Migration of Contaminants in FracturedPorous Media in the Presence of Colloids: Effects of Kinetic Interactions
 1.8k Downloads
 2 Citations
Abstract
The presence of colloids in groundwater can enhance contaminant migration by reducing retardation effects. The field experiments performed in a waterconducting feature of a shear zone at the Grimsel Test Site in Switzerland indicate that the sorption processes for contaminants on mobile and immobile colloids are kinetically controlled and that colloid filtration occurs. To enable the modelling of those experiments, an appropriate model of colloidfacilitated contaminant transport in fracturedporous media is developed. The physical system is modelled as a single planar fracture with adjacent fully saturated porous rock matrix. Contaminants can diffuse into the rock matrix but colloids cannot. In the mathematical model, the 1D advective contaminant transport along the fracture is coupled with contaminant diffusion into the rock matrix perpendicular to the fracture. Radioactive decay and sorption processes for contaminants in the rock matrix (linear equilibrium), on the fracture surface (linear equilibrium and linear kinetic reactions) and on mobile and filtered colloids (linear kinetic approach), are considered. The model for colloid transport includes filtration of colloids in the fracture and their remobilization. A useful approach is developed that can be applied to adequately describe a natural system (crystalline rock) with our doubleporosity model (single fracture integrated into porous rock). Numerical solutions are obtained using an implicit finite difference scheme and realized in the transport code COFRAME. The transport code is validated by the comparison of calculated results with field experiment data. Some sets of simulations are performed to study the effect of kinetics for interaction processes.
Keywords
Contaminant transport Colloid transport Doubleporosity model Fractured media Kinetic Experiment1 Introduction

In the KBS3 concept, the waste is packed into copper containers to provide a high corrosion resistance.

As buffer and backfill material, dry compacted bentonite is favoured. In contact with water, bentonite swells and thereby creates a very low permeable diffusion barrier delaying radionuclide release into the fracture. In addition, bentonite provides a high sorption capacity for many radionuclides.
But natural groundwater also contains colloids which are generated by weathering processes, conversion of organic substances, dissolution and precipitation processes as well as hydrochemical and hydraulic changes in the environment.
Colloids are defined as particles with diameters between approximately 1 and 1000 nm. The surface properties of colloids dominate compared to the bulk properties, i.e. colloids have an enormous specific sorption capacity. Consequently, colloids can sorb significant amounts of contaminants, which are usually rather immobile due to strong sorption on solid material. Because of their charge and size, colloids and colloidbound contaminants can be transported without sorption, tend to linger in the middle of the fracture, where the fluid velocity at laminar flow is maximum, and might not diffuse into the rock matrix. Hence, the average colloid velocity can be higher than the average fluid velocity. As a consequence, the transport of contaminants adsorbed on such colloids might be significantly increased. For these reasons, the impact of colloids has to be taken into account in the assessment of the longterm safety of a repository for radioactive waste.
The fact that colloids can act as carrier for contaminants has been shown in numerous laboratory and field tests (Bates et al. 1992; Kersting et al. 1999; Puls and Powell 1992; Huber et al. 2012; Smith 1993; Kim et al. 1996; Baik and Hahn 1997). Field experiments performed within the Colloid Formation and Migration (CFM) project under nearnatural flow conditions at the Grimsel Test Site (GTS) in Switzerland indicate that desorption processes for contaminants from mobile and immobile colloids are kinetically controlled (Blechschmidt and Lanyon 2008). This is true for the fluid transport times of several hours to several days that have been applied in these dipole experiments. These experiments further show that the colloid filtration proceeds according to a linear kinetic approach. At least in one of the dipole experiments, colloid remobilization seems to be important. In order to adequately describe these experiments, an appropriate model of colloidfacilitated contaminant transport is required.
The colloidfacilitated contaminant transport within fracturedporous media with kinetically controlled interaction processes has been previously modelled using different assumptions and approaches. In Ibaraki and Sudicky (1995), a very comprehensive model of coupled transport of radionuclides and colloids in discretely fracturedporous media is presented. According to that model, contaminants can be transported by the water both in the fracture and in the porous matrix, whereas the colloid transport occurs only in the fracture. The equilibrium as well as kinetic approaches for sorption of contaminants is considered. The interaction of colloids with the fracture surface is described by a linear kinetic reaction neglecting the colloid remobilization. The radioactive decay is taken into account, however without consideration of nuclide chains. In Li et al. (2004), three cases of colloid transport in a single planar fracture surrounded by saturated porous rock have been modelled based on different assumptions and solved analytically: (1) colloid transport only within the fracture considering an irreversible filtration onto the fracture surface (without remobilization), (2) colloid transport only within the fracture considering the mechanism of filtration as well as remobilization and (3) colloid transport including diffusion of colloids into the rock matrix and irreversible filtration onto the fracture surface. The transport of radionuclides is modelled under the assumption that the sorption reactions of radionuclides on colloids and solid material are in equilibrium. The radioactive decay is included in the model, however disregarding the contribution coming from parent nuclides.
In the model developed in this work, the key processes which affect the contaminant transport in a fracturedporous medium in the presence of colloids are treated explicitly. Linear kinetic reactions were used for describing the sorption processes of contaminants on colloids. The interaction of colloids with the fracture surface is modelled by a linear kinetic reaction including both filtration and remobilization terms. The justification and limitation of the approaches implemented in the model to describe the interaction processes are discussed. Radioactive decay is considered comprehensively, taking into account the complete nuclide chains. Based on the classical doubleporosity model, a fracturedporous media are modelled as a singular planar fracture, which is situated in watersaturated porous rock. However, fractures in a natural crystalline formation largely vary in size, properties and structure. They are connected with each other and can form largescale networks, especially in the case of a largescale model area. In this work, a useful approach is developed that can be applied to adequately describe a natural system (crystalline rock) with our doubleporosity model (single fracture integrated into porous rock). The kinetic approaches used in the model for description of sorption and filtration/remobilization processes are consistent with the interaction processes observed during the shortterm CFM experiments at GTS mentioned above and can as well be applied for the simulation of the equilibrium sorption conditions by using appropriately high reaction rates (possibly relevant for longterm safety assessments of deep geological repositories in crystalline formations).
The developed model is realized in the transport code COFRAME (COlloid facilitated transport in FRActuredporous MEdia). COFRAME is a computation module of the RepoTREND program package (Reiche 2012) that is used for the assessment of the longterm safety of a repository for radioactive waste. An important issue of this work was to investigate the effect of kinetics on contaminant sorption on colloids and on the fracture surface as well as on interactions of colloids with the fracture surface. For this reason, a number of simulations varying the appropriate model parameters were performed with COFRAME. This work provides a model and a tool, which could be used to analyse, better understand and explain the results obtained in the field experiments performed at GTS. In this paper, the results of the modelling and simulation of one of these experiments, namely CFM RUN 1001, are presented.
2 Modelling Assumptions
2.1 Physical System
Most rock types, especially crystalline rock formations, consist of a system of fractures, sheared zones and other mechanical defects which are generally interconnected over large distances. In this paper, all these defects are summarized by the term fracture. Fractures can be open as well as partially or totally filled with loose or solid substances. But all fractures have one property in common: Along a fracture, a groundwater flow is possible (fractures which are completely isolated from the conducting fracture network are not considered in this work). Hence, fractures act as main path for the advective transport of species dissolved in water.
Compared to this, the groundwater flow through the undisturbed rock matrix (solid rock between fractures) of a crystalline rock formation can be considered as negligible. But the water volume in the fully saturated rock matrix is often much larger than the water volume in fractures. Over a long timescale, due to molecular diffusion and sorption processes, significant amounts of solutes can be retarded and accumulated by the rock matrix.
There are several model concepts which adequately describe the physical system as well as the relevant physical and chemical processes. The model of the fracturedporous medium developed in this work is based on the socalled doubleporosity model (Barenblatt et al. 1960). According to this approach, a fracturedporous medium is interpreted as the combination of two separate but interacting systems with different porosities: the porous rock matrix and the fracture network.
 1.
Groundwater flow is assumed to be laminar. Because of this assumption, Darcy’s law can be applied.
 2.
The dispersion of radionuclides and colloids in the fracture in flow direction can be described by Fick’s law.
 3.
Transversal dispersion is neglected, and the complete mixing of contaminants and colloids across the fracture occurs immediately. This assumption allows a 1D modelling of the contaminant and colloid transport in the fracture.
 4.
The contaminant transport along the fracture is significantly faster than the transport in the rock matrix. Thus, the matrix diffusion can be restricted to a 1D problem in space, directed normal to the groundwater flow.
 5.
The matrix diffusion is limited by the maximum penetration depth \(x_\mathrm{m}\,(\hbox {m})\). The introduction of this parameter helps to optimize the numerical model and to improve the program performance. This parameter should be set to an appropriate value and thus is not a model restriction.

advective transport, longitudinal mechanical dispersion and molecular diffusion of contaminants and colloids in the fracture,

contaminant exchange between the fracture and the adjoining rock matrix due to molecular diffusion \(Q_{\mathrm{fp}}\),

limited molecular diffusion of contaminants within the rock matrix in the direction perpendicular to the fracture axis,

sorption of contaminants within the rock matrix \(Q_{\mathrm{pr}}\),

sorption of contaminants onto the fracture surface \(Q_{\mathrm{fr}}\),

sorption of contaminants on mobile and immobile colloids \(Q_{\mathrm{frm}}\) and \(Q_{\mathrm{fri}}\),

filtration and remobilization of colloids \(Q_\mathrm{c}\) due to their interaction with the fracture surface as well as thereby induced filtration and remobilization of contaminants adsorbed on colloids \(Q_{\mathrm{cr}}\),

radioactive decay under consideration of nuclide chains.

dissolved mobile contaminants in the fracture with concentration \(C_{\mathrm{fr}}\,(\hbox {mol}/\hbox {m}^{3})\),

dissolved mobile contaminants in the pore water of the rock matrix \(C_{\mathrm{pr}}~(\hbox {mol}/\hbox {m}^{3})\),

mobile contaminants adsorbed on mobile colloids \(C_{\mathrm{cr}}\,(\hbox {mol}/\hbox {m}^{3})\),

immobile contaminants adsorbed on the fracture surface \(S_{\mathrm{fr}}\,(\hbox {mol}/\hbox {m}^{2})\),

immobile contaminants adsorbed on rock matrix pore surfaces \(S_{\mathrm{pr}}\,(\hbox {mol}/\hbox {kg})\),

immobile contaminants sorbed on filtered colloids \(S_{\mathrm{cr}}\,(\hbox {mol}/\hbox {m}^{2})\),

mobile colloids \(C_\mathrm{c}\,(\hbox {mol}/\hbox {m}^{3})\),

immobile colloids filtered on the fracture surface \(S_\mathrm{c} \,(\hbox {mol}/\hbox {m}^{2})\).

All colloids have the same size (monodisperse) and properties.

All colloids are injected into the system by the groundwater through the inflow boundary \((z=0)\).

Contaminants sorbed on the colloids do not impact on the colloid properties.
2.2 Fluid Flow Model
The approach developed here for an adequate mapping of the natural system to obtain the resulting physical model as a single planar fracture with adjacent rock matrix is based on a model proposed in NAGRA (1994). When creating a model of the real area, it must be taken into account which part of the fluidaccessible cross section actually allows advective transport.
A real domain has the crosssectional area \(A\,(\hbox {m}^{2})\) (e.g. the crosssectional area of the repository for radioactive waste) and the length \(L\,(\hbox {m})\).
The crosssectional area in the model should be equal \(A=2x_{\mathrm{max}} \sum g_i \) with \(2x_{\mathrm{max}}\) the height of the cross section. In this way, it is guaranteed that the real ratio of the part of the cross section accessible for advective flow to the part not accessible is kept in the model.
2.3 Modelling of Sorption Processes
The following approaches for describing the sorption processes are used in the model of the transport system presented in this work.
2.3.1 Sorption of Contaminants Dissolved in the Pore Water on the Pore Surfaces
2.3.2 Sorption of Dissolved Contaminants on the Fracture Surface
 linear equilibrium reaction:$$\begin{aligned} S_{\mathrm{fr}} =K_{\mathrm{fr}} C_{\mathrm{fr}}, \end{aligned}$$(5)
 linear kinetic reaction:$$\begin{aligned} Q_{\mathrm{fr}} =k_{\mathrm{fr}} \left[ {K_{\mathrm{fr}} C_{\mathrm{fr}} S_{\mathrm{fr}} } \right] , \end{aligned}$$(6)
2.3.3 Sorption of Dissolved Contaminants on Colloids
The kinetic approach is justified for processes that are slow compared to the transport processes, where an equilibrium between the dissolved and adsorbed phase has not been established. The use of the linear isotherm in the kinetic term means that colloids can adsorb an unlimited amount of contaminants. The application of this isotherm is reasonable for low contaminant concentrations.
2.4 Interaction of Colloids with Fracture Surface
3 Mathematical Model
3.1 General Transport Equation
Dispersion coefficients \(D_\mathrm{P}\) and average velocities \(u_\mathrm{P} \) for each component P
\(C_\mathrm{c} \)  \(C_\mathrm{cr}\)  \(C_\mathrm{fr} \)  \(C_\mathrm{pr} \)  \(S_\mathrm{c} \)  \(S_\mathrm{cr} \)  \(S_\mathrm{fr} \)  \(S_\mathrm{pr} \)  

\(D_\mathrm{P}\)  \(D_\mathrm{c} \)  \(D_\mathrm{c} \)  \(D_\mathrm{f} \)  \(D_\mathrm{p} \)  0  0  0  0 
\(u_\mathrm{P} \)  \(u_\mathrm{c} \)  \(u_\mathrm{c} \)  u  0  0  0  0  0 
In the following, the transport equation for each component P is established, based on the general transport Eq. (11) and considering the above assumptions.
3.2 Diffusive Contaminant Flux Across the FractureMatrix Interface
3.3 Colloid Transport Along the Fracture
3.4 Contaminant Transport in the Rock Matrix
3.5 ColloidFacilitated Radionuclide Transport Along the Fracture
3.6 System of Equations

five coupled differential Eqs. (17), (19), (21), (22) and (23) for unknown concentrations \(C_\mathrm{pr}\), \(C_\mathrm{fr}\), \(C_\mathrm{cr}\), \(S_\mathrm{cr}\) and \(S_\mathrm{fr}\) in the case of the linear kinetic approach for the sorption of contaminants on the fracture surface or

four coupled differential Eqs. (17), (25), (21), and (22) for unknown concentrations \(C_\mathrm{pr}\), \(C_\mathrm{fr}\), \(C_\mathrm{cr}\) and \(S_\mathrm{cr}\) in the case of the linear equilibrium sorption reaction for contaminants with the fracture surface.
3.7 Initial Conditions
3.8 Boundary Conditions

Contaminants and colloids (both natural and from an artificial source) are transported into the system by the groundwater through the inflow boundary (no sources of contaminants and colloids within the system).

The input functions are known over the total simulation time.
4 Numerical Solution
Generally, it is impossible to solve the equations for colloids and contaminants described in the previous section analytically. In this study, the transport equations coupled with the initial and boundary conditions are numerically solved using the Crank–Nicolson implicit finite difference method (Wikipedia; Crank and Nicolson 1947). This method, which is based on the trapezoid rule in time, is unconditionally stable and secondorder accurate in time. Furthermore, the numerical method used employs an upwind difference approximation for the first derivative in the spatial coordinate and a central difference approximation for the second derivative in the spatial coordinate.
The discretization of the colloid transport Eq. (14) leads to a system of algebraic equations with a tridiagonal coefficient matrix, which can be directly solved by the Thomas algorithm (Wikipedia; Thomas 1949). Coupled Eqs. (17), (19), (21) or (17), (25), (21) describing the contaminant transport lead to an unsymmetric sparse linear system, which in this study is solved by the unsymmetric multifrontal (Davie 2004) method.
5 Model Simulation
5.1 Model Verification

Analytical solution of the transport equation for mobile colloids \(C_\mathrm{c} \) along the fracture that is initially colloidfree \(C_\mathrm{c} \left( {z,0} \right) =0\,(z>0)\), by a permanent constant colloid inflow \(C_\mathrm{c} \left( {0,t} \right) =C_{\mathrm{c},0} =\hbox {const}\,(t\ge 0)\) and the condition at the outflow boundary \(\frac{\partial C_\mathrm{c} \left( {\infty ,t} \right) }{\partial z}=0\,(t\ge 0)\) for the special case without remobilization \(R_\mathrm{mb} =0\) and without colloid diffusion into the rock matrix given by AbdelSalam and Chrysikopoulos (1994),

Analytical solution of the transport equations for radionuclides along the fracture \(C_\mathrm{fr} \) and in the porous rock matrix \(C_\mathrm{pr} \) for a system without colloids \(C_\mathrm{c} (t)=0\) obtained by Tang et al. (1981) in the case of the permanent constant radionuclide inflow \(C_\mathrm{fr} \left( {0,t} \right) =C_{\mathrm{fr},0} =\hbox {const}\,(t\ge 0)\) into an initial contaminantfree model domain \(C_\mathrm{fr} \left( {z,0} \right) =0,C_\mathrm{pr} \left( {x,z,0} \right) =0\,(x>0,z>0)\) with the following boundary conditions on the outflow and in the rock matrix: \(C_\mathrm{fr} \left( {\infty ,t} \right) =0\), \(C_\mathrm{pr} \left( {b,z,t} \right) =C_\mathrm{fr} \left( {b,t} \right) \,(t\ge 0)\),

Analytical solution given in Tien and Li (2002), Baek and Pitt (1996), Ahn (1988) for radionuclides dissolved in the fracture water \(C_\mathrm{fr} \) in the presence of the constant colloid concentration \(C_\mathrm{c} (t)=C_{\mathrm{c},0} =\hbox {const}\,(t\ge 0)\) whereby the colloid filtration and remobilization as well as all sorption processes for radionuclides are described by a linear equilibrium reaction. The inflow boundary condition for \(C_\mathrm{fr} \) is \(C_\mathrm{fr} \left( {z=0,t} \right) =C_{\mathrm{fr},0} \exp \left( {\lambda t} \right) \), and the further initial and boundary conditions are defined as in the case above.
5.2 Analysing the Effect of Kinetic Interactions
An important aspect of this work is to improve the understanding of kinetically controlled interaction processes between contaminants, colloids and solids during transport. In order to investigate the effect of kinetics as well as the role of the relevant parameters, a number of simulations varying the appropriate model parameters were performed with COFRAME.
5.2.1 Effect of Colloid Remobilization
Changing of environment parameters (such as flow rate, pH value or ionic strength) can lead to the remobilization of colloids filtrated on the fracture surface. Some numerical calculations have been performed with COFRAME to study how the effect of colloid remobilization impacts the system behaviour.
Parameters for calculations performed to analyse the effect of colloid remobilization
Parameter  Symbol  Value 

Fracture aperture  2b  0.0001 m 
Colloid velocity  \(u_\mathrm{c} \)  13.05 m/year 
Filtration coefficient  \(\lambda _\mathrm{f} \)  \(0.1\,\hbox {m}^{1}\) 
Longitudinal dispersion length for colloids  \(\alpha _\mathrm{c} \)  0.5 m 
Varied parameters used for the analysis of the kinetic effect by the filtration/remobilization processes for colloids
Case  \(\lambda _\mathrm{f}\,(\hbox {m}^{1})\)  \(R_\mathrm{mb}\,(\hbox {year}^{1})\) 

a  0.01  0.001 
b  0.1  0.01 
c  1  0.1 
d  10  1 
5.2.2 Effect of Kinetic Adsorption for Radionuclides on Colloids and the Fracture Surface
If sorption processes of contaminants on colloids and on the fracture surface are slow compared to the timescale of other transport processes, then the amounts of dissolved and adsorbed contaminants are not in equilibrium. An equilibrium state is reached when the rates of sorption and desorption reactions are fast enough and exactly equal. In the transport model presented in this study, the kinetic sorption processes are described by linear kinetic sorption reactions (7), (8), (9). To analyse the effect of kinetics, a set of simulations with varying reaction rates was performed.
The values of most system parameters specified for the test system are within the range of the values which are characteristic for the dipole tests performed at GTS within the CFM project (Sect. 5.3). The molecular diffusion in the fracture as well as into the porous rock matrix and the radioactive decay are neglected \((D_\mathrm{mc} =D_\mathrm{mf} =0,\,D_\mathrm{p} \approx 0,\,\lambda =0)\) to focus on the effect of kinetics. The sorption parameters and filtration/remobilization coefficients are chosen in a way that considerable amounts of mobile as well as filtered colloids are available and none of the sorption processes in the fracture dominates.
The simulated system contains only natural background colloids with a concentration \(C_{\mathrm{c},0} =0.1~\hbox {kg}/\hbox {m}^{3}\) (this value is within the range that is typical of natural colloid concentrations in groundwater systems according to field experiments, e.g. Nuclear Science and Technology 1990; Lieser et al. 1990). For the parameters applied here, a significant concentration of filtered colloids \(S_{\mathrm{c},0} =0.1\,\hbox {kg}/\hbox {m}^{2}\) is accumulated in the system. No additional colloids are inserted into the system at \(t\ge 0\), i.e. \(C_\mathrm{c} (t)=\hbox {const}\) and \(S_\mathrm{c}(t)=\hbox {const}\). Colloids have the same velocity as contaminants \(u_\mathrm{c} =u=1\,\hbox {m}/\hbox {year}\). The inflow of contaminants into the model domain begins at the time \(t=0\) and remains constant over the total simulation time \((C_r \left( {t,z=0} \right) =\hbox {const})\). The distribution of contaminants between colloids \(C_\mathrm{cr} \) and solution \(C_\mathrm{fr} \) at the inlet to the fracture \(z=0\) satisfies the equilibrium conditions and is calculated according to (28) and (30), respectively. The dispersion length of colloids and contaminants is \(\alpha _\mathrm{c} =\alpha _\mathrm{f} =0.1\,\hbox {m}\). The fracture aperture is \(2b=0.001\,\hbox {m}\). The reaction rates have been varied in such a way that the ratios of sorptiontodesorption and filtrationtoremobilization reaction rates remain constant.
Colloids are present in a system in mobile and immobile phase. Mobile colloids enhance and filtered colloids retard the transport of contaminants. The impact of these competing processes depends on system parameters which have to be taken into account in the analysis of the results.
Parameters for cases a–e
Case  \(\lambda _\mathrm{f}\,(\hbox {m}^{1})\)  \(R_\mathrm{mb}\,(\hbox {year}^{1})\)  \(k_\mathrm{frm},k_\mathrm{fri}\,(\hbox {year}^{1})\)  \(K_\mathrm{frm},K_\mathrm{fri} \,(\hbox {m}^{3}/\hbox {kg})\)  \(K_\mathrm{fr}\,(\hbox {m})\) 

a  0.2  0.0001  0.1  1  0 
b  200  0.1  100  1  0 
c  0.2  0.0001  0.1  10  10 
d  2  0.001  1  10  10 
e  200  0.1  100  10  10 
Figure 6 shows the spatial distributions of the normalized concentration for mobile radionuclides \(\left( {C_\mathrm{fr} +C_\mathrm{cr} } \right) /C_{\mathrm{r}\left( {z=0} \right) }\) at different times for cases a and b. For comparison, a case without colloids is plotted. In cases a and b, a fraction of radionuclides is adsorbed on filtered colloids, and the concentration of mobile radionuclides in the fracture increases accordingly slower compared to the case without colloids. For the system parameters used in the simulations, it can be concluded that the higher the reaction rate, the faster mobile radionuclides change into the immobile phase, which further causes stronger retardation of the front.
Further, the same system is considered, but in cases c, d and e, the sorption of contaminants on the fracture surface is modelled much faster than the sorption of contaminants on colloids so that an equilibrium for sorption on the fracture surface described by Eq. (5) can be assumed. The distribution coefficients \(K_\mathrm{frm} \), \(K_\mathrm{frm} \) and \(K_\mathrm{fr} \) are chosen in such a way that none of both sorption processes dominates. Further parameters used in these cases are listed in Table 4.
Parameters for cases f to k
Case  \(\lambda _\mathrm{f}\,(\hbox {m}^{1})\)  \(R_\mathrm{mb}\,(\hbox {year}^{1})\)  \(k_\mathrm{frm} ,k_\mathrm{fri}\,(\hbox {year}^{1})\)  \(k_\mathrm{fr}\,(\hbox {year}^{1})\) 

f  0.2  0.0001  0.1  0.1 
g  2  0.001  1  0.1 
h  200  0.1  100  0.1 
i  0.2  0.0001  0.1  0.1 
j  2  0.001  1  1 
k  200  0.1  100  100 
Next, the same system is considered, but kinetically controlled sorption processes on the fracture surface are assumed according to (6). The distribution coefficient for contaminants on the fracture surface is the same as in cases c to \(e \, K_\mathrm{fr} =10\,\hbox {m}\). The reaction rates used in the simulations are listed in Table 5. In cases f to h as well as in cases i to k, the rates are varied in the same way as in cases c to e, with the reaction rate for the kinetic reaction of contaminants adsorbed on the fracture surface \(k_\mathrm{fr} \) remaining constant in cases f to h and being varied in cases i to k.
Results presented in Figs. 10 and 11 show that the sorption kinetics of the contaminants on the fracture surface mainly impact the concentration of the dissolved contaminants \(C_\mathrm{fr} \) and therefore the total mobile concentration (in the given system especially in the first time, if the equilibrium has not yet been reached). It has nearly no influence on the velocity of the contaminant front.
5.3 Application to a Dipole Tracer Test of the CFM Project at the GTS
The intention for developing the presented model was to provide a tool describing the colloidfacilitated transport of contaminants for the longterm safety assessment of deep geological repositories in crystalline formations. This model should cover the relevant interaction processes between contaminants, colloids and solids. At the Grimsel Test Site, dipole tests have been performed addressing colloidfacilitated transport in a fracture zone under nearnatural flow conditions as expected in a granite host rock for a deep geological repository. Primarily, the developed model should be able to depict the key processes observed during these experiments. A first step of the model validation was accomplished by application to one of these dipole tests. The results are presented below. Justifications for all assumptions used to model the experiment (e.g. reduction in the 3Dproblem to a 1Dproblem or the parameter derivation from independent experiments) are not treated in this paper. The emphasis was placed on the model itself and not on the detailed description of the experimental setup. More information about the dipole tests performed at GTS can be found in Blechschmidt and Lanyon (2008), Huber et al. (2012), and new results are planned to be published soon.
5.3.1 Experiment Overview
In order to assess the impact of bentonite colloids on the radionuclide transport in granite, a series of laboratory and field experiments at the underground rock laboratory at GTS, Switzerland (www.grimsel.com), is performed within the international partner project CFM under the auspices of NAGRA, Switzerland (Blechschmidt and Lanyon 2008). One set of experiments are dipole tests in the shear zone with FEBEX bentonite (Cabentonite) colloids and radionuclides or homologues under defined flow conditions. In these experiments, a defined chemical solution with colloidbound radionuclides or homologues is injected into a dipole field in the shear zone and breakthrough curves are obtained at the outflow. The fluid velocity and therewith the transport time is controlled by the outflow rate (Huber et al. 2012). From these experiments, information and data for the interaction of colloids with the fracture and for the kinetics of radionuclide colloid interaction can be derived.
Parameters for the test calculations of the dipole experiment CFM RUN 1001
Parameter  Symbol  Value 

Fracture length  L  6.2 m 
Cross section of the modelling region (real area)  A  \(0.485\,\hbox {m}^{2}\) 
Total trace length by unit area  g  \(9.64\,\hbox {m}/\hbox {m}^{2}\) 
Groundwater volume flow rate  Q  \(25.44\,\hbox {m}^{3}/\hbox {year}\) 
Fracture aperture  2b  0.0025 m 
Porosity of the fracture fill  \(n_\mathrm{f} \)  1 (\(\)) 
Colloid dispersion length  \(\alpha _\mathrm{c} \)  0.6 m 
Colloid molecular diffusion coefficient  \(D_\mathrm{mc} \)  \(0.003\,\hbox {m}^{2}/\hbox {year}\) 
Colloid velocity  \(u_\mathrm{c} \)  2175.08 m/year 
Contaminant dispersion length  \(\alpha _\mathrm{f} \)  0.6 m 
Contaminant molecular diffusion coefficient in the fracture  \(D_\mathrm{mf}\)  \(0.03\,\hbox {m}^{2}/\hbox {year}\) 
Contaminant velocity  u  2175.08 m/year 
Multiplication factor that defines which fraction of contaminants coming from a source is presented on the inflow boundary at the time t as dissolved in the groundwater  p  0.01 (\(\)) 
Maximum penetration depth in the rock matrix  \(x_\mathrm{m}\)  0.02 m 
Porosity of the rock matrix  \(n_\mathrm{p} \)  0.05 (\(\)) 
Density of the rock matrix  \(\rho \)  \(2670\,\hbox {kg}/\hbox {m}^{3}\) 
Contaminant molecular diffusion coefficient in the rock matrix  \(D_\mathrm{p}\)  \(0.008\,\hbox {m}^{2}/\hbox {year}\) 
Sorption parameters for the test calculations of the dipole experiments at GTS
Parameter  Ur  Tb  Hf  Eu  Th 

\(K_\mathrm{pr}\,(\hbox {m}^{3}/\hbox {kg})\)  0  0.56  0.56  0.56  0.56 
\(K_\mathrm{fr}\,(\hbox {m})\)  0  1.56  1.56  1.56  1.56 
\(K_\mathrm{frm},K_\mathrm{fri}\, (\hbox {m}^{3}/\hbox {mol})\)  0  1500  1600  1500  1600 
\(k_\mathrm{fr}\,(\hbox {year}^{1})\)  –  \(1\times 10^{6}\)  \(1\times 10^{6}\)  \(1\times 10^{6}\)  \(1\times 10^{6}\) 
\(k_\mathrm{frm},k_\mathrm{fri}\,(\hbox {year}^{1})\)  0  450  250  600  200 
5.3.2 Breakthrough Curves
Interaction parameters of colloids with the fracture derived from the field experiment
Parameter  Symbol  Value 

Colloid filtration coefficient  \(\lambda _\mathrm{f} \)  \(0.33\,\hbox {m}^{1}\) 
Colloid remobilization coefficient  \(R_\mathrm{mb} \)  \(960\,\hbox {year}^{1}\) 
In Fig. 13, the breakthrough curves for the colloids are shown. In order to fit the shape of the experimental curve, a reversible, kinetically controlled colloid filtration and remobilization were assumed. Further, the reduction in the recovery is caused by an additional irreversible colloid filtration. The respective data are summarized in Table 8
In a final step, the breakthrough curves for the homologues are simulated. They are shown in Fig. 14. Interaction coefficients of homologues with colloids and fracture are taken from batch experiments. The reaction rates \(k_\mathrm{frm} \) and \(k_\mathrm{fri} \) of the homologues desorbing from the colloids are adjusted to fit the experimental curves. The resulting simulation curves coincide well with the experimental curves.
In conclusion, the field experiment results can be explained by the following processes. As described above, the homologues are equilibrated with the colloidbearing solution in advance and are quantitatively bound (\(\sim \)99 % adsorbed) to the colloids, when injected into the dipole. During the transport through the fracture, the homologues desorb from the colloids and subsequently adsorb to the fracturefilling material. The velocity of these processes is determined by the detachment rates \(k_\mathrm{frm}\) and \(k_\mathrm{fri} \) of the homologues from the colloids, since the adsorption reaction of the homologues to the fracturefilling material is assumed to be fast.
The results show that the experiment can be successfully simulated with the new COFRAME code taking into account the experimental boundary conditions and using plausible assumptions for the interaction data of contaminants, colloids and fractured medium. Further applications to other CFM field tests as well as for colloidfacilitated radionuclide transport under repository conditions are planned and will be published in the near future.
6 Conclusion
A model for the simulation of the migration of contaminants in a fracturedporous medium in the presence of colloids is introduced in this work. The sorption of contaminants on colloids and interactions of colloids with the fracture surface are treated as linear kinetically controlled processes. For the sorption of contaminants on the fracture surface, two approaches are used: linear equilibrium and linear kinetic reactions. The numerical solution based on the Crank–Nicolson implicit finite difference method was realized in the COFRAME transport code and verified using existing analytical solutions for colloid and contaminant migration in a fractureporous medium.
A useful approach was suggested in this work for adequate mapping of a natural system (fractured crystalline rock) onto its model consisting of a single planar fracture with adjacent rock matrix.
To verify the code and to investigate the effect of kinetics, a number of simulations were performed with COFRAME. Colloids can be present in a system as mobile and immobile components. In systems where contaminants do not sorb on the fracture surface, immobile colloids act as an additional retarding factor for contaminants. In systems where contaminants do sorb on the fracture surface, on the contrary, the presence of colloids can significantly accelerate the transport of contaminants and also lead to an increase in the total concentration of mobile contaminants compared to the case without colloids.
The reaction rates of the interacting processes for contaminants as well as for colloids affect the transport characteristics, which is best indicated by the shape of the spatial distribution curve (especial its tailing). The reaction rate for the sorption of contaminants on the fracture surface mainly impacts the concentration of mobile contaminants. The reaction rates for sorption of contaminants on colloids and for interacting of colloids with the fracture surface affect both accelerating and retarding effects on the contaminant migration. However, the impact and the extension of each of these competing effects do not only depend on reaction rates but also on the system parameters (e.g. on the accumulated amount of filtered colloids or distribution coefficients). For the system parameters used in the simulations (with significant amounts of mobile as well as immobile colloids), it can be concluded that the higher the rates of kinetic reactions, the faster mobile radionuclides change into the immobile phase due to their sorption on filtered colloids, which further causes stronger retardation of the front.
The developed model and the numerical solution were further validated by application to the data from a dipole test performed in the frame of the CFM project at GTS in Switzerland. The experiment was simulated with COFRAME. The modelled breakthrough curves coincide well with the experimental curves. The computed results also confirm that the experimental results can be best explained using a kinetic approach for desorption of contaminants from colloids with subsequent fast sorption on the fracturefilling material and for interaction of colloids with the fracture.
Notes
Acknowledgments
This work was financed by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). We would also like to thank the partners from the CFM project at Grimsel Test Site—KITINE (Germany), JAEA (Japan), SKB (Sweden), CRIEPI (Japan), KAERI (Republic of Korea), POSIVA (Finland), NAGRA (Switzerland), USDOE (USA). The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their very constructive comments.
References
 AbdelSalam, A., Chrysikopoulos, C.: Analytical solution for onedimensional colloid transport in saturated fractures. Adv. Water Resour. 17, 283–296 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Ahn, J.: Mass Transfer and Transport of Radionuclides in Fractured Porous Rock. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Publications, LBL25594 (1988)Google Scholar
 Baek, I., Pitt, W.W.: Colloidfacilitated radionuclide transport in fractured porous rock. Waste Manag. 16(4), 313–325 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Baik, M.H., Hahn, P.S.: Radionuclide transport facilitated by polydispersed pseudocolloids in the fractured rock media. J. Nuclear Sci. Technol. 34(1), 41–49 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Baik, M.H., Cho, W.J., Hahn, P.S.: Erosion of bentonite particles at the interface of a compacted bentonite and a fractured granite. Eng. Geol. 91(2–4), 229–239 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Bates, M., Bradley, J.P., Teetsov, A., Bradley, C.R., Ten Brindk, M.B.: Colloid formation during waste form reaction: implications for nuclear waste disposal. Science 256, 649–651 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Barenblatt, G.I., et al.: Basic concept in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured strata. J. Appl. Math. 24, 1286–1303 (1960)Google Scholar
 Bear, J.: Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Elsevier, New York (1979)Google Scholar
 Blechschmidt, I., Lanyon, B.: GTS Phase VI, CFM Phase 1, Field Activities 2006–2008. NAGRA Arbeitsbericht NAB 0833, NAGRA: Wettingen (Switzerland), p. 69 (2008)Google Scholar
 Crank, J., Nicolson, P.: A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heatconduction type. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 43(1), 50–67 (1947)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Davie, T.A.: A column preordered strategy for the unsymmetricpattern multifrontal method. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 30(2), 165–195 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Forsyth, P.A., Sammon, P.H.: Practical considerations for adaptive implicit methods in reservoir simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 62(2), 265–281 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Gardiner, M.P., Grindrod, P., Moulin, V.: The Role of Colloids in Transport of Radionuclides from a Radioactive Waste Repository: Implications on Safety Assessment, EUR 19781 EN. European Commission, Brussels (2001)Google Scholar
 Geckeis, H., Rabung, T., Schäfer, T.: Actinide–nanoparticle interaction: generation, stability and mobility. In: Kalmykov, S.N., Denecke, M.A. (eds.) Actinide Nanoparticle Research. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
 Helmig, R.: Multiphase Flow and Transport Processes in the Subsurface. Springer, Berlin (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Huber, F., Noseck, U., Schäfer, Th. (eds.): Colloid/Nanoparticle Formation and Mobility in the Context of Deep Geological Nuclear Waste Disposal. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, KIT Scientific Reports 7645, Karlsruhe (2012)Google Scholar
 Ibaraki, M., Sudicky, E.A.: Colloidfacilitated contaminant transport in discretely fractured porous media, 1. Numerical formulation and sensitivity analysis. Water Resour. Res. 31(12), 2945–2960 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Kersting, D.W., Efurd, D.L., Finnegan, D.L., Rokop, D.J., Smith, D.K., Thompson, J.L.: Migration of plutonium in ground water at the Nevada Test Site. Nature 397, 56–59 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Kim, J. I., Delakowitz, B., Zeh, P., Lin, X., Ehrlicher, U., Schauer, C., Probst, T.: Colloid Migration in Groundwaters: Geochemical Interactions of Radionuclides with Natural Colloids, Report EUR 16754 EN, chap. 1. European Commission, Brussels (1996)Google Scholar
 Lieser, K.H., Ament, A., Hill, R., Singh, R.N., Stingl, U., Thybusch, B.: Colloids in groundwater and their influence on migration of tracer elements and radionuclides. Radiochim. Acta 49, 83 (1990)Google Scholar
 Li, S.H., Yang, H.T., Jen, C.P.: Modelling of colloid transport mechanism facilitating migration of radionuclides in fractured media. Nuclear Technol. 148, 358–368 (2004)Google Scholar
 Missana, T., Alonso, U., Turrero, M.J.: Generation and stability of bentonite colloids at the bentonite/granite interface of a deep geological radioactive waste repository. J. Contam. Hydrol. 61(1–4), 17–31 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 NAGRA: KristallinI Safety Assessment Report. NTB 93–22, Wettingen (1994)Google Scholar
 Nuclear Science and Technology: Grimsel Colloid Exercise–An International Intercomparison Exercise on the Sampling and Characterization of Groundwater Colloids. Final Report, EUR 12660, Commission of the European Communities (1990)Google Scholar
 Oswald, J.G., Ibaraki, M.: Migration of colloids in discretely fractured porous media: effect of colloidal matrix diffusion. J. Contam. Hydrol. 52(1–4), 213–244 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Puls, R.W., Powell, R.M.: Transport of inorganic colloids through natural aquifer material: implication for contaminant transport. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26(3), 614–621 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Pusch, R.: Clay colloid formation and release from MX80 buffer, TR9931. SKB, Stockholm (1999)Google Scholar
 Reiche, T.: RepoTREND–An Advanced Modelling Tool for Performance Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories. EUROSAFE (2012)Google Scholar
 Reiche, T., Noseck, U., Wolf, J.W.: Modellierung des Schadstofftransports in geklüftetporösen Medien unter der Berücksichtigung von Kolloiden mit den Transportprogrammen FRAME und COFRAME, GRSBericht 333. Gesellschaft für Anlagen und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS), Braunschweig (2014)Google Scholar
 Schäfer, T., Huber, F., Seher, H., Missana, T., Alonso, U., Kumke, M., Eidner, S., Claret, F., Enzmann, F.: Nanoparticles and their influence on radionuclide mobility in deep geological formations. Appl. Geochem. 27(2), 390–403 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 SKB: LongTerm Safety for the Final Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel at Forsmark, Main report of the SRSite project, vol. IIII, Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (2011)Google Scholar
 Smith, P.A.: A Model for Colloid Facilitated Radionuclide Transport Through Fractured Media, Nagra, Technical Report 93–32 (1993)Google Scholar
 Tang, D.H., Frind, E.O., Sudicky, E.A.: Contaminant transport in fractured porous media: analytical solution for a single fracture. Water Resour. Res. 17(3), 555–564 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Tien, N.C., Li, S.H.: Transport of a twomember decay chain of radionuclides through a discrete fracture in a porous rock matrix in the presence of colloids. Nuclear Technol. 140, 83–93 (2002)Google Scholar
 Wikipedia: Crank–Nicolson method, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crank%E2%80%93Nicolson_method. Accessed 28 Sept 2015
 Wikipedia: Tridiagonal Matrix Algorithm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tridiagonal_matrix_algorithm. Accessed 13 Sept 2015
 Thomas, L.H.: Elliptic Problems in Linear Differential Equations Over a Network. Watson Sci. Comput. Lab Report. Columbia University, New York (1949)Google Scholar
Copyright information
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.