Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 309–333 | Cite as

Numerical Solution of Equation for Dynamic, Spontaneous Imbibition with Variable Inlet Saturation and Interfacial Coupling Effects

  • Saddam K. Yazzan
  • Ramon G. Bentsen
  • Japan J. Trivedi
Article

Abstract

In the oil industry, dynamic spontaneous imbibition plays an important role in several flow processes in porous media. A numerical approach is developed to simulate dynamic spontaneous imbibition with variable inlet saturation and interfacial coupling. The inclusion of interfacial coupling effects invalidates the assumption that the interfaces (fluid/fluid and fluid/solid) act in the same way. The one-dimensional numerical simulation model is developed using a Lagrangian formulation discretized in time and saturation. The solution of the partial differential equations utilizes an iteration process that includes two material balance criteria to ensure the validity of the variable inlet saturation. Furthermore, an error analysis, the validation of the model and a sensitivity study on the optimal number of time steps and saturation grid cells are undertaken. The numerical simulation solution represents an accurate approach to investigate the effect of fluid and rock properties on dynamic spontaneous imbibition.

Keywords

Dynamic spontaneous imbibition Lagrangian formulation Interfacial coupling Variable inlet saturation Counter-current two-phase flow Immiscible flow 

List of Symbols

a

Experimentally determined parameter

A

Cross-sectional area of core

\({\hat{{\rm A}}}\)

Slope obtained from plotting \({\overline Q }\) versus \({\sqrt{\tau }}\)

c

Parameter that controls the amount of viscous coupling

C(S)

Capillary function

F1

Non-capillary fractional flow function, \({F_1 =\frac{R_{12}\lambda_1^0 }{R_{12}\lambda_1^0 +\lambda_2^0 }}\)

G(S)

Gravity function

\({k_{_{r2}}^0}\)

Relative permeability of the non-wetting phase measured in co-current flow

Mr

End point mobility ratio

Ng

Gravity number, \({\frac{A\lambda_{1r}^0 \Delta \rho^{\prime}g\sin (\theta)}{q_o}}\)

\({\overline{{q}}}\)

Dimensionless normalized imbibition flow rate

\({\overline{{\overline{{q}}}}}\)

Average dimensionless normalized imbibition flow rate

q0

Characteristic flow rate

\({\overline Q}\)

Dimensionless normalized cumulative imbibition production

\({\overline Q_{\rm Analytical}}\)

Dimensionless normalized cumulative imbibition production calculated using Eq. 30

\({\overline Q_S }\)

Area under the curve ξ (S, τ) versus S

\({\overline Q_\tau }\)

Area under the curve \({\overline{{q}}({S^{\ast},\tau })}\) versus τ

R1

Ratio between dimensionless time and dimensionless cumulative imbibed water

R12

Hydrodynamic effect: function relating the steady-state, potential gradient in phase 1 to that in phase 2, R 12 = 1 − a(1 − S)

S

Normalized wetting phase saturation

Soi

Initial oil saturation

Sro

Residual oil saturation

Swi

Irreducible water saturation

S*

Normalized variable inlet saturation

SFactor

Value determined from the iteration attempts to find S*

\({S_2^{\ast}}\)

New assumed value of variable inlet saturation

Greek Symbols

αi

Interfacial coupling factor = α ci · α vi i = 1, 2

αci

Capillary coupling parameters, i = 1, 2

αvi

Viscous coupling parameters, i = 1, 2

Δ ρ

Difference in density without hydrodynamic effect

λ (S)

Average coupling effect, \({\lambda (S)=\left({\frac{\alpha_1 +\alpha_2}{2}}\right)}\)

\({\lambda_i^o }\)

Mobilities measured in a steady-state co-current (SSCO) flow experiment, i = 1, 2

\({\lambda_{1r}^0 }\)

Effective mobility to wetting phase at residual saturation of non-wetting phase

\({\lambda_{2r}^0 }\)

Effective mobility to non-wetting phase at initial saturation of wetting phase

\({\lambda_m^0 }\)

Parameter to ensure dimensional consistency

ξ

Normalized distance measured from the inlet surface of a core

πc (S)

Dimensionless capillary pressure

ρ

Fluid density

τ

Dimensionless time

τ0

Characteristic time

\({\phi}\)

Porosity of the porous medium

Superscripts

n

Present time step

n + 1

Next time step

Subscripts

1

Wetting phase

2

Non-wetting phase

i ± z

Saturation grid cell position according to Fig. 1: z = 1/2, 1, 3/2, 2, 5/2

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayodele, O.R.: Mathematical modeling, experimental testing and numerical simulation of interfacial coupling phenomena of two-phase flow in porous media. PhD Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
  2. Ayodele O.R., Bentsen R.G.: Numerical simulation of interfacial coupling phenomena in two-phase flow through porous media. Comput. Mech. 33, 389–405 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayub, M.: Experimental testing of interfacial coupling phenomena in two-phase flow. PhD Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (2000)Google Scholar
  4. Ayub M., Bentsen R.G.: Interfacial viscous coupling: a myth or reality?. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 23, 13–26 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babchin A., Yuan J.: On the capillary coupling between two phases in a droplet train model. Transp. Porous Media 26, 225–228 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bear J.: Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  7. Bentsen R.G.: Effect of momentum transfer between fluid phases on effective mobility. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 21, 27–42 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentsen R.G.: The physical origin of interfacial coupling in two-phase f1ow through porous media. Transp. Porous Media 44, 109–122 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bentsen R.G.: Effect of neglecting interfacial coupling when using vertical flow experiments to determine relative permeability. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 48, 81–93 (2005a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bentsen R.G.: Interfacial coupling in vertical, two-phase flow through porous media. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 23, 1341–1380 (2005b)Google Scholar
  11. Bentsen R.G., Manai A.A.: Measurement of cocurrent and countercurrent relative permeability curves using the steady-state method. AOSTRA J. Res. 7, 169–181 (1991)Google Scholar
  12. Bentsen R.G., Manai A.A.: On the use of conventional cocurrent and countercurrent effective permeabilities to estimate the four generalized permeability coefficients which arise in coupled, two-phase flow. Transp. Porous Media 11, 243–262 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brownscombe E.R., Dyes A.B.: Water imbibition displacement ... can it release reluctant Spraberry oil?. Oil Gas J. 51, 264–265 (1952)Google Scholar
  14. Handy L.L.: Determination of effective capillarity pressure for porous media from imbibition data. Trans. AIME 219, 75–80 (1960)Google Scholar
  15. Kalaydjian F.: Origin and quantification of coupling between relative permeabilities for two-phase flows in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 5(3), 215–229 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Y., Morrow N.R., Ruth D.: Similarity solution for linear counter-current spontaneous imbibition. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 39, 309–326 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liang Q., Lohrenz J.: Dynamic method of measuring coupling coefficients of transport equations of two-phase flow in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 15, 71–79 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Onsager L.: Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes-I. Phys. Rev. 37, 405–426 (1931)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Onsager L.: Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes-II. Phys. Rev. 38, 2265–2279 (1931)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rakotomalala N., Salin D., Yortsos C.Y.: Viscous coupling in a model porous medium geometry: effect of fluid contact area. App. Sci. Res. 55, 155–169 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reis J.C., Cil M.: A model for oil expulsion by counter-current water imbibition in rocks: one dimensional geometry. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 10, 97–107 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rice J.R.: Numerical Methods, Software and Analysis. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York (1983)Google Scholar
  23. Rose W.: Measuring transport coefficients necessary for the description of coupled two-phase flow of immiscible fluids in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 3(2), 163–171 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shen C., Ruth D.W.: Solutions to Bentsen’s equation with finite-element method. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 11, 165–179 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yazzan, S., Bentsen, R.G., Trivedi, J.: Theoretical development of a novel equation for dynamic spontaneous imbibition with variable inlet saturation and interfacial coupling effects. Transp.Porous Media (2010). doi: 10.1007/s11242-010-9647-z
  26. Zarcone C., Lenormand R.: Détermination expérimentale du couplage visqueux dans les écoulements diphasiques en milieu poreux. C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. II 318, 1429–1438 (1994)Google Scholar
  27. Zhang, X.Y.: Experimental testing and numerical simulation of interfacial coupling phenomena in two-phase flow through porous media. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saddam K. Yazzan
    • 1
  • Ramon G. Bentsen
    • 1
  • Japan J. Trivedi
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations