Advertisement

Aging peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth) cultures lose embryogenic potential and metabolic cellular function due to continuous culture in hypoxic environments

  • Joseph Francis Ree
  • Luiza Giacomolli Polesi
  • Franklin Back
  • Amanda Azevedo Bertolazi
  • Vanildo Silveira
  • Miguel Pedro GuerraEmail author
Original Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Formerly-embryogenic 8-year-old and 2-year-old embryogenic peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth.) cultures were treated with 0, 4, 16, or 64 µM 5-azacytidine, an inhibitor of cytosine methylation, to evaluate its ability to restore embryogenic potential to old cultures and observe its effects on younger embryogenic tissue. Either 16 or 64 µM 5-azacytidine restored the ability of a small proportion of older cultures to produce somatic embryos, but the same concentration also caused somatic embryos from the 2-year-old embryogenic culture line to lose regulation, resulting in non-embryogenic cultures and fast-growing yellow callus. Two-year-old embryogenic tissue had slightly lower global methylation, but only 4 µM 5-azacytidine caused a drop in global methylation. Two-year-old and 5-azacytidine-treated 8-year-old embryogenic cultures both showed an up-accumulation of proteins involved in a number of cellular functions: cellular redox control, anaerobic fermentation, protein degradation, NO-related synthesis and storage, and several forms of epigenetic regulation, including the highly-conserved Argonaute 4 protein; and untreated 8-year-old cultures showed increased amounts of proteins involved in cell wall formation and rearrangement, defense-related peroxidases associated with the cell wall, and phospholipidase D. All three tissues showed proteins involved in hypoxia response. HPLC analysis of 8-year-old cultures with embryogenic and non-embryogenic 2-year-old cultures revealed that 8-year-old cultures lacked any detectable carbohydrates, whereas the younger ones contained measurable amounts of arabinose, ribose, and sucrose. Aging of in vitro cultures is, therefore, likely related to loss of metabolic ability due to constant hypoxia, leading to low vigor, inability to adapt to stress, and loss of embryogenic potential.

Key message

Embryogenesis loss in ageing peach palm cultures is associated with hypoxia, leading to loss in detectable carbohydrates and down-accumulation of proteins associated with metabolism, nitric oxide storage, and epigenetic regulation

Keywords

5-Azacytidine Aging Somatic embryogenesis Epigenetic regulation Hypoxia Carbohydrate metabolism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Proc. 407974/2018-0, and 302798/2018-8) and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) of Brazil for funding.

Author contributions

JFR and MPG designed the experiment. JFR performed in vitro experiments, sample collection, statistical analysis, and data interpretation. LGP and FB performed the HPLC data collection. AZB and VS performed the proteomic analysis and identification of differentially-accumulated proteins. JFR wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Supplementary material

11240_2019_1710_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. Aken OV, Pečenková T, Cotte BVD et al (2007) Mitochondrial type-I prohibitins of Arabidopsis thaliana are required for supporting proficient meristem development. Plant J 52:850–864.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03276.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ausín I, Alonso-Blanco C, Jarillo JA et al (2004) Regulation of flowering time by FVE, a retinoblastoma-associated protein. Nat Genet 36:162–166.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1295 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bargmann BOR, Munnik T (2006) The role of phospholipase D in plant stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:515–522.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.07.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baťková P, Pospíšilová J, Synková H (2008) Production of reactive oxygen species and development of antioxidative systems during in vitro growth and ex vitro transfer. Biol Plant 52:413–422.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-008-0085-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Betekhtin A, Milewska-Hendel A, Chajec L et al (2018) 5-Azacitidine induces cell death in a tissue culture of Brachypodium distachyon. Int J Mol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061806 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhagavan NV, Ha C-E (2015) Chapter 13—Electron transport chain, oxidative phosphorylation, and other oxygen-consuming systems. In: Bhagavan NV, Ha C-E (eds) Essentials of medical biochemistry, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 187–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biddington NL (1992) The influence of ethylene in plant tissue culture. Plant Growth Regul 11:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blokhina O, Fagerstedt KV (2010) Oxidative metabolism, ROS and NO under oxygen deprivation. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:359–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.01.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradaï F, Pliego-Alfaro F, Sánchez-Romero C (2016) Long-term somatic embryogenesis in olive (Olea europaea L.): influence on regeneration capability and quality of regenerated plants. Sci Hortic 199:23–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bravo S, Bertín A, Turner A et al (2017) Differences in DNA methylation, DNA structure and embryogenesis-related gene expression between embryogenic and non embryogenic lines of Pinus radiataD. don. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult PCTOC 130:521–529.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-017-1242-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breton D, Harvengt L, Trontin J-F et al (2006) Long-term subculture randomly affects morphology and subsequent maturation of early somatic embryos in maritime pine. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 87:95–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9144-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buddendorf-Joosten JMC, Woltering EJ (1994) Components of the gaseous environment and their effects on plant growth and development in vitro. In: Lumsden PJ, Nicholas JR, Davies WJ (eds) Physiology, growth and development of plants in culture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 165–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chakrabarty D, Yu KW, Paek KY (2003) Detection of DNA methylation changes during somatic embryogenesis of Siberian ginseng (Eleuterococcus senticosus). Plant Sci 165:61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00127-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM et al (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21:3674–3676.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costa S, Shaw P (2007) ‘Open minded’ cells: how cells can change fate. Trends Cell Biol 17:101–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2006.12.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dai R-P, Yu F-X, Goh S-R et al (2008) Histone 2B (H2B) expression is confined to a proper NAD+/NADH redox status. J Biol Chem 283:26894–26901.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M804307200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. De-la-Peña C, Nic-Can GI, Galaz-Ávalos RM et al (2015) The role of chromatin modifications in somatic embryogenesis in plants. Front Plant Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00635 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Deleu C, Faes P, Niogret M-F, Bouchereau A (2013) Effects of the inhibitor of the γ-aminobutyrate-transaminase, vinyl-γ-aminobutyrate, on development and nitrogen metabolism in Brassica napus seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 64:60–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.12.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. R Development Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  20. Distler U, Kuharev J, Navarro P et al (2014) Drift time-specific collision energies enable deep-coverage data-independent acquisition proteomics. Nat Methods 11:167–170.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2767 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Distler U, Kuharev J, Navarro P, Tenzer S (2016) Label-free quantification in ion mobility–enhanced data-independent acquisition proteomics. Nat Protoc 11:795–812.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.042 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Doyle J (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  23. Dunstan DI, Bethune TD (1996) Variability in maturation and germination from white spruce somatic embryos, as affected by age and use of solid or liquid culture. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 32:165–170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02822761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eprintsev AT, Fedorin DN, Dobychina MA, Igamberdiev AU (2017) Expression and promoter methylation of succinate dehydrogenase and fumarase genes in maize under anoxic conditions. J Plant Physiol 216:197–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.06.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fang X, Qi Y (2016) RNAi in plants: an argonaute-centered view. Plant Cell.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.15.00920 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Fehér A (2015) Somatic embryogenesis—stress-induced remodeling of plant cell fate. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA 1849:385–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.07.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fieldes MA, Amyot LM (2000) Evaluating the potential of using 5-azacytidine as an epimutagen. Can J Bot 77:1617–1622.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b99-136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fieldes MA, Schaeffer SM, Krech MJ, Brown JCL (2005) DNA hypomethylation in 5-azacytidine-induced early-flowering lines of flax. Theor Appl Genet 111:136–149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-2005-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Filson PB, Dawson-Andoh BE (2009) Characterization of sugars from model and enzyme-mediated pulp hydrolyzates using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to evaporative light scattering detection. Bioresour Technol 100:6661–6664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.067 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fukao T, Bailey-Serres J (2004) Plant responses to hypoxia—is survival a balancing act? Trends Plant Sci 9:449–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.07.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Geigenberger P (2003) Response of plant metabolism to too little oxygen. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:247–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00038-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Grasser KD, Krohn NM, Lichota J, Stemmer C (2000) Chromatin-associated HMG1, HMGI/Y and SSRP1 proteins of higher plants. Physiol Plant 110:427–435.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2000.1100401.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gupta B, Huang B (2014) Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int J Genomics.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/701596 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Gupta R, Webster CI, Walker AR, Gray JC (1997) Chromosomal location and expression of the single-copy gene encoding high-mobility-group protein HMG-I/Y in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 34:529–536.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005828430861 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Hennig L, Bouveret R, Gruissem W (2005) MSI1-like proteins: an escort service for chromatin assembly and remodeling complexes. Trends Cell Biol 15:295–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2005.04.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Heringer AS, Steinmacher DA, Fraga HPF et al (2013a) Global DNA methylation profiles of somatic embryos of peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth) are influenced by cryoprotectants and droplet-vitrification cryopreservation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult PCTOC 114:365–372.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-013-0331-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heringer AS, Steinmacher DA, Schmidt ÉC et al (2013b) Survival and ultrastructural features of peach palm (Bactris gasipaes, Kunth) somatic embryos submitted to cryopreservation through vitrification. Protoplasma 250:1185–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heringer AS, Steinmacher DA, Fraga HPF et al (2014) Improved high-efficiency protocol for somatic embryogenesis in Peach Palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth) using RITA® temporary immersion system. Sci Hortic 179:284–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.09.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hernandez-Valladares M, Aasebø E, Mjaavatten O et al (2016) Reliable FASP-based procedures for optimal quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis on samples from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Biol Proced Online 18:13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-016-0043-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Jamet E, Durr A, Parmentier Y et al (1990) Is ubiquitin involved in the dedifferentiation of higher plant cells? Cell Differ Dev Off J Int Soc Dev Biol 29:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jiménez VM (2001) Regulation of in vitro somatic embryogenesis with emphasis on to the role of endogenous hormones. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 13:196–223.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-31312001000200008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnston JW, Harding K, Bremner DH et al (2005) HPLC analysis of plant DNA methylation: a study of critical methodological factors. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:844–853.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.07.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kathiresan A, Tung P, Chinnappa CC, Reid DM (1997) [gamma]-Aminobutyric acid stimulates ethylene biosynthesis in sunflower. Plant Physiol 115:129–135.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.115.1.129 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Kawano T (2003) Roles of the reactive oxygen species-generating peroxidase reactions in plant defense and growth induction. Plant Cell Rep 21:829–837.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-003-0591-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kim SY, Paeng SK, Nawkar GM et al (2011) The 1-Cys peroxiredoxin, a regulator of seed dormancy, functions as a molecular chaperone under oxidative stress conditions. Plant Sci 181:119–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.04.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Klimaszewska K, Noceda C, Pelletier G et al (2009) Biological characterization of young and aged embryogenic cultures of Pinus pinaster (Ait.). Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45:20–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-008-9158-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Koike S, Matsukura C, Takayama M et al (2013) Suppression of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transaminases induces prominent GABA accumulation, dwarfism and infertility in the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Plant Cell Physiol 54:793–807.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pct035 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Konan KE, Durand-Gasselin T, Kouadio YJ et al (2010) In vitro conservation of oil palm somatic embryos for 20 years on a hormone-free culture medium: characteristics of the embryogenic cultures, derived plantlets and adult palms. Plant Cell Rep 29:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-009-0787-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Konishi T, Takeda T, Miyazaki Y et al (2007) A plant mutase that interconverts UDP-arabinofuranose and UDP-arabinopyranose. Glycobiology 17:345–354.  https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwl081 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Konishi T, Aohara T, Igasaki T et al (2011) Down-regulation of UDP-arabinopyranose mutase reduces the proportion of arabinofuranose present in rice cell walls. Phytochemistry 72:1962–1968.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.07.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kosová K, Vítámvás P, Prášil IT, Renaut J (2011) Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress—contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. J Proteomics 74:1301–1322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2011.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kubienová L, Kopečný D, Tylichová M et al (2013) Structural and functional characterization of a plant S-nitrosoglutathione reductase from Solanum lycopersicum. Biochimie 95:889–902.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2012.12.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kwon E, Feechan A, Yun B-W et al (2012) AtGSNOR1 function is required for multiple developmental programs in Arabidopsis. Planta 236:887–900.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1697-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lahmy S, Pontier D, Bies-Etheve N et al (2016) Evidence for ARGONAUTE4–DNA interactions in RNA-directed DNA methylation in plants. Genes Dev.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.289553.116 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Landey R, Cenci A, Guyot R et al (2015) Assessment of genetic and epigenetic changes during cell culture ageing and relations with somaclonal variation in Coffea arabica. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult PCTOC 122:517–531.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0772-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lewis ML, Miki K, Ueda T (2000) FePer 1, a gene encoding an evolutionarily conserved 1-Cys peroxiredoxin in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench), is expressed in a seed-specific manner and induced during seed germination. Gene 246:81–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00045-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Linden JC, Haigh JR, Mirjalili N, Phisaphalong M (2001) Gas concentration effects on secondary metabolite production by plant cell cultures. In: Zhong J-J, Byun SY, Cho GH et al (eds) Plant cells. Springer, Berlin, pp 27–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Linder P, Jankowsky E (2011) From unwinding to clamping—the DEAD box RNA helicase family. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:505–516.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3154 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lipecka J, Chhuon C, Bourderioux M et al (2016) Sensitivity of mass spectrometry analysis depends on the shape of the filtration unit used for filter aided sample preparation (FASP). Proteomics 16:1852–1857.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201600103 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lyngved R, Renaut J, Hausman J-F et al (2008) Embryo-specific Proteins in Cyclamen persicum Analyzed with 2-D DIGE. J Plant Growth Regul 27:353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-008-9061-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mithran M, Paparelli E, Novi G et al (2014) Analysis of the role of the pyruvate decarboxylase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana under low-oxygen conditions. Plant Biol 16:28–34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Moller IM (2001) PLANT MITOCHONDRIA AND OXIDATIVE STRESS: electron transport, NADPH turnover, and metabolism of reactive oxygen species. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:561–591.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.561 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Morel G, Wetmore RH (1951) Fern callus tissue culture. Am J Bot 38:141–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nair RB, Bastress KL, Ruegger MO et al (2004) The Arabidopsis thaliana REDUCED EPIDERMAL FLUORESCENCE1 gene encodes an aldehyde dehydrogenase involved in ferulic acid and sinapic acid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 16:544–554.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.017509 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Nanjo Y, Skultety L, Uváčková L et al (2012) Mass spectrometry-based analysis of proteomic changes in the root tips of flooded soybean seedlings. J Proteome Res 11:372–385.  https://doi.org/10.1021/pr200701y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Nascimento-Gavioli MCA, Cangahuala-Inocente GC, Steinmacher D et al (2017) Physiological and biochemical features of embryogenic and non-embryogenic peach palm Bactris gasipaesKunth) cultures. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 53:33–40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-017-9805-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Obata T, Fernie AR (2012) The use of metabolomics to dissect plant responses to abiotic stresses. Cell Mol Life Sci 69:3225–3243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1091-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Park S-Y, Cho H-M, Moon H-K et al (2011) Genotypic variation and aging effects on the embryogenic capability of Kalopanax septemlobus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult PCTOC 105:265–270.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9862-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Petrášek J, Schwarzerová K (2009) Actin and microtubule cytoskeleton interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:728–734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.09.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Phillips RL, Kaeppler SM, Olhoft P (1994) Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. Proc Natl Acad Sci 91:5222–5226.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.12.5222 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Qi Y, He X, Wang X-J et al (2006) Distinct catalytic and non-catalytic roles of ARGONAUTE4 in RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nature 443:1008–1012.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05198 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Quinga LAP, Fraga HPdF, Vieira LdN, Guerra MP (2017) Epigenetics of long-term somatic embryogenesis in Theobroma cacao L.: DNA methylation and recovery of embryogenic potential. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult PCTOC 131:295–305.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-017-1284-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rautengarten C, Ebert B, Herter T et al (2011) The interconversion of UDP-Arabinopyranose and UDP-Arabinofuranose is indispensable for plant development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.083931 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Reboul R, Geserick C, Pabst M et al (2011) Down-regulation of UDP-glucuronic acid biosynthesis leads to swollen plant cell walls and severe developmental defects associated with changes in pectic polysaccharides. J Biol Chem 286:39982.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.255695 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Ree JF, Guerra MP (2015) Palm (Arecaceae) somatic embryogenesis. Vitro Cell Dev Biol 51:589–602.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9722-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reeves R, Beckerbauer L (2001) HMGI/Y proteins: flexible regulators of transcription and chromatin structure. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA 1519:13–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4781(01)00215-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Rival A, Ilbert P, Labeyrie A et al (2013) Variations in genomic DNA methylation during the long-term in vitro proliferation of oil palm embryogenic suspension cultures. Plant Cell Rep 32:359–368.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-012-1369-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Roberts JKM, Hooks MA, Miaullis AP et al (1992) Contribution of malate and amino acid metabolism to cytoplasmic pH regulation in hypoxic maize root tips studied using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Plant Physiol 98:480–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rocha M, Licausi F, Araújo WL et al (2010) Glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle are linked by alanine aminotransferase during hypoxia induced by waterlogging of Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiol 152:1501–1513.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.150045 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Rodziewicz P, Swarcewicz B, Chmielewska K et al (2014) Influence of abiotic stresses on plant proteome and metabolome changes. Acta Physiol Plant 36:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-013-1402-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rojas-Martínez L, Visser RGF, de Klerk GJ (2010) The hyperhydricity syndrome: waterlogging of plant tissues as a major cause. Propag Ornam Plants 10:169–175Google Scholar
  83. Rossi V, Varotto S, Locatelli S et al (2001) The maize WD-repeat gene ZmRbAp1 encodes a member of the MSI/RbAp sub-family and is differentially expressed during endosperm development. Mol Genet Genomics 265:576–584.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380100461 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Sampedro J, Sieiro C, Revilla G et al (2001) Cloning and expression pattern of a gene encoding an α-xylosidase active against xyloglucan oligosaccharides from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 126:910–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sampedro J, Pardo B, Gianzo C et al (2010) Lack of α-xylosidase activity in arabidopsis alters xyloglucan composition and results in growth defects1[W][OA]. Plant Physiol 154:1105–1115.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.163212 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Seitz B, Klos C, Wurm M, Tenhaken R (2000) Matrix polysaccharide precursors in Arabidopsis cell walls are synthesized by alternate pathways with organ-specific expression patterns. Plant J 21:537–546.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00696.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Shelp B, Bown A, McLean M (1999) Metabolism and functions of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Trends Plant Sci 4:446–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Shen W, Wei Y, Dauk M et al (2006) Involvement of a glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in modulating the NADH/NAD+ ratio provides evidence of a mitochondrial glycerol-3-phosphate shuttle in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18:422–441.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.039750 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Shiao T, Ellis MH, Dolferus R et al (2002) Overexpression of alcohol dehydrogenase or pyruvate decarboxylase improves growth of hairy roots at reduced oxygen concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:455–461.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10147 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Silva JC, Gorenstein MV, Li G-Z et al (2006) Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel ms acquisition. Mol Cell Proteomics 5:144–156.  https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M500230-MCP200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Skibbe DS, Liu F, Wen T-J et al (2002) Characterization of the aldehyde dehydrogenase gene families of Zea mays and Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 48:751–764.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014870429630 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Smulders MJM, De Klerk GJ (2011) Epigenetics in plant tissue culture. Plant Growth Regul 63:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Smýkal P, Valledor L, Rodríguez R, Griga M (2007) Assessment of genetic and epigenetic stability in long-term in vitro shoot culture of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Cell Rep 26:1985–1998.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0413-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Solís M-T, El-Tantawy A-A, Cano V et al (2015) 5-azacytidine promotes microspore embryogenesis initiation by decreasing global DNA methylation, but prevents subsequent embryo development in rapeseed and barley. Front Plant Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00472 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Steinmacher DA (2010) Aspects of somatic embryogenesis and seed germination of peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth)Google Scholar
  96. Steinmacher DA, Krohn NG, Dantas ACM et al (2007) Somatic embryogenesis in peach palm using the thin cell layer technique: induction, morpho-histological aspects and AFLP analysis of somaclonal variation. Ann Bot 100:699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Steinmacher DA, Saare-Surminski K, Lieberei R (2012) Arabinogalactan proteins and the extracellular matrix surface network during peach palm somatic embryogenesis. Physiol Plant 146:336–349.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01642.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Stone SL (2014) The role of ubiquitin and the 26S proteasome in plant abiotic stress signaling. Front Plant Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00135 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Sullivan JA, Shirasu K, Deng XW (2003) The diverse roles of ubiquitin and the 26S proteasome in the life of plants. Nat Rev Genet 4:948–958.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1228 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Sun L, Wu Y, Zou H et al (2013) Comparative proteomic analysis of the H99 inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult PCTOC 113:103–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0255-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Timperio AM, Egidi MG, Zolla L (2008) Proteomics applied on plant abiotic stresses: role of heat shock proteins (HSP). J Proteomics 71:391–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2008.07.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Tognolli M, Penel C, Greppin H, Simon P (2002) Analysis and expression of the class III peroxidase large gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 288:129–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00465-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Tokuji Y, Takano S, Tonomura M et al (2011) Influence of 5′-azacitidine on promoting recovery of cell competence for shoot organogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult PCTOC 106:289–297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-9920-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. van Dongen JT, Gupta KJ, Ramírez-Aguilar SJ et al (2011) Regulation of respiration in plants: a role for alternative metabolic pathways. J Plant Physiol 168:1434–1443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.11.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Verdeil J-L, Alemanno L, Niemenak N, Tranbarger TJ (2007) Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy? Trends Plant Sci 12:245–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Walker SE, Charbonneau LF, Law S, Earle C (2012) Stability of Azacitidine in sterile water for injection. Can J Hosp Pharm 65:352–359PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  107. Wang HC, Chen JT, Chang WC (2010a) Morphogenetic routes of long-term embryogenic callus culture of Areca catechu. Biol Plant 54:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-010-0001-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wang Y, Ries A, Wu K et al (2010b) The Arabidopsis prohibitin gene PHB3 functions in nitric oxide-mediated responses and in hydrogen peroxide-induced nitric oxide accumulation. Plant Cell 22:249–259.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.072066 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. Wiśniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M (2009) Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods 6:359–362.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1322 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Yamamoto N, Kobayashi H, Togashi T et al (2005) Formation of embryogenic cell clumps from carrot epidermal cells is suppressed by 5-azacytidine, a DNA methylation inhibitor. J Plant Physiol 162:47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.05.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Ye R, Chen Z, Lian B et al (2016) A dicer-independent route for biogenesis of siRNAs that direct DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 61:222–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.11.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Zabalza A, van Dongen JT, Froehlich A et al (2009) Regulation of respiration and fermentation to control the plant internal oxygen concentration. Plant Physiol 149:1087–1098.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.129288 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. Zavattieri MA, Frederico AM, Lima M et al (2010) Induction of somatic embryogenesis as an example of stress-related plant reactions. Electron J Biotechnol 13:12–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Zhang W, Yu L, Zhang Y, Wang X (2005) Phospholipase D in the signaling networks of plant response to abscisic acid and reactive oxygen species. Biochim Biophys Acta 1736:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2005.07.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Zhang J, Ma H, Chen S et al (2009) Stress response proteins’ differential expression in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon—a proteomic approach. Plant Sci 177:103–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratório de Fisiologia do Desenvolvimento e Genética Vegetal, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Genéticos VegetaisUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecossistemas Agrícolas e NaturaisUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaCuritibanosBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratório de Biotecnologia, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia (CBB)Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF)Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  4. 4.Unidade de Biologia Integrativa, Setor de Genômica e Proteômica, UENFRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations