Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 58, Issue 2–3, pp 85–102 | Cite as

Effect of the TiO2 Crystallite Size, TiO2 Polymorph and Test Conditions on the Photo-Oxidation Rate of Aqueous Methylene Blue

  • Wan-Ting Chen
  • Andrew Chan
  • Vedran Jovic
  • Dongxiao Sun-Waterhouse
  • Kei-ichiro Murai
  • Hicham Idriss
  • Geoffrey I. N. Waterhouse
Original Paper

Abstract

This study systematically re-examines the titania-catalysed photo-oxidation of methylene blue (MB) in aqueous solution at 20 °C, placing particular emphasis on the effects of TiO2 crystallite size, TiO2 polymorph (anatase, brookite, rutile and combinations thereof) and experimental test conditions on the rate of MB photo-oxidation. For all TiO2 samples tested, the highest rate of MB photo-oxidation was observed at pH 6, slightly above the isoelectric point of TiO2 (~5.8 for P25 TiO2). Increasing the ionic strength at pH 6 induced MB dimer formation in solution, and lowered the rate of MB photo-oxidation by TiO2. For all TiO2 polymorphs, the surface area normalised rate increased with crystallite size reflecting the corresponding reduction in surface and bulk defects (electron–hole pair recombination sites). The optimum crystallite sizes were ~20–25 nm for anatase and ~50 nm for brookite. The photocatalytic activity of the different TiO2 powders followed the general order P25 > anatase > brookite ≫ rutile, with the high activity of P25 TiO2 providing strong evidence that anatase–rutile heterojunctions act as “hotspots” for MB photo-oxidation. Mixed phase anatase–rutile or brookite–rutile powders, each containing ~5 wt% rutile, demonstrated superior area normalized photocatalytic activities for MB photo-oxidation compared to pure phase anatase or brookite powders of comparable crystallite size. Finally, deposition of Pd, Pt or Au nanoparticles decreased the activity of P25 TiO2 for MB photo-oxidation. This paper clarifies long-standing confusion in the scientific literature about the photo-oxidation of aqueous MB over TiO2 and M/TiO2 (M = Pd, Pt and Au) photocatalysts.

Keywords

Photocatalysis Anatase Rutile Brookite P25 Methylene blue 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Wan-Ting Chen acknowledges the Energy Education Trust of New Zealand for the award of a doctoral scholarship. The authors acknowledge funding support the MacDiarmid Institute for Advance Materials and Nanotechnology and the Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering (ALNGRA11126). Geoff Waterhouse thanks the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for award of a JSPS Fellowship to work in Japan (S13179). The authors thank Dr. Peter Swedlund of the University of Auckland for useful insight regarding the competitive adsorption of MB and phosphate on TiO2 surfaces.

Supplementary material

11244_2014_348_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2565 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bolong N, Ismail AF, Salim MR, Matsuura T (2009) Desalination 1–3:229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petrović M, Gonzalez S, Barceló D (2003) Trac Trends Anal Chem 10:685–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malik P (2004) J Hazard Mater 1:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim T-H, Park C, Yang J, Kim S (2004) J Hazard Mater 1–2:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koyuncu I (2002) Desalination 3:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kobya M, Can OT, Bayramoglu M (2003) J Hazard Mater 1:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang CP, Dong C, Tang Z (1993) Waste Manage 5–7:361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chakrabarti S, Dutta BK (2004) J Hazard Mater 3:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuo WS, Ho PH (2001) Chemosphere 1:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Syoufian A, Nakashima K (2008) J Colloid Interface Sci 2:507–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crittenden JC, Zhang Y, Hand DW, Perram DL, Marchand EG (1996) Water Environ Res 68:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wood PM (1988) Biochem J 1:287Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu C-H, Chern J-M (2006) Ind Eng Chem Res 19:6450–6457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baiju KV, Shukla S, Sandhya KS, James J, Warrier KGK (2007) J Phys Chem C 21:7612–7622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Houas A, Lachheb H, Ksibi M, Elaloui E, Guillard C, Herrmann J-M (2001) Appl Catal B Environ 2:145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lachheb H, Puzenat E, Houas A, Ksibi M, Elaloui E, Guillard C, Herrmann J-M (2002) Appl Catal B Environ 1:75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Talebian N, Nilforoushan MR (2010) Thin Solid Films 8:2210–2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Konstantinou IK, Albanis TA (2004) Appl Catal B Environ 1:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lakshmi S, Renganathan R, Fujita S (1995) J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 2–3:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chang H, Su C, Lo C-H, Chen L-C, Tsung T-T, Jwo C-S (2004) Mater Trans 12:3334–3337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mills A (2012) Appl Catal B Environ 128:144–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Du P, Bueno-Lopez A, Verbaas M, Almeida A, Makkee M, Moulijn J, Mul G (2008) J Catal 1:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ohtani B, Prieto-Mahaney OO, Li D, Abe R (2010) J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 2–3:179–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ohno T, Sarukawa K, Matsumura M (2001) J Phys Chem B 12:2417–2420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zanella R, Giorgio S, Henry CR, Louis C (2002) J Phys Chem B 31:7634–7642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barrett EP, Joyner LG, Halenda PP (1951) J Am Chem Soc 1:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tauc J, Menth A (1972) J Non-Cryst Solids 8:569–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reyes-Coronado D, Rodriguez-Gattorno G, Espinosa-Pesqueira M, Cab C, De Coss R, Oskam G (2008) Nanotechnology 14:145605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Suttiponparnit K, Jiang J, Sahu M, Suvachittanont S, Charinpanitkul T, Biswas P (2011) Nanoscale Res Lett 1:27Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cavigli L, Bogani F, Vinattieri A, Faso V, Baldi G (2009) J Appl Phys 5:053516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Su R, Bechstein R, Sø L, Vang RT, Sillassen M, Esbjörnsson B, Palmqvist A, Besenbacher F (2011) J Phys Chem C 49:24287–24292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Winardi S, Mukti RR, Kumar K-NP, Wang J, Wunderlich W, Okubo T (2010) Langmuir 7:4567–4571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Toyoda M, Nanbu Y, Nakazawa Y, Hirano M, Inagaki M (2004) Appl Catal B Environ 4:227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang X, Sø L, Su R, Wendt S, Hald P, Mamakhel A, Yang C, Huang Y, Iversen BB, Besenbacher F (2014) J Catal 310:100–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chan C-C, Chang C-C, Hsu W-C, Wang S-K, Lin J (2009) Chem Eng J 2–3:492–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen P, Zhang X (2008) Clean 5–6:507–511Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sangpour P, Hashemi F, Moshfegh AZ (2010) J Phys Chem C 33:13955–13961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang X, Waterhouse GIN, Mitchell DRG, Prince K, Caruso RA (2011) ChemCatChem 11:1665–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wan-Ting Chen
    • 1
  • Andrew Chan
    • 1
  • Vedran Jovic
    • 1
  • Dongxiao Sun-Waterhouse
    • 1
  • Kei-ichiro Murai
    • 2
  • Hicham Idriss
    • 3
  • Geoffrey I. N. Waterhouse
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Chemical SciencesThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Graduate School of Advanced Technology and ScienceThe University of TokushimaTokushimaJapan
  3. 3.SABIC, Corporate Research and Innovation (CRI), KAUSTThuwalSaudi Arabia
  4. 4.The MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and NanotechnologyWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations