Heterogeneously Catalysed Aldol Reactions in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide as Innovative and Non-Flammable Reaction Medium
- 247 Downloads
Aldol reactions of several aldehydes have been investigated over acidic and basic catalysts in supercritical carbon dioxide at 180 bar and 100 °C. Both acidic (Amberlyst-15, tungstosilicic acid (TSA) on SiO2 and MCM-41) and basic (hydrotalcite) materials showed interesting performance in this preliminary study under the entitled reaction conditions. Small and linear aldehydes, such as propanal, butanal, pentanal and hexanal, react more efficiently than the branched 3-methylbutanal, which is converted much slower. Whereas Amberlyst-15 showed the highest conversion based on the catalyst mass, tungstosilicic acid-based catalysts were significantly better if the rates were related to the number of acidic sites (>1000 h−1). The rate depends both on the dispersion and the kind of support. Strikingly, tungstosilicic acid (TSA) on MCM-41 was also an effective catalysts for the selective C=C double bond hydrogenation of 2-butenal and is therefore a potential catalyst for the “one-pot” synthesis of 2-ethyl-2-hexenal and 2-ethylhexanal via combined hydrogenation and aldol reaction from 2-butenal. A number of characterisation techniques, such as temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), etc. were used to get an insight into the catalyst structure, which support a high dispersion and strong acidity of the tungsten based species on silica and MCM-41.
KeywordsAldol reaction Supercritical carbon dioxide 2-Butenal Selective hydrogenation Amberlyst-15 Tungstosilicic acid
We are very grateful to Zeolyst and Sven Kureti (KIT), for providing the catalyst samples, the Danish Research Council (FTP-proposal “Exploring new catalytic reactions in supercritical carbon dioxide as innovative and non-flammable reaction medium”) for financial support of the project, to Center of Electron Nanoscopy (CEN), DTU for assistance with TEM, Wolfgang Kleist for characterization, Matthias Beier for his help during the experiments, and to Georgios Kontogeorgis (DTU) concerning optimization of reaction conditions by calculation of phase equilibria. ANKA at KIT and HASYLAB at DESY, Hamburg, are gratefully acknowledged for beamtime and DANSCAT and the EU (Contract RII13-CT-2004-506008) for financial support of the synchrotron radiation experiments.
- 1.Baiker A (1999) Chem Rev 99:453Google Scholar
- 5.Green MM, Wittcoff HA (2003) Organic chemical principles and industrial practice. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
- 8.Figueras F, Lopez J (2001) In: Sheldon RA, van Bekkum H (eds) Fine chemicals through heterogeneous catalysis. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, p 327Google Scholar
- 11.Kirk-Othmer (1991) Encyclopaedia of chemical technology, 4th edn, vol. 1. Wiley-VCH, New York, p 911Google Scholar
- 12.Maki T, Yokkoyama T, Sumino Y (1988) Jpn Patent 63,68,538, Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Co., Ltd, JapanGoogle Scholar
- 13.Olson KD (1978) U.S. Patent 4,704,478, Union Carbide Corp, HoustonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Chen PY, Chu SJ, Chen CC, Chang NS, Lin WC, Chaung TK (1991) U.S. Patent 5,059,724 Industrial Technology Research Institute, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
- 28.Regalbuto J (2007) Catalyst preparation: science and engineering. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 30.Hubaut R, Rives A, Kuang W, Fournier M (2005) Top Catal 4:101Google Scholar