen A, Gunes G (2006) Influence of some bulk sweeteners on rheological properties of chocolate. LWT Food Sci Technol 39(10):1053–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tathod AP, Dhepe PL (2014) Towards efficient synthesis of sugar alcohols from mono- and poly-saccharides: role of metals, supports & promoters. Green Chem 16(12):4944–4954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Research and Market (2014) Xylitol—a global market overview. Accessed 24 Sept 2015
  7. 7.
    Mikkola J-P, Vainio H, Salmi T, Sjöholm R, Ollonqvist T, Väyrynen J (2000) Deactivation kinetics of Mo-supported Raney Ni catalyst in the hydrogenation of xylose to xylitol. Appl Catal A 196(1):143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yadav M, Mishra DK, Hwang J-S (2012) Catalytic hydrogenation of xylose to xylitol using ruthenium catalyst on NiO modified TiO 2 support. Appl Catal A 425:110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gallezot P, Nicolaus N, Fleche G, Fuertes P, Perrard A (1998) Glucose hydrogenation on ruthenium catalysts in a trickle-bed reactor. J Catal 180(1):51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hernández-Mejía C, Raja E, Olivos-Suarez A, Gascon J, Greer HF, Zhou W, Rothenberg G, Shiju RN (2015) Ru/TiO2-catalysed hydrogenation of xylose: the role of crystal structure of the support. Catalysis Science & Technology 6(2):577–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mishra DK, Dabbawala AA, Park JJ, Jhung SH, Hwang J-S (2014) Selective hydrogenation of d-glucose to d-sorbitol over HY zeolite supported ruthenium nanoparticles catalysts. Catal Today 232:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luo C, Wang S, Liu H (2007) Cellulose conversion into polyols catalyzed by reversibly formed acids and supported ruthenium clusters in hot water. Angew Chem Int Ed 46(40):7636–7639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pham TN, Samikannu A, Kukkola J, Rautio A-R, Pitkänen O, Dombovari A, Lorite GS, Sipola T, Toth G, Mohl M (2014) Industrially benign super-compressible piezoresistive carbon foams with predefined wetting properties: from environmental to electrical applications. Sci Rep 4:6933. doi: 10.1038/srep06933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coker AK (2001) Modeling of chemical kinetics and reactor design, vol 1. Gulf Professional Publishing, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eta V, Anugwom I, Virtanen P, Mäki-Arvela P, Mikkola J-P (2014) Enhanced mass transfer upon switchable ionic liquid mediated wood fractionation. Ind Crops Prod 55:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mallin H, Muschiol J, Byström E, Bornscheuer UT (2013) Efficient biocatalysis with immobilized enzymes or encapsulated whole cell microorganism by using the SpinChem reactor system. ChemCatChem 5(12):3529–3532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chan HYH, Takoudis CG, Weaver MJ (1997) High-pressure oxidation of ruthenium as probed by surface-enhanced Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies. J Catal 172(2):336–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mun C, Ehrhardt J, Lambert J, Madic C (2007) XPS investigations of ruthenium deposited onto representative inner surfaces of nuclear reactor containment buildings. Appl Surf Sci 253(18):7613–7621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kinoshita K, Bett JAS, Stonehart P (1975) Effects of gas-and liquid-phase environments on the sintering behavior of platinum catalysts. In: Kuczynski GC (ed) Sintering and catalysis. Springer, Boston, pp 117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hassan SA (1974) Kinetics of sintering of unsupported platinum catalyst in nitrogen, oxygen and hydrogen atmospheres. J Appl Chem Biotechnol 24(9):497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guisnet M, Magnoux P (2001) Organic chemistry of coke formation. Appl Catal A 212(1):83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salmi T, Murzin DY, Mikkola J-P, Wärnå J, Mäki-Arvela P, Toukoniitty E, Toppinen S (2004) Advanced kinetic concepts and experimental methods for catalytic three-phase processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 43(16):4540–4550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sifontes Herrera VA, Oladele O, Kordás K, Eränen K, Mikkola JP, Murzin DY, Salmi T (2011) Sugar hydrogenation over a Ru/C catalyst. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86(5):658–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wisniak J, Hershkowitz M, Stein S (1974) Hydrogenation of xylose over platinum group catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 13(4):232–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    de Beeck BO, Dusselier M, Geboers J, Holsbeek J, Morré E, Oswald S, Giebeler L, Sels BF (2015) Direct catalytic conversion of cellulose to liquid straight-chain alkanes. Energy Environ Sci 8:230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mikkola JP, Salmi T, Sjöholm R (1999) Modelling of kinetics and mass transfer in the hydrogenation of xylose over Raney nickel catalyst. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74(7):655–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mishra DK, Dabbawala AA, Hwang JS (2013) Ruthenium nanoparticles supported on zeolite Y as an efficient catalyst for selective hydrogenation of xylose to xylitol. J Mol Catal A 376:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tung Ngoc Pham
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ajaikumar Samikannu
    • 1
  • Anne-Riikka Rautio
    • 3
  • Koppany L. Juhasz
    • 4
  • Zoltan Konya
    • 4
    • 5
  • Johan Wärnå
    • 6
  • Krisztian Kordas
    • 3
  • Jyri-Pekka Mikkola
    • 1
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Technical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Chemical-Biological CentreUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryThe University of Danang, Danang University of Science and TechnologyDa NangVietnam
  3. 3.Microelectronics and Materials Physics Laboratories, Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  4. 4.Department of Applied and Environmental ChemistryUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
  5. 5.MTA-SZTE Reaction Kinetics and Surface Chemistry Research GroupSzegedHungary
  6. 6.Industrial Chemistry & Reaction Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Process Chemistry CentreÅbo Akademi UniversityÅbo-TurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations