Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 58, Issue 1–2, pp 121–145 | Cite as

Macro-Scale Dynamic Effects in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Porous Media

  • Sabine Manthey
  • S. Majid Hassanizadeh
  • Rainer Helmig


It is known that the classical capillary pressure-saturation relationship may be deficient under non-equilibrium conditions when large saturation changes may occur. An extended relationship has been proposed in the literature which correlates the rate of change of saturation to the difference between the phase pressures and the equilibrium capillary pressure. This linear relationship contains a damping coefficient, \tau, that may be a function of saturation. The extended relationship is examined at the macro-scale through simulations using the two-phase simulator MUFTE-UG. In these simulations, it is assumed that the traditional equilibrium relationship between the water saturation and the difference in fluid pressures holds locally. Steady-state and dynamic ‘‘numerical experiments’’ are performed where a non-wetting phase displaces a wetting phase in homogeneous and heterogeneous domains with varying boundary conditions, domain size, and soil parameters. From these simulations the damping coefficient τ can be identified as a (non-linear) function of the water saturation. It is shown that the value of τ increases with an increased domain size and/or with decreased intrinsic permeability. Also, the value of τ for a domain with a spatially correlated random distribution of intrinsic permeability is compared to a homogeneous domain with equivalent permeability; they are shown to be almost equal.


two-phase flow dynamic capillary pressure-saturation relationship macro-scale damping coefficient 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ataie-Ashtiani, B., Hassanizadeh, S. M., Oostrom, M., Celia, M. A., White, M. D. 2001Effective parameters for two-phase flow in a porous medium with periodic heterogeneitiesJ. Contam. Hydrol.4987100Google Scholar
  2. Barenblatt, G. I., Patzek, T. W., Silin, D. B. 2002The mathematical model of non- equilibrium effects in water-oil displacement. In proceedings of SPE/DOE 13th Symposium on improved oil recovery. SPE 75169Tulsa OKUSAGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastian, P.: 1999, Numerical computation of multiphase flows in porous media. Habilitation thesis. Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Germany.Google Scholar
  4. DiCarlo, D. A., Blunt, M. J. 2000Determination of finger shape using the dynamic capillary pressureWater Resour. Res.3627812785Google Scholar
  5. Bourgeat, A., Panfilov, M. 1998Effective two-phase flow through highly heterogeneous porous media: capillary non-equilibrium effectsComput. Geosci.2191215Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T.: 1964, Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology Papers. Colorado State University.Google Scholar
  7. Burdine, N. T. 1953Relative permeability calculations from pore size distribution dataPetroleum Trans.1987177Google Scholar
  8. Dahle, H., Celia, M. A. and Hassanizadeh, S. M.: 2003, A bundle of capillary tubes model to investigate dynamic effects in the capillary pressure- saturation relationship. European Science Foundation (ESF) Exploratory Workshop: Recent advances in multiphase flow and transport in porous media, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, June 23--25. Google Scholar
  9. Dykaar, B. B., Kitanidis, P. 1992Determination of effective hydraulic conductivity for heterogeneous porous media using a numerical spectral approach: 1Meth. Water Resour. Res.2811551166Google Scholar
  10. Gielen, T., Hassanizadeh, S. M., Nordhaug, H. and Leijnse, A.: 2003, Dynamic effects in multiphase flow: a pore-scale network approach. European Science Foundation (ESF) Exploratory Workshop: Recent advances in multiphase flow and transport in porous media, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, June 23--25. Google Scholar
  11. Gielen, T., Hassanizadeh, S. M., Celia, M. A., Dahle, H. and Leijnse, A.: 2004, A pore- network approach to investigate dynamic effects in multiphase flow. Conference Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, June 13th to 17th, 2004 in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A., Vol. 1: 83--94. Google Scholar
  12. Hassanizadeh, S. M., Gray, W. G. 1993Thermodynamic basis of capillary pressure in porous mediaWater Resour. Res.2933893405Google Scholar
  13. Hassanizadeh, S. M., Celia, M. A., Dahle, H. K. 2002Dynamic effect in the capillary pressure – saturation relationship and its impact on unsaturated flowVadose Zone Hydrol.13857Google Scholar
  14. Helmig, R. 1997Multiphase Flow and Transport Processes in the Subsurface. SpringerBerlinHeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  15. Hilfer, R. 1996Transport and Relaxation Phenomena in Porous MediaAdvances in Chemical PhysicsXCII299424Google Scholar
  16. Huber, R. U., Helmig, R. 1999Multiphase Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media: A Classical Finite Element Method Versus an IMPES-based Mixed FE/FV ApproachInt. J. Num. Meth. Flu.1899920Google Scholar
  17. Kalaydijan, F. J.-M.: Dynamic capillary pressure curve for water/oil displacement in porous media: theory vs. experiment. SPE Conference. Washington D.C. 4--7 Oct. 1992. Paper no. 24183, p. 491--506.Google Scholar
  18. Silin, D., Patzek, T. 2004On Barenblatt’s model of spontaneous countercurrent imbibitionTransport in Porous Media54297322Google Scholar
  19. Singh, M., Mohanty, K. K. 2003Dynamic modeling of drainage through three-dimensional porous materialsChem. Eng. Sci.,58118Google Scholar
  20. Stauffer, F.: 1978, Time dependence of the relationship between capillary pressure, water content and conductivity during drainage of porous media. In proceedings of the IAHR conference on scale effects in porous media, Thessaloniki, Greece. Google Scholar
  21. Topp, G. C., Klute, A., Peters, D. B. 1967Comparison of water content-pressure head obtained by equilibrium. steady-state and unsteady state methods.Soil. Sci. Am. Proc31312314Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Manthey
    • 1
  • S. Majid Hassanizadeh
    • 2
  • Rainer Helmig
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Hydraulic Engineering, Chair of Hydromechanics and Modeling of HydrosystemsUniversität StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Department of Earth SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations