Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)

, Volume 100, Issue 3, pp 283–291 | Cite as

Initiation of embryogenic cell suspensions of taro (Colocasia esculenta var. esculenta) and plant regeneration

  • Pradeep C. Deo
  • Mary Taylor
  • Robert M. Harding
  • Anand P. Tyagi
  • Douglas K. Becker
Original Paper


Embryogenic callus was initiated by culturing in vitro taro corm slices on agar-solidified half-strength MS medium containing 2.0 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) for 20 days followed by transfer to 1.0 mg/L thidiazuron (TDZ). Callus was subsequently proliferated on solid medium containing 1.0 mg/L TDZ, 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D and 800 mg/L glutamine before transfer to liquid medium containing the same components but with reduced glutamine (100 mg/L). After 3 months in liquid culture on an orbital shaker, cytoplasmically dense cell aggregates began to form. Somatic embryogenesis was induced by plating suspension cells onto solid media containing reduced levels of hormones (0.1 mg/L TDZ, 0.05 mg/L 2,4-D), high concentrations of sucrose (40–50 g/L) and biotin (1.0 mg/L). Embryo maturation and germination was then induced on media containing 0.05 mg/L benzyladenine (BA) and 0.1 mg/L indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Histological studies of the developing embryos revealed the presence of typical shoot and root poles suggesting that these structures were true somatic embryos. The rate of somatic embryos formation was 500–3,000 per mL settled cell volume while approximately 60% of the embryos regenerated into plants.


Somatic embryogenesis Callus Cell suspension Taro Colocasia esculenta var. esculenta 



The authors wish to thank New Zealand’s International Aid and Development Agency and The University of the South Pacific for their financial support, and the Centre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities (Queensland University of Technology) and the Secretariat of the Pacific Community for their provision of facilities and technical support during this project. PCD was a PhD candidate at The University of the South Pacific.


  1. Abo El-Nil MM, Zettler FW (1976) Callus initiation and organ differentiation from shoot tip cultures of Colocasia esculenta. Plant Sci Lett 6:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Khayri JM (2001) Optimization of biotin and thiamine requirements for somatic embryogenesis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:453–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett JD, Park YS, Bonga JM (1997) The effectiveness of various nitrogen sources in white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss] somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Rep 16:411–415Google Scholar
  4. de los Blanco MA, Segura-Nieto M, Castillo R, Nieves N (1999) Storage proteins in sugarcane: an interesting exception in monocots. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 59:217–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deo PC, Harding RM, Taylor M, Tyagi AP, Becker DK (2009) Somatic embryogenesis, organogenesis and plant regeneration in taro (Colocasia esculenta var. esculenta). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 99:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gandonou C, Errabii T, Abrini J, Idaomar M, Chibi F, Senhaji NS (2005) Effect of genotype on callus induction and plant regeneration from leaf explants of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Afr J Biotechnol 4:1250–1255Google Scholar
  7. Gorret N, bin Rosli SK, Oppenheim SF, Wallis LB, Lessard DA, Rha CK, Sinskey AJ (2004) Bioreacter culture of oil palm (Elaeis guimensis) and effects of nitrogen source, inoculum size and conditioned medium on biomass production. J Biotechnol 108:253–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ikeda-Iwai M, Satoh S, Kamada H (2002) Establishment of a reproducible tissue culture system for the induction of Arabidopsis somatic embryos. J Exp Bot 53:1575–1580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ivancic A (1992) Breeding and genetics of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott). Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Solomon Islands UNDP, Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations, pp 1–97Google Scholar
  10. Kamo K, Becwar MR, Hodges TK (1985) Regeneration of Zea mays L. from embryogenic callus. Bot Gaz 146:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lou H, Kako S (1995) Role of high sugar concentrations in inducing somatic embryogenesis from cucumber cotyledons. Sci Hortic 64:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nakagawa H, Saijyo T, Yamauchi N, Shigyo M, Kako S, Ito A (2001) Effects of sugars and abscisic acid on somatic embryogenesis from melon (Cucumis melo L.) expanded cotyledon. Sci Hortic 90:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ogita S, Sasamoto H, Yeung EC, Thorpe TA (2001) The effects of glutamine on the maintenance of embryogenic cultures of Cryptomeria japonica. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Panaia M, Senaratma T, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K (2004) The role of cytokinins and thidiazuron in the stimulation of somatic embryogenesis in key members of the Restionaceae. Aust J Bot 52:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ribnicky DM, Ilić N, Cohen JD, Cooke TJ (1996) The effects of exogenous auxins on endogenous indole-3-acetic acid metabolism. Plant Physiol 112:549–558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Souter M, Lindsey K (2000) Polarity and signaling in plant embryogenesis. J Exp Bot 51:971–983CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Strauss MS, Michaud JD, Arditti J (1979) Seed storage and germination and seedling proliferation in taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott). Ann Bot 43:603–612Google Scholar
  18. Visser C, Qureshi JA, Gill R, Saxena PK (1992) Morphoregulatory role of thidiazuron- substitution of auxin and cytokinin requirement for the induction of somatic embryogenesis in geranium hypocotyl cultures. Plant Physiol 99:1704–1707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilson JE (1990) Agro facts, taro breeding. IRETA Publication No: 3/89Google Scholar
  20. Wurtele ES, Nikolau BJ (1992) Differential accumulation of biotin enzymes during carrot somatic embryogenesis. Plant Physiol 99:1699–1703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yam TW, Young JLP, Fan KPL, Arditti J (1990) Induction of callus from axillary buds of taro (Colocasia esculenta var. esculenta, Araceae) and subsequent plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep 9:459–462Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pradeep C. Deo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Mary Taylor
    • 2
  • Robert M. Harding
    • 3
  • Anand P. Tyagi
    • 1
  • Douglas K. Becker
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Technology and EnvironmentUniversity of the South PacificSuvaFiji
  2. 2.Centre for Pacific Crops and TreesSecretariat of the Pacific CommunitySuvaFiji
  3. 3.Centre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities, Faculty of ScienceQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations