An improved protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)
- 468 Downloads
An improved protocol for efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of grapevine (Vitis sp.) was developed through modification of cocultivation and subsequent washing procedures. It was determined that Agrobacterium-infected somatic embryos (SE) cocultivated on filter paper exhibited less browning and significantly higher transient GFP and GUS expression than those cultured on agar-solidified medium. Furthermore, such SE, when subjected to a prolonged washing period in liquid medium containing cefotaxime and carbenicillin, followed by another wash in similar medium with kanamycin added, exhibited significantly higher rates of stable transformation compared to previously-described procedures. Transgenic plant recovery was increased 3.5–6 Xs by careful excision of leafy cotyledons from SE that had been induced to germinate on MS medium containing 1 μM of BA. Southern blot analysis revealed the low copy number integration of transgenes in transgenic plants recovered using the improved protocol. These improved cocultivation and plant recovery procedures have been demonstrated to facilitate production of large populations of transgenic plants from V. vinifera ‘Merlot’, ‘Shiraz’ and ‘Thompson Seedless’ as well as Vitis hybrid ‘Seyval Blanc’.
KeywordsAgrobacterium tumefaciens Cocultivation EGFP GUS expression Transgenic plants Vitisvinifera
Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S
Enhanced green fluorescence protein
Neomycin phosphotransferase II
This research was supported by the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services’ Viticulture Trust Fund.
- Driver JA, Kuniyuki AH (1984) In vitro propagation of Paradox walnut rootstock. HortScience 19:507–509Google Scholar
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:12–14Google Scholar
- Gray DJ (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in grape. In: Jain SM, Gupta PK, Newton RJ (eds) Somatic embryogenesis in woody plants, vol. 2, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 191–217Google Scholar
- Gray DJ, Jayasankar S, Li Z (2005a) Vitis spp. Grape, Chap. 22. In: Litz RE (ed) Biotechnology of fruit and nut crops. CAB International Wallingford, Oxford, pp 672–706Google Scholar
- Gray DJ, Li ZT, Hopkins DL, Dutt M, Dhekney SA, Van Aman MM, Tattersall J, Kelley KT (2005b) Transgenic grapevines resistant to Pierce’s disease. 2005 Amer Soc Hort Sci Ann Meeting. HortScience 40:1104AGoogle Scholar
- Hoshino Y, Zhu YM, Nakano M, Takahashi E, Mii M (1998) Production of transgenic grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Koshusanjaku) plants by cocultivation of embryogenic calli with Agrobacterium tumefaciens and selecting secondary embryos. Plant Biotechnol 15:29–33Google Scholar
- Mitsuhara I, Ugaki M, Hirochika M, Ohshima M, Murakami T, Gotoh Y, Katayose Y, Nakamura S, Honkura R, Nishimiya S, Ueno K, Mochizuki A, Tanimoto H, Tsugawa H, Otsuki Y (1996) Efficient promoter cassettes for enhanced expression of foreign genes in dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. Plant Cell Physiol 37:49–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scorza R, Cordts JM, Gray DJ, Gonsalves D Emershad RL, Ramming DW (1996) Producing transgenic ‘Thompson Seedless’ grape (Vitis vinifera L.) plants. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 121:616–619Google Scholar