Abstract
Severe abiotic stresses may cause permanent damage leading to death. In Arabidopsis seedlings germinating in vitro, we examined whether stress-related damage could be reduced by addition of protective low-molecular-weight compounds (trehalose and putrescine), addition of a specific signal molecule (acetylsalicylic acid), culture in the dark before and/or after the stress, and hardening mild-stress pretreatments. All four tested protective procedures increased survival after exposure to drought, warm air, warm water or salinity, often from ca. 15% in the control to ca. 85% in the treated seedlings. These protective measures may be usable to reduce the negative effects of abiotic stresses related to tissue culture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plants have developed a range of mechanisms to overcome damage by adverse environmental conditions. To survive predictable climatic stresses such as hot dry summers or cold winters, plants generate survival organs with specific morphological and biochemical properties, in particular dormant seeds and buds. To overcome other stresses, plants synthesize protective low-molecular-weight compounds, viz., proline, glycine betaine, polyamines or trehalose, and protective proteins, viz., late-embryogenesis abundant proteins (LEA-proteins; unknown function, Tunnacliffe and Wise 2007) and heat shock proteins (HSPs; chaperone-function, Wang et al. 2003). Since under severe stress conditions, the balance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the antioxidant defense system is disturbed, increased antioxidant activity also occurs in stressed plants (review in Wang et al. 2003).
To obtain genotypes with improved stress tolerance, plants have been transformed with genes that confer the synthesis of protectants (trehalose, Garg et al. 2002; polyamines, Kasukabe et al. 2004), protective proteins (HSPs, Malik et al. 1999; LEA-proteins, RoyChoudhury et al. 2007) and antioxidative enzymes (McKersie et al. 1999). Plants may be rendered resistant to severe stress in several other ways. Direct application of protectants results in resistance to stress (de Klerk 2002; Bae et al. 2005; Zeid and Shedeed 2006). Addition of signal molecules that form part of the signal transduction pathway for stress, may bring about protection (Lopez-Delgado et al. 1998). A foregoing moderate stress may harden against severe stress because the moderate stress sets off protective mechanisms (Larkindale et al. 2005). Finally, since photosynthesis is a major source of ROS, culture in darkness may also reduce the negative effects of stress.
Tissue-cultured plants are exposed to stress when they are acclimatized to ex-vitro conditions (de Klerk and Wijnhoven 2005) and during various techniques such as protoplast preparation, thermotherapy etc. Moreover, it has been suggested that several “unnatural” conditions inherent in tissue culture, e.g., mixotrophy, high levels of plant growth regulators and very high relative humidity (close to 100%, Chen 2004) also impose major stresses in sensitive genotypes and cause typical tissue-culture problems such as hyperhydricity, recalcitrance and variation (review in de Klerk 2007). Since often cross-protection occurs (Sabehat et al. 1998), damage by typical in-vitro stresses may be reduced by treatments that confer resistance to other abiotic stresses. Thus, the protective measures mentioned above may reduce these tissue-culture problems. In this article, we explore the effectiveness of various protective treatments in Arabidopsis seedlings germinating in vitro and exposed to common stresses (drought, heat and salinity).
Materials and methods
Plant material and growth conditions
Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia (Lehle Seeds, Roundrock, TX) was used. Seeds were surface-sterilized for 5 min in 70% ethanol followed by 10 min in 1.5% (w/v) hypochlorite + 0.02% Tween 20. They were rinsed 5 times with water, dried and stored under sterile conditions at 4°C. Seeds were sown in a 60-mm Petri dish with 8 ml nutrient medium composed of ½ MS (Murashige and Skoog 1962), 1.5% sucrose and 0.7% (w/v) agar (micro-agar, Duchefa, Haarlem, Netherlands), vernalized at 4°C for 2 day in the dark to synchronize growth, and then kept at 20°C and a 16 h photoperiod (30 μE m− 2 s−1, Philips TL 33). Per Petri dish, 20 seeds were germinated. The germination percentage was close to 100. The seeds were sown on a nylon gauze (3.5 × 3.5 cm) on the medium. For transfer, e.g., for the drought treatment, the gauze with the seedlings was transferred. To remove excess of liquid, the gauze was kept for 5 s on filter paper.
Stress treatments
Heat stress was given in an incubator (hot-air treatment, HAT) or in a hot-water bath (hot-water treatment, HWT). In the latter case, 20 seedlings were in an Eppendorf tube in 1 ml liquid medium unless indicated otherwise. Drought stress was imposed in a sealed 60-mm Petri dish on top of blue silica gel. For salinity stress, seedlings, grown for 5 day at 20°C, were exposed to nutrient medium with 600 mM NaCl for 4 h and then transferred back to standard medium.
Statistical analysis
Survival was scored 12 day after the stress. For each determination six Petri dishes with 20 seedlings each were used. In the figures and tables, means ± SEs are shown.
Results and discussion
Development of test systems for drought and heat
For drought stress, various experimental setups may be chosen (Verslues et al. 2006). Plantlets may be cultured on medium with low water potential obtained by adding a high-molecular-weight solute such as polyethylene glycol 6000. Alternatively, plantlets may be air-dried. The latter may be done by taking the seedlings from the nutrient medium and leaving them on the laminar flow bench. Preferably, though, drought stress should be given under controlled conditions. In our experiments, seedlings were removed from the nutrient medium, kept constantly for 2½ h in a sealed 60-mm Petri dish on filter paper on top of blue silica gel and then transferred back to the nutrient medium. Survival was scored 12 days after the stress. Only ca. 15% of the seedlings survived the drought-stress treatment. Detached leaves of Arabidopsis plants lose 50% FW in 6 h (Verslues et al. 2006) whereas in-vitro grown Arabidopsis seedlings lose 50% FW in ½ h of drought stress (de Klerk 2007). After 2½ h, the seedlings have lost 85% FW. The rapid loss of FW of in-vitro grown seedlings is for the greater part likely due to the specific tissue culture conditions which strongly decrease the water retention capacity (de Klerk and Wijnhoven 2005).
Heat stress may be given simply by transferring Petri dishes into an incubator. This is referred to as “hot-air treatment” (HAT). However, because thermal conduction of air is poor, heat treatment may be applied in hot water in a small tube in a water bath or in a thermoblock. A hot-water treatment (HWT) was given by Larkindale and Knight (2002). We compared both methods. After a HWT far more seedlings died than after a HAT (Table 1).
Various differences between HWT and HAT may be responsible for the much higher level of damage during HWT. We assume that poor gas exchange leading to anaerobiosis is a major factor (Jackson 1985; Dolferus et al. 2003). To examine the effect of low oxygen, the number of seedlings per Eppendorf tube was increased so that per seedling even less oxygen would be available. Figure 1 shows that for tubes with five or ten seedlings survival was ca 40%, but when the HWT was applied to tubes with 40 seedlings, survival was close to 0% (Fig. 1). We also added an oxygen donor, H2O2. This resulted in a somewhat increased survival (10% to 20%; data not shown). In horticulture, HWTs are being used routinely to render seeds, bulbs and fruits free from micro-organisms (Grondeau and Samson 1994). This effect of HWT is likely related to the synthesis of pathogenesis related proteins during the HWT (Van Loon et al. 2006).
Addition of protectants and signal molecules
For protectants, we focused on polyamines and carbohydrates. The results with polyamines have been reported previously (de Klerk 2007). Putrescine increased survival after the 2½ h drought treatment from 15% (control) to 85% (treated for 2 day with 10 mM putrescine). At the same time, though, putrescine is toxic as shown by protracted culture in putrescine-containing medium (de Klerk 2007).
With respect to protection by carbohydrates, until recently only few plant species, viz., desiccation tolerant ‘resurrection plants’ were thought to synthesize trehalose. However, most plant species accumulate sucrose during stress (Wingler 2002). Trehalose protects proteins and membranes by replacing water through hydrogen bonding to polar residues and is superior in protection because of its physical–chemical properties (Lerbret et al. 2005; Wingler 2002). We tested trehalose at a range of concentrations (10, 20, 60 and 100 mM) and found that the highest concentration tested (100 mM) resulted in high protection against drought (80% survival, Fig. 2). At this concentration, protection by other carbohydrates is less (Fig. 3).
Protectants act by direct interaction with vulnerable macromolecules or by osmoprotection. Signaling molecules act in a very different way. They evoke a protective action by the tissue, among others the synthesis of protective molecules such as the afore-mentioned low-molecular-weight compounds but also proteins such as LEA-proteins, HSPs and enzymes to remove toxic active oxygen species. We have examined salicylic acid and acetylsalicylic acid and only found a minor protective effect of acetylsalicylic acid (results not shown). Various signaling molecules have been examined by other authors and significant improvements have been obtained with salicylic acid (in contrast to our results, Lopez-Delgado et al. 1998), abscisic acid (Gómez-Cadenas et al. 2003) and jasmonates (Wasternack 2007).
Hardening by a mild prestress
Mild heat pretreatments enhance thermotolerance (Burke 1998; Larkindale and Knight 2002). Drought hardening by mild drought treatments is well known in agriculture and forestry (Lemcoff et al. 2006; Villar-Salvador et al. 2004). When 5 day-old seedlings were pretreated with a mild HWT (1½ h at 35°C), survival after severe HWT (2 h at 40°C) applied 4 h after the mild stress was increased from ca. 10% to ca 85%. Since maximum protection was reached some hours after the mild stress, the development of stress resistance continued for some time after the mild stress. After that, both the development of stress-resistance and the stress resistance itself decreased rapidly. After 48 h, only 50% of the maximal effect was still present (Fig. 4). Similar effects were obtained when a mild drought stress was given before the severe drought stress. When seedlings were dried under standard conditions for a short period (15–60 min), reimbibed for 4 h and then subjected to the 2½ h drought stress, they showed strongly increased survival (Fig. 5). We examined cross-protection and found that brief exposure to drought stress protected against severe HWT (Fig. 5).
Darkness
Photosynthesis is a major source of activated oxygen. Larkindale and Knight (2002) and Larkindale et al. (2005) report that the heat damage to Arabidopsis seedlings is reduced by culture in dark. In agreement with this, we observed that dark-grown seedlings have a strongly increased tolerance to drought treatment (Fig. 6a). Figure 6b shows that in darkness, the sensitivity to salinity is also much reduced. Salt stress increases photodamage to PSII (Murata et al. 2007). Similar effects were obtained with apple shoots exposed to heat or salinity stress (data not shown).
Conclusion
The aim of this research was to examine the effect of various protective measures in vitro to overcome damage by abiotic stress. Several protective procedures have been identified using seedlings of Arabidopsis exposed to severe abiotic stresses. In tissue culture, various instances of abiotic stress occur (see Introduction) and future experiments concern measures protective towards these alleged stresses. Positive effects of protectants on performance during acclimatization have been reported previously (de Klerk 2002).
Abbreviations
- HWT:
-
Hot-water treatment
- HAT:
-
Hot-air treatment
- MS:
-
Murashige-Skoog
- LEA:
-
Late-embryogenesis abundant
- HSPs:
-
Heat shock proteins
- ROS:
-
Reactive oxygen species
References
Bae H, Herman E, Sicher R (2005) Exogenous trehalose promotes non-structural carbohydrate accumulation and induces chemical detoxification and stress response proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana grown in liquid culture. Plant Sci 168:1293–1301
Burke JJ (1998) Characterization of acquired thermotolerance in soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 36:601–607
Chen C (2004) Humidity in plant tissue culture vessels. Biosyst Eng 88:231–241
de Klerk GJ (2002) Rooting of microcuttings: theory and practice. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 38:415–422
de Klerk GJ (2007) Stress in plants cultured in vitro. Prop Ornam Plants 7:129–137
de Klerk GJ, Wijnhoven F (2005) Water retention capacity of tissue-cultured plants: performance of leaves from in vitro germinated mungbean seedlings. Prop Ornam Plants 5:14–18
Dolferus R, Klok EJ, Delessert C, Wilson S, Ismond KP, Good AG, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (2003) Enhancing the anaerobic response. Ann Bot 91:111–117
Garg AK, Kim JK, Owens TG, Ranwala AP, Do Choi Y, Kochian LV, Wu RJ (2002) Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:15898–15903
Gómez-Cadenas A, Arbona V, Jacas J, Primo-Millo E, Talon M (2003) Abscisic acid reduces leaf abscission and increases salt tolerance in citrus plants. J Plant Growth Regul 21:234–240
Grondeau C, Samson R (1994) A review of thermotherapy to free plant materials from pathogens, especially seeds from bacteria. Crit Rev Plant Sci 13:57–75
Jackson MB (1985) Ethylene and responses of plants to soil waterlogging and submergence. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 36:145–174
Kasukabe Y, He L, Nada K, Misawa S, Ihara I, Tachibana S (2004) Overexpression of spermidine synthase enhances tolerance to multiple environmental stresses and up-regulates the expression of various stress-regulated genes in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 45:712–722
Larkindale J, Knight MR (2002) Protection against heat stress-induced oxidative damage in Arabidopsis involves calcium, abscisic acid, ethylene, and salicylic acid. Plant Physiol 128:682–695
Larkindale J, Hall JD, Knight MR, Vierling E (2005) Heat stress phenotypes of Arabidopsis mutants implicate multiple signaling pathways in the acquisition of thermotolerance. Plant Physiol 138:882–897
Lemcoff JH, Ling F, Neumann PM (2006) Short episodes of water stress increase barley root resistance to radial shrinkage in a dehydrating environment. Physiol Plant 127:603–611
Lerbret A, Bordat P, Affouard F, Descamps M, Migliardo F (2005) How homogeneous are the trehalose, maltose, and sucrose water solutions? An insight from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 109:11046–11057
Lopez-Delgado H, Dat JF, Foyer CH, Scott IM (1998) Induction of thermotolerance in potato microplants by acetylsalicylic acid and H2O2. J Exp Bot 49:713–720
Malik MK, Slovin JP, Hwang CH, Zimmerman JL (1999) Modified expression of a carrot small heat shock protein gene, Hsp17.7, results in increased or decreased thermotolerance. Plant J 20:89–99
McKersie BD, Bowley SR, Jones KS (1999) Winter survival of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutase. Plant Physiol 119:839–847
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Murata N, Takahashi S, Nishiyama Y, Allakhverdiev SI (2007) Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1767:414–421
RoyChoudhury A, Roy C, Sengupta DN (2007) Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing the heterologous lea gene Rab16A from rice during high salt and water deficit display enhanced tolerance to salinity stress. Plant Cell Rep 26:1839–1859
Sabehat A, Weiss D, Lurie S (1998) Heat-shock proteins and cross-tolerance in plants. Physiol Plant 103:437–441
Tunnacliffe A, Wise MJ (2007) The continuing conundrum of the LEA proteins. Naturwissenschaften 94:791–812
Van Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse CMJ (2006) Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 44:135–162
Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu JK (2006) Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J 45:523–539
Villar-Salvador P, Planelles R, Oliet J, Peñuelas-Rubira JL, Jacobs DF, González M (2004) Drought tolerance and transplanting performance of holm oak (Quercus ilex) seedlings after drought hardening in the nursery. Tree Physiol 24:1147–1155
Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A (2003) Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218:1–14
Wasternack C (2007) Jasmonates: an update on biosynthesis, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. Ann Bot 100:681–697
Wingler A (2002) The function of trehalose biosynthesis in plants. Phytochemistry 60:437–440
Zeid IM, Shedeed ZA (2006) Response of alfalfa to putrescine treatment under drought stress. Biol Plant 50:635–640
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Anne Bremkens, Guilhem Reyt, Marion Berardi and Pingping Huang for their excellent assistance and Frans Krens for reading the manuscript.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
de Klerk, GJ., Pumisutapon, P. Protection of in-vitro grown Arabidopsis seedlings against abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 95, 149–154 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9426-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9426-5