Effect of the TiO2 Crystallite Size, TiO2 Polymorph and Test Conditions on the Photo-Oxidation Rate of Aqueous Methylene Blue
- 531 Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
This study systematically re-examines the titania-catalysed photo-oxidation of methylene blue (MB) in aqueous solution at 20 °C, placing particular emphasis on the effects of TiO2 crystallite size, TiO2 polymorph (anatase, brookite, rutile and combinations thereof) and experimental test conditions on the rate of MB photo-oxidation. For all TiO2 samples tested, the highest rate of MB photo-oxidation was observed at pH 6, slightly above the isoelectric point of TiO2 (~5.8 for P25 TiO2). Increasing the ionic strength at pH 6 induced MB dimer formation in solution, and lowered the rate of MB photo-oxidation by TiO2. For all TiO2 polymorphs, the surface area normalised rate increased with crystallite size reflecting the corresponding reduction in surface and bulk defects (electron–hole pair recombination sites). The optimum crystallite sizes were ~20–25 nm for anatase and ~50 nm for brookite. The photocatalytic activity of the different TiO2 powders followed the general order P25 > anatase > brookite ≫ rutile, with the high activity of P25 TiO2 providing strong evidence that anatase–rutile heterojunctions act as “hotspots” for MB photo-oxidation. Mixed phase anatase–rutile or brookite–rutile powders, each containing ~5 wt% rutile, demonstrated superior area normalized photocatalytic activities for MB photo-oxidation compared to pure phase anatase or brookite powders of comparable crystallite size. Finally, deposition of Pd, Pt or Au nanoparticles decreased the activity of P25 TiO2 for MB photo-oxidation. This paper clarifies long-standing confusion in the scientific literature about the photo-oxidation of aqueous MB over TiO2 and M/TiO2 (M = Pd, Pt and Au) photocatalysts.
Keywords
Photocatalysis Anatase Rutile Brookite P25 Methylene blueNotes
Acknowledgments
Wan-Ting Chen acknowledges the Energy Education Trust of New Zealand for the award of a doctoral scholarship. The authors acknowledge funding support the MacDiarmid Institute for Advance Materials and Nanotechnology and the Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering (ALNGRA11126). Geoff Waterhouse thanks the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for award of a JSPS Fellowship to work in Japan (S13179). The authors thank Dr. Peter Swedlund of the University of Auckland for useful insight regarding the competitive adsorption of MB and phosphate on TiO2 surfaces.
Supplementary material
References
- 1.Bolong N, Ismail AF, Salim MR, Matsuura T (2009) Desalination 1–3:229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Petrović M, Gonzalez S, Barceló D (2003) Trac Trends Anal Chem 10:685–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Malik P (2004) J Hazard Mater 1:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kim T-H, Park C, Yang J, Kim S (2004) J Hazard Mater 1–2:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Koyuncu I (2002) Desalination 3:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kobya M, Can OT, Bayramoglu M (2003) J Hazard Mater 1:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Huang CP, Dong C, Tang Z (1993) Waste Manage 5–7:361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Chakrabarti S, Dutta BK (2004) J Hazard Mater 3:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kuo WS, Ho PH (2001) Chemosphere 1:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Syoufian A, Nakashima K (2008) J Colloid Interface Sci 2:507–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Crittenden JC, Zhang Y, Hand DW, Perram DL, Marchand EG (1996) Water Environ Res 68:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Wood PM (1988) Biochem J 1:287Google Scholar
- 13.Wu C-H, Chern J-M (2006) Ind Eng Chem Res 19:6450–6457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Baiju KV, Shukla S, Sandhya KS, James J, Warrier KGK (2007) J Phys Chem C 21:7612–7622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Houas A, Lachheb H, Ksibi M, Elaloui E, Guillard C, Herrmann J-M (2001) Appl Catal B Environ 2:145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lachheb H, Puzenat E, Houas A, Ksibi M, Elaloui E, Guillard C, Herrmann J-M (2002) Appl Catal B Environ 1:75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Talebian N, Nilforoushan MR (2010) Thin Solid Films 8:2210–2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Konstantinou IK, Albanis TA (2004) Appl Catal B Environ 1:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lakshmi S, Renganathan R, Fujita S (1995) J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 2–3:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Chang H, Su C, Lo C-H, Chen L-C, Tsung T-T, Jwo C-S (2004) Mater Trans 12:3334–3337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Mills A (2012) Appl Catal B Environ 128:144–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Du P, Bueno-Lopez A, Verbaas M, Almeida A, Makkee M, Moulijn J, Mul G (2008) J Catal 1:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Ohtani B, Prieto-Mahaney OO, Li D, Abe R (2010) J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 2–3:179–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ohno T, Sarukawa K, Matsumura M (2001) J Phys Chem B 12:2417–2420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Zanella R, Giorgio S, Henry CR, Louis C (2002) J Phys Chem B 31:7634–7642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Barrett EP, Joyner LG, Halenda PP (1951) J Am Chem Soc 1:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Tauc J, Menth A (1972) J Non-Cryst Solids 8:569–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Reyes-Coronado D, Rodriguez-Gattorno G, Espinosa-Pesqueira M, Cab C, De Coss R, Oskam G (2008) Nanotechnology 14:145605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Suttiponparnit K, Jiang J, Sahu M, Suvachittanont S, Charinpanitkul T, Biswas P (2011) Nanoscale Res Lett 1:27Google Scholar
- 31.Cavigli L, Bogani F, Vinattieri A, Faso V, Baldi G (2009) J Appl Phys 5:053516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Su R, Bechstein R, Sø L, Vang RT, Sillassen M, Esbjörnsson B, Palmqvist A, Besenbacher F (2011) J Phys Chem C 49:24287–24292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Winardi S, Mukti RR, Kumar K-NP, Wang J, Wunderlich W, Okubo T (2010) Langmuir 7:4567–4571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Toyoda M, Nanbu Y, Nakazawa Y, Hirano M, Inagaki M (2004) Appl Catal B Environ 4:227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Wang X, Sø L, Su R, Wendt S, Hald P, Mamakhel A, Yang C, Huang Y, Iversen BB, Besenbacher F (2014) J Catal 310:100–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Chan C-C, Chang C-C, Hsu W-C, Wang S-K, Lin J (2009) Chem Eng J 2–3:492–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Chen P, Zhang X (2008) Clean 5–6:507–511Google Scholar
- 38.Sangpour P, Hashemi F, Moshfegh AZ (2010) J Phys Chem C 33:13955–13961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Wang X, Waterhouse GIN, Mitchell DRG, Prince K, Caruso RA (2011) ChemCatChem 11:1665–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar