Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)

, Volume 100, Issue 3, pp 241–254 | Cite as

Recalcitrance in clonal propagation, in particular of conifers

  • J. M. Bonga
  • K. K. Klimaszewska
  • P. von Aderkas
Review

Abstract

Despite major advances in forest biotechnology, clonal regeneration by somatic embryogenesis or organogenesis is still difficult for many woody species and is often limited to the use of juvenile explants. Adventitious regeneration of plants from gymnosperms older than zygotic embryos, and frequently even from highly immature zygotic embryos, is often difficult or has not yet been achieved. A number of experimental approaches that could eventually lead to overcoming recalcitrance are suggested in this review. When cloning trees of various ages, it is important to determine first which part of the individual contains the most responsive cells and at what time of the year these cells are in the most responsive state. This allows selection of the most useful explants. In hardwood trees and a few gymnosperms, responsive tissues are found in root or stump sprouts and in tissues near the site of meiosis at about the time that meiosis takes place. Another potentially active area is the shoot apex with most or all of its leaf or needle primordia removed. Apomixis is a natural form of clonal regeneration but occurs naturally in only one gymnosperm species. As the genetic mechanism of apomixis has been in part elucidated, the induction of apomixis by experimental means may soon be possible. The cytoplasm plays a major role in the expression or repression of nuclear genes that control embryogenesis. Expression of nuclear genes can be manipulated by nuclear transfer into de-nucleated cells (e.g., the cytoplasm of egg cells). Cytoplasmic control also plays a role in regeneration by androgenesis, asymmetric cell division and cell isolation. A short overview is presented of the genetic mechanisms involved in embryo initiation, maturation and germination and how manipulation of these mechanisms by genetic transformation could help in overcoming recalcitrance. It is expected that rapid development in the fields of research areas discussed in this review will over time eliminate the problem of recalcitrance in many instances where it is currently prevalent.

Keywords

Conifers Forest biotechnology Somatic embryogenesis 

Abbreviations

ABA

Abscisic acid

AGP

Arabinogalactan proteins

2,4-D

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SAM

Shoot apical meristem

SE

Somatic embryogenesis

CaMV35S

Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter

References

  1. Albertini E, Marconi G, Reale L, Barcaccia G, Porceddu A, Ferranti F, Falcinelli M (2005) SERK and APOSTAT. Candidate genes for apomixis in Poa pratensis. Plant Physiol 138:2185–2199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altamura MM (2004) Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolB and rolD genes: regulation and involvement in plant development. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 77:89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersone U, Ievinsh G (2005) In vitro regeneration of mature Pinus sylvestris buds stored at freezing temperatures. Biol Plant 49:281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arroyo-Herrera A, Ku-Gonzalez A, Canche-Moo A, Quiroz-Figueroa FR, Loyola-Vargas VM, Rodriguez-Zapata LC, Burgeff D’Hondt C, Suárez-Solis VM, Castaňo E (2008) Expression of WUSCHEL in Coffea canephora causes ectopic morphogenesis and increases somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 94:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Attree SM, Dunstan DI, Fowke L (1989) Initiation of embryogenic callus and suspension cultures, and improved embryo regeneration from protoplasts of white spruce (Picea glauca). Can J Bot 67:1790–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell PR (1994) Commentary; apomictic features revealed in a conifer. Int J Plant Sci 155:621–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belmonte MF, Donald G, Reid DM, Yeung EC, Stasolla C (2005) Alterations of the glutathione redox state improve apical meristem structure and somatic embryo quality in white spruce (Picea glauca). J Exp Bot 56:2355–2364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benson EE (2000) Special symposium: in vitro plant recalcitrance. Do free radicals have a role in plant tissue culture recalcitrance? In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 36:163–170Google Scholar
  9. Bicknell RA, Koltunow AM (2004) Understanding apomixis: recent advances and remaining conundrums. Plant Cell 16:S228–S245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonga JM (1985) Vegetative propagation in relation to juvenility, maturity and rejuvenation. In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Tissue culture in forestry. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 387–412Google Scholar
  11. Bonga JM (1996) Frozen storage stimulates the formation of embryo-like structures and elongating shoots in explants from mature Larix decidua and L. x eurolepis trees. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 46:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonga JM (1997) The effect of collection date and frozen storage on the formation of embryo-like structures and elongating shoots from explants from mature Larix decidua and L. x eurolepis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 51:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonga JM (2004) The effect of various culture media on the formation of embryo-like structures in cultures derived from explants taken from mature Larix decidua. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 77:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonga JM, von Aderkas P (1988) Attempts to micropropagate mature Larix decidua Mill. In: Ahuja MR (ed) Somatic cell genetics of woody plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 155–168Google Scholar
  15. Bonga JM, von Aderkas P (1992) In vitro culture of trees. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Bonga JM, MacDonald JE, von Aderkas P (2008) Cloning of conifers, with emphasis on mature trees. In: Rao GP, Zhao Y, Radchuck VV, Batnagar SK (eds) Advances in plant biotechnology. Studium Press LLC, Houston, pp 475–490Google Scholar
  17. Boulay M (1987) Conifer micropropagation: applied research and commercial aspects. In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Cell and tissue culture in forestry, case histories: gymnosperms, angiosperms and palms, vol 3. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 185–206Google Scholar
  18. Boutilier K, Offringa R, Sharma VK, Kieft H, Ouellet T, Zhang L, Hattori J, Liu C-M, van Lammeren AAM, Miki BLA, Custers JBM, van Lookeren Campagne MM (2002) Ectopic expression of BABY BOOM triggers a conversion from vegetative to embryonic growth. Plant Cell 14:1737–1749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Budimir S (2003/2004) Developmental histology of organogenic and embryogenic tissue in Picea omorika culture. Biol Plant 47:467–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carr DJ (1976) Plasmodesmata in growth and development. In: Gunning BES, Robards AW (eds) Intercellular communication in plants: studies on plasmodesmata. Springer, Berlin, pp 243–289Google Scholar
  21. Casson SA, Lindsey K (2006) The turnip mutant of Arabidopsis reveals that LEAFY COTYLEDON 1 expression mediates the effects of auxin and sugars to promote embryonic cell identity. Plant Physiol 142:526–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen Y, Zhang L, Geng Y, Chen Z (2001) Meiosis-like reduction during somatic embryogenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:654–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chiappetta A, Fambrini M, Petrarulo M, Rapparini F, Michelotti V, Bruno L, Greco M, Baraldi R, Salvini M, Pugliesi C, Bitonti MB (2009) Ectopic expression of LEAFY COTYLEDON1-LIKE gene and localized auxin accumulation mark embryonic competence in epiphyllous plants of Helianthus annuus × H. tuberosus. Ann Bot 103:735–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Clouse S (2000) Plant development: a role for sterols in embryogenesis. Curr Biol 10:R601–R604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. D’Erfurth I, Jolivet S, Froger N, Catrice O, Novatchkova M, Mercier R (2009) Turning meiosis into mitosis. PLoS Biol 7:e1000124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Day RC, Grossniklaus U, Macknight RC (2005) Be more specific! Laser-assisted microdissection of plant cells. Trends Plant Sci 10:397–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. De Diego N, Montalbán IA, Fernandez de Larrinoa E, Montcaleán P (2008) In Vitro regeneration of Pinus pinaster adult trees. Can J For Res 38:2607–2615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Muyt A, Vezon D, Gendrot G, Gallois JL, Stevens R, Grelon M (2007) AtPRD1 is required for meiotic double strand break formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO J 26:4126–4137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dijak M, Simmonds DH (1988) Microtubule organization during early direct embryogenesis from mesophyll protoplasts of Medicago sativa L. Plant Sci 58:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dudits D, Györgyey J, Bögre L, Bakó L (1995) Molecular biology of somatic embryogenesis. In: Thorpe TA (ed) In vitro embryogenesis in plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 267–308Google Scholar
  31. Durzan DJ (1996) Asexual reproductive adaptation to simulated cretaceous climatic variables by Norway spruce cells in vitro. Chemosphere 33:1655–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Durzan DJ, Jokinen K, Guerra MP, Santerre A, Chalupa V, Havel L (1994) Latent diploid parthenogenesis and parthenote cleavage in egg-equivalents of Norway spruce. Int J Plant Sci 155:677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eckhardt NA (2003) Patterns of gene expression in apomixis. Plant Cell 15:1499–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Egertsdotter U, von Arnold S (1998) Development of somatic embryos in Norway spruce. J Exp Bot 49:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Estrada-Luna AA, Huanga-Mamani W, Acosta-Garcia G, Leon-Martinez G, Becerra-Flora A, Perez-Ruiz R, Vielle-Calzada J-PH (2002) Beyond promiscuity: from sexuality to apomixis in flowering plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 38:146–151Google Scholar
  36. Fehér A (2008) The initiation phase of somatic embryogenesis: what we know and what we don’t. Acta Biol Szeged 52:53–56Google Scholar
  37. Fehér A, Pasternak TP, Dudits D (2003) Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 74:201–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Filonova LH, Bozhkov PV, von Arnold S (2000a) Developmental pathway of somatic embryogenesis in Picea abies as revealed by time-lapse tracking. J Exp Bot 51:249–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Filonova LH, Bozhkov PV, Brukhin VB, Daniel G, Zhivotovsky B, von Arnold S (2000b) Two waves of programmed cell death occur during formation and development of somatic embryos in the gymnosperm, Norway spruce. J Cell Sci 113:4399–4411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gallois JL, Woodward C, Reddy GV, Sablowski R (2002) Combined SHOOT MERISTEMLESS and WUSCHEL trigger ectopic organogenesis in Arabidopsis. Development 129:3207–3217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Geri C, Turrini A, Giorgetti L, Nicoletti E, Nuti Ronchi V (1999) Genome plasticity during the acquisition of embryogenic competence. Genome 42:1134–1143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Goldberg RB, de Paiva G, Yadegari R (1994) Plant embryogenesis: zygote to seed. Science 266:605–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goodrich J, Tweedie S (2002) Remembrance of things past: chromatin remodeling in plant development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 18:707–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grafi G (2004) How cells differentiate: a lesson from plants. Dev Biol 268:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gunning BES, Robards AW (1976) Plasmodesmata: current knowledge and outstanding problems. In: Gunning BES, Robards AW (eds) Intercellular communication in plants: studies on plasmodesmata. Springer, Berlin, pp 297–311Google Scholar
  46. Harigaya Y, Yamamoto M (2007) Molecular mechanisms underlying the mitosis–meiosis decision. Chromosome Res 15:523–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Harvengt L, Trontin JF, Reymond I, Canlet F, Paques M (2001) Molecular evidence of true-to-type propagation of a 3-year-old Norway spruce through somatic embryogenesis. Planta 213:828–832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hecht V, Vielle-Calzada J-P, Hartog MV, Schmidt EDL, Boutilier K, Grossniklaus U, de Vries S (2001) The Arabidopsis SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE 1 gene is expressed in developing ovules and embryos and enhances embryogenic competence in culture. Plant Physiol 127:803–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Helmersson A, von Arnold S (2009) Embryogenic cell lines of Juniperus communis; easy establishment and embryo maturation, limited germination. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 96:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Holdgate DP, Zandvoort EA (1997) Strategic considerations for the establishment of micro-organism-free tissue cultures for commercial ornamental micropropagation. In: Cassells AC (ed) Pathogen and microbial contamination management in micropropagation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 15–22Google Scholar
  51. Hosp J, Maraschin SF, Touraev A, Boutilier K (2007) Functional genomics of microspore embryogenesis. Euphytica 158:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Irish EE, McMurray D (2006) Rejuvenation by shoot apex culture recapitulates the developmental increase of methylation at the maize gene Pl-Blotched. Plant Mol Biol 60:747–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Joyce SM, Cassells AC, Jain SM (2003) Stress and aberrant phenotypes in in vitro culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 74:103–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Klimaszewska K (1989) Recovery of somatic embryos and plantlets from protoplast cultures of Larix x eurolepis. Plant Cell Rep 8:440–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Klimaszewska K, Cyr DR (2002) Conifer somatic embryogenesis: I. Development. Dendrobiology 48:31–39Google Scholar
  56. Klimaszewska K, Park YS, Overton C, MacEacheron I, Bonga JM (2001) Optimized somatic embryogenesis in Pinus strobus L. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Klimaszewska K, Overton C, Stewart D (2009a) Rejuvenation of 7-years old Picea glauca somatic trees from shoot bud explants and expression dynamic of several transcription factors during culture. Abstract 2009 IUFRO Tree Biotechnology Conference, 28 June–2 July 2009, Whistler, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  58. Klimaszewska K, Noceda C, Pelletier G, Label P, Rodriguez R, Lelu-Walter MA (2009b) Biological characterization of young and aged embryogenic cultures of Pinus pinaster (Ait.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Klimaszewska K, Pelletier G, Overton C, Stewart D, Rutledge R (2009c) Hormonally regulated over expression of Arabidopsis WUS and conifer LEC1 (CHAP3A) in transgenic white spruce: implication for somatic embryo development and somatic seedling growth. Abstract 2009 IUFRO Tree Biotechnology Conference, 28 June–2 July 2009, Whistler, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  60. Koltunow AM, Johnson SD, Lynch M, Yoshihara T, Costantino P (2001) Expression of rolB in apomictic Hieracium piloselloides Vill. causes ectopic meristems in planta and changes in ovule formation, where apomixis initiates at higher frequency. Planta 214:196–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kranz E, Scholten S (2008) In vitro fertilization: analysis of early post-fertilization development using cytological and molecular techniques. Sex Plant Reprod 21:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Krikorian AD (1982) Cloning higher plants from aseptically cultured tissues and cells. Biol Rev 57:151–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Krogstrup P (1987) Formation of adventitious buds in needle primordia isolated from embryonic shoots of adult Picea abies. Biol Plant 29:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kwong RW, Bui AQ, Lee H, Kwong LW, Fisher RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (2003) LEAFY COTYLEDON-LIKE defines a class of regulators essential for embryo development. Plant Cell 15:5–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lainé E, David H, David A (1988) Callus formation from cotyledon protoplasts of Pinus oocarpa and Pinus patula. Physiol Plant 72:374–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Levi A, Erlanger M, Rosenthal M, Epel BL (2007) A plasmodesmata-associated β-1, 3-glucanase in Arabidopsis. Plant J 49:669–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lindner AB, Madden R, Demarez A, Stewart EJ, Taddei F (2008) Asymmetric segregation of protein aggregates is associated with cellular aging and rejuvenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:3076–3081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Loi P, Fulka JF, Ptak G (2003) Amphibian and mammal somatic-cell cloning: different species, common results? Trends Biotechnol 21:471–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. MacKay JJ, Becwar MR, Park YS, Corderro JP, Pullman GS (2006) Genetic control of somatic embryogenesis initiation in loblolly pine and implications for breeding. Tree Genet Genomes 2:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Madlen W, Zoglauer K (2009) The attempt to tramsfer embryogenic competence through electrofusion from embryogenic to non-embryogenic cells in Larix spp. Abstract 2009 IUFRO Tree Biotechnology Conference 28 June–2 July 2009, Whistler, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  71. Manganaris GA, Economou AS, Boubourakas IN, Katis NI (2003) Elimination of PPV and PNRSV through thermotherapy and meristem-tip culture in nectarine. Plant Cell Rep 22:195–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Maraschin SF, de Priester W, Spaink HP, Wang M (2005) Androgenic switch: an example of plant embryogenesis from the male gametophyte perspective. J Exp Bot 56:1711–1726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mathew MM, Philip VJ (2003) Somatic embryogenesis versus zygotic embryogenesis in Ensete superbum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 72:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mazzucato A, Falcinelli M, Veronesi F (1996) Evolution and adaptedness in a facultative apomictic grass, Poa pratensis L. Euphytica 92:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McCabe PF, Valentine TA, Forsberg LS, Pennell RI (1997) Soluble signals from cells identified at the cell wall establish a developmental pathway in carrot. Plant Cell 9:2225–2241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Meier-Dinkel A, Kleinschmit J (1990) Aging in tree species: present knowledge. In: Rodriguez R, Sanchez Tames R, Durzan DJ (eds) Plant aging basic and applied approaches. Plenum Press, New York, pp 51–63Google Scholar
