Advertisement

Optimizing culture medium ingredients and micrografting devices can promote in vitro micrografting of cut roses on different rootstocks

  • Mahboubeh Davoudi Pahnekolayi
  • Ali TehranifarEmail author
  • Leila Samiei
  • Mahmoud Shoor
Original Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Tissue culture and micrografting techniques are known as effective procedures to produce healthy rose rootstocks and high quality scions. In order to establish successful micrografting protocol for roses, several factors including different concentrations of Benzylamino-purine (BA) (0, 1, 1.5, 2 mg l−1) + 0.1 mg l−1 α-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), sucrose concentrations (30, 50, 70 g l−1), types of grafting devices (aluminium foil, parafilm, paper bridge), and types of rose scions cultivars (Rosa hybrida cv. Red One, R. hybrida cv. Samurai) on two different types of native (Rosa canina) and commercial rose rootstocks (Rosa multiflora cv. Natal Briar) were examined. The high micrografting success (100%) was micrografting R. hybrida cv. Samurai scion on R. mutiflora cv. Natal Briar rootstock with the paper bridge as the best grafting device in the liquid Van der salm (VS) medium containing 2 mg l−1 BA + 0.1 mg l−1 NAA + 300 mg l−1 Casein Hydrolyzate + 2 g l−1 myo-inositol + 50 g l−1 sucrose. Treating the wounded explants (scions and rootstocks) with silver nitrate (50 mg l−1) during the micrografting process, increased the survival of micrografts. The micrografted plants were successfully rooted and well acclimatized. The present results provide the first efficient protocol to produce high successful micrografted rose plantlets in tissue culture.

Key message

It is the first research protocol for micrografting of native and commercial roses by considering important factors relating to successful micrografting such as plant growth regulators, growth adjuvants, grafting devices, and medium ingredients.

Keywords

Culture medium ingredients Micrografting Paper bridge Rootstock Scion 

Abbreviations

BA

Benzylamino-purine

CH

Casein hydrolyzate

CRD

Completely randomized design

Fe-EDDHA

Ethylenediamine di-2-hydroxy-phenylacetic acid

Fe-EDTA

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

MS

Murashige and Skoog

NAA

α-Naphthaleneacetic acid

PGRs

Plant growth regulators

PVP

Polyvinylpyrrolidone

VS

Van der Salm

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by Ferdowi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran (Grant No. 38934).

Author contributions

This research is part of a Phd thesis. MDP designed and carried out the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript under the supervision of AT, LS and MS. Furthermore, they evaluated the original and final version of the paper. All the authors edited and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict to interest

The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

References

  1. Aazami MA, Bagher MH (2010) In vitro micro-grafting of some Iranian grapevine cultivars. Rom Biotech Lett 15(5):5576–5580Google Scholar
  2. Abousalim A, Mantell SH (1992) Micrografting of pistachio (Pistacia vera L. cv. Mateur). Plant Cell Tiss Org 29(3):231–234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034357 Google Scholar
  3. Ali M, Baloch SK, Seema N et al (2018) Influence of phytohormones on callus indication and micrpropagation on rose (Rosa indica L.). BJBAS 14:9–11Google Scholar
  4. Alvarado-Camarillo D, Valdez-Aguilar LA, Castillo-González AM, Trejo-Téllez LI, Martínez-Amador SY (2018) Biomass, nitrogen and potassium dynamics in hydroponic rose production. Acta Agr Scand Sect B 68(8):719–726.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2018.1473481 Google Scholar
  5. Amer AM, Mohamed GM, Hussein MH, Sedik MZ, Aly UI (2017) Effect of some of the natural organic sources on rice tissue culture. Egypt Pharm J 16(3):152–156.  https://doi.org/10.4103/epj.epj_32_17 Google Scholar
  6. Azadi P, Kermani MJ, Samiei L (2018) Somatic embryogenesis in Rosa hybrida. In: Jain S, Gupta P (eds) Step wise protocols for somatic embryogenesis of important woody plants. forestry sciences. Springer, Cham, pp 161–170Google Scholar
  7. Babaei A, Tabaei-Aghdaei SR, Khosh-Khui M, Omidbaigi R, Naghavi MR, Esselink GD, Smulders MJM (2007) Microsatelite analysis of Damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) accessions from various regions in Iran reveals multiple genotypes. BMC Palnt Biol 7:12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-7-12 Google Scholar
  8. Badalamenti O, Carra A, Oddo E, Carimi F, Sajeva M (2016) Is in vitro micrografting a possible valid alternative to traditional micropropagation in Cactaceae? Pelecyphora aselliformis as a case study. Springerplus 5(1):201.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1901-6 Google Scholar
  9. Baktir I, Hazar D, Usyal S, Ozel S (2005) Possible uses of dogrose branches and rose hips for ornamental purposes. Acta Hortic 690:97–99.  https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.690.13 Google Scholar
  10. Bhat KM, Banday FA, Mir MA (2010) Micrografting and its application in fruit crops. In: Banday FA, Sharma MK (eds) Advances in temperate fruit production. Kalyani Publishers, New Dehli, pp 290–294Google Scholar
  11. Byrne DH, Klein P, Yan M et al (2018) Challenges of breeding rose rosette–resistant roses. HortScience 53(5):604–608.  https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI1255 Google Scholar
  12. Cabrera RI, Perdomo P (2003) Reassessing the salinity tolerance of greenhouse roses under soilless production conditions. HortScience 38(4):533–536Google Scholar
  13. Carins T (2003) Classification/horticultural classification schemes. In: Roberts AV, Debener T, Gudin S (eds) Encyclopedia of rose science. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 117–124Google Scholar
  14. Conejero A, Romero C, Cunill M, Mestre MA, Martínez-Calvo J, Badenes ML, Llácer G (2013) In vitro shoot-tip grafting for safe Prunus budwood exchange. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 150(4):365–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.11.026 Google Scholar
  15. Cubero J, Lastra B, Salcedo CI, Piquer J, Lopez MM (2006) Systemic movement of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in several plant species. J Appl Microbiol 101(2):412–421.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02938.x Google Scholar
  16. Daniel MA, David RHA, Caesar SA, Ramakrishnan M, Duraipandiyan V, Ignacimuthu S, Al-Dhabi NA (2018) Effect of l-glutamine and casein hydrolysate in the development of somatic embryos from cotyledonary leaf explants in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. monech). S Afr J Bot 114:223–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.11.014 Google Scholar
  17. Darikova JA, Savva YV, Vaganov EA, Grachev AM, Kuznetsova GV (2011) Grafts of woody plants and the problem of incompatibility between scion and rootstock (a review). SibFU J Biol 1(4):54–63Google Scholar
  18. Davoudi Pahnekolay M, Tehranifar A, Samiei L, Shoor M (2015) Optimization of the micro-propagation protocol of two native rose species of Iran (Rosa canina and Rosa beggeriana). In: III international conference on quality management in supply chains of ornamentals 1131:87–96.  https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1131.12
  19. Davoudi Pahnekolayi M, Samiei L, Tehranifar A, Shoor M (2015) The effect of medium and plant growth regulators on micropropagation of Dog rose (Rosa canina L.). JPMB 3(1):61–71Google Scholar
  20. Debener T, Byrne DH (2014) Disease resistance breeding in rose: current status and potential of biotechnological tools. Plant Sci 228:107–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.04.005 Google Scholar
  21. Debener T, Bartels C, Mattiesch L (1996) RAPD analysis of genetic variation between a group of rose cultivars and selected wild rose species. Mol Breed 2(4):321–327.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437910 Google Scholar
  22. Folta KM, Gardiner SE (2009) Genetics and genomics of rosaceae, plant genetics and genomics: crops and models 6. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuller SL, Savory EA, Weisberg AJ, Buser JZ, Gordon MI, Putnam ML, Chang JH (2017) Isothermal amplification and lateral-flow assay for detecting crown-gall-causing Agrobacterium spp. Phytopathology 107(9):1062–1068.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-04-17-0144-R Google Scholar
  24. Gebhardt K, Goldbach H (1988) Establishment, graft union characteristics and growth of Prunus micrografts. Physiol Plant 72(1):153–159.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb06637.x Google Scholar
  25. Gentile P, Scioli MG, Bielli A, Orlandi A, Cervelli V (2016) Reconstruction of alar nasal cartilage defects using a tissue engineering technique based on a combined use of autologous chondrocyte micrografts and platelet-rich plasma: preliminary clinical and instrumental evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(10):e1027.  https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001027 Google Scholar
  26. Gentile A, Frattarelli A, Nota P, Condello E, Caboni E (2017) The aromatic cytokinin meta-topolin promotes in vitro propagation, shoot quality and micrografting in Corylus colurna L. Plant Cell Tiss Org 128(3):693–703.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1150-y Google Scholar
  27. George EF, Hall MA, Klerk GJD (2008) The components of plant tissue culture media I: macro- and micro-nutrients. In: George EF, Hall MA, Klerk GJD (eds) Plant propagation by tissue culture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 65–113Google Scholar
  28. Giovannini A, De Benedetti L, Crippa F, Mercuri A (2015) Micropropagation of old cultivars of scented cut roses. Acta Hortic 1155:613–618.  https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1155.89 Google Scholar
  29. Gorjian S, Ghobadian B (2015) Solar desalination: a sustainable solution to water crisis in Iran. Renew Sust Energ Rev 48:571–584.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.009 Google Scholar
  30. Gupta J, Dubey RK (2018) Factors affecting post-harvest life of flower crops. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 7(1):548–557.  https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.065 Google Scholar
  31. Hosny SM, Hammad G, El Sharbasy S, Zayed Z (2016) Effect of coconut milk, casein hydrolysate and yeast extract on the proliferation of in vitro Barhi date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). J Hortic Sci Ornamen Plants 8(1):46–54.  https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.jhsop.2016.8.1.1172 Google Scholar
  32. Huang SC, Millikan DF (1980) In vitro micrografting of apple shoot tips. Hortic Sci 15(6):741–743Google Scholar
  33. Huang NC, Yu TS (2015) A pin-fasten grafting method provides a non-sterile and highly efficient method for grafting Arabidopsis at diverse developmental stages. Plant Methods 11:38.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0081-7 Google Scholar
  34. Hussain G, Wani MS, Mir MA, Rather ZA, Bhat KM (2014) Micrografting for fruit crop improvement. Afr J Biotechnol 13(25):2474–2483.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.13602 Google Scholar
  35. Ishihuro Y, Fukui H, Kageyama K, Matsumoto S (2006) Observation of attachment of agrobacterium tumefaciens to rose cell surface using TEM in relation to resistance responses to crown gall disease. In: XXVII international horticultural congress-IHC2006: international symposium on sustainability through integrated and organic 767:451–456.  https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.767.53
  36. Izadi Z, Zarei H, Alizadeh M (2014) Effect of time, cultivar and rootstock on success of rose propagation through stenting technique. Am J Plant Sci 5(11):1644.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.511178 Google Scholar
  37. Jonard R (1986) Micrografting and its applications to tree improvement. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry 1, trees I. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–48Google Scholar
  38. Jonard R, Hugard J, Macheix JJ, Martinez J, Mosella-Chancel L, Poessel JL, Villemur P (1983) In vitro micrografting and its applications to fruit science. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 20(2):147–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(83)90135-8 Google Scholar
  39. Katsumoto Y, Fukuchi-Mizutani M, Fukui Y, Brugliera F, Holton A, Karan T, Nakamura M, Yonekura-Sakakibara N, Togami K, Pigeaire J, Tao A, Nehra GS, Lu N, Dyson CY,K, Tsuda B, Ashikari T, Kusumi T, Mason JG, Tanaka Y (2007) Engineering of the rose flavonoid biosynthetic pathway successfully generated blue-hued flowers accumulating delphinidin. Plant Cell physiol 48(11):1589–1600.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm131 Google Scholar
  40. Kaur H, Bedi S, Sethi VP, Dhatt AS (2018) Effects of substrate hydroponic systems and different N and K ratios on yield and quality of tomato fruit. J Plant Nutr 41(12):1547–1554.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1459689 Google Scholar
  41. Khaskheli AJ, Khaskheli MI, Khaskheli MA et al (2018) Proliferation, multiplication and improvement of micro-propagation system for mass clonal production of rose through shoot tip culture. Am J Plant Sci 9(02):296.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2018.92024 Google Scholar
  42. Khierallah HSM, Hussein NH (2013) The role of coconut water and casein hydrolysate in somatic embryogenesis of date palm and genetic stability detection using RAPD markers. Res Biotechnol 4(3):20–28Google Scholar
  43. Kim CS, Lee CH, Park HS, Lee GP (2005) In vitro grafting of grape with phylloxera resistant rootstock cultivars. Vitis 44(4):195–196Google Scholar
  44. Kumari A, Kumar J, Kumar A, Chaudhury A, Singh SP (2015) Grafting triggers differential responses between scion and rootstock. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0124438.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124438 Google Scholar
  45. Lane WD, Bhagwat B, Wahlgren S, Armstrong JD (2003) Apple micrografting protocol to establish transgenic clones on field ready rootstock. HortTechnology 13(4):641–646Google Scholar
  46. Malik K, Birla D, Yadav H, Sainger M, Chaudhary D, Jaiwal PK (2017) Evaluation of carbon sources, gelling agents, growth hormones and additives for efficient callus induction and plant regeneration in Indian wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using mature embryos. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 20(3):185–192.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-017-0046-0 Google Scholar
  47. Malik M, Warchol M, Pawlowska B (2018) Liquid culture systems affect morphological and biochemical parameters during Rosa canina plantlets in vitro production. Not Bot Horti Agrobot 46(1):58–64.  https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha46110880 Google Scholar
  48. Marti R, Cubero J, Daza A, Piquer J, Salkedo CI, Morente C, Lopez MM (1999) Evidence of migration and endophytic presence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in rose plants. Eur J Plant Pathol 105:39–50.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008660500107 Google Scholar
  49. Miguelez-Sierra Y, Hernández-Rodríguez A, Acebo-Guerrero Y, Baucher M, El Jaziri M (2017) In vitro micrografting of apical and axillary buds of cacao. J Hortic Sci Biotech 92(1):25–30.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2016.1215231 Google Scholar
  50. Murashige T, Skoog F (1977) Manipulation of organ initiation in plant tissue cultures. Bot Bull Acad Sin 18:1–24Google Scholar
  51. Navarro L, Roistacher CN, Murashige T (1975) Improvement of shoot-tip grafting in vitro for virus-free citrus. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 100:471–479Google Scholar
  52. Nybom H, Werlemark G (2017) Realizing the potential of health-promoting rosehips from dogroses (Rosa sect. Caninae). Curr Bioact Compd 13:3–17Google Scholar
  53. Nybom H, Esselink GD, Werlemark G, Leus L, Vosman B (2006) Uniques genomic configuration revealed by microsatellite DNA in polyploid dogrose, Rosa sect. Caninae. J Evolut Biol 19(2):635–648.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01010.x Google Scholar
  54. Obeidy AA, Smith MAL (1991) A versatile new tactic for fruit tree micrografting. Hortic Sci 26(6):776–776Google Scholar
  55. Onay A, Tilkat E, Süzerer V, Metin ÖK, Çiftçi Y, Kilinc FM, Calar N (2016) Rejuvenation of mature lentisk by micrografting and evaluation of genetic stability. Turk J Biol 40(4):781–796.  https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1510-25 Google Scholar
  56. Ong K, Shires M, Whitaker HJ, Olson J, LaForest J, Byrne DH (2018) Combatting rose rosette disease with volunteer involvement in the monitoring effort. HortScience 53(5):601–603.  https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12552-17 Google Scholar
  57. Pahlavan R, Omid M, Rafiee S, Mousavi-Avval SH (2012) Optimization of energy consumption for rose production in Iran. Energy Sustain Dev 16(2):236–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.12.001 Google Scholar
  58. Rafail ST, Mosleh MS (2010) Factors involved in micropropagation and shoot tip grafting of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) and pear (Pyrus sp. L.). Tropentag. In: World Food System—a contribution from Europe September 14–16, in ZurichGoogle Scholar
  59. Rasouli O, Ahmadi N, Monfared SR, Sefidkon F (2018) Physiological, phytochemicals and molecular analysis of color and scent of different landrace of Rosa damascena during flower development stages. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam 231:144–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.010 Google Scholar
  60. Reis M, Figueiredo JRM, Paiva R, da Silva DP, de Faria CVN, Rouhana L (2016) Salinity in rose production. Ornam Hortic 22(2):228–234Google Scholar
  61. Reynders-Aloisi S, Pelloli G, Bettachini A, Poncet C (1998) Tolerance to crown gall differs among genotypes of rose rootstocks. Hortic Sci 33(2):296–297Google Scholar
  62. Ribeiro LM, Nery LA, Vieira LM, Mercadante-Simões MO (2015) Histological study of micrografting in passionfruit. Plant Cell Tiss Org 123(1):173–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0824-1 Google Scholar
  63. Roosta HR, Bagheri V, Kian H (2017) Effect of different planting substrates on vegetative and physiologic characteristics and nutrients content of rose (Rosa hybrida var. Grandgala) in hydroponic system. J Sci Technol Greenh Culture 7(28):Pe27–pe39Google Scholar
  64. Saini RK, Keum YS (2018) Significance of genetic, environmental, and pre-and post-harvest factors affecting carotenoid contents in crops: a review. J Agric Food Chem 66(21):5310–5324.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01613 Google Scholar
  65. Shetty MJ, Chandan K, Krishna HC, Aparna GS (2018) Genetically modified crops: an overview. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 7(1):2405–2410Google Scholar
  66. Singh AK, Meetei NT, Kundu S, Salma U, Mandal N (2018) In vitro micrografting using three diverse indigenous rootstocks for the production of Citrus tristeza virus-free plants of Khasi mandarin. In Vitro Cell Dev Plant.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-018-9946-6 Google Scholar
  67. Tabesh F, Jafarkhani Kermani M, Khayam Nekouei M, Mousavi A, Khalighi A (2013) In vitro propagation of damask rose (Rosa damascena cv. Ispahan). Ann Bio Res 4:134–138Google Scholar
  68. Tholl D, Gershenzon J (2015) The flowering of a new scent pathway in rose. Sci 349(6243):28–29.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac6509 Google Scholar
  69. Wang T, Li F, Xu S, Bian P, Wu Y, Wu L, Yu Z (2011) The time course of long-distance signaling in radiation-induced bystander effect in vivo in Arabidopsis thaliana demonstrated using root micro-grafting. Radiat Res 176(2):234–243Google Scholar
  70. Woltering EJ, Maxence JMP (2018) Effect of cold storage on stomatal functionality, water relations and flower performance in cut roses. Postharvest Biol Tec 136:66–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.10.009 Google Scholar
  71. Yeo KH, Choi KY, Rhee HC, Choi GL, Lee YB (2017) Erratum to: optimal levels of N, P, and K for the cultivation of single-stemmed roses in a closed hydroponic system. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 58(1):101–101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-017-0120-6 Google Scholar
  72. Yıldırım H, Akdemir H, Süzerer V, Ozden Y, Onay A (2013) In vitro micrografting of the almond cultivars “Texas”,“Ferrastar” and “Nonpareil”. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 27(1):3493–3501.  https://doi.org/10.5504/BBEQ.2012.0087 Google Scholar
  73. Zhang Z, Finer JJ (2016) Use of cytokinin pulse treatments and micrografting to improve sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plant recovery from cotyledonary tissues of mature seeds. In Vitro Cell Dev Plant 52(4):391–399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-016-9770-9 Google Scholar
  74. Zhou L, Suzuki K, Naruse T, Fukui H, Matsumoto S, Kageyama K (2000) In vitro testing of rose rootstocks resistance to crown gall disease. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 69(2):171–175.  https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.69.171 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Horticultural Sciences, Ornamental Plants, Department of Horticulture, College of AgricultureFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran
  2. 2.Department of Horticultural Science and LandscapeFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran
  3. 3.Department of Ornamental Plants, Research Center for Plant SciencesFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations