Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 107, Issue 3, pp 821–841 | Cite as

Effects of Airflow Induced by Rainfall Infiltration on Unsaturated Soil Slope Stability

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of airflow induced by rainfall infiltration and their effects on unsaturated soil slope stability using numerical methods. The TOUGH2/EOS3 simulator was used to analyze the features of water–air two-phase flow in a soil slope under rain conditions. The results show that when the rain infiltrates the soil, the air is pushed into the soil by the advancing wetting front, the pore-air pressure in the unsaturated zone increases firstly, then the airflow is reversed, and the pore-air pressure decreases until it is close to atmospheric pressure. The features of water single-phase flow (i.e., the gas phase is neglected) were also simulated using the TOUGH2/EOS9 simulator. When the infiltration of rainwater into the soil slope in the water single-phase flow model is set as same as that in the water–air two-phase flow model, the water saturation and the capillary pressure distributions in the unsaturated zone are probably the same. Slope stability studies were then performed based on the simulated water–air two-phase and water single-phase seepage conditions, respectively. The slope stability analysis on a given slip surface based on the simulated water–air two-phase seepage condition shows that the safety factor decreases during rainfall, reaches the lowest value when rain stops, generates immediately a sudden rise, and then increases slowly to a steady value. The capillary pressure is beneficial to slope stability, while the pore-air pressure is unfavorable to slope stability. The variation tendency of the safety factor is similar to that of the negative total air pressure acting on the slip surface. The slope stability analysis on the given slip surface based on the water single-phase seepage condition shows that the safety factor is approximate to FS1 (is the safety factor for the case that does not take into account the air pressure based on the water–air two-phase seepage condition). Therefore, difference between the safety factor and FS1 based on the water–air two-phase seepage condition can approximately represent the effects of airflow induced by rainfall on unsaturated soil slope stability under the condition that the infiltration of rainwater into the soil slope remains unchanged.

Keywords

Water–air two-phase flow Airflow induced by rainfall  Pore-air pressure Capillary pressure Unsaturated soil slope stability 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The support for this research from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51179118 and 50809044) and the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51321065) is greatly appreciated. Gratitude is expressed to Prof. Günter Hofstetter and Mr. Peter Gamnitzer of University of Innsbruck for their helpful discussions with us. Comments made by three anonymous reviewers were greatly appreciated.

References

  1. Albers, B.: Modeling the hysteretic behavior of the capillary pressure in partially saturated porous media: a review. Acta Mech. 225, 2163–2189 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bianchi, W.C., Haskell, E.E.: Air in the vadose zone as it affects water movements beneath a recharge basin. Water Resour. Res. 2(2), 315–322 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop, A.W.: The use of the slip circle in the stability of slopes. Geotechnique 5, 7–17 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cho, S.E., Lee, S.R.: Instability of unsaturated soil slopes due to infiltration. Comput. Geotech. 28(3), 185–208 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Class, H., Helmig, R., Bastian, P.: Numerical simulation of non-isothermal multiphase multicomponent processes in porous media: 1. An efficient solution technique. Adv. Water Resour. 25(5), 533–550 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, B.D., Znidarcic, D.: Stability analyses of rainfall induced landslides. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130(4), 362–372 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corey, A.T.: The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Prod. Mon. 19(1), 38–41 (1954)Google Scholar
  8. Coussy, O.: Mechanics of Porous Continua. Wiley, Chichester (1995)Google Scholar
  9. Coussy, O.: Revisiting the constitutive equations of unsaturated porous solids using a Lagrangian saturation concept. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 31(15), 1675–1694 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dangla, P., Coussy, O., Olchitzky, E., Imbert, C.: A micromechanical approach to the behaviour of unsaturated porous media. In: Symposium on Theoretical and Numerical Methods in Continuum Mechanics of Porous Materials, IUTAM, Stuttgart (1999)Google Scholar
  11. Fredlund, D.G., Morgenstern, N.R., Widger, R.A.: The shear strength of unsaturated soils. Can. Geotech. J. 15(3), 313–321 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fredlund, D.G.: Slope stability analysis incorporating the effect of soil suction. In: Anderson, M.G., Richards, K.S. (eds.) Slope Stability, pp. 113–145. Wiley, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  13. Fredlund, D.G., Xing, A., Fredlund, M.D., Barbour, S.L.: The relationship of the unsaturated soil shear strength to the soil–water characteristic curve. Can. Geotech. J. 32, 440–448 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Free, G.R., Palmer, J.J.: Interrelationships of infiltration, air movement, and pore size in graded silica sand. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 5, 390–398 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Free, R.A., Cherry, J.A.: Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1979)Google Scholar
  16. Grgic, D., Giot, R., Homand, F., Giraud, A.: Effect of suction on the mechanical behaviour of iron ore rock. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 29(8), 789–827 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guo, H., Jiao, J.J., Weeks, E.P.: Rain-induced subsurface airflow and Lisse effect. Water Resour. Res. 44(7), W07409 (2008). doi: 10.1029/2007WR006294 Google Scholar
  18. Healy, R.W., Cook, P.G.: Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeol. J. 10(1), 91–109 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horton, R.E.: An approach toward a physical interpretation of infiltration capacity. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 5(C), 399–417 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu, R., Chen, Y.F., Zhou, C.B.: Modeling of coupled deformation, water flow and gas transport in soil slopes subjected to rain infiltration. Sci. China Tech. Sci. 54(10), 2561–2575 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khoei, A.R., Mohammadnejad, T.: Numerical modeling of multiphase fluid flow in deforming porous media: a comparison between two- and three-phase models for seismic analysis of earth and rockfill dams. Comput. Geotech. 38(2), 142–166 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuang, X., Jiao, J.J., Li, H.: Review on airflow in unsaturated zones induced by natural forcings. Water Resour. Res. 49, 6137–6165 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Linden, D.R., Dixon, R.M.: Infiltration and water table effects of soil air pressure under border irrigation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 37(1), 94–98 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mein, R.G., Larson, C.L.: Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resour. Res. 9(2), 384–394 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyboom, P.: Groundwater studies in the Assiniboine River drainage basin. Part II: hydrologic characteristics of phreatophytic vegetation in south-central Saskatchewan. Geol. Surv. Can. Bull. 139 (1967)Google Scholar
  26. Morel-Seytoux, H.J., Billica, J.A.: A two-phase numerical model for prediction of infiltration: application to a semi-infinite soil column. Water Resour. Res. 21(4), 607–615 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mualem, Y.: A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res. 12(3), 513–522 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ng, C., Shi, Q.: A numerical investigation of the stability of unsaturated soil slopes subjected to transient seepage. Comput. Geotech. 22(1), 1–28 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Öberg, A.L., Sällfors, G.: Determination of shear strength parameters of unsaturated silts and sands based on the water retention curve. ASTM Geotech. Test. J. 20(1), 40–48 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peck, A.J.: Moisture profile development and air compression during water uptake by bounded bodies: 3. Vert. Columns Soil Sci. 100(1), 44–51 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pertl, M., Hofmann, M., Hofstetter, G.: Coupled solid–fluid FE-analysis of an embankment dam. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 5(1), 53–62 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pruess, K., Oldenburg, C., Moridis, G.: TOUGH2 user’s guide, version 2.0. Earth Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 (1999)Google Scholar
  33. Regmi, R.K., Nakagawa, H., Kawaike, K., Baba, Y., Zhang, H.: Two and three dimensional slope stability analysis of landslide dam failure due to sliding. Annu. Disaster Prev. Res. Inst. Kyoto Univ. 53 B, 617–627 (2010)Google Scholar
  34. Richards, L.A.: Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics 1(5), 318–333 (1931)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sako, K., Danjo, T., Fukagawa, R., Bui, H. H.: Measurement of pore-water and pore-air pressure in unsaturated soil. In: Jotisankasa, Sawangsuriya, Soralump, Mairaing (eds.) Proceedings of 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Unsaturated Soils, pp. 443–448. Kasetsart University, Thailand (2011)Google Scholar
  36. Samimi, S., Pak, A.: A novel three-dimensional element free Galerkin (EFG) code for simulating two-phase fluid flow in porous materials. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 39, 53–63 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schrefler, A.B., Scotta, R.: A fully coupled dynamic model for two-phase fluid flow in deformable porous media. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190, 3223–3246 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sun, D.M., Zhu, Y.M., Zhang, M.J.: Water–air two-phase flow model for numerical analysis of rainfall infiltration. J. Hydraul. Eng. 38(2), 150–156 (2007)Google Scholar
  39. Sun, D.M., Feng, P., Zhang, M.J.: Refined analysis of stability of unsaturated soil slope due to rainfall infiltration considering the effect of gas phase. J. Tianjin Univ. 42(9), 777–783 (2009)Google Scholar
  40. Szymkiewicz, A., Neuweiler, I., Helmig, R.: Influence of heterogeneous air entry pressure on large scale unsaturated flow in porous media. Acta Geophys. 62(5), 1179–1191 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Todd, D.K., Mays, L.W.: Groundwater Hydrology, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2005)Google Scholar
  42. Touma, J., Vauclin, M.: Experimental and numerical analysis of two-phase infiltration in a partially saturated soil. Transp. Porous Media 1(1), 22–55 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Genuchten, M.T.: A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44(5), 892–898 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vanapalli, S.K., Fredlund, D.G., Pufahl, D.E., Clifton, A.W.: Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction. Can. Geotech. J. 33(3), 379–392 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang, Z., Feyen, J., van Genuchten, M.T., Nielsen, D.R.: Air entrapment effects on infiltration rate and flow instability. Water Resour. Res. 34(2), 213–222 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weeks, E.P.: The Lisse effect revisited. Ground Water 40(6), 652–656 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang, X.Y., Zhu, Y.M., Feng, C.H.: The role for air flow in soil slope stability analysis. J. Hydrodyn. Ser. B 21(5), 640–646 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and SafetyTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Institute of Soil Mechanics and Foundation EngineeringGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations