Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)

, Volume 105, Issue 3, pp 395–404 | Cite as

In vitro assay of native Iranian almond species (Prunus L. spp.) for drought tolerance

  • K. Sorkheh
  • B. Shiran
  • M. Khodambshi
  • V. Rouhi
  • S. Ercisli
Original Paper

Abstract

Eight native Iranian almond species from three sections, ‘Euamygdalus’ (Prunus communis; Prunus eleagnifolia and Prunus orientalis); ‘Lycioides’ (Prunus lycioides and Prunus reuteri) and ‘Spartioides’ (Prunus arabica, Prunus glauca and Prunus scoparia) were in vitro screened for drought tolerance using sorbitol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) as an osmoticum. Different levels of water stress were induced using five concentrations of either sorbitol or polyethylene glycol in Woody Plant Medium (WPM). Water potential of various media ranged from −0.80 to −2.05 MPa and water stress in culture medium adversely affected plantlet growth. Wild species from ‘Spartioides’ were less affected than ‘Lycioides’ and ‘Euamygdalus’. At the same level of water potential, sorbitol had lower adverse effects than PEG; the latter being severe. Prunus × sorbitol and Prunus × PEG interactions were significant. At 0.2 M sorbitol and 0.003 M PEG, ‘Spartioides’ produced significantly more roots with higher total root length and root volume, as well as root-dry weight than those of ‘Lycioides’ and ‘Euamygdalus.’ It is concluded that in vitro screening of native Iranian almond species under specific and limited water-stress conditions may provide a system for effectively differentiating the wild species of almond for their expected root mass production under field conditions.

Keywords

Drought tolerance In vitro rooting Prunus L. spp. Water stress 

Abbreviations

PEG

Polyethylene glycol

WPM

Woody Plant Medium (Lloyd and McCowen 1981)

MPa

Water potential

References

  1. Aazami MA, Torabi M, Jalili E (2010) In vitro response of promising tomato genotypes for tolerance to osmotic stress. Afr J Biotechnol 9:4014–4017Google Scholar
  2. Alasdon AA, Knutson KW, Wilkinson JC (1988) Relationship between microtuber and minitubers production and yield characteristics of six potato cultivars. Am Potato J 65:468 (abstract)Google Scholar
  3. Almansouri M, Kinet JM, Lutts S (2001) Effect of salt and osmotic stresses on germination in durum wheat (Triticum durum) Desf. Plant Soil 231:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashraf M (1994) Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 13:17–42Google Scholar
  5. Atokple IDK, Singh BB, Emechebe AM (1993) Independent inheritance of Striga and Alectra resistance in cowpea genotype B301. Crop Sci 33:714–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barreto R, Nieto-Sotelo J, Cassab GI (2010) Influence of plant growth regulators and water stress on ramet induction, rosette engrossment, and fructan accumulation in Agave tequilana Weber var. Azul. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 103:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyer JS, Knipling EB (1965) Isopiestic technique for measuring leaf water potential with a thermocouple psychrometer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 54:1044–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpita N, Sabularse D, Montezinos D, Delmer DP (1979) Determination of the pore size of cell walls of living plant cells. Science 205:1144–1147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Day LH (1953) Rootstocks for stone fruits. University of California, California agricultural experiment station extension bulletin no. 736Google Scholar
  10. de Klerk G, Pumisutapon P (2008) Protection of in vitro grown Arabidopsis seedlings against abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 95:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deblonde PMK, Ledent JF (2001) Effects of moderate drought conditions on green leaf number, stem height, leaf length and tuber yield of potato cultivars. Eur J Agron 14:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Djilianov D, Prinsen E, Oden S, van Onckelen H, Muller J (2003) Nodulation under salt stress of alfalfa lines obtained after in vitro selection for osmotic tolerance. Plant Sci 165:887–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donnelly DJ, Coleman WK, Coleman SE (2003) Potato microtuber production and performance: a review. Am J Potato Res 80:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehdaie B, Hall AE, Farquhar GD, Nguyen HT, Waines JG (1991) Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in wheat. Crop Sci 31:1282–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehlenfeldt MK (1994) The genetic composition and tetrasomic inbreeding coefficients of high bush blueberry cultivars. Hort Sci 29:1342–1345Google Scholar
  16. El-Sharabasy SF, Wanas WH, Al-Kerdany AY (2008) Date palm cultivars in vitro screening to drought tolerance using isozymes. Arab J Biotechnol 11:263–272Google Scholar
  17. Erb WA, Draper AD, Swartz HJ (1988) Methods of screening blueberry seedling populations for drought resistance. Hort Sci 23:312–314Google Scholar
  18. Erusha KS, Shearman RC, Roirdan TP, Wit LA (2002) Kentucky bluegrass cultivar root and top growth responses when grown in hydroponics. Crop Sci 42:848–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gopal J, Iwama K (2007) In vitro screening of potato against water-stress mediated through sorbitol and polyethylene glycol. Plant Cell Rep 26:693–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gopal J, Minocha JL, Dhaliwal HS (1998) Microtuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Cell Rep 17:794–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gorttapeh AH, Hasani MH, Ranji H (2005) Recognition and ecological investigation of almond species (Amygdalus spp.) in West Azerbaijan province. In: Abstract of the 4th international symposium on pistachios & almonds. Tehran (IRAN), 22–25 May 2005Google Scholar
  22. Hassanein AMA (2010) Establishment of efficient in vitro method for drought tolerance evaluation in Pelargonium. J Horti Sci Ornam Plants 2:8–15Google Scholar
  23. He Sh, Han Y, Wang Y, Zhai H, Liu Q (2009) In vitro selection and identification of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) plants tolerant to NaCl. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 96:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hohl M, Schopfer P (1991) Water relations of growing maize coleoptiles. Comparison between mannitol and polyethylene glycol 6000 as external osmotica for adjusting turgor pressure. Plant Physiol 95:716–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsissou D, Bouharmont J (1994) In vitro selection and characterization of drought-tolerant plants of duram wheat (Triticum durum Desf). Agronomie 2:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ingram KT, Bueno FD, Namuco OS, Yambao EB, Beyrouty CA (1994) Rice root traits for drought resistance and their genetic variation. In: Kirk GJD (ed) Rice roots: nutrient and water use. IRRI, Manila, Philippines, pp 67–77Google Scholar
  27. Iwama K, Yamaguchi J (2006) Abiotic stresses. In: Gopal J, Paul KhuranaSM (eds) Handbook of potato production improvement and post harvest management. Food Product Press, New York, pp 231–278Google Scholar
  28. Iwama K, Nakaseko K, Gotoh K, Nishibe Y (1982) Studies on the root system in potato plants. In: Hooker WJ (ed) Research for potato in the year 2000. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru, pp 102–104Google Scholar
  29. Iwama K, Hasegawa T, Nakaseko K (1999) New potato lines with high productivity and drought tolerance. In: Horie H, Geng S, Amano T, Inamura T, Shiraiwa T (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on world food security and crop production technologies for tomorrow. Kyoto, Japan, pp 189–193Google Scholar
  30. Karunaratne S, Santha S, Kovoor A (1991) An in vitro assay for drought-tolerant coconut germplasm. Euphytica 53:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khrais T, Leclerc Y, Donnelly DJ (1998) Relative salinity tolerance of potato cultivars assessed by in vitro screening. Am J Potato Res 75:207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krizek DT (1985) Methods of inducing water stress in plants. Hort Sci 20:1028–1038Google Scholar
  33. Lahlou O, Ledent JF (2005) Root mass and depth, stolons and roots formed on stolons in four cultivars of potato under water stress. Eur J Agron 22:159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ledbetter CA, Peterson S, Palmquist D (1996) In vitro osmotic tolerance of six clonally propagated Prunus accessions. J Genet Breed 50:1–6Google Scholar
  35. Ledbetter CA, Palmquist DE, Peterson SJ (1998) Germination and net in vitro growth of peach, almond and peach-almond hybrid embryos in response to mannitol inclusion in the nutrient medium. Euphytica 103:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lentini Z, Earle ED (1991) In vitro tuberization of potato clones from different maturity groups. Plant Cell Rep 9:691–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lipavská H, Vreugdenhil D (1996) Uptake of mannitol from the media by in vitro grown plants. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 45:103–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lloyd G, McCowen B (1981) Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Int Plant Prop Soc 30:421–427Google Scholar
  39. Lynch DR, Tai GCC (1989) Yield and yield component response of eight potato genotypes to water stress. Crop Sci 29:1207–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maruyama H, Koyama R, Oi T, Yagi M, Takeda M, Kanechi M, Inagaki N, Uno Y (2008) In vitro evaluation of osmotic stress tolerance using a novel root recovery assay. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 95:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matheka JM, Magiri E, Rasha AO, Machuka J (2008) In vitro selection and characterization of drought tolerance somaclones of tropical maize (Zea mays L.). Biotech 7:641–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moradi M (2005) Identification and collection of almond species and germplasm in the Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province. In: Abstracts of the 4th international symposium on pistachios & almonds. Tehran (IRAN), 22–25 May 2005Google Scholar
  43. Morpurgo R (1991) Correlation between potato clones grown in vivo and in vitro under sodium chloride stress conditions. Plant Breed 107:80–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Munns R (1993) Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant Cell Environ 16:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Munns R, Pearson CJ (1974) Effects of water deficit on translocation of carbohydrate in Solanum tuberosum. Aus J Plant Physiol 1:529–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ng SYV, Ekanayake IJ (1997) Screening cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) for polyethylene glycol mediated osmotic stress in vitro. J Root Crops 23:15–18Google Scholar
  47. Ouendeba G, Ejeta G, Hanna WW, Kumar AK (1995) Diversity among African pearl millet landrace populations. Crop Sci 35:919–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Platt (Bud) HW (1992a) Cultivar response to fusarium storage rot as affected by two methods of seed origin propagation; clonal selections and in vitro culture. Am J Potato Res 69:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Platt (Bud) HW (1992b) Potato cultivar response to late blight as affected by clonal selections and in vitro culture. Am J Potato Res 69:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Plaut Z, Federman E (1985) A simple procedure to overcome polyethylene glycol toxicity on whole plants. Plant Physiol 79:559–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Punia MS, Jain A (2002) In vitro selection for drought tolerance in sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). Nat J Plant Improv 4:27–30Google Scholar
  52. Rajashekar G, Palmquist D, Ledbetter CA (1995) In vitro screening procedure for osmotic tolerance in Prunus. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 41:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rossouw FT, Waghmarae J (1995) The effect of drought on growth and yield of two South African potato cultivars. S Afr J Sci 91:149–150Google Scholar
  54. Saranga Y, Zamir D, Marani A, Rudich J (1993) Breeding tomatoes for salt tolerance: variations in ion concentrations associated with response to salinity. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 118:405–408Google Scholar
  55. SAS Institute Inc (1989) SAS/STATr user’s guide, version 6, vol 2, 4th edn. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharma SB, Ashokkumar P, McDonald D (1991) A greenhouse technique to screen pigeon pea for resistance to Heterode racajani. Ann Appl Biol 118:351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Snow LM (1905) Development of root hairs. Bot Gaz 40:12–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sorkheh K, Shiran B, Gradziel TM, Epperson BK, Martínez-Gómez P, Asadi E (2007) Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism as a tool for molecular characterization of almond germplasm: genetic diversity among cultivated genotypes and related wild species of almond, and its relationships with agronomic traits. Euphytica 156:327–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sorkheh K, Shiran B, Rouhi V, Asadi E, Jahanbazi H, Moradi H, Gradziel TM, Martínez-Gómez P (2009) Phenotypic diversity within native Iranian almond (Prunus spp.) species and their breeding potential. Genet Resour Crop Evol 56:947–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Srinivasan T, Kumar KRR, Kirti PB (2010) Establishment of efficient and rapid regeneration system for some diploid wild species of Arachis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 101:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tal M (1994) In vitro selection for salt tolerance in crop plants: theoretical and practical considerations. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 30:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Termaat A, Munns R (1986) Use of concentrated macronutrient solutions to separate osmotic from NaCl-specific effects on plant growth. Aust J Plant Physiol 13:509–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tewary PK, Sharma A, Raghunath MK, Sarkar A (2000) In vitro response of promising mulberry (Morus sp.) genotypes for tolerance to salt and osmotic stresses. Plant Growth Regul 30:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tourneux C, Devaux A, Camacho MR, Mamani P, Ledent JF (2003) Effects of water shortage on six potato genotypes in the highlands of Bolivia (I): morphological parameters, growth and yield. Agronomie 23:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Verslues PE, Ober ES, Sharp RE (1998) Root growth and oxygen relations at low water potentials. Impact of oxygen availability in polyethylene glycol solutions. Plant Physiol 116:1403–1412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wright LN, Jordan GL (1970) Artificial selection for seedling drought tolerance in Boer Love grass (Eragrostis curvula Nees). Crop Sci 10:99–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ye X, Du L, Xu H, Xin Z (2002) Root characters of several wheat genotypes. J Triticeae Crops 22:43–46Google Scholar
  68. Zhang Y, Donnelly DJ (1997) In vitro bioassays for salinity tolerance screening of potato. Potato Res 40:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhao X, Tan HJ, Liu YB, Li XR, Chen GX (2009) Effect of salt stress on growth and osmotic regulation in Thellungiella and Arabidopsis callus. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 98:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Sorkheh
    • 1
  • B. Shiran
    • 1
  • M. Khodambshi
    • 1
  • V. Rouhi
    • 1
  • S. Ercisli
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of AgricultureShahrekord UniversityShahrekordIran
  2. 2.Department of Horticulture, Agricultural FacultyAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey

Personalised recommendations