The Linear Boltzmann Equation in Column Experiments of Porous Media

Abstract

The use of the linear Boltzmann equation is proposed for transport in porous media in a column. By column experiments, we show that the breakthrough curve is reproduced by the linear Boltzmann equation. The advection–diffusion equation is derived from the linear Boltzmann equation in the asymptotic limit of large propagation distance and long time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Adams, E.E., Gelhar, L.W.: Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer, 2, spatial moments analysis. Water Resour. Res. 28(12), 3293–3307 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR01757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Apresyan, L.A., Kravtsov, Y.A.: Radiation Transfer: Statistical and Wave Aspects. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barichello, L.B.: Explicit formulations for radiative transfer problems. In: Orlande, H.R.B., Fudym, O., Maillet, D., Cotta, R.M. (eds.) Thermal Measurements and Inverse Techniques. CRS Press, Boca Raton (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barichello, L.B., Siewert, C.E.: A new version of the discrete-ordinates method. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Heat and Mass Transfer, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 22–26 (2001)

  5. Barichello, L.B., Garcia, R.D.M., Siewert, C.E.: Particular solutions for the discrete-ordinates method. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Trans. 64(3), 219–226 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(98)00146-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benson, S.M., Orr Jr., F.M.: Carbon dioxide capture and storage. Harnessing Mater. Energy 33(4), 303–305 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2008.63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benson, D.A., Wheatcraft, S.W., Meerschaert, M.M.: Application of a fractional advection–dispersion equation. Water Resour. Res. 36(6), 1403–1412 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Benson, D.A., Schumer, R., Meerschaert, M.M., Wheatcraft, S.W.: Fractional dispersion, Lévy motion, and the MADE tracer tests. Transp. Porous Media 42(1–2), 211–240 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006733002131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berkowitz, B., Scher, H.: Theory of anomalous chemical transport in random fracture networks. Phys. Rev. E 57(5), 5858–5869 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.57.5858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berkowitz, B., Scher, H., Silliman, S.E.: Anomalous transport in laboratory-scale, heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour. Res. 36(1), 149–158 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Case, K.M.: Elementary solutions of the transport equation and their applications. Ann. Phys. 9(1), 1–23 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(60)90060-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Case, K.M., Zweifel, P.F.: Linear Transport Theory. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chakraborty, P., Meerschaert, M.M., Lim, C.Y.: Parameter estimation for fractional transport: a particle-tracking approach. Water Resour. Res. 45(10), W10415 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandrasekhar, S.: Radiative Transfer. Dover, New York (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cortis, A., Chen, Y., Scher, H., Berkowitz, B.: Quantitative characterization of pore-scale disorder effects on transport in “homogeneous” granular media. Phys. Rev. E 70(4), 041108 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.041108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Anna, P., Le Borgne, T., Dentz, M., Tartakovsky, A.M., Bolster, D., Davy, P.: Flow intermittency, dispersion, and correlated continuous time random walks in porous media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(18), 184502 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.184502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duderstadt, J.J., Martin, W.R.: Transport Theory. Wiley, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Furutsu, K., Yamada, Y.: Diffusion approximation for a dissipative random medium and the applications. Phys. Rev. E 50(5), 3634–3640 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.3634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gelhar, L.W.: Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications. Water Resour. Res. 22(9), 135S–145S (1986). https://doi.org/10.1029/WR022i09Sp0135S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Golub, G.H., Welsch, J.H.: Calculation of Gauss quadrature rules. Math. Comput. 23(106), 221–230 (1969). https://doi.org/10.2307/2004418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hatano, Y., Hatano, N.: Dispersive transport of ions in column experiments: an explanation of long-tailed profiles. Water Resour. Res. 34(5), 1027–1033 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR00214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ishimaru, A.: Wave Propagation and Scattering in Random Media. Academic, San Diego (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly, J.F., Bolster, D., Meerschaert, M.M., Drummond, J.D., Packman, A.I.: FracFit: a robust parameter estimation tool for fractional calculus models. Water Resour. Res. 53(3), 2559–2567 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kennedy, C.A., Lennox, W.C.: A stochastic interpretation of the tailing effect in solute transport. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 15(4), 325–340 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004770100076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Levy, M., Berkowitz, B.: Measurement and analysis of non-Fickian dispersion in heterogeneous porous media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 64(3–4), 203–226 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(02)00204-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liang, Y., Chen, W., Xu, W., Sun, H.: Distributed order Hausdorff derivative diffusion model to characterize non-Fickian diffusion in porous media. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Sim. 70, 384–393 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, H., Kang, Q., Leonardi, C.R., Schmieschek, S., Narvaez, A., Jones, B.D., Williams, J.R., Valocchi, A.J., Harting, J.: Multiphase lattice Boltzmann simulations for porous media applications. Comput. Geosci. 20(4), 777–805 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-015-9542-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Matsuda, N., Mikami, S., Shimoura, S., Takahashi, J., Nakano, M., Shimada, K., Uno, K., Hagiwara, S., Saito, K.: Depth profiles of radioactive cesium in soil using a scraper plate over a wide area surrounding the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant, Japan. J. Environ. Radioact. 139, 427–434 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Meerschaert, M.M., Zhang, Y., Baeumer, B.: Tempered anomalous diffusion in heterogeneous systems. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35(17), L17403 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Metzler, R., Klafter, J.: The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Phy. Rep. 339(1), 1–77 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00070-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Montero, M., Masoliver, J.: Nonindependent continuous-time random walks. Phys. Rev. E 76(6), 061115 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.061115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Montroll, E.W., Weiss, G.H.: Random walks on lattices. II. J. Math. Phys. 6(2), 1672013181 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1704269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moroni, M., Cushman, J.H., Cenedese, A.: Application of photogrammetric 3D-PTV technique to track particles in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 79(1), 43–65 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-008-9270-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nissan, A., Dror, I., Berkowitz, B.: Time-dependent velocity-field controls on anomalous chemical transport in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 53(5), 3760–3769 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ogata, A., Banks, R.B.: A solution of the differential equation of longitudinal dispersion in porous media. Professional paper, 411-A (1961). https://doi.org/10.3133/pp411A

  36. Rubin, Y.: Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology. Oxford University Press, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schumer, R., Benson, D.A., Meerschaert, M.M., Baeumer, B.: Fractal mobile/immobile solute transport. Water Resour. Res. 39(10), 1296 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sen, D., Nobes, D.S., Mitra, S.K.: Optical measurement of pore scale velocity field inside microporous media. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 12(1–4), 189–200 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-011-0862-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Siewert, C.E.: A concise and accurate solution to Chandrasekhar’s basic problem in radiative transfer. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Trans. 64(2), 109–130 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(98)00144-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Siewert, C.E., Wright, S.J.: Efficient eigenvalue calculations in radiative transfer. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Trans. 62(6), 685–688 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(98)00099-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sobolev, V.V.: Light Scattering in Planetary Atmospheres. Pergamon, Oxford (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Succi, S.: The Lattice Boltzmann Equation for Fluid Dynamics and Beyond. Clarendon, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sun, H., Chen, W., Chen, Y.: Variable-order fractional differential operators in anomalous diffusion modeling. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 388(21), 4586–4592 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sun, H., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, W.: Fractional and fractal derivative models for transient anomalous diffusion: model comparison. Chaos Solitons Fractals 102, 346–353 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.03.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Thomas, S.: Enhanced oil recovery—an overview. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 63(1), 9–19 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2007060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Thomas, G.E., Stamnes, K.: Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere and Ocean. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Van Genuchten, M.T., Wierenga, P.J.: Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media I. Analytical solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 40(4), 473–480 (1976). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000040011x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wei, S., Chen, W., Hon, Y.C.: Characterizing time dependent anomalous diffusion process: a survey on fractional derivative and nonlinear models. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 462(15), 1244–1251 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.06.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Weideman, J., Trefethen, L.: Parabolic and hyperbolic contours for computing the Bromwich integral. Math. Comput. 76(259), 1341–1356 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-07-01945-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Williams, M.M.R.: Stochastic problems in the transport of radioactive nuclides in fractured rock. Nuclear Sci. Eng. 112(3), 215–230 (1992a). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A29070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Williams, M.M.R.: A new model for describing the transport of radionuclides through fractured rock. Ann. Nuclear Energy 19(10–12), 791–824 (1992b). https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4549(92)90018-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Williams, M.M.R.: A new model for describing the transport of radionuclides through fractured rock. Part II: numerical results. Ann. Nuclear Energy 20(3), 185–202 (1993a). https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4549(93)90101-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Williams, M.M.R.: Radionuclide transport in fractured rock a new model: application and discussion. Ann. Nuclear Energy 20(4), 279–297 (1993b). https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4549(93)90083-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Yoo, K.M., Liu, F., Alfano, R.R.: When does the diffusion approximation fail to describe photon transport in random media? Phys. Rev. Lett. 64(22), 2647–2650 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The seed of this research was planted on the occasion of the Study Group Workshop (Department of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, December 2010), which is greatly appreciated. The research was restarted with the support of the Focusing Collaborative Research by the Interdisciplinary Project on Environmental Transfer of Radionuclides (University of Tsukuba and Hirosaki University). The research was partially supported by the JSPS A3 Foresight Program: Modeling and Computation of Applied Inverse Problems. MM acknowledges support from Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (17H02081, 17K05572, 18K03438) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. YH acknowledges support from Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (15H05740, 17H01478) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuko Hatano.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Eigenvalues

Let us write the homogeneous equation as

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \left( \mu _tI-\frac{1}{\nu }\Xi _+\right) \Phi _+&= \frac{\mu _s}{2}W\left( \Phi _++\Phi _-\right) ,\\ \left( \mu _tI-\frac{1}{\nu }\Xi _-\right) \Phi _-&= \frac{\mu _s}{2}W\left( \Phi _++\Phi _-\right) , \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(50)

where I is the identity, \(\Xi _{\pm }\) and W are matrices, and \(\Phi _{\pm }\) are vectors defined as

$$\begin{aligned} \Xi _{\pm }=\begin{pmatrix} \pm \mu _1+\eta &{}&{}&{} \\ &{} \pm \mu _2+\eta &{}&{} \\ &{}&{} \ddots &{} \\ &{}&{}&{} \pm \mu _N+\eta \end{pmatrix}, \quad \Phi _{\pm }=\begin{pmatrix} \phi (\nu ,\pm \mu _1) \\ \phi (\nu ,\pm \mu _2) \\ \vdots \\ \phi (\nu ,\pm \mu _N) \end{pmatrix}, \quad \left\{ W\right\} _{ij}=w_j. \end{aligned}$$
(51)

We obtain

$$\begin{aligned} SM\begin{pmatrix}\Phi _+ \\ \Phi _-\end{pmatrix}= \frac{1}{\nu }\begin{pmatrix}\Phi _+ \\ \Phi _-\end{pmatrix}, \end{aligned}$$
(52)

where

$$\begin{aligned} S=\begin{pmatrix}\Xi _+^{-1} &{} \\ &{} \Xi _-^{-1}\end{pmatrix}, \quad M=\mu _t(s)\begin{pmatrix}I &{} \\ &{} I \end{pmatrix}-\frac{\mu _s}{2} \begin{pmatrix}W &{} W \\ W &{} W\end{pmatrix}. \end{aligned}$$
(53)

We label the eigenvalues as \(\nu _n\) (\(n=1,2,\dots ,2N\)).

By deforming the Bromwich contour, we obtain a contour \((-\infty ,\gamma )\), \(\gamma >0\), on which s is real. In this case, we have

$$\begin{aligned} SMw_0=\lambda _0w_0, \end{aligned}$$
(54)

where \(\lambda _0\) is real and \(w_0\) a 2N-dimensional real vector. We note that \(M=\mathfrak {R}{M}\) in this case and moreover we can write

$$\begin{aligned} \mu _t(s)=\frac{\sigma _a+\sigma _s+\mathfrak {R}{s}}{v_0}. \end{aligned}$$
(55)

Since M is a symmetric real matrix, by the Cholesky decomposition we can write \(M=U^TU\), where U is a real triangular matrix with positive diagonal entries. Hence,

$$\begin{aligned} USU^T\widetilde{w_0}=\lambda \widetilde{w_0},\quad \widetilde{w_0}=Uw_0. \end{aligned}$$
(56)

Since U is nonsingular, S and \(USU^T\) have the same inertia, i.e., the same number of positive, negative, and zero eigenvalues according to Sylvester’s law of inertia. Clearly, S has \(N_{\eta }\) positive eigenvalues. Therefore, there are \(N_{\eta }\) eigenvalues \(\lambda _0\).

Next, we assume that s has a small imaginary part. Then, we can write

$$\begin{aligned} S\left( \mathfrak {R}{M}+i\frac{\mathfrak {I}{s}}{v_0}\begin{pmatrix}I&{}\\ {} &{}I\end{pmatrix}\right) w= \lambda w. \end{aligned}$$
(57)

We treat the imaginary part as perturbation and express the matrix-vector equation as

$$\begin{aligned} S\left( \mathfrak {R}{M}+i\epsilon \frac{\mathfrak {I}{s}}{v_0} \begin{pmatrix}I&{}\\ {} &{}I\end{pmatrix}\right) \left( w_0+\epsilon w_1+\cdots \right) = \left( \lambda _0+\lambda _1+\cdots \right) \left( w_0+\epsilon w_1+\cdots \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(58)

By collecting terms of order \(O(\epsilon ^0)\), we have \(S(\mathfrak {R}{M})w_0=\lambda _0w_0\). From terms of \(O(\epsilon ^1)\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} S(\mathfrak {R}{M})w_1+i\frac{\mathfrak {I}{s}}{v_0}Sw_0=\lambda _0w_1+\lambda _1w_0. \end{aligned}$$
(59)

Let us multiply \(w_0^T\) on both sides of the above equation. We obtain

$$\begin{aligned} w_0^TS(\mathfrak {R}{M})w_1+i\frac{\mathfrak {I}{s}}{v_0}w_0^TSw_0=\lambda _0w_0^Tw_1+\lambda _1w_0^Tw_0. \end{aligned}$$
(60)

Using \(w_0^T(S(\mathfrak {R}{M}))^T=w_0^TS\mathfrak {R}{M}=\lambda _0w_0^T\), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \lambda _1=i\frac{(\mathfrak {I}{s})w_0^TSw_0}{v_0w_0^Tw_0}. \end{aligned}$$
(61)

That is, \(\lambda _1\) is pure imaginary and the number of positive \(\mathfrak {R}{\lambda }\) does not change. This fact implies that there are \(N_{\eta }\) eigenvalues \(\nu _n\) (\(n=1,\dots ,2N\)) such that \(\mathfrak {R}{\nu _n}>0\).

Appendix 2: Advection–Diffusion Equation with Absorption

Let us consider the following advection–diffusion equation with the absorption term:

$$\begin{aligned} \left( \frac{\partial }{\partial t}-D\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}+u\frac{\partial }{\partial x}+\sigma _a \right) C(x,t)=0, \end{aligned}$$
(62)
$$\begin{aligned} C(x,0)=0, \end{aligned}$$
(63)
$$\begin{aligned} C(0,t)=C_0. \end{aligned}$$
(64)

Let us introduce \(\Gamma (x,t)\) as

$$\begin{aligned} C(x,t)=\Gamma (x,t)\exp \left( \frac{ux}{2D}-\frac{u^2t}{4D}-\sigma _at\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(65)

We have

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\Gamma (x,t)-D\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}\Gamma (x,t)=0, \end{aligned}$$
(66)
$$\begin{aligned} \Gamma (x,0)=0, \end{aligned}$$
(67)
$$\begin{aligned} \Gamma (0,t)=C_0\exp \left( \frac{u^2t}{4D}+\sigma _at\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(68)

Let us consider the Laplace transform:

$$\begin{aligned} \hat{\Gamma }(x,{p})=\int _0^{\infty }\mathrm {e}^{-{p}t}\Gamma (x,t)\,\mathrm {d}t, \quad \mathfrak {R}{{p}}>\frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a. \end{aligned}$$
(69)

Then, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}\hat{\Gamma }(x,{p})=\frac{{p}}{D}\hat{\Gamma }(x,{p}),\quad \hat{\Gamma }(0,{p})=\frac{C_0}{{p}-\frac{u^2}{4D}-\sigma _a}. \end{aligned}$$
(70)

We obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \hat{\Gamma }(x,{p})=\frac{C_0}{{p}-\frac{u^2}{4D}-\sigma _a} \mathrm {e}^{-\sqrt{\frac{{p}}{D}}x}. \end{aligned}$$
(71)

Thus,

$$\begin{aligned} \Gamma (x,t)=C_0\int _0^tf(t-\tau )g(\tau )\,d\tau , \end{aligned}$$
(72)

where

$$\begin{aligned} \hat{f}({p})=\frac{1}{{p}-\frac{u^2}{4D}-\sigma _a},\quad \hat{g}({p})=\mathrm {e}^{-\sqrt{\frac{{p}}{D}}x}. \end{aligned}$$
(73)

Noting that

$$\begin{aligned} \int _0^{\infty }\mathrm {e}^{-{p}t}\mathrm{e}^{at}\,\mathrm {d}t= \frac{1}{{p}-a}\;(\mathfrak {R}{{p}}>a),\quad \int _0^{\infty }\mathrm {e}^{-{p}t}\frac{b}{2\sqrt{\pi }t^{3/2}} \mathrm{e}^{-\frac{b^2}{4t}}\,\mathrm {d}t= \mathrm {e}^{-b\sqrt{{p}}}\;(\mathfrak {R}{{p}}>0), \end{aligned}$$
(74)

we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \Gamma (x,t)&= C_0\int _0^t\exp \left( \left( \frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a\right) (t-\tau )\right) \frac{x/\sqrt{D}}{2\sqrt{\pi }\tau ^{3/2}}\mathrm {e}^{-\frac{x^2}{4D\tau }} \,\mathrm {d}\tau \nonumber \\&= \frac{x/\sqrt{D}}{2\sqrt{\pi }}\exp \left( \left( \frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a\right) t\right) \exp \left( -\sqrt{\frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a}\frac{x}{\sqrt{D}}\right) \nonumber \\&\quad \times \int _0^t\frac{1}{\tau ^{3/2}}\exp \left( -\left( \frac{x/\sqrt{D}}{2\sqrt{\tau }}- \sqrt{\left( \frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a\right) \tau }\right) ^2\right) \,\mathrm {d}\tau \nonumber \\&= \frac{C_0}{2}\exp \left( \left( \frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a\right) t\right) \exp \left( -\sqrt{\frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a}\frac{x}{\sqrt{D}}\right) \nonumber \\&\quad \times \Biggl [ \mathop {\mathrm {erfc}}\left( \frac{x}{\sqrt{4Dt}}-\sqrt{\left( \frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a\right) t}\right) \nonumber \\&\quad + \exp \left( \sqrt{\frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a}\frac{2x}{\sqrt{D}}\right) \mathop {\mathrm {erfc}}\left( \frac{x}{\sqrt{4Dt}}+\sqrt{\left( \frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a\right) t}\right) \Biggr ], \end{aligned}$$
(75)

where the complementary error function is given by \(\mathop {\mathrm {erfc}}(x)=(2/\sqrt{\pi })\int _x^{\infty }\mathrm {e}^{-t^2}\,\mathrm {d}t\). Finally,

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} C(x,t)&= \frac{C_0}{2}\mathrm {e}^{\frac{ux}{2D}} \exp \left( -\sqrt{\frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a}\frac{x}{\sqrt{D}}\right) \\&\quad \times \Biggl [ \mathop {\mathrm {erfc}}\left( \frac{x}{\sqrt{4Dt}}-\sqrt{\left( \frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a\right) t}\right) \\&\quad + \exp \left( \sqrt{\frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a}\frac{2x}{\sqrt{D}}\right) \mathop {\mathrm {erfc}}\left( \frac{x}{\sqrt{4Dt}}+\sqrt{\left( \frac{u^2}{4D}+\sigma _a\right) t}\right) \Biggr ]. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(76)

The above solution reduces to the Ogata–Banks solution (Ogata and Banks 1961) when \(\sigma _a=0\). In particular, we have \(C(x,t)\rightarrow C_0\) as \(t\rightarrow \infty\) if \(\sigma _a=0\). When \(\sigma _a=0\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} C(x,t)= \frac{C_0}{2}\left[ \mathop {\mathrm {erfc}}\left( \frac{x-ut}{\sqrt{4Dt}}\right) + \mathrm {e}^{ux/D} \mathop {\mathrm {erfc}}\left( \frac{x+ut}{\sqrt{4Dt}}\right) \right] . \end{aligned}$$
(77)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amagai, K., Yamakawa, M., Machida, M. et al. The Linear Boltzmann Equation in Column Experiments of Porous Media. Transp Porous Med 132, 311–331 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-020-01393-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Anomalous diffusion
  • Linear Boltzmann transport
  • Column experiment
  • Porous media