  77. Merkle SA, Neu KA, Battle PJ, Bailey RL (1998) Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from immature and mature tissues of sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Plant Sci 132:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Monteuuis O (1991) Rejuvenation of a 100-year-old Sequoiadendron giganteum through in vitro meristem culture. I. Organogenic and morphological arguments. Physiol Plant 81:111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Noël A, Levasseur C, Van Quy L, Séguin A (2005) Enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens in forest trees by genetic transformation of black spruce and hybrid poplar with a Trichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 67:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nuti Ronchi V, Giorgetti L, Tonelli M, Martini G (1992) Ploidy reduction and genome segregation in cultured carrot cell lines. I. Prophase chromosome reduction. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 30:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Othmani A, Bayoudh C, Drira N, Marrakchi M, Trifi M (2009) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in date palm Phoenix dactylifera L., cv. Boufeggous is significantly improved by fine chopping and partial desiccation of embryogenic callus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 97:71–79Google Scholar
  82. Palovaara J, Hakman I (2008) Conifer WOX-related homeodomain transcription factors, developmental consideration and expression dynamic of WOX2 during Picea abies somatic embryogenesis. Plant Mol Biol 66:533–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Park YS (2002) Implementation of conifer somatic embryogenesis in clonal forestry: technical requirements and deployment considerations. Ann For Sci 59:651–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Park YS, Pond SE, Bonga JM (1993) Initiation of somatic embryogenesis in white spruce (Picea glauca): genetic control, culture treatment effects, and implications for tree breeding. Theor Appl Genet 86:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Park YS, Lelu-Walter MA, Harvengt L, Trontin JF, MacEacheron I, Klimaszewska K, Bonga JM (2006) Initiation of somatic embryogenesis in Pinus banksiana, P. strobus, P. pinaster and P. sylvestris at three laboratories in Canada and France. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 86:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Passarinho P, Ketelaar T, Xing M, van Arkel J, Maliepaard C, Weemen Hendriks M, Joosen R, Lammers M, Herdies L, den Boer B, van der Geest L, Boutilier K (2008) BABY BOOM target genes provide diverse entry points into cell proliferation and cell growth pathways. Plant Mol Biol 68:225–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pedroso MC, Pais MS (1992) A scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis study during induction of morphogenesis in Camelia japonica L. Plant Sci 87:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pichot C, Liens B, Rivera Nava JL, Bachelier JB, Maâtaoui ME (2008) Cypress surrogate mother produces haploid progeny from alien pollen. Genetics 178:379–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Prehn D, Serrano C, Mercado A, Stange C, Barrales L, Arce-Johnson P (2003) Regeneration of whole plants from apical meristems of Pinus radiate. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 73:91–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rákosy-Tican E, Aurori A, Vesa S, Kovacs KM (2007) In vitro morphogenesis of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) hypocotyl protoplasts: the effects of protoplast density, haemoglobin and spermidine. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 90:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ramarosandratana AV, van Staden J (2003) Tissue position, explant orientation and naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) affect initiation of somatic embryos and callus proliferation in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 74:249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ranganath RM (2004) Harnessing the developmental potential of nucellar cells: barriers and opportunities. Trends Biotechnol 22:504–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rodrigues AP, Sergio PM, Teixeira MR, Pais MS (2001) In vitro break of dormancy of axillary buds from woody species (Persea indica and Arbutus unendo) by sectioning with a laser beam. Plant Sci 161:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rohr R, von Aderkas P, Bonga JM (1989) Ultrastructural changes in haploid embryoids of Larix decidua during early embryogenesis. Am J Bot 76:1460–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rose RJ, Nolan KE (2006) Genetic regulation of somatic embryogenesis with particular reference to Arabidopsis thaliana and Medicago truncatula. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 42:473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ruaud JN (1993) Maturation and conversion into plantlets of somatic embryos derived from needles and cotyledons of 7–56-day-old Picea abies. Plant Sci 92:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1987) Ultrastructural cytology of plastids in pollen grains of certain androgenic and nonandrogenic plants. Protoplasma 138:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Schweiger HG, Bannwarth H, Berger S, de Groot E, Neuhaus G, Neuhaus-Url G (1984) Interactions between compartments in Acetabularia during gene expression. In: Wiessner W, Robinson D, Starr RC (eds) Compartments in algal cells and their interaction. Springer, Berlin, pp 28–35Google Scholar
  99. Sharma SK, Millam S, Hedley PE, McNicol J, Bryan GJ (2008) Molecular regulation of somatic embryogenesis in potato: an auxin lead perspective. Plant Mol Biol 68:185–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sheres B, Benfey PN (1999) Asymmetric cell division in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:505–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Singh MB, Bhalla PL (2006) Plant stem cells carve their own niche. Trends Plant Sci 11:241–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Stasolla C, Bozhkov PV, Chu T-M, van Zyl L, Egertsdotter U, Suarez MF, Craig D, Wolfinger RD, von Arnold S, Sederoff RD (2004) Variation in transcript abundance during somatic embryogenesis in gymnosperms. Tree Physiol 24:1073–1085PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Staxén I, Klimaszewska K, Bornman CH (1994) Microtubular organization in protoplasts and cells of somatic embryo-regenerating and non-regenerating cultures of Larix. Physiol Plant 91:680–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Steward FC (1968) Growth and organization in plants: structure, development, metabolism, physiologys. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  105. Stone SL, Braybrook SA, Paula SL, Kwong L, Meuser J, Pelletier J, Hsieh TF, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (2008) Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON2 induces maturation traits and auxin activity: implications for somatic embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:3151–3156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tahir M, Stasolla C (2006) Shoot apical development during in vitro embryogenesis. Can J Bot 84:1650–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. ten Hove CA, Heidstra R (2008) Who begets whom? Plant cell fate determination by asymmetric cell division. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:34–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Thorpe TA (1980) Organogenesis in vitro: structural, physiological and biochemical aspects. In: Vasil IK (ed) International review of cytology, Suppl. 11A, perspectives in plant cell and tissue culture. Academic Press, New York, pp 71–111Google Scholar
  109. van Dijk P, van Damme J (2000) Apomixis technology and the paradox of sex. Trends Plant Sci 5:81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. van Hengel AJ, Guzzo F, van Kammen A, de Vries SC (1998) Expression pattern of carrot EP3 endochitinase genes in suspension cultures and in developing seeds. Plant Physiol 117:43–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Verdeil JL, Hocher V, Huet C, Grosdemange F, Escoute J, Ferrière N, Nicole M (2001) Ultrastructural changes in coconut calli associated with the acquisition of embryogenic competence. Ann Bot 88:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. von Aderkas P, Bonga JM (1988) Formation of haploid embryoids of Larix decidua: early embryogenesis. Am J Bot 75:690–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. von Aderkas P, Bonga JM, Klimaszewska K, Owens J (1991) Comparison of larch embryogeny in vivo and in vitro. In: Ahuja MR (ed) Woody plant biotechnology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 139–155Google Scholar
  114. von Aderkas P, Pattanavibool R, Hristoforoglu K, Ma Y (2003) Embryogenesis and genetic stability in long term megagametophyte-derived cultures of larch. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 75:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. von Arnold S, Sabala I, Bozhkov P, Dyachok J, Filanova L (2002) Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 69:233–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. von Arnold S, Bozkov P, Clapham D, Dyachok J, Filanova L, Högberg KA, Ingouff M, Wiweger M (2005) Propagation of Norway spruce via somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 81:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wang K, Karnosky DF, Timmis R (1991) Adventitious bud production from mature Picea abies: rejuvenation associated with female strobili formation. In: Ahuja MR (ed) Woody plant biotechnology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 83–90Google Scholar
  118. Williams EG, Maheswaran G (1986) Somatic embryogenesis: factors influencing coordinated behaviour of cells as an embryo group. Ann Bot 57:443–462Google Scholar
  119. Yin Y, Cheong H, Friedrichsen D, Zhao Y, Hu J, Mora-Garcia S (2002) A crucial role for the putative Arabidopsis topoisomerase VI in plant growth and development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:10191–10196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zuo J, Niu Q-W, Frugis G, Chua N-H (2002) The WUSCHEL gene promotes vegetative-to-embryonic transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J 30:349–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Bonga
    • 1
  • K. K. Klimaszewska
    • 2
  • P. von Aderkas
    • 3
  1. 1.Natural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry CentreFrederictonCanada
  2. 2.Natural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry CentreStation Ste-FoyCanada
  3. 3.Graduate Centre for Forest Biology, Department of BiologyUniversity of VictoriaStation CSC, VictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations