Simulation of Dynamic Two-Phase Flow During Multistep Air Sparging
- 926 Downloads
Air sparging is an in situ soil/groundwater remediation technology, which involves the injection of pressurized air through air sparging well below the zone of contamination. To investigate the rate-dependent flow properties during multistep air sparging, a rule-based dynamic two-phase flow model was developed and applied to a 3D pore network which is employed to characterize the void structure of porous media. The simulated dynamic two-phase flow at the pore scale or microscale was translated into functional relationships at the continuum-scale of capillary pressure–saturation (P c–S) and relative permeability—saturation (K r–S) relationships. A significant contribution from the air injection pressure step and duration time of each air injection pressure on both of the above relationships was observed during the multistep air sparging tests. It is observed from the simulation that at a given matric potential, larger amount of water is retained during transient flow than that during steady flow. Shorter the duration of each air injection pressure step, there is higher fraction of retained water. The relative air/water permeability values are also greatly affected by the pressure step. With large air injection pressure step, the air/water relative permeability is much higher than that with a smaller air injection pressure step at the same water saturation level. However, the impact of pressure step on relative permeability is not consistent for flows with different capillary numbers (N ca). When compared with relative air permeability, relative water permeability has a higher scatter. It was further observed that the dynamic effects on the relative permeability curve are more apparent for networks with larger pore sizes than that with smaller pore sizes. In addition, the effect of pore size on relative water permeability is higher than that on relative air permeability.
KeywordsPore network model Dynamic two-phase flow Air sparging Capillary pressure–saturation Relative permeability–saturation
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from State Key Laboratory of Hydro Science and Engineering (SKLHSE-2010-D1, SKLHSE-2012-KY-01), National Key Basic Research Program (2012CB719804), Beijing Scientific Research Program (D07050601510000), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 50879038).
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- Bausmith D.S., Campbell D.J., Vidic R.D.: In situ air stripping. Water Environ. Technol. 8(2), 45–51 (1996)Google Scholar
- Gao, S., Meegoda, J.N., Hu, L.: Two methods for pore network of porous media. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nag.1134
- Leonard, W.C., Brown, R.A.: Air sparging: an optimal solution. In: Proceedings of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Groundwater: Prevention, Detection and Restoration, Houston, Texas, 349–363, 4–6 Nov, 1992Google Scholar
- Mohanty, K.K, Salter, S.J.: Multiphase flow in porous media. Part 2. Pore-level modeling. In: 57th AIME Society of Petroleum Engineers annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, LA, USA, Sept 26, SPE-11018 (1982)Google Scholar