Advertisement

Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)

, Volume 136, Issue 2, pp 269–277 | Cite as

Effects of ZnO, CuO and γ-Fe3O4 nanoparticles on mature embryo culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

  • Ozge Balpınar Nalci
  • Hayrunnisa NadarogluEmail author
  • Arash Hossein Pour
  • Azize Alayli Gungor
  • Kamil Haliloglu
Original Article
  • 158 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the effects of ZnO, CuO, and γ-Fe3O4 nanoparticles on two different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes, namely, Kırik and ES-26, were investigated as micro elements in mature embryo culture. In this direction, nanoparticle constructions were tested with both the normal amount (1 ×) and the two (2 ×) and three (3 ×) quantities available in the Murashige and Skoog media. The study was supported by negative and positive controls. Obtained findings suggest that wheat embryos left to develop in applications containing nanoparticles do not actively utilize nanoparticle structures. As a result, the development of nanoparticle-containing applications was less than control. It has been determined that media containing 3 × CuO nanoparticles and media containing 3× ZnO nanoparticles are more successful than controls in terms of callus formation rate among all applications. The most successful group in terms of plant-building ability has been the control group. Plant regeneration did not increase with nanoparticle application compared to control. However, it is thought that this situation is mainly related to the utilization process of the plant by the nanoparticles. However, since the properties of nano-sized elements are variable, it is considered that the obtained data may be related to toxicity. This study is a first in the test of NP structures obtained by green synthesis in mature embryo culture. It is thought that this study contributes to the literature in determining the effects nanoparticle’s have on tissue culture development stages of embryos.

Keywords

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ZnO NPs CuO NPs γ-Fe3O4 NPs Embryo culture 

Notes

Author contributions

Concept—HN; Design—HN and AAG; Supervision—HN; Resource—KH; Materials—HN and KH; Data Collection and/or Processing—AHP and OBN; Analysis and/or Interpretation—HN; Literature Search—HN and AAG; Writing—HN and OBN; Critical Reviews—HN.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exists.

Supplementary material

11240_2018_1512_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1787 KB)

References

  1. Abdi G, Salehi H, Khosh-Khui M (2008) Nano silver: a novel nanomaterial for removal of bacterial contaminants in valerian (Valeriana officinalis L.) tissue culture. Acta Physiol Plant 30:709–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmet H, Adak MS (2007) Callus induction and plant regeneration in some Iraqi common wheat varieties. Tarim Bilim Derg 13:285–292Google Scholar
  3. Aydin M, Tosun M, Haliloglu K (2011) Plant regeneration in wheat mature embryo culture. Afr J Biotechnol 10:15749–15755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bello-Bello JJ, Chavez-Santoscoy RA, Lecona-Guzmán CA, Bogdanchikova N, Salinas-Ruíz J, Gómez-Merino FC, Pestryakov A (2017) Hormetic response by silver nanoparticles on in vitro multiplication of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. cv. Mex 69–290) using a temporary immersion system. Dose Response.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325817744945 Google Scholar
  5. Bi RM, Kou M, Chen LG, Mao SR, Wang HG (2007) Plant regeneration through callus initiation from mature embryo of Triticum. Plant Breeding 126:9–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cifuentes Z, Custardoy L, de la Fuente JM, Marquina C, Ibarra MR, Rubiales D, Perez-De-Luque A (2010) Absorption and translocation to the aerial part of magnetic carbon-coated nanoparticles through the root of different crop plants. J Nanobiotechnol 8:26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delporte F, Mostade O, Jacquemin JM (2001) Plant regeneration through callus initiation from thin mature embryo fragments of wheat. Plant Cell Tissue Org 67:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gnanasangeetha D, Sarala Thambavani D (2014) Neural network modeling of placid ZNO nanoparticle as a sensible adsorbent for removal of As(III) Ions ingrained on activated silica using acalypha indica (ZnO-NPs-AS-AI). Int J Chem Technol Res 6:3546–3557Google Scholar
  9. Haliloglu K, Baenziger PS (2005) Screening wheat genotypes for high callus induction and regeneration capability from immature embryo cultures. J Plant Biochem Biot 14:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karaduman I, Gungor AA, Nadaroglu H, Altundas A, Acar S (2017) Green synthesis of gamma-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for methane gas sensing. J Mater Sci 28:16094–16105Google Scholar
  11. Khan MS, Zaka M, Abbasi BH, Rahman L, Shah A (2016) Seed germination and biochemical profile of Silybum marianum exposed to monometallic and bimetallic alloy nanoparticles. IET Nanobiotechnol 10(6):359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim YR, Park JI, Lee EJ, Park SH, Seong NW, Kim JH, Kim GY, Meang EH, Hong JS, Kim SH, Koh SB, Kim MS, Kim CS, Kim SK, Son SW, Seo YR, Kang BH, Han BS, An SSA, Yun HI, Kim MK (2014) Toxicity of 100 nm zinc oxide nanoparticles: a report of 90-day repeated oral administration in Sprague Dawley rats. Int J Nanomed 9:109–126Google Scholar
  13. Kumari M, Khan SS, Pakrashi S, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N (2011) Cytogenetic and genotoxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on root cells of Allium cepa. J Hazard Mater 190:613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee WM, An YJ, Yoon H, Kweon HS (2008) Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1915–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin DH, Xing BS (2007) Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environ Pollut 150:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin DH, Xing BS (2008) Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 42:5580–5585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathias RJ, Simpson ES (1986) The interaction of genotype and culture-medium on the tissue-culture responses of wheat (Triticum-Aestivum L. Em Thell) callus. Plant Cell Tiss Org 7:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mbonyiryivuze A, Zongo S, Diallo A, Bertrand S, Minani E, Yadav LL, Mwakikunga B, Dhlamini SM, Maaza M (2015) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles biosynthesis for dye sensitized solar cells application: review. Phys Mater Chem 3:12–17Google Scholar
  19. Menard A, Drobne D, Jemec A (2011) Ecotoxicity of nanosized TiO2. Review of in vivo data. Environ Pollut 159:677–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Min JS, Kim KS, Kim SW, Jung JH, Lamsal K, Bin Kim S, Jung M, Lee YS (2009) Effects of colloidal silver nanoparticles on sclerotium-forming phytopathogenic fungi. Plant Pathol J 25:376–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mishra V, Mishra RK, Dikshit A, Pandey AC (2014) Interactions of nanoparticles with plants: an emerging prospective in the agriculture industry. In: Ahmad P, Rasool S (eds) Emerging technologies and management of crop stress tolerance. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nadaroglu H, Cicek S, Gungor AA (2017) Removing trypan blue dye using nano-Zn modified Luffa sponge. Spectrochim Acta A 172:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nazir S, Zaka M, Adil M, Abbasi BH, Hano C (2018) Synthesis, characterisation and bactericidal effect of ZnO nanoparticles via chemical and bio-assisted (Silybum marianum in vitro plantlets and callus extract) methods: a comparative study. IET Nanobiotechnol 12(5):604–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prabhu YT, Rao KV, Sai VS, Pavani T (2017) A facile biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles: a micro-structural and antibacterial activity investigation. J Saudi Chem Soc 21:180–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Purnhauser L, Medgyesy P, Czako M, Dix PJ, Marton L (1987) Stimulation of shoot regeneration in Triticum-aestivum. and Nicotiana-plumbaginifolia Viv tissue-cultures using the ethylene inhibitor AgNO3. Plant Cell Rep 6:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raliya R, Saharan V, Dimkpa C, Biswas P (2017) Nanofertilizer for precision and sustainable agriculture: current state and future perspectives. J Agric Food Chem 66:6487–6503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rashid H, Ghani RA, Chaudhry Z (2002) Effect of media, growth regulators and genotypes on callus induction and regeneration in wheat (Triticum estivum). Biotechnology 1:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raveendran P, Fu J, Wallen SL (2003) Completely “green” synthesis and stabilization of metal nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 125:13940–13941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Solati E, Dorranian D (2017) Estimation of lattice strain in zno nanoparticles produced by laser ablation at different temperatures. J Appl Spectrosc 84:490–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spinoso-Castillo JL, Chavez-Santoscoy RA, Bogdanchikova N, Pérez-Sato JA, Morales-Ramos V, Bello-Bello JJ (2017) Antimicrobial and hormetic effects of silver nanoparticles on in vitro regeneration of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews) using a temporary immersion system. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 129:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ul Ain N, ul Haq I, Abbasi BH, Javed R, Zia M (2018) Influence of PVP/PEG impregnated CuO NPs on physiological and biochemical characteristics of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. IET Nanobiotechnol 12(3):349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van NL, Ma CX, Shang JY, Rui YK, Liu ST, Xing BS (2016) Effects of CuO nanoparticles on insecticidal activity and phytotoxicity in conventional and transgenic cotton. Chemosphere 144:661–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang ZY, Xu LN, Zhao J, Wang XK, White JC, Xing BS (2016) CuO Nanoparticle interaction with Arabidopsis thaliana: toxicity, parent-progeny transfer, and gene expression. Environ Sci Technol 50:6008–6016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yew YP, Shameli K, Miyake M, Kuwano N, Khairudin NBBA, Mohamad SEB, Lee KX (2016) Green synthesis of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles using seaweed (Kappaphycus alvarezii) extract. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zaka M, Abbasi BH (2017) Effects of bimetallic nanoparticles on seed germination frequency and biochemical characterisation of Eruca sativa. IET Nanobiotechnol 11(3):255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zaka M, Abbasi BH, Rahman LU, Shah A, Zia M (2016) Synthesis and characterisation of metal nanoparticles and their effects on seed germination and seedling growth in commercially important Eruca sativa. IET Nanobiotechnol 10(3):134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang X, Niu YG, Meng XD, Li Y, Zhao JP (2013) Structural evolution and characteristics of the phase transformations between alpha-Fe2O3, Fe3O4 and gamma-Fe2O3 nanoparticles under reducing and oxidizing atmospheres. CrystEngComm 15:8166–8172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhu H, Han J, Xiao JQ, Jin Y (2008) Uptake, translocation, and accumulation of manufactured iron oxide nanoparticles by pumpkin plants. J Environ Monit 10:713–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Internal Medical Sciences, Faculty of MedicineAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Food Technology, Erzurum Vocational Training CollageAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Nano-Science and Nano-Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Field Crops, Faculty of AgricultureAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  5. 5.Department of Chemical Technology, Erzurum Vocational Training CollageAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey

Personalised recommendations