Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)

, Volume 125, Issue 3, pp 521–535 | Cite as

Homologous promoter derived constitutive and chloroplast targeted expression of synthetic cry1Ac in transgenic chickpea confers resistance against Helicoverpa armigera

  • Joydeep Chakraborty
  • Senjuti Sen
  • Prithwi Ghosh
  • Anindita Sengupta
  • Debabrata Basu
  • Sampa Das
Original Article

Abstract

The insecticidal crystal protein derived from gram positive soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis plays an important role in controlling lepidopteran infestation. The present study seeks to protect chickpea plants from Helicoverpa armigera infestation by over expressing cry1Ac. Homologous Ubiquitin and RuBisCO small subunit (rbcS) promoters were used to transcribe cry1Ac in transgenic chickpea both constitutively and in a tissue specific manner through Agrobacterium mediated transformation of chickpea var. ICCV89314. Expressed Cry1Ac was specifically targeted to the chloroplast rich tissues using transit peptide sequence. After monitoring transgene integration by Southern hybridization, transgenic chickpea lines were further analyzed by western blot, ELISA and insect bioassay. Expression of cry1Ac in chickpea under the control of above two promoters conferred a high level of protection against pod borer infestation, where chloroplast targeting system was found to be more efficient in controlling this particular devastating lepidopteran pest.

Keywords

cry1Ac Chloroplast transit peptide Chloroplast targeted expression RuBisCO small subunit promoter Transgenic chickpea Ubiquitin promoter 

Notes

Acknowledgments

JC and SS are indebted to Indian Council of Agricultural Research (No. NFBSFARA/AB-2010(2010-11 dt. 24.01.2011) for providing financial support. PG and AS are thankful to Bose Institute for financial assistance. Dr. Dipankar Chakraborty, St. Xavier’s college, Kolkata is acknowledged for his intellectual contribution. Dr. Sujayanand G.K. of Indian Institute of Pulse Research is duly acknowledged for providing H. armigera strain. All the authors are grateful to Bose Institute for infrastructural facilities. Special thanks are extended to Mr. Sudipta Basu, Mr. Swarnava Das and Mr. Surajit Maity for their sincere efforts in the field and necessary laboratory assistance.

Author contributions

JC, SS, DB and SD conceived and designed the experiments. JC, SS and PG carried out Southern analysis, Immunohistofluorescence, ELISA and statistical analysis. JC and SS conducted all the other experiments. JC, SS, PG, AS and SD analyzed the data. JC, SS and PG drafted the manuscript. DB and SD edited the manuscript and supervised the work. SD contributed all the reagents, materials and analysis tools. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abu-Salem FM, Abou EA (2011) Physico-chemical properties of tempeh produced from chickpea seeds. Arab J Am Sci 7:107–118Google Scholar
  2. Acharjee S, Sarmah BK, Ananda Kumar P, Olsen K, Mahon R, Moar WJ, Moore A, Higgins TVJ (2010) Transgenic chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) expressing a sequence-modified cry2Aa gene. Plant Sci 178:333–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez JM, Dotseth E, Nolte P (2005) Potato tuberworm: a threat for Idaho potatoes. Univ Idaho Ext Bull CIS1125, p4. http://info.ag.uidaho.edu/pdf/CIS/CIS1125.pdf
  4. Arvinth S, Arun S, Selvakesavan RK, Srikanth J, Mukunthan N, Kumar PA, Premachandran MN, Subramonian N (2010) Genetic transformation and pyramiding of aprotinin-expressing sugarcane with cry1Ab for shoot borer (Chilo infuscatellus) resistance. Plant Cell Rep 29:383–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Asharani BM, Ganeshaiah KN, Kumar ARV, Makarla U (2011) Transformation of chickpea lines with Cry1X using in planta transformation and characterization of putative transformants T1 lines for molecular and biochemical characters. J Plant Breed Crop Sci 3:16413–16423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atif RM, Patat-Ochatt EM, Svabova L, Ondrej V, Klenoticova H, Jacas L, Griga M, Ochatt SJ (2013) Gene transfer in legumes. Prog Bot 74:37–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bao JH, Chin DP, Fukami M, Ugaki M, Nomura M, Mii M (2009) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of spinach (Spinacia oleracea) with Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ac gene for resistance against two common vegetable pests. Plant Biotechnol 26:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates SL, Zhao J, Roush RT, Shelton AM (2005) Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future. Nat Biotechnol 23:57–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of proteins using the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bregitzer P, Halbert SE, Lemaux PG (1998) Somaclonal variation in the progeny of transgenic barley. Theor Appl Genet 96:421–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Canedo V, Benavides J, Golmirzaie A, Cisneros F, Ghislain M, Lagnaoui A (1999) Assessing Bt-transformed potatoes for potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller), management. Program report 1997–98, Impact on a Changing World International Potato Centre (CIP), Lima, pp 161–170Google Scholar
  12. Chakrabarti SK, Mandaokar AD, Pattanayak D, Chandla VK, Ananada Kumar P, Naik PS, Sharma RP (2000) Transgenic potato lines expressing a synthetic cry1Ab gene acquired tolerance to both potato tuber moth and defoliating caterpillar. In: Paul Khurana SM, Shekhawat GS, Singh BP, Pandey SK (eds) Potato global research and development. Indian Potato Association, Shimla, pp 249–255Google Scholar
  13. Chakraborti D, Sarkar A, Das S (2006) Efficient and rapid in vitro plant regeneration system for Indian cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 86:117–123. doi: 10.1007/s11240-005-9072-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornejo M-J, Luth D, Blankenship KM, Anderson OD, Blechl AE (1993) Activity of a maize ubiquitin promoter in transgenic rice. Plant Mol Biol 23(3):567–581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Datta K, Vasquez A, Tu J, Torrizo L, Alam MF, Oliva N, Abrigo E, Khush GS, Datta SK (1998) Constitutive and tissue specific differential expression of cryIA(b) gene in transgenic rice plants conferring resistance to rice insect pest. Theor Appl Genet 97:20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davidson MM, Jacobs JME, Reader JK, Butler RC, Frater CM, Markwick NP, Wratten SD, Conner AJ (2002) Development and evaluation of potatoes transgenic for a cry1Ac9 gene conferring resistance to potato tuber moth. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127:590–596Google Scholar
  17. Davidson MM, Takla MFG, Jacobs JME, Butler RC, Wratten SD, Conner AJ (2004) Transformation of potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars with a cry1Ac9 gene confers resistance to potato tuber moth (Phthorimaea operculella). NZ J Crop Hortic 32:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Rocher EJ, Vargo-Gogola TC, Diehn SH, Green PJ (1998) Direct evidence for rapid degradation of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin mRNA as a cause of poor expression in plants. Plant Physiol 117:1445–1461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Douches DS, Li W, Zarka K, Coombs J, Pett W, Grafius E, Ei-Nasr T (2002) Development of Bt-cry5 insect-resistant potato lines ‘Spunta-G2’ and ‘Spunta-G3’. HortScience 37:1103–1107Google Scholar
  20. Dutta I, Majumder P, Saha P, Ray K, Das S (2005) Constitutive and phloem specific expression of Allium sativum leaf agglutinin (ASAL) to engineer aphid (Lipaphis erysimi) resistance in transgenic Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Plant Sci 169:996–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dutton A, Romeis J, Bigler F (2005) Effects of Bt maize expressing cry1Ab and Bt spray on Spodoptera littoralis. Entomol Exp Appl 114:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ganguly M, Molla K, Karmakar S, Datta K, Datta S (2014) Development of pod borer resistant transgenic chickpea using apod specific and a constitutive promoter driven fused cry1Ab/Acgene. Theor Appl Genet 127:2555–2565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gatehouse JA (2008) Biotechnological prospects for engineering insect-resistant plants. Plant Physiol 146:881–887CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaur PM, Tripathi S, Gowda CLL, Ranga Rao GV, Sharma HC, Pande S, Sharma M (2010) Chickpea seed production manual. ICRISAT 502:1–28Google Scholar
  25. Jain M, Misra G, Patel RK, Priya P et al (2013) A draft genome sequence of the pulse crop chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant J. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12173 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jefferson RA (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep 5:387–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jouanin L, Bonadé Bottino M, Girard C, Morrot G, Giband M (1998) Transgenic plants for insect resistance. Plant Sci 131:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jurat-Fuentes JL, Adang MJ (2006) Cry toxin mode of action in susceptible and resistant Heliothis virescens larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 92:166–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Khan GA, Baksh A, Ghazanfar M, Riazuddin S, Husnain T (2013) Development of transgenic cotton lines harbouring a pesticidal gene (cry1Ab). Emir J Food Agric 25(6):434–442Google Scholar
  30. Kim EH, Suh SC, Park BS, Shin KS, Kweon SJ, Han EJ, Park S-H, Kim YS, Kim J-K (2009) Chloroplast-targeted expression of synthetic cry1Ac in transgenic rice as an alternative strategy for increased pest protection. Planta 230:397–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Klinkenberg J (2014) Extraction of chloroplast proteins from transiently transformed Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Bio-protocol 4(18): e1238. http://www.bio-protocol.org/e1238
  32. Kota M, Daniell H, Varma S, Garczynski SF, Gould F, Moar WJ (1999) Overexpression of the (Bt) Cry2Aa2 protein in chloroplasts confers resistance to plants against susceptible and Bt-resistant insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:840–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koziel MG, Beland GL, Bowman C, Carozzi NB, Crenshaw R, Crossland L, Dawson J, Desai N, Hill M, Kadwell S, Launis K, Lewis K, Maddox D, McPherson K, Meghji MR, Merlin E, Rhodes R, Warren GW, Wright M, Evola SV (1993) Field performance of elite transgenic maize plants expressing an insecticidal protein derived from Bacillus thuringiensis. Biotechnology 11:194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kumar H, Kumar V (2004) Tomato expressing Cry1A(b) insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis protected against tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) damage in the laboratory, greenhouse and field. Crop Prot 23:135–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maiti RK (2001) The chickpea crop. In: Maiti R, Wesche-Ebeling P (eds) Advances in chickpea science. Science Publishers Inc, Enfield, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  36. Maqbool SB, Riazuddin S, Nyguyen TL, Gatehouse AMR, Gatehouse JA, Christou P (2001) Expression of multiple insecticidal genes confers broad resistance against a range of different rice pests. Mol Breed 7:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mehrotra M, Singh AK, Sanyal I, Altosaar I, Amla DV (2011) Pyramiding of modified cry1Ab and cry1Ac genes of Bacillus thuringiensis in transgenic chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) for improved resistance to pod borer insect Helicoverpa armigera. Euphytica 182:87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meiyalaghan S, Davidson MM, Takla MGF, Wratten SD, Conner AJ (2004) Effectiveness of four cry genes in transgenic potato for conferring resistance to potato tuber moth. New directions for a diverse planet. In: Proceedings of the 4th international crop science congress Risbane, Australia. ISBN 1 920842 20 9Google Scholar
  39. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissues cultures. Physiol Plantarum 15:473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Narváez-Vásquez J, Orozco-Cárdenas ML, Ryan CA (1992) Differential expression of a chimeric CaMV-tomato proteinase Inhibitor I gene in leaves of transformed nightshade, tobacco and alfalfa plants. Plant Mol Biol 20:1149–1157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nayak P, Basu D, Das S, Basu A, Ghosh D, Ramakrishnan NA, Ghosh M, Sen SK (1997) Transgenic elite indica rice plants expressing cry1Ac-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis are 24 resistant against yellow stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulas). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2111–2116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Perera OP, Willis JD, Adang MJ, Jurat-Fuentes JL (2009) Cloning and characterization of the Cry1Ac-binding alkaline phosphatase (HvALP) from Heliothis virescens. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 39:294–302. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.01.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Perlak FJ, Deaton RW, Armstrong TA, Fuchs RL, Sims SR, Greenplate JT, Fischhoff DA (1990) Insect-resistant cotton plants. Bio/Technology 8:939–943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Perlak FJ, Fuchs RL, Dean DA, McPherson SL, Fischhoff DA (1991) Modification of the coding sequence enhances plant expression of insect control protein genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:3324–3328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Perlak FJ, Oppenhuizen M, Gustafson K, Voth R, Sivasupramaniam S, Herring D, Carey B, Ihring RA, Roberts JK (2001) Development and commercial use of Bollgard® cotton in the USA-early promises versus today’s reality. Plant J 27:489–501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rawat P, Singh AK, Ray K, Chaudhary B, Kumar S, Gautam T, Kanoria S, Kaur G, Kumar P, Pental D, Burma PK (2011) Detrimental effect of expression of Bt endotoxin Cry1Ac on in vitro regeneration, in vivo growth and development of tobacco and cotton transgenics. J Biosci 36:363–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rondon SI, DeBano SJ, Clough GH, Hamm PB, Jensen A, Schreiber A, Alvarez JM, Thornton M, Barbour J, Dogramaci M (2007) Biology and management of the potato tuberworm in the Pacific Northwest. PNW.594Google Scholar
  48. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:8014–8018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York (PCR)Google Scholar
  50. Sardana R, Dukiandjiev S, Giband M, Cheng X, Cowan K, SauderC Altosaar I (1996) Construction and rapid testing of synthetic and modified toxin gene sequences CryIA (b&c) by expression in maize endosperm culture. Plant Cell Rep 15:677–681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sarkar A, Hess D, Mondal HA, Banerjee S, Sharma HC, Das S (2009) Homodimeric Alkaline Phosphatase located at Helicoverpa armigera midgut, a putative receptor of Cry1Ac Ccntains α-GalNAc in terminal glycan structure as interactive epitope. J Proteome Res 8:1838–1848. doi: 10.1021/pr8006528 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sengupta A, Sarkar A, Priya P, Ghosh Dastidar S, Das S (2013) New insight to structure-function relationship of GalNAc mediated primary interaction between insecticidal Cry1AcToxin and HaALP receptor of Helicoverpa armigera. PLoS One 8(10):e78249Google Scholar
  53. Somers DA, Samac DA, Olhoft PM (2003) Recent advances inlegume transformation. Plant Physiol 131:892–899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Streatfield S, Magallanes-Lundback M, Beifuss K, Brooks C, Harkey R, Love R, Bray J, Howard J, Jilka J, Hood E (2004) Analysis of the maize polyubiquitin-1 promoter heat shock elements and generation of promoter variants with modified expression characteristics. Trans Res 13(4):299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sullivan TD, Christensen A, Quail P (1989) Isolation and characterization of a maize chlorophyll a/b binding protein gene that produces high levels of mRNA in the dark. Mol Gen Genet 215:431–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tabashnik BE, Huang F, Ghimire MN, Leonard BR, Siegfried BD, Rangasamy M, Yang Y, Wu Y, Gahan LJ, Heckel DG, Bravo A, Soberón M (2011) Efficacy of genetically modified Bt toxins against insects with different genetic mechanisms of resistance. Nat Biotechnol 29:1128–1131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tohidfar M, Zare N, Jouzani GS, Eftekhari SM (2013) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (Medicago sativa) using a synthetic cry3a gene to enhance resistance against alfalfa weevil. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 113:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Rheenen HR, Pundir RPS, Miranda JH (1993) How to accelerate the genetic improvement of a recalcitrant crop species such as chickpea. Curr Sci 654:414–417Google Scholar
  59. Varshney RK, Song C, Saxena RK, Azam S, Yu S, Sharpe AG, Cannon S, Baek J, Rosen BD, Taŕan B, Millan T, Zhang X, Ramsay LD, Iwata A, Wang Y, Nelson W, Farmer AD, Gaur PM, Soderlund C, Penmetsa RV, Xu C, Bharti AK, He W, Winter P, Zhao S, Hane JK, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Condie JA, Upadhyaya HD, Luo MC et al (2013) Draft genome sequence of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) provides a resource for trait improvement. Nat Biotechnol 3:240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wei H, Wang M-L, Moore PH, Albert HH (2003) Comparative expression analysis of two sugarcane polyubiquitin promoters and flanking sequence in transgenic plants. J Plant Physiol 160:1241–1251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Wong EY, Hironaka CM, FischhoV DA (1992) Arabidopsis thaliana small subunit leader and transit peptide enhance the expression of Bacillus thuringiensis proteins in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol 20:81–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wunn J, Kloti A, Burkhardt PK, Biswas GC, Ghosh K, Iglesias VA, Potrykus I (1996) Transgenic indica rice breeding lineIR58 expressing a synthetic CryIA(b) gene from Bacillus thuringiensis provides effective insect pest control. Biotechnology 14:171–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Ye G, Tu J, Hu C, Datta K, Datta SK (2001) Transgenic IR72 with fused Bt gene cry1Ab/cry1Ac from Bacillus thuringiensis is resistant against four lepidopteran species under field conditions. Plant Biotechnol 8(2):125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joydeep Chakraborty
    • 1
  • Senjuti Sen
    • 1
  • Prithwi Ghosh
    • 1
  • Anindita Sengupta
    • 1
    • 2
  • Debabrata Basu
    • 1
  • Sampa Das
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Plant BiologyBose InstituteKolkataIndia
  2. 2.ICRISATPatancheruIndia

Personalised recommendations