Advertisement

Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 52, Issue 11, pp 1575–1583 | Cite as

Activity of Nitrogen Containing Carbon Nanotubes in Base Catalyzed Knoevenagel Condensation

  • S. van Dommele
  • K. P. de Jong
  • J. H. BitterEmail author
Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

The catalytic activity of Nitrogen containing Carbon Nanotubes (NCNT), grown from acetonitrile or pyridine over supported Fe-, Co or Ni catalysts at various conditions, were tested for the base catalyzed Knoevenagel condensation of benzaldehyde and ethylcyanoacetate. All NCNT displayed activity for the reaction with initial turn over frequencies between 9 × 10−3 and 5 × 10−2 s−1 which is comparable with to those of activated basic carbons and a rehydrated hydrotalcite. Furthermore, the initial activity per gram of catalyst of NCNT was related to the amount of pyridinic type nitrogen in the NCNT. However, the reaction rate decreased with time on stream which was explained by competitive adsorption of reactant and product. The reaction rate can be described using Langmuir–Hinshelwood type kinetics including product adsorption.

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes Nitrogen doping Base catalysis Kinetics Condensation 

1 Introduction

Base-catalyzed chemical conversions are important industrial processes for the production of drugs, fragrances and chemical intermediates [1, 2]. Of special importance are C–C coupling reactions such as Aldol condensations, Michael reactions and Knoevenagel condensations [3, 4, 5]. Conventionally, almost stoichiometric amounts of homogeneous bases such as hydroxides or methoxides are used for this purpose [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. In such systems several difficult issues arise of which isolation of the products, the corrosive nature of the reaction mixture and formation of large amounts of waste (salts) are the most important. The amount of waste can be as high as 5–50 kg for fine chemicals and 25–100 kg for pharmaceuticals per kg of desired product [9]. Therefore improved synthesis routes in terms of product purity, yield and minimal waste formation are highly desirable.

One of the major advantages of using heterogeneous base catalysts is the absence of salt formation potentially leading to reusable and environmentally benign processes [6, 7, 9, 11]. Examples are (metal) oxides like MgO, Al2O3 or SiO2, hydrotalcites, ALPON, alkali doped zeolites and immobilized amines such as aminopropyl silica [12, 13, 14, 15, 16].

Beside their potential for electronic applications [17, 18, 19] nanostructured carbons, such as carbon nanofibers, have the required physical properties for the use as catalyst (support), such as inertness for various solvents and mechanical strength [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. Nitrogen incorporation in carbon nanotubes (NCNT) is expected to result in base catalysts with the favourable properties of a nanostructured carbon. The basic character of the NCNT originates from the presence of pyridinic like nitrogen (NP), located at the edges of the graphene layers [26, 27]. Other nitrogen types present are quaternary N (NQ), pyrrolic N (NPYR) and oxidized pyridinic N (NOX) [28, 29, 30] however their role in base-catalysis is expected to be limited.

The NCNT used in this study were prepared by chemical vapour deposition of C- and N-containing precursors (acetonitrile, pyridine) over a supported metal catalyst, viz. Co or Ni supported on SiO2 [31, 32, 33]. As test reaction to analyse the NCNT’s catalytic activity we chose the Knoevenagel condensation of benzaldehyde (BA) with ethylcyanoacetate (ECA) resulting in ethyl-α-cyanocinnamate (ECC) (Scheme 1.) In a preliminary study we showed that the pyridinic nitrogen atoms present in the NCNT were responsible for the catalytic activity [27]. Here we report a more detailed study on a kinetic analysis, including product inhibition and mass transfer limitation, of the above mentioned Knoevenagel condensation.
Scheme 1

Knoevenagel condensation; benzaldehyde reacts with ethylcyanoacetate to form ethyl-α-cyanocinnamate

2 Experimental Section

2.1 NCNT Synthesis

Silica-supported Ni and Co catalysts with a metal loading of 20 wt% for the growth of NCNT were prepared via Homogeneous Deposition Precipitation (HDP) using Ni-nitrate or Co-nitrate as described before [34, 35]. For NCNT growth 0.5 g of the calcined catalyst was loaded into a vertical quartz reactor and heated (5° C min−1) in He (100 mL min−1) to 973 K followed by reduction at that temperature in 20% H2/He (100 mL min−1) for 2 h. Next, the temperature of the reactor was adjusted to the desired temperature (5° C min−1) for NCNT growth (823–1123 K) while keeping the catalyst in He (50 mL min−1). Subsequently, a He gas stream saturated at 303 K with the desired hydrocarbon (acetonitrile or pyridine) was fed to the reactor. After 16 h the growth reaction was terminated, the reactor was cooled to room temperature in He and the product, i.e. NCNT together with the growth catalyst, was collected. The product was refluxed in a 1 M potassium hydroxide solution for one hour to remove the silica and, after washing, refluxed in concentrated hydrochloric acid for two hours to remove the exposed metal [36, 37]. Finally, the material was washed with an aqueous ammonia solution to remove any salts formed between the basic sites in the NCNT and the acid. The NCNT were rinsed thoroughly with de-ionized water, dried at 333 K and stored for further use.

2.2 Catalysis

The catalytic activity of the NCNT was tested in the Knoevenagel condensation of benzaldehyde (BA) with ethylcyanoacetate (ECA) to form ethyl-α-cyanocinnamate (ECC). The NCNT (1 g) were heated to 423 K under vacuum and kept at that temperature for one hour. All further handling was carried out in a nitrogen atmosphere. BA (0.01 mol) and ECA (0.01 mol) were dissolved in 50 mL ethanol (p.a. grade) and any dissolved carbon dioxide was removed using the freeze-thaw method. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was added to the NCNT and the suspension was stirred vigorously and heated to reflux temperature. Samples of the reaction mixture were taken regularly for GC analysis. For reference, a blank reaction of only BA and ECA in 50 mL ethanol (p.a. grade) was performed; all reported curves are correct for the activity of the blank.

The yield of ECC formed in the Knoevenagel condensation was analyzed with gas chromatography. Aliquots of 1 mL were taken regularly from the reaction mixture and analyzed with a Chrompack CP9001 GC provided with a Chrompack CP9050 autosampler. Iso-octane was used as an internal standard. A known amount was added to a weighted amount of reaction mixture after removal of the catalyst by filtration.

To investigate the role of diffusion limitation on the catalytic activity the Weisz–Prater number was calculated for each of the NCNT samples for a 1st and 2nd order reaction. The Weisz-Prater number was calculated with Formula 1;
$$ \Upphi = \rho_{\text{p}} \cdot {\text{r}}_{{{\text{v}},{\text{obs}}}} \cdot {\text{d}}_{\text{p}}^{ 2} \cdot \left( { 3 6\cdot {\text{D}}_{\text{eff}} \cdot {\text{C}}_{\text{s}}} \right)^{ - 1} \cdot \left( {\raise.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 1$}\kern-.1em/ \kern-.15em\lower.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$} {\text{ n}} + \raise.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 1$}\kern-.1em/ \kern-.15em\lower.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$}} \right) <0. 1 5 $$
(1)
The parameters used to calculate the Weisz–Prater number at 353 K are derived from [38].

For comparison the Knoevenagel condensation was performed using a number of other solid bases. The type of material, pre-treatment and reaction conditions are summarized in Table 1.

The Knoevenagel condensation was performed with these materials in the same manner as the NCNT except for the HT where THF was used as the solvent to prevent the reaction of the HT with ethanol.
Table 1

Reference materials used in the Knoevenagel condensation, pre-treatment and reaction conditions

Solid base

Material

Reference

Pre-treatment

Material amount/solvent

HT

Rehydrated hydrotalcite

39

Vacuum, 2 h, RT

0.6 g/THF

AC-SA-Super

Activated carbon

Norit BV

Vacuum, 2 h, 423 K

1 g/EtOH

AC-SX2

Activated carbon

Norit BV

Vacuum, 2 h, 423 K

1 g/EtOH

CNF-OX

Oxidized carbon nanofibers

38

Vacuum, 2 h, 423 K

1 g/EtOH

CMK-ACN

Nitrogen containing Ordered mesoporous carbon

40

Vacuum, 2 h, 423 K

1 g/EtOH

2.3 Characterization

The N/C atomic ratio in the NCNT was determined by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) using a Vacuum Generators XPS system operating with Al(Kα) radiation. The raw data were corrected using the binding energy of graphite at 284.4 eV. Peak areas were determined after background subtraction using Shirley’s method and fitting the spectra with Gaussian curves. The amount of nitrogen incorporated was calculated from the peak areas of the C1s- and N1s peak after correcting for differences in sensitivity using sensitivity factors of 0.540 and 0.972 for C and N respectively. The N1s peak was deconvoluted into contributions of pyridinic N (398.4–399.0 eV), pyrrolic N (400.0–400.6 eV), quaternary N (401.1–401.7 eV) and N–O species (402.0–405.0 eV).

The amount of active sites at the NCNT surface was determined with acid–base titration. First an electrolyte solution was prepared by dissolving KCl (7.45 g) in 1 l deionized water. A sample of NCNT (0.1 g) was ground and subsequently dried under reduced pressure at 423 K for 1–2 h to remove any adsorbed carbon dioxide. The sample was suspended in the electrolyte solution (70 mL) and stirred for 24 h to reach equilibrium. The suspension was then titrated with a hydrochloric acid solution (2 × 10−3 M) under continuous stirring and under nitrogen atmosphere. The titrations were performed automatically using a Titralab TIM880. The pH was recorded as a function of the amount of titrant added. The rate of the addition was limited to a minimum of 0.2 ml min−1 and a maximum of 0.8 mL min−1 and in such a way that the pH changes per second were in the interval 0.01–0.05.

The proton uptake by the NCNT as function of suspension pH was calculated using Formula 1 [39]:
$$ {\text{N}} = {\text{V}}_{0} {\text{C}}_{0} + {\text{V}}_{\text{a}} {\text{C}}_{\text{a}} -\left( {{\text{V}}_{0} + {\text{V}}_{\text{a}}} \right) \cdot 10^{{ - {\text{pH}}}} $$
(2)
Where N is the amount of protons absorbed by the NCNT in mol, V0 and Va represent respectively the volume of the suspension at start of the titration and the volume of acid added in liters, C0 and Ca are respectively the concentration of protons in the suspension at start of the titration and concentration of the acid in mol l−1.
The proton uptake was plotted as function of pH and the obtained curves were deconvoluted with Gaussian curves of which the position of the peak’s maximum corresponds to the pKa value of the conjugated acid of a particular basic site on the NCNT surface. The pKa value of a certain basic site was determined by taking the derivative of the titration curve (pH as function of titrant addition) and locating the maxima of the derivative curve. With the maximum the equivalence point could be found which was then used to find the corresponding pKa value using the following relationship:
$$ {\text{pK}}_{\text{a}} = {\text{pH at V}} = 1/ 2 {\text{ V}}_{\text{eq}} $$
(3)
The pKa values were used as starting points to fit the proton uptake curve by varying the peak FWHM and position of the maximum within a set limit (ΔpH = 1).

Titration curves of pure nitrogen containing organic compounds were taken as reference. Pyridine (0.01 mmol), 4-methylpyridine (0.01 mmol), quinoline (0.01 mmol), benzylamine (0.004 mmol), piperidine (0.04 mmol) or triethylamine (0.04 mmol) were dissolved in 70 mL of the electrolyte solution. Subsequently these solutions were titrated with hydrochloric acid under continuous stirring and nitrogen flow.

3 Results

Figure 1 displays both medium and high resolution TEM micrographs of a typical NCNT sample. Uniform NCNT were observed with an average tube diameter of 25 nm. The medium magnification micrograph displayed a significant contrast between the centre and edge of the material suggesting tube morphology and an on-top view (examples indicated with arrows) further proved that the material comprised hollow tubes. High resolution TEM (Fig. 1, inset) showed that the prepared materials consisted of multiwall tubes with an average graphene sheet spacing of 3.4 Å. Some physico-chemical properties of the NCNT that have been used for catalytic testing are given in Table 2. NCNT samples are denoted according to the growth catalyst, growth temperature and C/N source. For example, NCNT grown over a cobalt catalyst at 823 K from acetonitrile has been denoted as Co823ACN. All NCNT materials were mesoporous without micropores.
Fig. 1

TEM images of Co923ACN. Arrows indicate the on-top view of the tubes. The inset is an HRTEM image of an NCNT showing parallel graphene layers

Table 2

Physico-chemical properties of solid bases

Sample

N/Ca (at/at)

NP/NT

BET surface (m2 g−1)

Mesopore vol (mmol g−1)

Pore diameter (nm)

Active sitesb (mmol g−1)

TOF  (×10−2 s−1)

Initial activityc (mmol g cat −1 h−1)

Co823ACN

0.10

0.65

147

0.57

16

0.074

5.3

14

Co923ACN

0.06

0.56

132

0.67

20

0.068

2.0

4.8

Co1023ACN

0.05

0.51

106

0.49

17

0.037

2.3

3.0

Co1023PYR

0.10

0.55

28

0.34

8

0.051

1.5

2.8

Ni823ACN

0.06

0.66

173

0.40

8

0.065

2.8

6.6

Ni1023ACN

0.05

0.35

148

0.52

14

0.057

0.9

1.8

CMK-ACN

0.09

0.42

0.248

1.1

9.9

CNFOX

186

0.36

11

0.430d

0.8

1.2

AC-SX2

841

0.33 (+0.27g)

0.117

1.1

4.6

AC-SA-Super

1.26

2.2

10

HTe

0.160f

4.4

25

Reaction conditions: 10 mmol ECA, 10 mmol BA, 50 mL EtOH, 353 K

aXPS data

bAt surface (titration)

cDetermined from yield vs time plot

dAcidic sites

eTHF used as solvent

fDetermined with CO2 adsorption

gMicropore volume

The N/C atomic ratios were determined with XPS (Table 2) and varied between 0.05 and 0.10 which equals respectively 3.7 and 7.9 mmol N per gram NCNT. The amount seemed to decrease with increasing growth temperature for a given growth catalyst and C/N source. Further analysis of the N1s spectrum revealed the presence of different types of nitrogen species in the NCNT graphene sheets, i.e., pyridynic, quaternary, pyrrolic and N-oxides. The fraction of pyridinic nitrogen, NP/NT in Table 2 where NT denotes pyridinic-, pyrrolic- and oxidic N species, varies between 0.35 and 0.65 and is an indication of the relative amount of basic N.

The amount of basic sites at the surface of the samples was calculated from titration data and was in the range 0.037–0.074 mmol g−1 for the NCNT. Here we determined the total amount of surface sites by deconvolution of proton uptake curves which were derived from titration curves. This technique provides more detailed information about the pKa distribution of the accessible sites than can obtained from titration curves alone as was done before [27]. The site density of the NCNT is about an order of magnitude lower compared to the site density of AC-SA-super samples and, although acidic, the site density of CNFOX.

In Table 2 the results of the catalytic testing of all samples, corrected for blank activity, have been compiled. The activity of the blank is shown in Fig. 2 as well; all reported activities are corrected for the blank activity. All NCNT displayed activity for the Knoevenagel condensation of BA and ECA. Figure 2 displays some typical catalytic results of NCNT in which the yield of ECC was plotted as a function of time. As can be seen in this figure, most of the conversion occurred in the first half hour. After that the curve levels off and little increase of the ECC yield is observed. From Fig. 2 it can also be concluded that a high initial rate (Table 2) does not necessarily lead to a high ECC yield after prolonged time. For example, the yield after 4 hours obtained with Ni823ACN, which had an initial rate of 6.6 mmol g cat −1  h−1, is similar to the yield obtained with Co1023ACN, which had an initial rate of 3.0 mmol g cat −1  h−1.
Fig. 2

Knoevenagel condensation with Co grown NCNT (a) and Ni grown NCNT (b) at 823 K (■), 923 K (●) and 1023 K (□); blank activity (♦)

To get an impression of the reusability of the catalysts, Co823ACN was after the first test experiment filtered off, washed with ethanol, pre-treated as before and used for a second run. The activity of that run (data not shown) was comparable to that of the first one indicating that irreversible deactivation was limited.

The catalytic activity of the NCNT was compared with other solid bases. In Fig. 3 the yield of ECC as function of reaction time is displayed for AC-SX2, AC-SA-super, CMKACN and HT. Also the activity of oxidized Carbon Nanofibers (CNFOX) has been added for comparison. As was observed with the NCNT the conversion of reactants to ECC occurred in the first half hour after which the yield did not increase significantly. The yield of ECC obtained with the HT was rather high, 8.5 mmol g cat −1 . The yield obtained with AC-SA-Super, 4.5 mmol g cat −1 , was comparable to that obtained with one of the NCNT. However, as can be seen in Table 2 the site density on AC-SA-Super is an order of magnitude higher than that of the NCNT. Thus when the activity per site of the catalysts is compared the performance of the activated carbon is rather poor. Furthermore, the yield over AC-SA-Super decreased after 1 hour which suggests that absorption of the product or secondary reactions might occur. The same was observed for AC-SX2. The acidic CNFOX hardly displayed any activity with an ECC yield of 0.6 mmol g cat −1 .
Fig. 3

Yield of ECC plotted as function of reaction time for the Knoevenagel condensation with HT (♦), AC-SA-super (■), AC-SX2 (●), CMKACN (▲) and CNFOX (□)

To investigate the possibility of internal diffusion limitation the Weisz–Prater number was calculated for reactants and product for all NCNT samples. The parameters used and the results have been compiled in Table 3.
Table 3

Weisz–Prater numbers (Φ) for BA, ECA and ECC for the Knoevenagel condensation at 353 K

Sample

Co823ACN

Co923ACN

Co1023ACN

Co1023PYR

Ni823ACN

Ni1023ACN

Reaction order (n)

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

ΦBA

0.06

0.08

0.02

0.03

0.01

0.02

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.01

0.01

ΦECA

0.06

0.09

0.02

0.03

0.01

0.02

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.01

0.01

ΦECC

0.14

0.22

0.05

0.07

0.03

0.05

0.03

0.04

0.07

0.10

0.02

0.03

As can be seen there were no internal diffusion limitations for any sample in case of a 1st order reaction. If the reaction was 2nd order only slight diffusion limitations occurred in ECC with the Co823ACN sample.

4 Discussion

Figure 2 shows that reactant conversions between 10% and 50% to ECC were obtained within the first hour after which little increase in yield was observed. It should be noted that ECC was the only product observed in all experiments. However the final yield is different for all samples even though the reactions conditions were the same in all experiments. Therefore the yield is not limited by the thermodynamic equilibrium of the reaction. Thus we conclude that the active sites are deactivated by the adsorption of (one of) the products. Therefore, we evaluate the catalytic activity of the materials by its initial reaction rate.

The amount of basic N, as determined with acid base titration, is approximately related to the NCNT’s initial activity in the Knoevenagel condensation as displayed in Fig. 4. An increase in the number of N groups leads to an increase in the initial activity.
Fig. 4

Relation between the amount of active N sites in NCNT and the initial activity in the Knoevenagel condensation

However, this increase could be caused by any of the basic N types, amine or pyridinic N. Therefore the possibility that the increase in initial activity is related to the increase of a specific N type was investigated. For each sample of NCNT the total number of surface N groups was determined by titration. Then the ratio Ntype/NT was determined for each of the N types, i.e. amine N, pyridinic N and oxidized N, from XPS data where NT is the sum of all the mentioned N types. This ratio was then taken to estimate the number of surface groups of a specific N type and used as correction factor for Fig. 4. Please note that it was assumed that the ratio of each N type determined with XPS was constant throughout the whole NCNT. It turned out that the initial activity in the Knoevenagel condensation increased with increasing amount of NP (Fig. 5), which indicated that this type of nitrogen is (part of) the active site for the reaction. No relation could be found between the other nitrogen species and activity.
Fig. 5

Relation of pyridinic nitrogen and initial activity [adapted from 27]

To investigate the order of the reaction in Fig. 6 the concentration of BA as function of reaction time is plotted. As can be seen from this figure the conversion of BA is initially rapid and then decreases as can be expected for a batch reactor. The experimental data were compared with a 2nd order rate model, thus assuming that the C–C bond formation is the rate determining step. It should be noted that if proton abstraction is the rate determining step, a first order equation would be appropriate [40]. However, the data could not be fitted with a second order rate equation as is illustrated in Fig. 6. As can be seen in Fig. 6 the fit matches the experimental data only at start for Co823ACN and Co923ACN but not beyond half an hour. Only a good fit is observed with Co1023ACN. A mismatch between experimental data and the rate model was also observed with the other NCNT.
Fig. 6

BA conversion as function of reaction time by Co823ACN (◊) and fit (solid line), Co923ACN (∆) and fit (dotted line), Co1023ACN (○) and fit (dashed line)

As can be concluded from Fig. 6 the predicted conversion is much higher than is achieved in reality. This may indicate that active sites are deactivated over time as more BA and ECA have reacted and more ECC is formed. This might be explained by inhibition of the active sites by reactants or products, in the latter case either ECC or water. Since the concentration of reactants is relatively high at the start of the reaction and the activity of the catalyst decreases as more product is formed, the latter option seems more plausible.

Langmuir–Hinshelwood type kinetics including product inhibition would be needed for an improved model. Here we used the simplified expression:
$$ {\text{r}} = \left( {{\text{k}}\left[ {\text{BA}} \right]\left[ {\text{ECA}} \right]} \right) \cdot \left( { 1+ {\text{K}}_{\text{c}} \left[ {\text{ECC}} \right]} \right)^{ - 1} $$
(4)
with the assumption of a single site and product inhibition. The reactant and product concentration can be written in terms of conversion (x) and since equimolar amounts BA and ECA are used the following expressions are derived:
$$ \left[ {\text{BA}} \right] = \left[ {\text{BA}} \right]_{0} \cdot \left( { 1- {\text{x}}} \right) $$
(5)
$$ \left[ {\text{ECA}} \right] = \left[ {\text{BA}} \right] = \left[ {\text{BA}} \right]_{0} \cdot \left( { 1- {\text{x}}} \right) $$
(6)
$$ \left[ {\text{ECC}} \right] = \left[ {\text{BA}} \right]_{0} \cdot {\text{x}} $$
(7)
where [BA]0 is the BA concentration at start of the reaction. Equation 3 can be written as a differential equation:
$$ \left[ {\text{BA}} \right]_{0} {\text{dx}}/{\text{dt}} = \left( {{\text{k}}\left[ {\text{BA}} \right]_{0}^{ 2} \cdot \left( { 1- {\text{x}}} \right)^{2}} \right) \cdot \left( { 1+ {\text{K}}_{\text{c}} \left[ {\text{BA}} \right]_{0} \cdot {\text{x}}} \right)^{ - 1} $$
(8)
By solving the integral and using Eqs. 57 we arrive at an expression for the concentration of [BA] as function of time with variables k and Kc:
$$ \left[ {\text{BA}} \right] = \left( {{\text{K}}_{\text{c}} \left[ {\text{BA}} \right]_{0} + 1} \right) \cdot \left( {{\text{k}} \cdot {\text{t}} + \left[ {\text{BA}} \right]_{0}^{ - 1} -{\text{K}}_{\text{c}} \cdot \left\{ {{ \ln}\left( { 1- {\text{x}}} \right) - 1} \right\}} \right)^{ - 1} $$
(9)
The results of fitting the experimental data with a Langmuir–Hinshelwood type equation are shown in Fig. 7. As can be seen from this figure the experimental data can be described fairly accurately with the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model. The corresponding k, Kc and correlation coefficients are tabulated in Table 4.
Fig. 7

Experimental BA conversion as function of reaction time fit with a Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model. a Co823ACN (◊), Co923ACN (♦) and Co1023ACN (∆). b Ni823ACN (■), Ni1023ACN (○) and Co1023PYR (□)

Table 4

k, Kc and R2 values of NCNT for the observed data and the Langmuir–Hinshelwood rate model

Sample

k (L mol−1 h−1)

Kc (L mol−1)

R2

Co823ACN

15

50

0.992

Co923ACN

7

150

0.998

Co1023ACN

2

10

0.996

Co1023PYR

3

30

0.999

Ni823ACN

10

100

0.997

Ni1023ACN

4

40

0.990

From the correlation coefficients in Table 4 it can be concluded that the rate model agrees well with the experimental data and that the Knoevenagel condensation with NCNT follow Langmuir–Hinshelwood type kinetics. As predicted by Eq. 4 the reaction rate decreases as more product, i.e. ECC, is formed which means that competitive adsorption occurs between reactants and products. The calculated k-values showed a quadratic dependency with the amount of pyridinic N in the NCNT. Therefore, the k-value can be regarded as being composed of the real k value and the concentration of pyridinic N:
$$ {\text{k}} = {\text{k}}_{\text{real}} \cdot \left[ {{\text{N}}_{\text{P}}} \right]^{\alpha} $$
(10)
with [NP] the concentration of pyridinic N and α the reaction order. Since a quadratic relationship exists between [NP] and k, α should be 2. By plotting k as function of [Np] (Fig. 8) and calculating the coefficients of the quadratic fit the value of kreal was determined to be 5500 L3 mol−3 h−1. No relationship between kc and [NP] was observed. The second order relationship of k and [NP] suggests a dual site mechanism for the NCNT catalyzed knoevenagel condensation.
Fig. 8

Relationship between the calculated k values and the pyridinic N concentration at the NCNT surface

The activities of reference materials i.e. activated carbons, hydrotalcite and oxidized CNF, were rather diverse. Relatively high yields of ECC were obtained within one hour with the HT and AC-SA-Super. However, the activity of the latter per active site of the material is rather low (Table 2). The decline in ECC yield with the latter after one hour may be explained by adsorption of product or consecutive reactions. Since no other product besides ECC was observed the first explanation is more plausible especially when it is taken into account that the AC materials were designed as adsorbents for organic molecules. Since the used activated carbons (AC materials) are microporous it likely that the condensation reaction is diffusion limited. This further proves that NCNT being mesoporous materials are very suitable for the Knoevenagel condensation if site inhibition can be prevented.

In Fig. 9 a comparison of activities in the Knoevenagel condensation of ECA and BA with different solid bases is displayed. It should be noted that the catalytic data from the literature were obtained at a variety of conditions. Therefore only the order of magnitudes of activities can be compared. The initial activities per gram of NCNT are comparable with some other mildly basic materials [41, 42, 43, 44] like fluoro- and hydroxy appatites and aluminophosphate oxynitrides. The higher activities observed with the other types of solid bases may be caused by the number or accessibility of the active site. The highest activities were observed with alkaline exchanged zeolites which had active sites with pKa values between 10 and 13. A strong base is not necessarily an advantage since side reactions might occur as well which lead to low product concentration. NCNT prove to be efficient catalysts for condensation reactions which require mild solid bases. Further study about the incorporation and accessibility of nitrogen at the CNT surface may enhance their catalytic performance.
Fig. 9

Activities of solid bases in the Knoevenagel condensation of ECA and BA

5 Conclusions

We succeeded in preparing a new solid base catalyst that consists of nitrogen-containing CNT. The activity of these materials seems to be determined by the concentration of pyridinic nitrogen present in the catalyst. The observed deactivation of the catalysts was explained by inhibition of the active sites by the formed products. The reaction rate could be described by a Langmuir–Hinshelwood type kinetic model. Calculations showed that the mesoporous NCNT did not suffer from diffusion limitation which is an advantage of these materials over existing microporous basic materials.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial support of the Dutch Science Foundations (NWO) within the “Jonge Chemici” scheme is (project number 700.50.520) gratefully acknowledged.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. 1.
    Kelly GJ, King F, Kett M (2002) Green Chem 4:392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tanabe K, Hölderich WF (1999) Appl Catal A Gen 181:399–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weitkamp J, Hunger M, Rymsa U (2001) Micropor Mesopor Mat 48:255–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheldon RA (2000) Pure Appl Chem 72(7):1233–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zapf A, Beller M (2002) Top Catal 19(1):101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    King F, Kelly GJ (2002) Catal Today 73:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blaser H-U (2000) Catal Today 60:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poliakoff M, Fitzpatrick JM, Farren TR, Anastas PT (2002) Science 297:807–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sheldon RA, Molec J (1996) Catal A 107:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kelly GJ, King F, Kett M (2002) Green Chem 4:392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Winter F, Koot V, van Dillen AJ, Geus JW, de Jong KP (2005) J Catal 236:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ono Y (2003) J Catal 216:406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hattori H (2001) Appl Catal A 222:247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tanabe K, Hölderich WF (1999) Appl Catal A 181:399–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clark JH, Macquarrie DJ (1997) Org Process Res Dev 1(2):149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ono Y, Baba T (1997) Catal Today 38:321–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de eer WA (2002) Science 297:787–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Avouris P (2002) Chem Phys 281:429–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kreupl F, Graham AP, Duesberg GS, SteinHögl W, Liebau M, Unger E, Hönlein W (2002) Microelectron Eng 64:399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patent application, PCT/NL2005/000274Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    van der Lee MK, van Dillen AJ, Geus JW, de Jong KP, Bitter JH (2006) Carbon 44:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    de Jong KP, Geus JW (2000) Catal Rev-Sci Eng 42(4):481–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Serp P, Corrias M, Kalck P (2003) Appl Catal A Gen 253:337–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bitter JH, van der Lee MK, Slotboom AGT, van Dillen AJ, de Jong KP (2003) Cat Let 89(1–2):139–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Czerw R, Terrones M, Charlier JC, Blasé X, Foley B, Kamalakaran R, Grobert N, Terrones H, Tekleab D, Ajayan PM, Blau W, Rühle M, Carroll DL (2001) Nano Lett 1(9):457–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Burg P, Frydrych P, Cagniant D, Nanse G, Bimer J, Jankowska A (2002) Carbon 40:1521–1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Dommele S, de Jong KP, Bitter JH (2006) Chem Commun 4859–4861Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Raymundo-Piñero E, Cazorla-Amorós D, Linares-Solano A, Find J, Wild U, Schlögl R (2002) Carbon 40:597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pels JR, Kapteijn F, Moulijn JA, Zhu Q, Thomas KM (1995) Carbon 33(11):1641–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kapteijn F, Moulijn JA, Matzner S, Boehm HP (1999) Carbon 37:1143–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tang C, Bando Y, Goldberg D, Xu F (2004) Carbon 42:2625–2633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nath M, Satishkumar BC, Govindaraj A, Vinod CP, Rao CNR (2000) Chem Phys Lett 322:333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van Dommele S, Romero-Izquirdo A, Brydson R, de Jong KP, Bitter JH (2008) Carbon 46:138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bezemer GL, Radstake PB, Koot V, van Dillen AJ, Geus JW, de Jong KP (2006) J Catal 237:291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    van der Lee MK, van Dillen AJ, Bitter JH, de Jong KP (2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:13573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Toebes ML, Bitter JH, van Dillen AJ, de Jong KP (2002) Catal Today 76(1):33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Toebes ML, van Heeswijk JMP, Bitter JH, van Dillen AJ, de Jong KP (2004) Carbon 42(2):307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O’Connell JP (2000) The properties of gases and liquids, 5th edn. McGRaw-Hill professional, NYGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tantavichet N, Pritzker MD, Burns CM (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 81:1493–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang X, Lai ESM, Martin-Aranda R, Yeung KL (2004) Appl Catal A Gen 261:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    de D. López-González J, López-Peinado A, Martin-Aranda RM, Rojas-Cervantes ML (1993) Carbon 31(8):1231–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Corma A, Fornés V, Martin-Aranda RM, García H, Primo J (1990) Appl Catal 59:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Elazarifi N, Ezzamarty A, Leglise J, de Ménorval L-C, Moreau C (2004) Appl Catal A Gen 267:235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Massinon A, Odriozola JA, Bastians Ph, Conanec R, Marchand R, Laurent Y, Grange P (1996) Appl Catal A Gen 137:9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. van Dommele
    • 1
  • K. P. de Jong
    • 1
  • J. H. Bitter
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Inorganic Chemistry and CatalysisUniversity of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations