Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 32, Issue 3–4, pp 95–99 | Cite as

Global warming and the mining of oceanic methane hydrate

  • Chung-Chieng A. Lai
  • David E. Dietrich
  • Malcolm J. Bowman
Article

Abstract

The impacts of global warming on the environment, economy and society are presently receiving much attention by the international community. However, the extent to which anthropogenic factors are the main cause of global warming is still being debated. There are obviously large stakes associated with the validity of any theory since that will indicate what actions need to be taken to protect the human race’s only home—Earth. Most studies of global warming have investigated the rates and quantities of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere since the beginning of the industrial revolution. In this paper, we focus on the earth’s carbon budget and the associated energy transfer between various components of the climate system. This research invokes some new concepts: (i) certain biochemical processes which strongly interact with geophysical processes in climate system; (ii) a hypothesis that internal processes in the oceans rather than in the atmosphere are at the center of global warming; (iii) chemical energy stored in biochemical processes can significantly affect ocean dynamics and therefore the climate system. Based on those concepts, we propose a new hypothesis for global warming. We also propose a revolutionary strategy to deal with global climate change and provide domestic energy security at the same time. Recent ocean exploration indicates that huge deposits of oceanic methane hydrate deposits exist on the seafloor on continental margins. Methane hydrate transforms into water and methane gas when it dissociates. So, this potentially could provide the United States with energy security if the technology for mining in the 200-mile EEZ is developed and is economically viable. Furthermore, methane hydrate is a relatively environmentally benign, clean fuel. Such technology would help industry reduce carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere, and thus reduce global warming by harnessing the energy from the deep sea.

Keywords

global warming methane hydrate greenhouse gases methane carbon dioxide methane oxidation methane bubbles ocean warming heat content 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    United Nations Environmental Programme: Introduction to climate change. Website- http://www.grida.no/climate/vital/11.htm.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    IPCC, IPCC Third assessment Report—Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (Cambridge University Press, 2001) p. 874.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    U.S. Department of Energy: All about hydrates. NETL website— http://www.netl.doe.gov/scng/hydrate/about-hydrates/conditions.htm.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    K.A. Kvenvolden, in: Gas Hydrates J.-P. Henriet and J Mienert eds. vol. 137, (Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1998) pp. 9–30.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kennett J.P., Cannariato K.G., Hendy I.L., Behl R.J. (2003). Methane Hydrates in Quaternary Climate Change The Clathrate Gun Hypothesis. American Geophysical Union, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Levitus, S., Antonov, J.I., Wang, J., Delworth, T.L., Dixon, K.W., Brocoli, A.J. 2001Science292267Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Hansen, M. Sata, R. Ruedy, A. Lacis and V. Oinas, Natl. Acad Sci. USA 10.1073/pnas.170278997 (2000) 6.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    U.S. NASA, Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) for Monthly Medium-Wide Data Tape (MWDT) (S-7) Langley DAAC Data Set Document. Website—http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/GUIDE/dataset_documents/erbe_s7.htmlGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    U.S. Department of Commerce, World Ocean Atlas 1994, Vol. 2, Oxygen. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 2, (1994) 186Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Carmack, E.C., MacDomald, R.W., Perkin, R.G., McLaughlin, F.A., Pearson, R.J. 1995Geophys. Res. Lett.221061Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Grotefendt, K., Logeman, K., Quadfasel, D., Ronski, S. 1998J.’Geophys. Res.10327679Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    M.J. Karcher, R. Gerdes, F. Kauker and C. Koberle, J. Geophys. Res. 108, C2, 3034, (2003) 16-1 to 16-16.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Mork, K.A., Blindheim, J. 2000Deep Sea Res. I471035Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Quadfasel D., Sy A., Wells D., Tunil A. Nature 350: 385Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Orvik, K.A., Skagseth, O., Mork, M. 2001Deep-Sea Res. I48937Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Wadhams, P., Davis, N. 2000Geophys. Res. Lett.243973Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Zhang, J., Rothrock, D.A., Steele, M. 2001J. Climate133099Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    N. Iversen, in: Microbiology of Atmospheric Tracer Gases, eds. J.C. Murrell and D.P. Kelley, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996) pp.51–68.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    W.S. Reeburgh, S.C. Whalen and M.J. Alperin, in: Microbiology of CI Compounds, eds. J.C. Murrell and D.P. Kelley (Intercept, Andover, UK, 1993) pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    T. Westerlund, On modeling of the atmospheric carbon dioxide change. Internal report 90-111-A. Abo Akademi Univ. Dept. of Chemical Engineering. Finland, (1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chung-Chieng A. Lai
    • 1
  • David E. Dietrich
    • 2
  • Malcolm J. Bowman
    • 3
  1. 1.Earth and Environmental Sciences DivisionLos Alamos National LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA
  2. 2.AcuSea, Inc.AlbuquerqueUSA
  3. 3.Marine Sciences Research CenterState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations