Real-Time Systems

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 198–221 | Cite as

Hierarchical CPU utilization control for real-time guarantees in power grid computing

Article

Abstract

Blackouts in our daily life can be disastrous with enormous economic loss. Blackouts usually occur when appropriate corrective actions are not effectively taken for an initial contingency. Therefore, it is critical to complete those tasks that are running power grid computing algorithms in the Energy Management System (EMS) in a timely manner to avoid blackouts. This problem can be formulated as guaranteeing end-to-end deadlines in a Distributed Real-time Embedded (DRE) system. However, existing feedback scheduling algorithms in DRE systems cannot be directly adopted to handle with significantly different timescales of power grid computing tasks. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical control solution to guarantee the deadlines of those tasks in EMS by grouping them based on their characteristics. Furthermore, we present an adaptive control scheme to achieve analytical assurance of control accuracy and system stability, in spite of significant system variation. Our solution is based on well-established control theory for guaranteed control accuracy and system stability and can adapt to changes in the system model without manual reconfiguration and profiling. Simulation results based on a realistic workload configuration demonstrate that our solution can guarantee timeliness for power grid computing and hence help to avoid blackouts.

Keywords

Real-time scheduling Utilization control Power grid Feedback control 

References

  1. Abdelzaher T, Stankovic J, Lu C, Zhang R, Lu Y (2003) Feedback performance control in software services. IEEE Control Syst 23(3) Google Scholar
  2. Abdelzaher T, Sharma V, Lu C (2004) A utilization bound for aperiodic tasks and priority driven scheduling. IEEE Trans Comput 53(3):334–350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amirijoo M, Chaufette N, Hansson J, Son SH, Gunnarsson S (2005) Generalized performance management of multi-class real-time imprecise data services. In: RTSS Google Scholar
  4. Chen F, Han X, Pan Z, Han L (2008a) State estimation model and algorithm including pmu. In: DRPT Google Scholar
  5. Chen M, Wang X, Gunasekaran R, Qi H, Shankar M (2008b) Control-based real-time metadata matching for information dissemination. In: RTCSA Google Scholar
  6. Chen M, Nolan C, Wang X, Adhikari S, Li F, Qi H (2009) Hierarchical utilization control for real-time and resilient power grid. In: Euromicro conference on real-time systems (ECRTS), Jul 2009 Google Scholar
  7. Franklin GF, Powell JD, Workman M (1997) Digital control of dynamic systems, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New York Google Scholar
  8. Glanzmann G, Andersson G (2006) Incorporation of n-1 security into optimal power flow for facts control. In: PSCE Google Scholar
  9. Ioannou PA, Sun J (1996) Robust adaptive control. Prentice Hall, New York MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Li F, Chen Z, Fan L, Zhang P (2008) Toward a self-healing protection and control system. In: NAPS Google Scholar
  11. Lin K-J, Natarajan S, Liu JWs (1987) Imprecise results: utilizing partial computations in real-time systems. In: RTSS, Dec 1987 Google Scholar
  12. Liscouski B, Elliot W (2004) Final report on the august 14, 2003 blackout in the united states and Canada: Causes and recommendations. In: A report to US department of energy Google Scholar
  13. Liu JWS (2000) Real-time systems. Prentice Hall, New York Google Scholar
  14. Liu X, Abdelzaher T (2006) On non-utilization bounds for arbitrary fixed priority policies. In: RTAS Google Scholar
  15. Lu C, Stankovic JA, Son SH (2002) Feedback control real-time scheduling: Framework, modeling and algorithms. Real-Time Syst 23:85–126. Special Issue on Control-Theoretical Approaches to Real-Time Computing MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lu C, Wang X, Koutsoukos X (2005) Feedback utilization control in distributed real-time systems with end-to-end tasks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 16(6):550–561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Skadron K, Abdelzaher T, Stan MR (2002) Control-theoretic techniques and thermal-rc modeling for accurate and localized dynamic thermal management. In: HPCA Google Scholar
  18. Strosnider JK, Lehoczky JP, Sha L (1995) The deferrable server algorithm for enhanced aperiodicresponsiveness in hard real-time environments. IEEE Trans Comput 44(1) Google Scholar
  19. Wang X, Chen M (2008) Cluster-level feedback power control for performance optimization. In: HPCA Google Scholar
  20. Wang X, Jia D, Lu C, Koutsoukos X (2007) Deucon: decentralized end-to-end utilization control for distributed real-time systems. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 18(7):996–1009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang Y, Wang X, Chen M, Zhu X (2008) Power-efficient response time guarantees for virtualized enterprise servers. In: RTSS Google Scholar
  22. Wei X (2006) On estimation of autoregressive signals in the presence of noise. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 53(12) Google Scholar
  23. Wood AJ, Wollenberg BF (1996) Power generation, operation, and control, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York Google Scholar
  24. Xue H, Jia Qq, Wang N, Bo Zq, Wang Ht, Ma Hx (2007) A dynamic state estimation method with pmu and scada measurement for power systems. In: IPEC Google Scholar
  25. Zhang R, Lu C, Abdelzaher TF, Stankovic JA (2002) ControlWare: a middleware architecture for feedback control of software performance. In: ICDCS, Jul 2002 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations